logo
Revisit the Last Major U.S. National Military Parade of 1991

Revisit the Last Major U.S. National Military Parade of 1991

Yahoo11-06-2025
Soldiers who served in the Gulf War march along the streets of Washington, D.C., on June 8, 1991. Credit - Mark Reinstein—Getty Images
To mark the 250th anniversary of the United States Army, Washington D.C. will play host to a national military parade on Saturday, June 14. The date also falls in line with President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, but the U.S. Army has said it has no plans to mark the occasion alongside the parade. Either way, the President is still expected to play a significant role in the celebrations.
But the event comes at a highly precarious time, amid nationwide protests which started in Los Angeles when people rallied against raids conducted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). After some of the protests descended into violence, Trump controversially deployed the National Guard and active-duty Marines to L.A. to quell the demonstrations. The move was made without a request from California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has since taken legal action against the Trump Administration.
Amid backlash, the 'No Kings' movement is expected to hold nationwide protests against Trump on Saturday, including in Arlington, Virginia, across the Potomac River from Washington, D.C.
Speaking at the Oval Office on Tuesday, Trump warned against people who planned to protest at the upcoming parade, telling reporters: "For those who want to protest, they're going to be met with very big force."
Read More: L.A. Protests Intensify as Police Report 'Mass Arrests' Despite Curfew, While Trump Says City Is 'Lucky' He Got Involved
Even prior to the recent escalated tension over immigration efforts, Trump's decision to hold the parade received criticism, especially from some Democratic lawmakers.
Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois, who is an Iraq War veteran, has called it an 'egotistical, nonsensical birthday parade.' While Sen. Adam Schiff of California described it as a 'dictator-style military parade' and accused Trump of spending millions of tax dollars to throw himself a 'birthday party.'
The upcoming parade is expected to cost around $45 million, including $16 million in damages to roads after tanks and other heavy vehicles tour the streets of Washington. It's set to be a grand affair, involving an estimated 6,500 U.S. troops, 150 vehicles, and 50 aircraft.
This is the first major national military parade in the U.S. since 1991. President George H. W. Bush held the event on June 8 that year, after the U.S. led a successful coalition in the Gulf War.
As the U.S. gets ready for Trump's much-discussed June 14 military parade, here's everything you need to know about the last one that took place 34 years ago.
The parade was held to celebrate the military success of the U.S.-led coalition in the Gulf War, which came to a conclusion in late February. The first phase of the war, named Operation Desert Shield, involved a military and personnel coalition in Saudi Arabia from August 1990 to January 1991, hashed out on the border with Kuwait which had been invaded by Iraq, under the eye of Saddam Hussein.
On Jan. 17, 1991, the war entered its second phase, Operation Desert Storm, in which the U.S-led coalition orchestrated an aerial and naval bombardment of Iraqi forces in Kuwait. This was followed by a ground operation, which lasted for five days, concluding on Feb. 28, with Kuwait liberated and Iraqi forces expelled.
On the evening that Desert Storm began, President Bush addressed the nation in a speech from the Oval Office, saying: 'I've told the American people before that this will not be another Vietnam, and I repeat this here tonight. Our troops will have the best possible support in the entire world, and they will not be asked to fight with one hand tied behind their back.'
He added: 'This is an historic moment. We have in this past year made great progress in ending the long era of conflict and cold war. We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order.'
But it wasn't only the Gulf War occupying the minds of Americans during the 1991 military parade.
Bill Allison, a professor of history at Georgia Southern University, says that the legacy of the Vietnam War, which ended in April 1975, was still very much felt.
'Vietnam was looming large in that rear-view mirror. Vietnam veterans didn't get a parade and the war was a hot mess,' he says. "[For symbolic reasons], there was also a group of Vietnam veterans invited to march in the 1991 parade and as Bush said, 'We've kicked the Vietnam syndrome.''
Connor Williams, a professor of history at Yale, says that this campaign changed the American mindset on the military. 'Desert Shield and Desert Storm provided a relationship with the military that had not been seen in a generation… The incredible swiftness and completeness of that victory left a lot to celebrate,' he notes.
The Gulf War was also the first major conflict in which the U.S. deployed a fully voluntary military force after conscriptions in both World Wars, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War.
'For the United States, [the parade] was a testament to the volunteer work force and that had been a very risky move at the time,' says Allison.
The parade is estimated to have cost around $12 million, which adjusted for inflation, translates to roughly £28 million today.
An estimated $5 million dollars in 1991 was raised by the volunteer Homecoming Foundation, established to support military personnel returning from the Gulf and to help coordinate the parade. Around 700 foundation volunteers were also present to help the clean-up operation.
Although, with roughly 8,000 troops marching through the streets of the nation's capital, the show of military might attracted a far smaller crowd than expected. Only 200,000 showed up to the parade early in the day, with numbers peaking later in the evening, when around 800,000 were present for the glittering fireworks display.
Whilst there were some, such as anti-war protesters and people concerned about the cost, who voiced disapproval over the parade, there didn't appear to be too much criticism from lawmakers, according to historians.
"One thing that will always unite politicians is supporting the troops, [even though] there's different opinions on how the troops should be supported," Williams says, adding that this sentiment can change if there is no notable military success to honor.
'In 1991, it was very much a campaign event for everybody. The salute Bush exchanged with Norman Schwarzkopf [a U.S. Army General during the Gulf War] was highly photographed. There was a [presidential] election the next year and there was a lot of B-roll happening because Bush and Democratic leaders wanted to be seen shaking hands and supporting the troops,' Williams says.
The only significant demonstration was a group of anti-war activists delivering speeches in Lafayette Park, on the opposite side of the White House to the parade, which went down Constitution Avenue.
In January 1991, during the conflict in Kuwait, thousands of protestors attended multiple anti-war demonstrations, centered around humanitarian worries.
Read More: Veterans Condemn Trump's 'Misuse of Military Power' Amid L.A. Protests
Experts tell TIME that, generally speaking, there are three key reasons behind military parades, including the one held in 1991:
Celebrating the troops
Rallying the public
Sending a message to other countries
'In 1991, it was more about rallying the people and celebrating the troops. To some extent, the U.S. didn't need to display power like the Soviets did. The power had already been displayed. People had been watching the capability of the U.S. military on the nightly news,' says Williams. 'Not everyone [tanks and personnel] rolled down Pennsylvania avenue to give off that effect. It was more a way for people to celebrate what they thought was emerging, a unipolar world.'
As for Trump's upcoming parade on June 14, Williams says that it "will be interesting" to see how U.S. strength is displayed anew. 'Will it be demonstrated in a peaceful way or in attack mode? How will the people respond?'
That remains to be seen.
Contact us at letters@time.com.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Commerce Dept. widens products subject to steel, aluminum tariffs
US Commerce Dept. widens products subject to steel, aluminum tariffs

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US Commerce Dept. widens products subject to steel, aluminum tariffs

(Reuters) -The Trump administration on Friday widened the reach of its 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports by adding hundreds of derivative products to the list of goods subject to the levies. In a Federal Register notice late on Friday, the Commerce Department said the Bureau of Industry and Security was adding 407 product codes to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States that identify the goods to be hit with the additional duties on the steel and aluminum content of those products. The non-steel and non-aluminum content will be subject to the tariff rates President Donald Trump has imposed on the goods originating from specific countries, the notice said. The levies on the goods on the expanded list go into effect on August 18. Earlier on Friday, Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One as he headed to a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska that he planned additional announcements on steel tariffs and on levies for semiconductor imports. (Reporting By Dan Burns; Editing by Leslie Adler) Sign in to access your portfolio

Intel stock is spiking after a report says the US government could buy a stake
Intel stock is spiking after a report says the US government could buy a stake

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Intel stock is spiking after a report says the US government could buy a stake

Intel stock jumped Friday on news that the Trump administration could be taking a stake. Trump recently criticized Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan over ties to China. The move: Intel stock surged on Friday, jumping as much as 5% to add to the gains logged in Thursday's session. Intel stock has been volatile this year, with the ailing chip maker lagging competitors like AMD and Nvidia, though the shares are still up 23% year-to-date. Why: The fresh momentum follows a report that the US government could take a stake in the company. Bloomberg reported that plans came about after a meeting between President Donald Trump and Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan. Details are still being assessed but sources said that the US government plans on paying for a stake in the company. The report follows news this month that the administration had struck deals with Nvidia and AMD that would see those firms pay 15% of their China chip revenues to the US government. Other examples of the government getting involved in private businesses include the US Department of Defense's plans to take an equity stake in MP Materials, a rare earth mining company. No details of the White House's deal with Intel have been formally announced. What it means: On August 7, Trump posted to Truth Social that Tan was "highly conflicted" and needed to resign immediately. Tan responded a few days later, defending his integrity and reaffirming that he remains committed to the company. A week later, Trump appears to have changed his stance on Tan and seems open to working with him. If the White House does acquire a stake in Intel, it could allow the company to expand its chip manufacturing in the US, helping it stay competitive in the key corner of the tech space. Once a pillar of the tech sector, Intel stock has shed almost half its value over the past five years, even as the artificial intelligence boom has sent demand for semiconductors soaring. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Putin and Trump conclude high-stakes summit over Ukraine war
Putin and Trump conclude high-stakes summit over Ukraine war

Los Angeles Times

time13 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Putin and Trump conclude high-stakes summit over Ukraine war

President Trump and Vladimir Putin held nearly three hours of talks over the prospects for a ceasefire in Ukraine on Friday, negotiating for hours at a U.S. air base in Alaska over the future of Russia's military campaign, a war of conquest that has resulted in Europe's bloodiest conflict since World War had said before the summit he would know if Putin was serious about peace within minutes of their meeting. Yet, before the talks began, the Russian leader, a global pariah since launching his full-scale invasion of Ukraine three years ago, received a red carpet arrival on American soil and a greeting of applause from the U.S. president. It was an extraordinary welcome for Putin, whose government has called the United States an 'enemy state' and who faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court over war crimes in Ukraine. Putin's war has led to 1.4 million casualties, according to independent analysts, including 1 million dead and wounded among Russian soldiers alone.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store