Apple orchards on forest land: Himachal to approach apex court against green felling, says minister
As part of the ongoing HC monitored exercise to clear forest land of all encroachments about 3,700 apple plants have been cut so far.
Negi who was speaking to media in Shimla on Friday said that nowhere in the country is green felling allowed and albeit the state government is removing encroachments from forest land, they will challenge green felling.
Negi said the state is complying with the HC's orders on removing illegal encroachments, but the destruction of full-grown apple orchards and green cover as part of the eviction process could lead to serious environmental consequences, especially in the context of heavy monsoon, cloudbursts, and floods. 'Eviction of illegal encroachments is being carried out, but cutting decades-old fruit-bearing trees is not justified,' Negi said, adding that the state will file a petition in the apex court to prevent unnecessary destruction of trees.
He urged the judiciary to differentiate between illegal possession and green asset preservation, and asked the Centre to frame a balanced policy that allows removal of encroachments without harming the environment.
Cutting fruit trees is wrong: Rathore
All India Congress Committee spokesperson and Theog MLA Kuldeep Rathore said, 'I will not comment on the court's orders, but cutting fruit trees in the month of Sawan is wrong.' He said, 'This action could have been postponed for three-four months. During monsoon rendering people homeless at such a time is against democratic values.'
Instead of axe-cutting the trees, the govt should take possession: Shanta
Former chief minister Shanta Kumar said that instead of cutting down the lush green gardens, the government should take them under its control. 'These gardens should be brought under the control of the forest department and made a source of income,' said former CM.
Shongtong hydroelectric project to be completed by December 2026
Construction of Shongtong hydroelectric project to be completed by December 2026, said Singh Negi after chairing cabinet sub-committee to review matters related to the 450 MW Shong-tong Hydroelectric project being developed by HPPCL.
He said that approximately 60% of the construction work has been completed. He urged the officials to ensure the project to be completed before December, 2026. He expressed satisfaction over the progress and said that the positive indication indicates the early completion of the project.
PWD roads to be entered in the revenue records: Negi
Negi on Friday directed the officials of the PWD to instruct all Deputy Commissioners and other revenue officers to conduct girdawari (field inspection) to ensure that government properties, especially PWD roads that have existed for more than 20 years and are duly recorded in the revenue records. Detailed discussions were held during the meeting regarding the registration of possession of all government properties, particularly PWD roads in the revenue records.
Negi also asked to ensure necessary action in this regard by August 1 and asked the officials to submit the compliance report to the panel.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
27 minutes ago
- Business Standard
EC's refusal to accept Aadhaar as voter ID in Bihar is 'absurd': ADR
The Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) has told the Supreme Court that the Election Commission's (EC) claim of having constitutional powers to verify voters' citizenship during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar's electoral rolls contradicts earlier court rulings. According to a report by The Indian Express, ADR also criticised the EC for excluding Aadhaar and ration cards as acceptable proof of identity, calling the move 'patently absurd,' especially as Aadhaar is widely used for passports, caste certificates, and permanent residency documents. 'Grave fraud' in rush to revise rolls The ADR, the petitioner in the matter, argued that the EC has not provided valid reasons for hurrying through the revision ahead of Bihar's Assembly polls. The group described the process as a 'grave fraud' on the state's electorate. The revision exercise, announced on June 24, has been controversial due to its timing and new requirement that voters registered after 2003 must provide several documents to stay on the electoral rolls. This has raised fears that many legitimate voters could be disenfranchised. ADR has submitted its response to the EC's affidavit, filed on July 21. In that affidavit, the EC claimed that Article 326 of the Constitution permits it to verify the citizenship of voters and clarified that being removed from the electoral roll does not mean loss of citizenship. The matter will be heard next on 28 July. Citizenship verification against court judgments? ADR argued that the EC's claim of authority to verify citizenship goes against earlier Supreme Court decisions. It cited Lal Babu Hussain vs Union of India (1995), which stated that the burden of proving citizenship lies with new applicants, not existing voters. It also referenced Inderjit Barua vs ECI (1985), where the court held that being on the electoral roll is strong proof of citizenship, and the onus to disprove it lies with those who object. ADR criticised the EC's directive requiring voters added after 2003 to produce one of 11 specified documents, saying this wrongly shifts the burden of proof to voters. 'It is submitted that the SIR process shifts the onus of citizenship proof on all existing electors in a state, whose names were registered by the ECI through a due process,' ADR said. The group questioned why the existing legal procedures under the Representation of the People Act and the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 had to be replaced with a fresh set of documentation and a new form. ADR also said the EC had not provided any data showing foreign nationals or illegal migrants had been included in the electoral rolls. EC's Aadhaar rejection 'absurd' In its July 21 affidavit, the EC refused to accept the Supreme Court's suggestion to include Aadhaar, ration cards, and Voter ID as valid documents, arguing that Aadhaar and ration cards can be obtained using false papers. ADR countered that the EC's list of 11 acceptable documents is also open to fraud. It added, 'The fact that Aadhaar card is one of the documents accepted for obtaining Permanent Residence Certificate, OBC/SC/ST Certificate and for passport – makes ECI's rejection of Aadhar (which is most widely held document) under the instant SIR order patently absurd.' 'Violations' by officials ADR alleged that EC officials on the ground are not following the Commission's own rules. The June 24 guidelines required Block Level Officers (BLOs) to visit each home and provide two forms per voter. But ADR said many voters had not met any BLOs and had not signed any forms, yet their submissions were recorded online. 'Forms of even dead individuals have been reported to have been submitted,' it added. ADR also criticised the lack of a clear process for verifying these forms and documents, saying this gave Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) excessive powers that could lead to widespread disenfranchisement. Why target post-2003 voters? The EC's order says that the 2003 electoral roll is proof of citizenship for voters already registered. For those born after July 1, 1987, the EC asks for proof of citizenship from at least one parent. If the parent appears on the 2003 roll, the child may rely on that. ADR said this distinction was unfair and placed those registered after 2003 at 'a larger risk of disenfranchisement.' It also questioned why the EC had not submitted the 2003 revision order to the Court and asked for it to be produced. In contrast, during the 2004 revision exercise in the North East, only new voters had to submit documents, and that process took over six months (July 1, 2004 to January 3, 2005). In Bihar, the entire process is being compressed into three months -- from June 25 to September 30. 2025 roll already revised ADR also asked why a fresh revision is needed when the 2025 electoral roll was already updated and published in January this year. The group said the roll is regularly updated to account for deaths, migration, and other changes. ADR also highlighted an August 11, 2023 EC circular to state CEOs, directing them to delete names of electors who had died, moved, or were duplicates. The EC claimed the current SIR was being held in response to concerns raised by political parties. But ADR said, 'not a single political party had asked ECI for a de novo exercise such as the one prescribed in the instant SIR order'. Instead, parties had raised concerns about fake votes being added, genuine opposition voters being deleted, and irregular voting after polls had closed. Supreme Court's interim observations The case was first heard on July 10 by a vacation bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Joymalya Bagchi. While the Court did not halt the process, it suggested the EC consider allowing Aadhaar, Voter ID, and ration cards as valid documents, in addition to the 11 listed. The EC was told to submit its affidavit by July 21, and the matter will be heard again on July 28. As of Friday, the EC said it had received forms from 72.3 million voters for inclusion in the draft roll. Around 6.5 million names are to be deleted due to death, permanent migration, duplicate entries, or because the voter was untraceable. Further deletions may occur after the draft roll is published. Between August 1 and September 1, those whose names are missing from the draft will be able to file claims and objections.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Bengal guv to move Supreme Court over control of state universities
Kolkata, Jul 26 (PTI) In another escalation of the ongoing tussle between the West Bengal government and the Raj Bhavan over higher education governance, Governor CV Ananda Bose on Saturday said he plans to seek clarity from the Supreme Court on whether ultimate authority over state universities lies with the chancellor (governor) or the state government. The move comes after a meeting between Bose and vice chancellors (VCs) of state-run universities at the Raj Bhavan, convened to address key issues in the state's higher education sector. The meeting was attended by nine VCs, with most others remaining absent. Several VCs who skipped the meeting claimed they faced obstructions from the higher education department, while others alleged they were gheraoed or faced hostile conditions on campus. Some sought appointments with the governor to explain their absence. Sources in Raj Bhavan suggest absenteeism has not been taken lightly. 'This is an issue that requires clarification. What is the role of the chancellor or the role of the government? The Supreme Court will be approached to determine who holds the ultimate authority over state universities — the chancellor (governor) or the state government," Bose told reporters at the Raj Bhavan. The meeting had a wide-ranging agenda, from digital reforms and manpower gaps to implementation of NEP 2020 and awareness on cybersecurity and drug addiction. PTI SCH MNB Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
EC's citizenship verification in Bihar defies SC verdicts, a fraud on voters: ADR tells Court
New Delhi: The Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) on Saturday told the Supreme Court that the Election Commission's (EC) citizenship verification exercise in Bihar constitutes a 'grave fraud' on voters and violates the apex court's past rulings. In its rejoinder affidavit, ADR responded to the EC's counter filed on July 21, in which the poll body defended the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. The EC had claimed the exercise aimed to restore public confidence in the electoral process. A batch of petitions challenging the Bihar SIR is scheduled to be heard by the top court on Monday, July 28, ahead of the State Assembly elections in November. ADR, in its response, questioned the EC's refusal to accept Aadhaar, Voter ID (EPIC), and ration cards as standalone proof of identity for inclusion in the electoral roll. It termed the stance 'patently absurd.' On July 10, a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court, comprising Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Joymalya Bagchi, declined to stay the revision process but directed the Commission to consider Aadhaar, EPIC, and ration card documents for verification. The Court noted that these documents serve as foundational proof for obtaining any of the 11 documents listed by the EC for voter verification. The EC, however, contended that Aadhaar, EPIC, and ration cards were susceptible to forgery. Disputing this claim, ADR argued that the remaining 11 documents permitted by the EC were equally vulnerable to fraudulent procurement, thereby rendering the EC's rationale arbitrary and inconsistent. "The situation raises serious concerns regarding transparency, accountability, and the potential for electoral fraud. Voters have expressed confusion and concern over the uploading of their details without their knowledge or involvement,' ADR said in its rejoinder, a copy of which was accessed by The New Indian Express. ADR also alleged that the ground realities in Bihar contradicted the EC's claims about the integrity of the process. "The reports from various towns and villages indicate that the SIR process is being carried out in a manner that is arbitrary, illegal, and in violation of the Commission's own guidelines dated June 24," it said.
