
Socialite's sister accuses her of sharing details about pregnancy loss against her will in memoir
The sister of a popular socialite has accused her of sharing intimate details about her tragic pregnancy loss against her will in her new memoir.
Sarah Hoover - an art consultant, influencer, and the wife of artist Tom Sachs - released her debut book The Motherload: Episodes from the Brink of Motherhood back in January.
Described as 'an unflinching motherhood memoir that dares to ask what happens when "what to expect when you're expecting" turns out to be months of rage, anguish, brain fog, and a total surrender of sex, career, and identity,' the tome quickly rose in popularity.
But now, someone who claimed to be Sarah's estranged sister has unleashed a furious tirade against it, in which she alleged that Sarah included a segment describing the moment her son was born stillborn - despite her requesting that Sarah not talk about it publicly.
The woman, who did not share her name, slammed Sarah's book in a scathing post on Reddit, entitled, 'Am I the a**hole for wanting to hold my sister accountable for publishing information about my private trauma where my baby boy died without asking me?'
In the lengthy post, the woman explained that she lost her son nine years ago during childbirth.
'Nine years ago I lost a baby boy in childbirth at 41 weeks who was stillborn,' she wrote.
'This really f**ked me up, like to the point that it still makes me very sad after nine years.'
The woman explained that about four years after the tragedy, Sarah spoke about it during an interview with 'an internationally read magazine' while discussing her own journey to motherhood.
'She included very private details and information about my son who died and my stillbirth - medical information and other things I would never have agreed to share,' the woman wrote on Reddit.
'She did not ask my permission and did not give me any warning ahead of time.'
In a 2021 essay for Vogue, Sarah said, '[My sister's] little boy was dead on his due date, and she was nursing the wounds of her emergency c-section; a scar with nothing to show for it.
'We counted his fingers and toes and made ink prints of his feet and kissed his head until he turned cold and stopped smelling like a baby.
'He was buried the following week next to his paternal grandfather, dressed in the outfit my mom had bought him in Paris, a white Peter Pan collar and blue velvet pants, which he had been meant to wear home from the hospital.'
On Reddit, the woman said she 'was very triggered' reading the article and had 'an emotional breakdown' afterwards.
'It was the idea that all these strangers were reading about my private life and had access to information that I would never have shared with them - it made me feel first of all like I was back in the moments after my son died and secondly, like I was being continually re-traumatized by all these people reading about it without my consent,' she added.
'Acquaintances/work colleagues/etc. who I never told about this experience started asking me about it and trying to talk to me about it - people who I would not have shared with about my private life in that level of detail.'
She said she told Sarah she thought it was wrong and they ended up having a 'huge fight' about it - and have 'essentially not spoken since.'
She claimed that Sarah did not apologize, but vowed that 'she would ask her permission if she were ever to write about it again' the last time they spoke.
Flash forward to now, however, and the woman has claimed that the influencer, who has racked up more than 54,000 followers on Instagram, included the story of her stillbirth in her new memoir.
'I knew that she was publishing a book, but I assumed per our last communication that she would not include information about my son's death or anything about my family in the book. Well, I was wrong,' she continued.
'I am very angry again at the inclusion of my life and my son's death ... I did not read a draft and did not give permission or consent for what was included.'
The woman also accused her of 'lying' in the book, claiming that her retelling of the events weren't 'accurate.'
'She says she held my son in the hospital and while I was very out of it emotionally I am certain to the point where I would die on the hill that she never held my son,' she wrote.
'She says she held him while he was "still warm" which also seems impossible since no one held him directly out of my uterus and he was dead and logically could not be warm.
'I know these things only matter to me and don't matter to the general point of her book's narrative.
'But, when the only the only way you get to be a mom to your son is through those very few memories you have, it feels like a really big deal for someone to do this.'
She concluded the post by admitting that she was considering taking legal action against her sister, and asked Reddit users if they thought she would be in the wrong for doing so.
'Would I be the a**hole if I tried to take legal action? Is there a perspective where I am the a**hole for being angry about this?' she asked.
'Do people think what she did is not such big deal? My family is kind of split on this and my parents are very complicit in her behavior and actions and have been very supportive of her and the book.
'I also feel bad that this has destroyed our once very close family and my parents are getting older.'
DailyMail.com has reached out to Sarah for comment.
Sarah's publicist told Page Six that they wouldn't comment on the matter because it was 'a family matter,' but said: 'As a memoirist, Sarah writes from her memory and her lived experience.'
Sarah has gained fame for her 'essays on pregnancy, childbirth, and motherhood,' per her bio.
The Vogue piece - which focused on 'the traumatic birth of her son and ensuing postpartum depression' - was what shot her into the spotlight.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Hailey Bieber flashes her butt in G-string underwear... after admitting she is in therapy amid Justin drama
make a cheeky move on social media on Tuesday. The 31-year-old Vogue model was laying down on her back as she twisted to show off her tiny black G-string underwear that flashed her butt. On top the wife of Justin Bieber added a low-cut black lace camisole that fit her tight as her brunette hair fell down onto a shag carpet. In all the shots she was rolling around on the ground while looking very sultry. The glamorous portraits were used to help promote a new product from her Rhode Skincare company which was recently acquired by Elf Cosmetics. Her pal Kylie Jenner wrote, 'So HOT' in the comments section as Kourtney Kardashian added two red exclamation marks. This comes after the billionaire admitted in a social media post that she was in therapy: 'Lemon drop martinis and therapy all summer long.' This comes after the Arizona native posed in a black string bikini. In the photos, Hailey flaunted her flawless physique in a barely-there black two-piece while wearing a stylish cowboy hat. Earlier this month fans were outraged after a video resurfaced of Justin admitting he would have ditched his wife 'a long time ago' if it weren't for her looks. The supermodel was riding high following back-to-back victories — landing the cover of Vogue and selling her Rhode beauty brand for a staggering $1 billion. But instead of celebrating her wins, Justin reminded fans he once said Hailey would never make Vogue — and marked her $1 billion Rhode deal with a silent repost, offering no praise. Then, adding fuel to the fire of what fans already see as a rocky marriage, a 2020 clip went viral showing Justin in a car with Hailey, turning to her and dropping a jaw-dropping line. 'If you weren't so hot, I would've got rid of you a long time ago,' he says into the camera with a smile. The video resurfaced just as Hailey's Vogue interview was making headlines, where she opened up about working with a team to return to her pre-pregnancy body after welcoming their son Jack last year — a vulnerable moment now overshadowed by Justin's remark. Fans didn't hold back in the comments. 'Justin that is RUDE and DISGUSTING thing to say to your wife. You aren't hot btw. Disrespect a woman like that? Red flag,' one wrote. Another added, 'No words. That man would never see me again or he would never see the light of day again.' One Hailey fan posted, 'this is a crazy thing to say to your gf/fiance/wife (idk what they where at the time).' Yet another added simply: 'This is abuse.' Earlier this month, the Sorry hitmaker faced major backlash after admitting he once harshly told Hailey she'd never land a Vogue cover during an argument. That same day, as his wife celebrated achieving that very milestone, the embattled pop star sparked controversy with his Instagram post meant to congratulate her. His attempt at humor didn't sit well with fans, as he explained why the Vogue cover felt like a full-circle moment for their relationship. 'Yo this reminds me when Hailey and I got into a huge fight. I told Hails that she would never be on the cover of Vogue. 'Yikes, I know, so mean. For some reason because I felt so disrespected I thought I gotta get even,' he explained. Justin continued: 'Think as we mature we realize that we're not helping anything by getting even... we're honestly just prolonging what we really want which is intimacy and connection.' He concluded his post by writing a message directly to Hailey, which read: 'So baby u already know but forgive me for saying u wouldn't get a Vogue cover cuz clearly I was sadly mistaken.'


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Vogue slammed for putting controversial Blake Lively front and center amid Justin Baldoni legal feud
Vogue magazine has been bombarded with messages from angry followers after its publishers boldly decided to post Blake Lively at the front of a carousel of photos in an Instagram upload. On Tuesday morning, the publication took a moment to celebrate Chanel 's 18th Tribeca Festival Artists dinner at The Odeon restaurant which had taken place the previous evening. Gossip Girl alum Blake, 37, was among the celebrity guests in attendance, and showed up a mere couple of hours after it was revealed that Justin Baldoni 's $400 million countersuit against her had been dismissed. She joined the glitzy dinner alongside the likes of Hollywood legend Robert De Niro, Mad Men star Jon Hamm, and Chilling Adventures of Sabrina's Whitney Peak. Vogue shared a carousel of photos from the glamorous event, opting to lead the upload with a picture of Blake. 'Lights, camera, Chanel!' they captioned the post. 'Last night at The Odeon, @ChanelOfficial hosted its 18th annual Tribeca Festival Artists Dinner, honoring the artists who contributed original works for this year's Festival award-winning filmmakers. 'From @BlakeLively and Robert De Niro to @WhitneyPeak, Jon Hamm and Anna Osceola, head to the link in our bio to see the film stars, artists, and downtown darlings who stepped out for the occasion.' The decision to kick off the upload with Blake, however, didn't sit well with Vogue magazine's followers who blasted it as a 'poor choice.' 'Starting off with Blake was a poor choice,' one said. 'She was cancelled months ago,' another blasted. 'Enough Vogue.' A third continued: 'You lost me at lively. Cancel Blake.' 'Bold choice using Blake on the first picture…,' wrote another. 'Oof why are people still supporting Blake Lively?' asked a fifth. A sixth continued: 'Truly, I can't even scroll through my already depressing/disturbing feed with the current world we live in… 'I specifically came to Vogue to just look at some stellar fashion. First photo was of Blake Lively, right off the bat... Really Vogue - the very first photo?!? 'Why are all these publications shoving certain problematic people [that we don't want to see] in our faces constantly?? It honestly feels like we aren't allowed to enjoy anything anymore, without it having to be tainted in some kind of way… sad.' The decision to kick off the upload with Blake, however, didn't sit well with Vogue magazine's followers Blake has been embroiled in a legal wrangle with her It Ends with Us costar Justin for months. In December 2024, the actress sued Justin for allegedly sexually harassing her on set — claims he denied - before he and Wayfarer Studios fired back with a defamation suit against Blake, her publicist Leslie Sloane and husband Ryan Reynolds. Justin also waged war with The New York Times, filing a $250million lawsuit against the publication over its bombshell tell-all on Blake's sexual harassment claims against her former co-star on December 31, 2024. On Monday June 9, however, it was learned that a judge dismissed Justin's lawsuit in a major setback for the actor's hopes for a blockbuster win over the millionaire actress. Judge Lewis J Liman dismissed Justin's suit alleging defamation and extortion on the basis that all Blake's allegations were made within privileged court papers. The judge said in the order obtained by 'The Wayfarer Parties have not alleged that Lively is responsible for any statements other than the statements in her CRD complaint, which are privileged. 'The Wayfarer Parties have alleged that Reynolds and [publicist Leslie] Sloane made additional statements accusing Baldoni of sexual misconduct and that the Times made additional statements accusing the Wayfarer Parties of engaging in a smear campaign. 'But the Wayfarer Parties have not alleged that Reynolds, Sloane or the Times would have seriously doubted these statements were true based on the information available to them, as is required for them to be liable for defamation under applicable law. 'The Wayfarer Parties' additional claims also fail. Accordingly, the Amended Complaint must be dismissed in its entirety.'


Metro
3 hours ago
- Metro
It's been 20 years since Brad Pitt 'left' Jennifer Aniston for Angelina Jolie
Ready to feel old? It's been 20 years since one of the biggest events in tabloid media history: Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt filming Mr. and Mrs. Smith, which happened concurrently with the end of his marriage to Jennifer Aniston. The film started shooting in early 2004, while Brad was still very much married to Jennifer Aniston. At the time, Brad and Jen were considered Hollywood royalty. They'd been married since 2000 and were the golden couple: glamorous, low-drama, and wildly famous. Then came Mr. and Mrs. Smith. Brad was cast opposite Angelina Jolie, who already had a reputation for being edgy, bold, and wildly magnetic. From the minute filming began, rumours flew that something was happening between the two stars. Brad and Jen announced their separation in January 2005 and finalized their divorce in October. Just a few months later, paparazzi captured now-infamous photos of Brad, Angelina, and her son Maddox playing on a beach in Kenya. They never officially confirmed a relationship until the following year, but the timeline pretty much wrote itself – and so did the tabloid headlines. The media circus that followed wasn't just gossip, it was a revealing snapshot of how deeply sexist and one-sided pop culture could be (and honestly, still is). Right out of the gate, the media locked Jennifer Aniston into a role: the abandoned, heartbroken wife. Tabloids started calling her 'Poor Jen' on repeat, painting her as this sad, lonely woman who just couldn't hold onto her man. It was sympathetic, sure, but it also made her seem passive, like her only storyline was being left behind. Meanwhile, Angelina Jolie was cast as the villain. She was the 'homewrecker,' the 'temptress,' the sultry siren who stole Brad away. The term 'homewrecker' itself is soaked in sexist judgment, it's almost always used to shame women, not the men they supposedly 'lure' away. And then there was Brad. Somehow, the guy at the center of all this? Barely got touched. He was either the poor, bored husband stuck in a lifeless marriage or the helpless man who just couldn't resist Angelina's 'exotic' allure. If anything, the whole thing only helped his career, One Reddit user summed it up perfectly: 'When two women fight over one guy, that one guy is always gonna be a winner.' Then came the baby drama. The media latched onto this idea that Jen didn't want kids, forcing a heartbroken Brad to look elsewhere. It became a tabloid obsession: Did she choose her career over motherhood? Was she too selfish? Too cold? Never mind the fact that Aniston had never publicly said she didn't want children. She was being punished for not fulfilling the role of 'mother,' while Brad, who had clearly moved on and started a family with Angelina, was painted as this big-hearted family man. In a 2022 interview with Allure, Aniston addressed the rumors head-on: 'And God forbid a woman is successful and doesn't have a child… The reason my husband left me, why we broke up and ended our marriage, was because I wouldn't give him a kid. It was absolute lies.' Even back in 2005, she told Vanity Fair how blindsided she was when photos of Brad and Angelina first surfaced just months after her divorce filing. 'The world was shocked, and I was shocked,' she said. 'I'd be a robot if I said I didn't feel moments of anger, of hurt, of embarrassment.' Angelina's image, meanwhile, was all over the place. On one hand, she was praised for her humanitarian work and her growing family. On the other, she was still being branded as the 'other woman' with an 'agenda.' It was the classic Madonna-whore complex playing out in real time: She was either a goddess or a seductress, depending on which headline you were reading. And then there's Brad Pitt. The man at the center of the entire saga got off with barely a scratch. He eventually made a comment in Parade magazine in 2011 that seemed to throw shade at his marriage to Jen: 'I wasn't living an interesting life myself… I think that my marriage had something to do with it.' No apology. No real accountability. His alleged affair with Angelina was often framed as a result of Jen's 'failure' to keep him happy, not as a decision he made as a grown adult responsible for his own actions. That's a double standard we see over and over again: when a man cheats, it's her fault; when a woman cheats, it's also her fault. Looking back, the way this triangle was covered says a lot more about us than it does about Brad, Jen, or Angelina. It shows how media narratives lean hard into traditional gender roles, where women are either victims or villains, and men are…well, usually just fine. More Trending In the years since, both Jen and Angelina have opened up about the toll this all took. Jen, in particular, has pushed back against the cultural idea that a woman's life isn't full unless she has a husband and kids. As she told Allure: We are complete with or without a mate, with or without a child.' This story isn't just celebrity drama; it's a case study in how we, as a society, talk about women. And two decades later, it's still a reminder of how far we have to go. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Beyoncé giving away free concert tickets to London shows after 'poor sales' MORE: Britney Spears delights with rare insight into life with son Jayden, 18, after reunion MORE: Country star Conner Smith knocks down and kills woman walking her dog