Starmer criticised over action against Labour rebels
Responding to Sir Keir's attempt to assert his authority over the party, York Central MP Ms Maskell said: 'On this occasion, I don't think he's got it right.'
She told the BBC: 'I really hope from this process there will be reflection over the summer, but also learning.
'There needs to be a better reach-out to backbenchers to ensure that we are the safeguards of our Government.'
The four MPs all voted against the Government over the welfare reform legislation, but party sources said the decision to suspend the whip was taken as a result of persistent breaches of discipline rather than a single rebellion.
Government minister Jess Phillips said the four should not be surprised by the action against them.
The Home Office minister told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'There has to be an element of discipline otherwise you end up not being able to govern.'
She added: 'I think that constantly taking to the airwaves and slagging off your own Government, I have to say, what did you think was going to happen?'
On Sky News she said: 'We were elected as a team under a banner and under a manifesto, and we have to seek to work together, and if you are acting in a manner that is to undermine the ability of the Government to deliver those things, I don't know what you expect.'
Referring to a description of the rebels by an unnamed source in The Times, she told Sky News: 'I didn't call it persistent knob-headery, but that's the way that it's been termed by some.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
US judge rejects justice department bid to unseal Epstein grand jury materials
A judge in the US has rejected a justice department bid to unseal grand jury materials related to the sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The US government had filed a motion to unseal grand jury transcripts related to Epstein, a former financier who took his own life while awaiting trial in 2019. Last Friday, Donald Trump said attorney general Pam Bondi had been asked to release the transcripts because of "the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein". The Department of Justice said criminal cases against Epstein and his former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, were a matter of public interest. The judge's decision is the first ruling in a series of attempts by President Donald Trump's administration to release more information on the case amid calls by some in his MAGA support group for the full details of Epstein's activities to be released. Please refresh the page for the latest version.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Why Angela Rayner's comments on summer riots are part of a power play
At least three times now, Angela Rayner has given a major TV interview where she has insisted she does not want to be prime minister. The problem for the deputy prime minister, however, is that her rejections of the crown are not very convincing. And if there is a reason why nobody in Westminster really believes the deputy prime minister in regards to her own ambitions, the intervention on Tuesday during the final cabinet meeting before the summer recess underlined it. Her warning about a summer of riots, linking them to economic woes and failures on controlling migration appeared to be a masterclass of political timing and messaging. At the same time, though, there is surprise among her allies that the normally dull cabinet briefing used her 'spicier language' in a way which has drawn criticism of her. But whether Ms Rayner was happy with the reporting of it or not, there was no doubt that the intervention revealed a politician who has now emerged as one of the most powerful figures in government. There is widespread speculation among Labour MPs that the deputy prime minister is now positioning herself as the lead option to replace Sir Keir should he fall - and at the same time offer a different type of Labour government to the Starmerite project. In terms of political timing, Ms Rayner's intervention worked because it put a full stop to the end of a deeply troubled first year for Sir Keir. The speed with which the public fell out of love with Starmer's government after last year's election landslide, the anger over welfare cuts, winter fuel and other issues has poisoned the initial 12 months of Labour's return to power for the first time in 14 years. With the party at around 22 points in the polls and Nigel Farage 's Reform UK touching 30 points, they know they are in trouble. The threat (imagined or otherwise) of a Jeremy Corbyn-led party could pull away even more support. Ms Rayner ensured that as MPs headed to off on their summer breaks, the last thing they had in their minds was her as a 'more authentic' voice of Labour. There is an increasing feeling within Labour circles that Ms Rayner's 'real Labour' approach to politics is a more effective way of dealing with Farage and Reform, with the party appearing only too happy to pinch leftwing ideas including nationalising steel and the water industry, as well as paying out more benefits. The other, cruder part of the timing is that it was just a week away from the one year anniversary of the awful murders of three children in Southport, an event which triggered the riots across the country. Those riots were the first major challenge to a new Labour government last July and August, with Sir Keir robbed of any post-election honeymoon as the prime minister cancelled his holiday to deal with the unrest. With protests in Epping and problems beginning to stir with both the far right and far left, Ms Rayner was laying down a marker that this time they were ready for it. But there is a problem. As Michael Gove has pointed out, this cavalier use of a threat makes it look like the government 'is at the mercy of events'. Or at least that is what critics of hers will argue. When she returns after the summer, Ms Rayner is hoping to get an official Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, a real platform to wield power and an alternative centre of power to Downing Street. This has been won on the back of her saving the prime minister's skin in the welfare rebellion and negotiating a peace settlement over benefits cuts. The kicking out of four rebels only seems to have stirred up more discontent about Starmer not putting rebels off. Labour tends to not follow the Tory approach of quickly ditching leaders. But Ms Rayner has finished this first year ensuring that she is the clear frontrunner should the current prime minister's position become untenable.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Lammy handing Hamas a get-out card is an utter disgrace
To listen to David Lammy being interviewed by the BBC, it is as though the Islamist death cult known as Hamas bears absolutely no responsibility for the ongoing tragedy in Gaza. In the parallel universe occupied by our Foreign Secretary, it is seemingly not Hamas that started the war in Gaza by carrying out the worst massacre in Israel's history or bears responsibility for failing to agree a lasting ceasefire. It is not the terrorists who are to be blamed for disrupting the aid supply lines that are essential to preventing a humanitarian disaster. Instead, Lammy believes that the enduring catastrophe that has engulfed Gaza since the October 7 attacks in 2023 is the fault of the Israeli government and prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Commenting after the UK had joined 27 other countries, including Canada, France and Australia, in issuing a statement condemning Israel for depriving Palestinians in Gaza of their 'human dignity', Lammy's hyperbole knew no bounds as he declared he was 'sickened, appalled' by Israel's conduct and its 'grotesque' targeting of starving Palestinians. Lamenting the fact that the UK had neither the power nor influence to end the conflict, he warned he was prepared to impose further sanctions against Israel if hostilities did not end soon. Throughout this seemingly endless anti-Israel diatribe on the BBC, at no point did Lammy make any reference to Hamas, and the pernicious role the group has played in wilfully disrupting aid supplies to Palestinian civilians in Gaza. There was no condemnation of the campaign of tyranny Hamas continues to exercise over Gaza's civilian population, nor any mention of freezing the assets of the wealthy Hamas terrorist masterminds holed up in Qatar. This is despite mounting evidence that the Iranian-backed terrorist group is deliberately exacerbating the humanitarian crisis in the enclave for its own propaganda purposes. Hamas has been accused of targeting Palestinian civilians trying to obtain food and medical supplies provided by the US-sponsored Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. This is an aid organisation set up as an alternative to the UN-sponsored UNWRA, whose humanitarian efforts have been compromised by their links to Hamas. Videos are circulating online showing Hamas terrorists rounding up recipients of US aid, with some of them being tortured and killed. Meanwhile Israeli officials have released evidence that suggests that, far from blocking supplies, Israel has allowed 950 trucks to cross into Gaza to deliver aid, and the reason it has not been distributed is because too many of the UN-sponsored aid agencies are too busy criticising the Israelis to bother collecting it. In an active war zone like Gaza it is difficult to verify these conflicting narratives. But, at the very least, it is incumbent on the UK and other Western governments to try to bring some semblance of balance and proportion to highly inflammatory allegations, such as the claim that Israel is deliberately causing mass starvation among Palestinian civilians. This is clearly beyond Lammy's diplomatic skill set, with the Foreign Secretary apparently more interested in virtue signalling to Labour's hard-Left anti-Israel lobby than making any coherent effort to address the broader, and more complex, challenges raised by the Gaza crisis. By doing so, he is essentially propagating the same twisted anti-Israel agenda promoted by supporters of Palestine Action, the direct action group that Lammy and his ministerial colleagues have just proscribed as a terrorist organisation. No wonder the Israelis have responded to the latest international condemnation of their actions by Lammy and Co as being 'disconnected from reality'. If Britain and its co-signatories are genuinely committed to an 'unconditional and permanent ceasefire' in Gaza, as the statement insists, then they should concentrate their efforts on forcing Hamas and its backers in Iran to acknowledge the inevitable, and accept that the terrorist organisation's continued presence in Gaza must end. One of the biggest obstacles to the Trump administration's attempts to broker a lasting ceasefire in Gaza has been Hamas's determination to maintain operations in Gaza, irrespective of the scale of the defeat they suffer at the hands of the Israelis. If Hamas emerges from the conflict with just a fraction of its pre-war terrorist infrastructure intact, it will hail the achievement as a major victory. Israel, like any other country that has suffered atrocities on the scale committed on October 7, insists there will be no peace in Gaza so long as Hamas remains an active presence in the enclave. Allowing Hamas to retain any vestige of influence in the territory would simply place the Israeli people at risk of suffering yet another cataclysmic terrorist attack, which is why Netanyahu is so insistent that there can be no peace in Gaza so long as Hamas remains. The key to implementing a lasting ceasefire in Gaza is not indulging in more, utterly pointless, anti-Israel Lammyesque stunts. It is forcing Hamas and its backers that its reign of terror in the enclave is well and truly over.
