
How Pak Minister Khawaja Asif Brought Comic Relief Amid Tension On Border
New Delhi:
The past week saw India and Pakistan exchange heavy fire after New Delhi launched Operation Sindoor to avenge the Pahalgam terror attack. Artillery guns screamed on the borders and the people of the two countries argued on social media. But at a polarised time such as this, many on both sides of the border were united on one subject -- the criticism of Pakistan Defence Minister Khawaja Asif, whose bizarre remarks provided the much-needed comic relief amid a tense, war-like situation.
Honest Admission: During an interview with Sky News on April 25, Mr Asif effectively admitted that Pakistan has been backing terrorism and accused Western powers of conveniently blaming Pakistan. "When we were fighting on their side, way back in the 80s against the Soviet Union, all these terrorists of today were wining and dining in Washington, DC," he said. To a question on whether he admits that Pakistan had a long history of backing terror, he replied, "Well, we have been doing this dirty work for the United States for three decades and the West, including Britain. That was a mistake and we suffered for that."
"Madrasas Second Line Of Defence": Speaking in Pakistan's National Assembly, Mr Asif said madrasas and their students are the country's "second line of defence". "As far as madrassas or madrassa students are concerned, there's no doubt they are our second line of defence, the youngsters studying there. When the time comes, they will be used as needed 100 per cent," he said.
The remark drew strong criticism within Pakistan. Tahira Abdullah, a human rights activist, told news agency PTI, "It damages the already perceived image of Pakistan to the world which sees the unlimited spread of religious seminaries in the country as a place where young brains are brainwashed in the name of Jihad and so-called freedom struggle."
Drone Strategy: Defence Minister Asif told the Pakistan National Assembly that its forces decided not to intercept Indian drones so that they don't give away locations of Pakistan's military installations. "Yesterday's drone attack was aimed at detecting our locations. It's a technical matter. They were not intercepted, so our locations are not leaked. When it was safe, we shot them down," he said.
The remark was seen as an attempt to cover up the inadequacy of Pakistan's air defence system, one front that India aced with its near-perfect interception of the barrage of missiles and drones fired by Pakistan all along the western sector.
"Proof On Social Media": This is arguably Mr Asif's best moment during Operation Sindoor. In an interview with CNN, he was asked to substantiate Pakistan's claim that its air force shot down five Indian fighter planes. The anchor asked the Pakistan Defence Minister, "Where is the evidence?" The reply was confident: "It's all over social media." The anchor, visibly surprised, responded, "You are the Defence Minister. The reason to talk to you today, Sir, is not to talk about content all over social media. I am asking you very specifically for the evidence." The minister failed to substantiate his claims.
Later in the interview, Mr Asif also claimed, wrongly, that India had admitted that three planes were down. The Indian Air Force has made no such admission.
Nuclear Threat? Shortly after India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty, Mr Asif warned of a "historic" response if Pakistan's "existence is threatened". During an interview with Pakistan's Samaa TV, the Defence Minister criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi and said aggression from India will draw a response that "history will remember". "If our existence is threatened, if we don't exist, nobody will," he said. The doomsday warning was widely seen as a nuclear threat and many commented that it was irresponsible for a senior minister to make such provocative remarks.
In his address to the nation yesterday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi made it clear that India will no longer tolerate nuclear blackmail. "India will strike precisely and decisively at the terrorist hideouts developing under the cover of nuclear blackmail," he said.
Blast From the Past: While Mr Asif may have garnered international attention now, this is not the first time he has been under the spotlight for his off-the-cuff -- and often offensive -- remarks. In 2023, he referred to women parliamentarians of Imran Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf as "garbage". Following a massive uproar, Mr Asif came up with a bizarre defence. Speaking in the National Assembly, he said women must tolerate such offensive remarks if they talk about gender equality.
Criticism At Home: The Pakistan Defence Minister has been ridiculed at home and abroad for his irresponsible remarks. Zartaj Gul, a National Assembly member from Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf, said Mr Asif's attitude was "very irresponsible". "If you don't know English, don't go before international media. If you cannot defend your country, don't go, don't mock your government and your State," she said. "You say Pakistan shelters terrorists. The government has more educated people, send them," she added. On social media too, Pakistanis have slammed Mr Asif's remarks and termed them "embarrassing".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


United News of India
26 minutes ago
- United News of India
CJI Gavai champions cross-border legal synergy at ICA London conference
New Delhi / London, June 5 (UNI) Chief Justice of India Justice B R Gavai inaugurated the third International Conference on 'Arbitrating Indo-UK Commercial Disputes: Synergizing India–UK Arbitration Practices' in London on Thursday. The high-level event, hosted by the Indian Council of Arbitration (ICA) during London International Disputes Week, brought together legal luminaries, judges, policymakers, and commercial dispute resolution experts from both nations to strengthen ties in arbitration and mediation. Delivering the inaugural address, CJI Gavai remarked, 'India and the United Kingdom share a rich history, bound by the tradition of arbitration and mediation rooted in our common law heritage.' The conference was also addressed by Union Minister of Law and Justice Arjun Ram Meghwal, Lord Michael Briggs, Judge of the UK Supreme Court, Justice Hima Kohli, Supreme Court of India, Vikram Doraiswami, High Commissioner of India to the UK, and eminent lawyers including Harish Salve KC and Geeta Luthra, Vice President of ICA. CJI Gavai reflected on India's arbitration journey, invoking Mahatma Gandhi's commitment to mediation as foundational. 'Disputes are inevitable. What defines a strong commercial relationship is our commitment to resolve them efficiently,' he stated. He emphasised India's progress through amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (notably 2019), the establishment of the Arbitration Council of India, and the 2024 Bill proposing emergency arbitration and appellate tribunals. He lauded the UK's 2025 reforms in its Arbitration Act, promoting summary disposal and legal clarity. Justice Gavai drew from key Indian rulings, including BALCO, Vijay Karia, Amazon versus Future Retail and Gayatri Balasamy, to emphasise judicial minimalism and finality in arbitration. He noted, 'When arbitral awards are upheld without unnecessary interference, it enhances predictability, business trust, and investor confidence.' The CJI praised the growth of Indian institutions like DIAC, MCIA, and IIAC, while commending LCIA's role as a global benchmark. He stressed the importance of collaboration between Indian and UK arbitration bodies to raise global standards. Justice Gavai applauded the adoption of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) and hybrid systems such as Arb-Med-Arb. He called the Bar Council of India's recent move to allow foreign lawyers to advise on arbitration in India a 'landmark reform' that balances global openness with domestic integrity. CJI Gavai humorously outlined four transformative reforms he would introduce with a "magical wand". 'If I Had a Wand…,' CJI said, "I would make four reforms for India's Arbitration Regime." Finality of Arbitral Awards – Arbitration must be the final word, not an invitation for years of litigation. Mainstream Institutional Arbitration -- The Arbitration centres should be the norm, not an exception. Elimination of Delays -- Procedural fairness should not become a tool for tactical stalling. Diversity in Arbitrators -- The arbitrator pool must reflect varied perspectives and backgrounds for better outcomes. Chief Justice Gavai concluded by affirming India's unwavering commitment to becoming a preferred global seat for arbitration. He said, 'As India and the UK grow increasingly interconnected in commerce and law, our shared democratic values and legal traditions provide a strong foundation for a unified, efficient, and trustworthy dispute resolution system.' The conference echoed a resounding call for legal harmonisation, technology-driven arbitration, and cross-border cooperation with the shared goal of easing court pendency and bolstering investor confidence through strong alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. The event brought together senior dignitaries and legal experts from both India and the UK, including Chief Justice of India B R Gavai (inaugural address), Lord Briggs of Westbourne, Judge of the UK Supreme Court (keynote address), Vikram Doraiswami, High Commissioner of India to the UK (special address), Justice Hima Kohli, Supreme Court of India, Harish Salve KC, Senior Advocate and International Arbitrator, Sujit Ghosh, Deputy High Commissioner of India to the UK, Arun Chawla, Director General, ICA, Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate and Vice President, ICA, Dr N G Khaitan, President of ICA and Senior Partner at Khaitan and Co, and Karishma Vora, Barrister at 39 Essex Chambers, London and Member of the ICA International Advisory Committee. UNI SNG SS


Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
India-US deal momentum builds: US team holds talks in Delhi on BTA; Goyal says interim pact may be reach soon
The United States and India are intensifying negotiations on a bilateral trade agreement, with officials from both sides meeting in New Delhi this week to finalise the first phase of the proposed deal. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Commerce and Industry Minister on Thursday said the ongoing discussions are progressing well, and that additional US officials are expected to join the talks on June 6. 'Talks are progressing well. The US team is in India for the talks,' Goyal told reporters in Brescia, Italy, where he is on an official visit to promote trade and investment ties with Italian leadership and industry. According to PTI, the US and India are targeting an interim trade agreement by the end of June. The broader goal, announced jointly by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump in February, is to finalise a multi-sector Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) by September–October 2025. The deal aims to more than double bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030 from the current level of $191 billion. India is also pushing for full exemption from the 26% reciprocal tariff currently imposed on domestic goods as part of the ongoing talks. Last month, India's chief negotiator, Special Secretary Rajesh Agrawal from the Department of Commerce, held a four-day round of discussions in Washington with his US counterpart. Goyal also travelled to the US capital to provide political impetus to the talks. The US has remained India's largest trading partner for the fourth consecutive year in FY 2024–25, with total trade valued at $131.84 billion. The US accounts for about 18% of India's total goods exports, 6.22% of imports, and 10.73% of overall merchandise trade.
&w=3840&q=100)

India.com
28 minutes ago
- India.com
How Does Pakistan Keep Getting Loans? Unpacking The Dirty Secrets Behind The Global Funding That Shields A Failing State
New Delhi: Pakistan is broke. Its economy is shattered. Foreign reserves are vanishing. Yet it keeps getting blank cheques. Weeks after the International Monetry Fund (IMF) handed it over $1 billion in emergency funds plus an additional $1.3 billion in loans, the nuclear-armed state got another $800 million from the Asian Development Bank (ADB). India protested. The world ignored. And it is not the first time. Why does a nation with internal chaos and globally infamous for harboring terrorists keeps getting rewarded? Despite global acknowledgment of Pakistan's double-faced policies – begging for aid while exporting 'jihad' – the money keeps flowing. So what makes Pakistan the global community's 'spoiled child with a nuclear button'? The answer is not economic. It is political, strategic and dangerously hypocritical. Let's get this straight: Pakistan is not getting loans because it deserves them. It is getting them because the world is afraid of what will happen if it collapses. Its economy is in tatters. Pakistan's forex reserves dipped in 2023 below $3 billion – barely enough for three weeks of imports. The 2022 floods cost the country more than $30 billion in damages. 1. Too Nuclear to Fail: Pakistan's debt has ballooned to over $130 billion. If it defaults, global banks lose billions. It is financial blackmail that is working. 2. Location: Sitting between China, Afghanistan and Iran, the country holds strategic real estate. The West, especially the United States, does not want it slipping entirely into China's orbit. 3. A Loan with Strings: These are not freebies. IMF and ADB loans come with demands – raise taxes, cut subsidies and sell public assets. Western companies often swoop in to buy the leftovers. Global lending institutions like the IMF and the ADB may present themselves as neutral bodies, but their actions suggest otherwise. They claim to operate on technical grounds, but do not blink twice when handing over billions to a country that fuels terrorism in Kashmir and harbors global fugitives. And where is India in this equation? Despite protests after attacks like Pahalgam, New Delhi's influence is minimal. India's voting share in the IMF is small compared to the United States and Europe. Meanwhile, Pakistan's removal from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list in 2022 made getting loans even easier. The United States sees Pakistan as a pawn in its Afghanistan endgame. China, through the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), is turning it into a client state. Loans are just the leash – a way to pull Pakistan closer when needed and push it when not. Who Really Benefits? Not the people of Pakistan. Experts like Sushant Sareen argue these loans fatten the Pakistani military, not fuel reforms. Former diplomat Kanwal Sibal warns that the IMF funding indirectly supports terror. Even former Pakistani envoy Husain Haqqani admits that the IMF is an ICU for Pakistan, not a cure. These loans do not save Pakistan. They sustain it just enough to remain a useful mess. A mess that is allowed to fester because it serves the interests of those who pretend to fix it. Pakistan is not only playing the victim, it is gaming the system and the system is letting it.