logo
‘No coercive steps to be taken': SC respite for owners of 10-year-old diesel, 15-year-old petrol vehicles

‘No coercive steps to be taken': SC respite for owners of 10-year-old diesel, 15-year-old petrol vehicles

In a big relief to vehicle owners in the National Capital Region (NCR), the Supreme Court on Tuesday directed that no coercive action be taken against owners of 10-year-old diesel and 15-year-old petrol vehicles while it hears a review plea filed by the Delhi government in this regard.
Issuing notice on the plea, a three-judge bench presided by Chief Justice of India B R Gavai said, 'In the meantime, no coercive steps to be taken against the owners of the car on the ground that they are 10 years old in respect to diesel vehicles and 15 years old with respect to petrol vehicles.'
The bench also comprised Justices K Vinod Chandran and K V Anjaria.
As part of efforts to combat air pollution, the National Green Tribunal had in 2015 directed that diesel vehicles older than 10 years and petrol vehicles older than 15 years should not be allowed to operate in Delhi NCR. This was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018.
Recently, the Delhi government approached the Supreme Court seeking a review of the order saying the blanket ban on old vehicles 'was observed to have caused numerous practical hardships to the citizens of Delhi'.
In its application dated July 25, the Rekha Gupta government argued that 'the road-worthiness of a vehicle is a technical and scientific issue that must be linked to actual emissions as tested and recorded by mechanisms as set out under the Motor Vehicles Act, the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, etc., as opposed to blanket ban on the basis of age which is unlinked to actual emissions'.
The state said that the ban on the plying of the said vehicles in the last seven years, 'though undoubtedly salutary in aim was observed to have caused numerous practical hardships to the citizens of Delhi, which today, in light of the advancements in technology and enforcement now prima facie appear to outweigh the prudence and feasibility of continuance of the said ban'.
The plea further urged the court to direct the Centre or the Commission on Air Quality Management (CAQM) 'to carry out a suitable broad based, scientific study on the need for continuance of' the complete ban imposed by the Supreme Court's October 29, 2018, order.
The Delhi government said that in its considered view, 'the significant improvements in Pollution Under Control (PUC) technology, increased coverage of PUC testing, stricter monitoring of emission standards, transitioning over to Bharat Stage VI engines and various other measures' that have been implemented since the Supreme Court order 'suitably address the concerns that impelled' the apex court to pass such a judgment.
'It is the view of the State Government that there is great need for a graded, balanced and technology driven regime to handle vehicular pollution and that instead of an age-based blanket ban, a scientific, data-driven framework should be developed that considers all relevant indicators to ascertain individual vehicular pollution, for example but not limited to: (i) Actual emission, (ii) Actual mileage, (iii) regular and period vehicle fitness tests and (iv) best available retrofitting options (CNG/electric conversions),' the application stated.
The plea added that 'a balanced policy would ensure not only the protection of the environment through the phasing out of polluting vehicles, but would also preserve the rights of the responsible vehicle owners'.
The government said the complete ban order 'was originally passed as an emergency measure during a period when Bharat Stage IV (BS-IV) emission standards were in force and the migration to Bharat Stage VI (BS-VI), which has much stricter and advanced norms, had not yet commenced'.
It added, 'However, it is submitted that to tackle the issue of pollution in the NCR region, a comprehensive policy is required which gives vehicle fitness based on the actual emission levels of an individual vehicle as per scientific methods rather than implementing a blanket ban based on solely the age of the vehicle.'
The government said that significant technological, legal, and environmental developments have taken place since 2018, which warrant a 're-examination of this decision' by an expert body to form a structured and graded plan to tackle pollution.
The state said that since the issue of Delhi's air quality is not confined solely to the National Capital Territory but rather to the broader National Capital Region, it is respectfully submitted that 'it would be appropriate if suitable scientific studies on the feasibility, desirability and efficacy of continuing the said ban are carried out at the level of the Union of India or the Commission for Air Quality Management'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Top Court Cancels Appointment Of 2 Members Under Governor's Quota In Telangana
Top Court Cancels Appointment Of 2 Members Under Governor's Quota In Telangana

NDTV

timea minute ago

  • NDTV

Top Court Cancels Appointment Of 2 Members Under Governor's Quota In Telangana

Hyderabad: The Supreme Court Wednesday delivered a significant blow to the Telangana government, nullifying the appointments of Prof M Kodandaram and Amir Ali Khan as Members of the Legislative Council (MLCs) under the Governor's quota. The top court's decision comes after a long-drawn legal battle challenging their nominations. The ruling, which also effectively removed the two men from their positions, stems from a petition filed by Dasoju Sravan and Satyanarayana. The petitioners argued that the appointments were in violation of established norms for Governor's quota nominations, which are intended for individuals with distinguished achievements in fields like literature, science, art, and social service. Prof Kodandaram, a well-known political analyst and the founder of the Telangana Jana Samithi (TJS), and Amir Ali Khan, an editor of the Urdu daily The Siasat Daily, were nominated to the Legislative Council by the state government. The appointments were initially quashed by the Telangana High Court, but the Supreme Court had stayed that order, allowing them to continue in their roles until today's final judgment. The Supreme Court's verdict has once again brought to the forefront the debate surrounding the process of nominating individuals to the Legislative Council under the Governor's quota. The court's decision reinforces the need for nominations to adhere strictly to the criteria laid out for these specific seats. The next hearing in the case has been scheduled for September 17, which may provide more clarity on the future course of action for all parties involved.

SC agrees to constitute search committee for V-Cs' appointments in APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University and Digital University Kerala
SC agrees to constitute search committee for V-Cs' appointments in APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University and Digital University Kerala

The Hindu

timea minute ago

  • The Hindu

SC agrees to constitute search committee for V-Cs' appointments in APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University and Digital University Kerala

The Supreme Court on Wednesday decided to step in to resolve the impasse between the Kerala Governor, who is also the Chancellor of universities, and the State government over the formation of a search committee for the appointment of Vice-Chancellors to the APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University (KTU) and Digital University Kerala (DUK). A Bench of Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan said it would appoint the search committee. It asked the State and the Governor to provide, by August 14, four names each for inclusion on the five-member search panel. The court would select four names for the search committee from both lists. The fifth member of the search committee would be nominated by the University Grants Commission (UGC). Justice Pardiwala said neither the Governor nor the State should insist on appointing interim V-Cs. 'Our endeavour is to appoint regular V-Cs. Today the entire problem is with the constitution of a search committee. We will help you out. We will constitute a search committee, which would give an opinion as to who are fit enough to be V-Cs. Then, you (Chancellor-State Governor would sit in consultation with the State government and select one for the digital university and another for the technology university,' Justice Pardiwala addressed Attorney General R. Venkataramani, appearing for the Chancellor-Governor. Mr. Venkataramani said the Governor had only appointed interim V-Cs from serving V-Cs of other universities. 'We had done nothing wrong,' the top law officer submitted. He was referring to how the Kerala High Court had quashed Chancellor's appointment of temporary V-Cs to the universities without consulting with the State government. 'This is not a power struggle. This is a federal issue. We have an underlying common culture in this country. But every State is very different. So, therefore, education is on the Concurrent List. The Chancellor is trying to ensure there is no whiff of Kerala in his appointments. Like this, the federal nature of the process would get diluted,' senior advocate Jaideep Gupta and advocate CK Sasi, appearing for Kerala, submitted. Mr. Gupta said the 'unilateral' appointment of interim V-Cs for six months by the Chancellor was in breach of Section 13(7) of the Technological University Act. The provision mandated that interim V-Cs should be appointed only on the recommendation of the State government'. Justice Pardiwala responded to Mr. Gupta's submission by reading out the court's July 30 order in the case, which said 'in the event a vacancy of Vice-Chancellor arises the Chancellor may appoint a Vice-Chancellor of any other university or the Pro-Vice Chancellor of the university itself or the Secretary to the Government, Higher Education Department 'as recommended by the government'.

Plea to establish National Centre for Ageing in all districts in Tamil Nadu dismissed
Plea to establish National Centre for Ageing in all districts in Tamil Nadu dismissed

The Hindu

timea minute ago

  • The Hindu

Plea to establish National Centre for Ageing in all districts in Tamil Nadu dismissed

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has dismissed a petition that sought a direction to the Centre to establish National Centre for Ageing in all districts in Tamil Nadu. A Division Bench of Justices S.M. Subramaniam and A.D. Maria Clete observed that welfare schemes were being implemented by the Central and the State governments for the benefit of senior citizens. The court observed that the number of centres to be established cannot be gone into by the High Court in writ proceedings. It is for the government to implement welfare schemes for the benefit of citizens in a phased manner and such implementation is a matter of policy decision. The court was hearing the petition filed by K.K. Ramesh of Madurai. The petitioner said parents were being ignored by their own children and the elderly were being disrespected. The number of old age homes had increased. There were complaints that some old age homes charge high fees and do not take care of the elderly. This is causing difficulties to the elderly. Some old age homes do not provide basic facilities, food, medicine, etc, he said and sought a direction to the Centre to establish the National Centre for Ageing in all districts in the State.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store