&w=3840&q=100)
Who is Wajahat Khan, the man behind influencer Sharmistha Panoli's arrest?
Wajahat Khan, whose complaint led to the arrest of Instagram influencer and law student Sharmistha Panoli, is now in the spotlight. He has been booked by the Kolkata Police after several complaints were filed against him, accusing him of making offensive remarks about Hindu deities, festivals, and customs on social media. He has now gone missing read more
sWajahat Khan, whose complaint led to the arrest of Instagram influencer and law student Sharmistha Panoli, has now been booked by Kolkata Police. His family says they've been getting threatening calls since Panoli's arrest. Image courtesy:X
Wajahat Khan, whose complaint led to the arrest of Instagram influencer and law student Sharmistha Panoli , has now been booked by Kolkata Police.
Khan had accused Panoli of sharing a video on social media that allegedly contained hate speech and hurt religious sentiments. She was arrested from Gurugram on Friday and brought to Kolkata, where she was sent to 14 days of judicial custody. Her arrest triggered political backlash, with several BJP leaders calling for her release.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
But now, Khan himself is under the spotlight. He is facing multiple complaints and, according to his father, Saadat Khan, has gone missing. His family says they've been getting threatening calls since Panoli's arrest, reports Aaj Tak.
So, who is Wajahat Khan? And what are the complaints filed against him? Here's a look
Khan's 'controversial' social media posts
Wajahat Khan, reportedly the co-founder of the Rashidi Foundation in Kolkata, the group that lodged the initial complaint against Panoli, is now facing serious allegations himself.
After her arrest, several users began digging into Khan's social media history. What they found sparked outrage: posts that allegedly contained hate speech and derogatory remarks aimed at the Hindu community.
Screenshots and videos circulating online show Khan making comments that many believe stoke communal tension and mock Hindu beliefs. He had also posted messages demanding Panoli's arrest and later appeared to celebrate it.
As a result, complaints have been filed against him in multiple cities, including Guwahati and Delhi. These accuse him of making offensive remarks about Hindu deities, festivals, and customs.
One of the key complainants, the Shree Ram Swabhiman Parishad, alleges that Khan's posts promoted enmity between religious groups and could potentially incite public disorder.
According to a report by Aaj Tak, the complaint claims Khan used terms like 'rapist cultures' and 'urine drinkers' to describe Hindus. It also alleges that he posted vulgar and sexually explicit language targeting Hindu gods, while mocking temples, festivals, and other religious practices.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Complaints have been filed against Wajahat Khan in multiple cities, including Guwahati and Delhi, accusing him of making offensive remarks about Hindu deities, festivals, and customs. Image courtesy: X
The letter, addressed to the Officer-in-Charge of Garden Reach Police Station and dated June 2, calls for action under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita—196(1)(a), 299, 352, and 353(1)(c)—in addition to Sections 66A and 67 of the Information Technology Act.
A separate case has also been filed against Khan in Assam. Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said that a police team from the state would travel to West Bengal and seek cooperation in taking legal action against him.
'Receiving threats, gone missing'
Wajahat Khan's family claims he has been missing from his Kolkata residence since Sunday, shortly after his name surfaced in multiple complaints following Sharmistha Panoli's arrest.
His father, Saadat Khan, told Aaj Tak that the family has been receiving threatening phone calls ever since Panoli was taken into custody.
'My son is innocent and secular. He cannot insult Hinduism. We have been receiving threats since Sharmistha's arrest,' he said.
According to him, Wajahat was mentally disturbed by the barrage of abuse and threats that flooded his phone over the last few days. Many of the callers allegedly accused him of destroying Panoli's life.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Saadat Khan also said he himself received similar calls and was verbally abused. Addressing the allegations against his son for posting offensive content online, he suggested that Wajahat's social media profile may have been hacked.
Why was Sharmistha Panoli arrested?
Sharmistha Panoli was arrested based on a complaint filed at the Garden Reach Police Station on May 15. The complaint alleged that she posted a video on social media that hurt religious sentiments and could provoke communal unrest.
In the now-deleted clip, Panoli criticised Bollywood celebrities, particularly Muslim actors, for staying silent on Operation Sindoor, the Indian military strike that targeted terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
The video, which contained strong language and communal undertones, quickly drew backlash online. Panoli later removed the video and issued a public apology.
Despite that, she was arrested in Gurugram on Friday and brought to Kolkata. She has since been remanded to 14 days of judicial custody.
Sharmistha Panoli was arrested in Gurugram on Friday and brought to Kolkata. She has since been remanded to 14 days of judicial custody. Image courtesy: X
Amid criticism of the arrest, Kolkata Police issued a statement defending their action. They clarified that 'hate speech and abusive language should not be misconstrued as freedom of speech and expression.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Panoli is a law student originally from Kolkata's Anandapur area and is currently studying at a university in Pune. She has been charged under sections related to inciting enmity between religious groups and promoting communal disharmony.
The arrest has triggered political reactions from BJP leaders across West Bengal, with many demanding her immediate release.
Leader of Opposition Suvendu Adhikari questioned the selective action by police, pointing out that no steps were taken against TMC leaders accused of similar offences.
'TMC MP Mahua Moitra had said such disgraceful things against Goddess Kali, was any action taken against her even after 200 FIRs were filed? Their MP, Sayani Ghosh, had posted about Maha Dev. Was any action taken? So many FIRs against Firhad Hakim, was any action taken?' he said.
Adhikari added, 'Action is only taken against Sanatanis. I do not want to comment on what the girl (Panoli) has said, but the TMC is trying to appease a particular community for vote bank politics.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Bengal BJP president and Union Minister Sukanta Majumdar echoed similar concerns.
'Sharmistha Panoli, 22, law student, arrested for a now-deleted video and a public apology. No riots. No unrest. Yet Mamata Banerjee's police acted overnight — not for justice, but for appeasement. But when TMC leaders insult Sanatan Dharma… mock Maha Kumbh, and push communal poison — there's no FIR, no arrest, no apology. This is not justice. This is vote-bank vendetta,' he posted on social media.
With input from agencies
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
"This messy Trump-Musk breakup is truly the gayest thing about pride month"
This year's Pride Month was already going to be fabulous. But the universe went ahead and gifted us something truly iconic: an extremely messy, extremely public, deeply petty breakup between Donald Trump and Elon Musk. That's right. Two of the most powerful egos in America just had a melodramatic spat. What was once a bro-mance of billionaires and MAGA-fueled dreams has now combusted in a swirl of betrayal, subtweets, campaign threats, and conspiracy theories. Once upon a power couple It started like any great political love story: Musk and Trump, both media-savvy, chaos-loving figures, found common ground. Musk poured nearly $300 million into Trump's 2024 campaign, and Trump gave Musk something just as valuable: power and influence in the White House. Elon even headed up the hilariously named Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), because apparently memes can be federal policy now. But like any toxic relationship, the cracks were always there, hidden behind the performative smiles and tax breaks. And once they started fighting, they went full Real Housewives on each other. 'He's changed': Musk goes off It began when Musk denounced Trump's latest mega-bill, the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' (yes, that's actually the name). He called it a 'disgusting abomination,' citing everything from its trillion-dollar spending spree to the axing of EV tax credits. Translation: 'He doesn't support my electric dreams anymore.' In a move straight out of a bitter ex's playbook, Musk didn't stop at policy. No, he pulled the nuclear card: Epstein. Musk publicly suggested that Trump's name might be in Jeffrey Epstein's infamous flight logs and accused him of stalling the release of documents to protect himself. It was a jaw-dropping accusation—one that launched a thousand think pieces and even more memes. The billionaire equivalent of saying, 'He cheated on me... with a war criminal.' Trump: 'You'll regret leaving me' Trump, never known for restraint, responded by threatening to tear up every government contract tied to Musk's empire—NASA, Starlink, you name it. He mocked Musk's mental health, claiming he had 'Trump Derangement Syndrome,' and basically threatened to take the dog, the house, and the shared Netflix password. If this were a gay breakup, it would have involved an unfollow, a series of thirst traps, and vague Instagram stories set to Carly Rae Jepsen. Instead, we got Trump on Truth Social and Musk on X (formerly Twitter), subtweeting each other like bitter co-parents fighting over visitation rights to the American public. By now, you're probably wondering: is this all performative? A PR stunt? Not quite. The consequences are real. Tesla stock dropped 14%—a $152 billion slap. Trump's crypto coin ($TRUMP, yes, seriously) fell 12%. Even Trump Media & Technology Group took a nosedive. The markets treated this feud like your friend group would a breakup between two toxic people: immediate distance, cautious silence, and maybe some popcorn. The queerest thing about June Let's talk about that now-viral tweet: 'This messy Trump-Musk breakup is truly the gayest thing about Pride Month.' It's a joke, yes, but not a lie. Pride is a time for big personalities, louder statements, and unrelenting drama. This feud? It's camp. It's theatrical. It's two rich men yelling at each other across social media platforms while democracy quietly asks for a drink. If this really is the end, it's an ugly one. No reconciliation on the horizon, no 'we still love and respect each other.' Just lawsuits, threats, and allegations of sex trafficking cover-ups. What we have instead is Elon in his petty era, torching what's left of the bridge he once walked into the White House on. And Trump? He's not just burning bridges—he's threatening to bulldoze Elon's entire empire. What now? So what happens next? Will Musk fund a third-party run out of spite? Who knows. All we can say is this: if Pride Month is about authenticity, color, and living loud, then this messy, flamboyant, scorched-earth breakup absolutely qualifies.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Solving Crime: How a woman's murder probe led Karnataka cops to a ‘Drishyam'-inspired crime that stayed hidden for 5 years
In 2013, the Malayalam film Drishyam, with its intricate plot of a man outwitting the police and covering up a murder, captivated audiences across India. But for a man in Karnataka, the film served as a blueprint for murder—a crime that went unnoticed until a routine missing person case in 2024 unravelled his web of deception. On August 12, 2024, a man named Balaraju walked into the Magadi police station with a worried expression. His friend Lalitha, a beautician from Madanayakanahalli on the outskirts of Bengaluru, had vanished without a trace. Known to many as Divya, the 30-year-old had been living separately from her husband, Umesh, for two years, raising their five-year-old son alone while pursuing divorce proceedings. The police later learnt that Lalitha's marriage to Umesh, a travel agency employee, had crumbled under the weight of his alcohol addiction. Her active Instagram presence was a source of constant suspicion for Umesh, who was convinced she was having an affair. The couple's separation had been bitter. That August evening, Umesh had called Lalitha to discuss the divorce, Balaraju told the police. Umesh suggested they meet near the Basavanna temple close to Magadi to discuss matters 'amicably', he allegedly said. Lalitha agreed, but sensing something amiss, she shared her live location on WhatsApp with Balaraju's wife, Uma, before she left, borrowing a two-wheeler from him. The live location that Lalitha shared told a chilling story. In the FIR, Balaraju said that at 6.17 pm, Lalitha's location signal ended abruptly near Honnapura Lake. When Uma tried calling Lalitha and Umesh, neither answered. At 8.12 pm, Balaraju told the police, Umesh returned the borrowed two-wheeler, claiming he had accompanied Lalitha and put her on a bus home. But 19 minutes later, at 8.31 pm, Umesh allegedly called Balaraju confessing that he had killed Lalitha and begged him not to tell anyone. Twelve minutes after that, he allegedly made another desperate call, pleading with Balaraju to delete the WhatsApp live location that had been shared, as per the FIR. Balaraju and Uma immediately alerted the police. Following the digital trail left by Lalitha's shared location, the police found her body buried in a forest. Umesh was arrested. So was an alleged accomplice, Kiran Kumar—a man who seemingly had no motive for the murder. What transpired later left the police shocked. During questioning, the police asked Kiran about his family. His response was allegedly matter-of-fact: his wife Pooja had eloped with another man a decade ago, leaving him to raise their seven-year-old daughter alone, he told the police. However, Inspector Giriraj G Y, who was leading the investigation, was puzzled by certain aspects of Umesh's crime. 'Why would Umesh bring his wife all the way from Madanayakanahalli to Magadi to kill her?' he remembers wondering. 'He could have done it anywhere close to his place.' When pressed, Umesh allegedly revealed that choosing the remote location had been Kiran's idea. This detail sparked Giriraj's curiosity about Kiran's background, especially since no family members had visited him after his arrest. The breakthrough came when a constable contacted Kiran's mother-in-law, Gowramma, who lived in Tavarekere, Bengaluru. When asked about her daughter Pooja, Gowramma's story differed from Kiran's narrative, the police said. She said Pooja had disappeared five years ago—not 10—and that Kiran had filed a missing person's complaint with Magadi police. A quick check of police records, however, revealed that no such missing complaint had ever been filed. When confronted with this discrepancy, Kiran allegedly claimed he had come with two friends to file the complaint. The police tracked down these alleged friends, who categorically denied accompanying Kiran to any police station. Faced with evidence of his alleged deception, Kiran's carefully constructed story began to collapse. Under intense interrogation, he allegedly confessed to a murder in Hujugallu village in Ramanagara district that had remained hidden for five years. Kiran's confession revealed a chilling parallel to the Mohanlal-starrer Drishyam that had allegedly inspired his crime. On May 1, 2019, following fights with his wife, Pooja, he strangled her to death, the police said. Taking inspiration from the film's protagonist, George Kutty, he buried her body in a forest near Magadi, creating an elaborate cover story about her eloping with another man, the police added. To maintain his deception, Kiran allegedly prepared a fake police complaint, which he would show to Gowramma whenever she inquired about the investigation's progress. Over time, Pooja's family's questions became less frequent, allowing Kiran to believe he had gotten away with murder. The story took an even more bizarre turn when Kiran revealed how Drishyam 2 also allegedly influenced his actions. Two years after the murder, forest department officials began digging trenches in the area to prevent elephants from entering nearby villages. Fearing his crime might be discovered, Kiran took inspiration from the sequel, he allegedly told the police. He allegedly secretly excavated Pooja's remains, burnt the bones and teeth, and reburied them at a farm. Like the movie's protagonist, he believed destroying evidence would eliminate any possibility of detection, the police said. On August 26, 2024, based on Gowramma's complaint, the police registered a murder case against Kiran. He led investigators to the burial site, where forensic experts and Tahsildar Sharath Kumar oversaw the excavation. The burnt bones and teeth were recovered and sent for DNA analysis, with samples from Gowramma taken for comparison. The Magadi police later filed charge sheets in both murder cases. Though Umesh and Kiran are out on bail, a police officer said that there was sufficient scientific evidence to prove the murders.
Scroll.in
2 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Assam: Two more arrested in crackdown on ‘anti-nationals', says CM Himanta Sarma
Two more persons were arrested in Assam in a crackdown on alleged 'anti-national and communal elements', Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said on Saturday. With this, the number of arrests in such cases in the state since the terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam increased to 90. While Goalpara Police arrested Sanidul Islam for allegedly 'offensive social media posts on Lord Ram', Kamrup Police apprehended Saniur Rahman for 'inciting communal discord' through social media, Sarma said on social media. The attack at Baisaran near Pahalgam town on April 22 left 26 persons dead and 17 injured. The terrorists targeted tourists after asking their names to ascertain their religion, the police said. All but three of those killed were Hindu. Since the attack, the Bharatiya Janata Party government in Assam has been arresting persons accused of alleged 'anti-national' activities. On June 1, the chief minister said that 81 'anti-nationals' were put 'behind bars for sympathising with Pakistan'. On April 24, Sarma had said that the state would take action against anyone directly or indirectly defending the 'horrific, Pakistan-sponsored terror attack in Pahalgam'. This came after Opposition All India United Democratic Front MLA Aminul Islam was arrested on sedition charges for claiming that the Pahalgam attack and the 2019 Pulwama attack may have been the results of conspiracies by BJP leaders. Islam got bail in the sedition case on May 14, but was detained again under the National Security Act on the same day, PTI reported. The Act allows for long periods of detention without trial and suspends important rights of the accused person, including the right to legal representation and immediate information about the cause of the arrest.
