US considers cutting nearly all international pro-democracy aid programs
Nearly all US-funded pro-democracy programs operating under the State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) are at risk of termination, according to internal briefings on a sweeping foreign assistance review led by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
The review, sources say, recommends slashing nearly USD 1.3 billion in grants, leaving just two programs untouched: one in China and one in Yemen, The Guardian reported.
'This would terminate about 80 percent of all US government foreign assistance at the State Department,' said a department official briefed on the matter.
The recommendations signal a dramatic shift in US foreign policy priorities under the Trump administration. Critics warn that cutting these programs would leave pro-democracy activists in authoritarian countries vulnerable, with many of these initiatives focused on digital freedom, election support, transnational repression, and emergency protection for at-risk civil society figures.
Most DRL-backed programs are kept confidential due to the sensitive nature of their work in hostile regimes like Venezuela, Cuba, and China. However, the sudden recommendation to terminate hundreds of grants stunned many inside the State Department. Officials said leadership in both DRL and the Office of Foreign Assistance were 'in shock.'
Adding to the controversy, a newly appointed senior adviser to DRL, Samuel Samson, a recent college graduate and rising conservative figure, has reportedly proposed repurposing Congressionally allocated funds to support administration-linked priorities, including resettling Afrikaners to the US and backing the legal defense of French far-right leader Marine Le Pen.
Samson also led a US delegation in May that met with senior officials from Le Pen's National Rally party. Though Le Pen did not meet with him personally, the group rejected a US offer of public support, according to Reuters. Samson's recent writings have drawn criticism as well, particularly a State Department Substack post in which he questioned the designation of Germany's far-right AfD as an extremist party, claiming it undermines democratic elections in Europe.
It remains unclear whether his recommendations were included in DRL's official budget planning.
The review's release follows OMB Director Russell Vought's Senate testimony, during which he claimed the State Department's foreign assistance programs remained fully operational. Just days later, the results landed at DRL, coinciding with the department's plan to lay off up to 3,400 staff and shutter around 300 offices as part of a massive restructuring championed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
Under this reorganization, DRL is expected to be gutted, its aid programs stripped, and its staff laid off. Sources noted this would make it nearly impossible to challenge the funding cuts or defend terminated grants, as employees would lose access to the very resources and email systems required to do so.
'If you cut all the programs in DRL, then, why would you need to keep the staff if they're not doing any work,' said one source familiar with the plan.
The proposed dismantling of DRL has sparked outrage from Democratic lawmakers. Ten senators recently wrote a letter to Rubio urging him to reconsider. 'The proposed reorganization would result in a structural and substantive demotion of human rights promotion,' they wrote, arguing it runs counter to Rubio's past as a vocal advocate for oppressed peoples.
Citing Rubio's own prior testimony, they added, 'Millions of people around the world who live in societies dominated by fear and oppression look to the United States of America to champion their cause… There are no greater champions more capable of advancing this noble cause than the dedicated staff in DRL.'
Despite mounting concerns, the State Department's official line remains cautious. When asked for comment, a senior official said, 'The provision of any foreign assistance, including for democracy programming, will be guided by whether it makes America safer, stronger, and more prosperous.'
Still, many inside and outside the department worry that once these programs are gone, and the personnel with them, America's global human rights leadership will be diminished for years to come.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Roya News
6 hours ago
- Roya News
US considers cutting nearly all international pro-democracy aid programs
Nearly all US-funded pro-democracy programs operating under the State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) are at risk of termination, according to internal briefings on a sweeping foreign assistance review led by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The review, sources say, recommends slashing nearly USD 1.3 billion in grants, leaving just two programs untouched: one in China and one in Yemen, The Guardian reported. 'This would terminate about 80 percent of all US government foreign assistance at the State Department,' said a department official briefed on the matter. The recommendations signal a dramatic shift in US foreign policy priorities under the Trump administration. Critics warn that cutting these programs would leave pro-democracy activists in authoritarian countries vulnerable, with many of these initiatives focused on digital freedom, election support, transnational repression, and emergency protection for at-risk civil society figures. Most DRL-backed programs are kept confidential due to the sensitive nature of their work in hostile regimes like Venezuela, Cuba, and China. However, the sudden recommendation to terminate hundreds of grants stunned many inside the State Department. Officials said leadership in both DRL and the Office of Foreign Assistance were 'in shock.' Adding to the controversy, a newly appointed senior adviser to DRL, Samuel Samson, a recent college graduate and rising conservative figure, has reportedly proposed repurposing Congressionally allocated funds to support administration-linked priorities, including resettling Afrikaners to the US and backing the legal defense of French far-right leader Marine Le Pen. Samson also led a US delegation in May that met with senior officials from Le Pen's National Rally party. Though Le Pen did not meet with him personally, the group rejected a US offer of public support, according to Reuters. Samson's recent writings have drawn criticism as well, particularly a State Department Substack post in which he questioned the designation of Germany's far-right AfD as an extremist party, claiming it undermines democratic elections in Europe. It remains unclear whether his recommendations were included in DRL's official budget planning. The review's release follows OMB Director Russell Vought's Senate testimony, during which he claimed the State Department's foreign assistance programs remained fully operational. Just days later, the results landed at DRL, coinciding with the department's plan to lay off up to 3,400 staff and shutter around 300 offices as part of a massive restructuring championed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Under this reorganization, DRL is expected to be gutted, its aid programs stripped, and its staff laid off. Sources noted this would make it nearly impossible to challenge the funding cuts or defend terminated grants, as employees would lose access to the very resources and email systems required to do so. 'If you cut all the programs in DRL, then, why would you need to keep the staff if they're not doing any work,' said one source familiar with the plan. The proposed dismantling of DRL has sparked outrage from Democratic lawmakers. Ten senators recently wrote a letter to Rubio urging him to reconsider. 'The proposed reorganization would result in a structural and substantive demotion of human rights promotion,' they wrote, arguing it runs counter to Rubio's past as a vocal advocate for oppressed peoples. Citing Rubio's own prior testimony, they added, 'Millions of people around the world who live in societies dominated by fear and oppression look to the United States of America to champion their cause… There are no greater champions more capable of advancing this noble cause than the dedicated staff in DRL.' Despite mounting concerns, the State Department's official line remains cautious. When asked for comment, a senior official said, 'The provision of any foreign assistance, including for democracy programming, will be guided by whether it makes America safer, stronger, and more prosperous.' Still, many inside and outside the department worry that once these programs are gone, and the personnel with them, America's global human rights leadership will be diminished for years to come.
Roya News
6 hours ago
- Roya News
US greenlights $30M for controversial Gaza aid group
The US State Department announced Thursday it will provide USD 30 million in funding to a newly established food distribution network in Gaza. The initiative, known as the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), has been promoted by 'Israel' and is largely operated by American contractors, but has drawn sharp criticism from humanitarian groups and the UN. At a press briefing, State Department spokesman Thomas Pigott praised the group, calling it 'absolutely incredible and should be commended and supported.' He urged other countries to contribute financially to the foundation, despite objections raised by numerous aid organizations over its methods and the violence reported around its distribution points. The GHF began distributing food in southern Gaza late last month, establishing only a limited number of sites. Most are located near 'Israeli' military positions, a fact that aid groups say creates dangerous conditions for civilians seeking food and undermines humanitarian neutrality. Pigott declined to say whether the US funding had already been disbursed or if the foundation would expand to serve more of Gaza's population. However, he emphasized that the new system aligned with 'President Trump's call to deliver aid in a way where it can't be looted by Hamas,' and described the foundation's model as one of 'creative solutions.' Violence has been a constant near these distribution sites, with hundreds reportedly killed in the past month as desperate civilians have crowded around aid convoys. Witnesses say Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) have opened fire near the centers, though the IOF claims it only fired warning shots when soldiers felt threatened. The Gaza health ministry has attributed many deaths to these incidents. The GHF has denied responsibility, suggesting that some reports were misattributed or fueled by 'Hamas propaganda.' It has also accused Hamas of threatening aid workers and spreading misinformation. Meanwhile, international human rights groups remain skeptical. In a joint statement released Tuesday, 15 organizations criticized the foundation's 'militarized model' and close cooperation with 'Israeli' authorities, saying it violates the humanitarian principles of impartiality, neutrality, and independence. Despite these concerns, John Acree, the foundation's interim executive director, welcomed the US pledge. 'Americans deeply care about the humanitarian situation in Gaza and want to see real action,' he said. 'Now is the time for unity and collaboration.' However, many say the new initiative falls far short of meeting the enormous humanitarian need in Gaza. Nearly two million Palestinians live in the enclave, where 'Israel's' blockade, imposed after the aggression began in October 2023, drastically reduced the flow of food and medicine. From March to May, aid was almost entirely cut off. While 'Israel' insists Hamas has looted aid, the UN disputes that it happens systematically and argues that the real issue is the obstruction of supply lines. The UN warned Thursday that most families in Gaza are surviving on a single meager meal a day, with adults regularly skipping food so children and the elderly can eat. Even as other organizations resume work, including World Central Kitchen (WCK), which restarted operations after a May suspension, the UN says aid access is still woefully inadequate.
Roya News
a day ago
- Roya News
عربي
US Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff said Wednesday that new countries, some of which were never expected, will soon normalize relations with 'Israel' under the Abraham Accords framework. 'We think we will have some pretty big announcements on countries that are coming into the Abraham Accords,' Witkoff told CNBC. 'We're hoping for normalization across an array of countries, maybe that people would never have contemplated coming in before.' He emphasized that expanding the Abraham Accords remains a key objective of US President Donald Trump, who returned to office in 2025. The agreements, initially signed in 2020 between 'Israel and the UAE and Bahrain, were later joined by Morocco and Sudan. Witkoff said the US would issue a 'significant announcement' soon on the new wave of normalization. 'We expect many countries to normalize relations,' he added. His comments came after the end of a 12-day war between 'Israel' and Iran, which concluded Tuesday with a US-brokered ceasefire. The conflict, which began with 'Israeli' strikes on Iran, included a series of escalating attacks—among them, 'Israeli' bombings of Iranian military and nuclear sites, and retaliatory Iranian strikes on 'Israeli' intelligence centers. The US also carried out airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities before Iran responded by targeting the American Al-Udeid airbase in Qatar. Witkoff, who played a major role in negotiating the truce, expressed optimism about the future. 'We've received strong indications that a comprehensive peace agreement [with Iran] is possible. I believe Iran is ready,' he said. However, he warned that Iran's resumed uranium enrichment is a red line. 'Enrichment is a red line. Weaponization is another. We will never allow that. It would destabilize the entire region,' Witkoff said.
