RTE funds from centre to states need not be linked to NEP: Madras HC
CHENNAI: In a significant ruling, the Madras High Court has held that the centre's obligation to disburse its share of funds to Tamil Nadu towards reimbursement of fees for students admitted in private schools under the Right to Education (RTE) Act is an independent responsibility and it need not be linked with the implementation of the National Education Policy 2020 (NEP).
The state government has the non-derogable obligation to reimburse the fee to private unaided schools, and non-receipt of funds from the centre cannot be cited as a reason to wriggle out of that statutory obligation, the court said.
A division bench of Justices GR Swaminathan and V Lakshminarayanan issued the ruling while disposing of a PIL petition by Coimbatore-based activist V Eswaran praying for directions to the TN government to begin admissions under the RTE Act for 2025-26.
The court observed that the obligation under the RTE Act is independent by itself. It referred to Section 7 of the Act that says that the central and state governments will have concurrent responsibility to provide funds for implementing the provisions of the Act.
Section 7(3) also mandates that the centre provide the state government a specific percentage of expenditure referred under sub-section 2 as grant-in-aid from time-to-time in consultation with state governments, the bench noted.
'Therefore, funds payable to the state government, representing the central government's share, towards discharging the RTE Act obligations need not be linked to NEP-2020,' the court said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
14 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Restore Section 13 on loan waivers in Disaster Management Act, CM writes to PM
Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan on Thursday wrote a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi seeking his intervention to restore Section 13 of the Disaster Management Act related to relief in loan repayment for victims of disaster. Mr. Vijayan pointed out in the letter that the removal of this Section, which was included in the law with purely humanitarian considerations, will further distress the victims of natural disasters. The Chief Minister wrote to the Prime Minister in the context of the Union Government informing the Kerala High Court that the law does not allow the loan waiver of the victims of the Mundakkai-Chooralmala landslides in Wayanad district, citing the amendment made in March 2025 to the Disaster Management Act. Section 13, which the Union government omitted as part of an amendment, reads — 'The National Authority may, in cases of disasters of severe magnitude, recommend relief in repayment of loans or for grant of fresh loans to the persons affected by disaster on such concessional terms as may be appropriate.' 'The above Section enables providing much needed financial relief to victims of disasters, who face unprecedented crisis and will have to rebuild their lives after incurring heavy losses. The said provision in the Disaster Management Act was included with a humanitarian intent and deleting the same amounts to putting the victims of natural disasters to added hardship,' wrote Mr. Vijayan. The CM's office said in a press release that Kerala had submitted its first memorandum to the Union government on August 17, 2024, immediately after the disaster. In addition to the memorandum, a Post-Disaster Needs Assessment was conducted and a detailed report was submitted to the Union Government on November 13, 2024. On both these occasions, Section 13 of the Disaster Management Act was in force. However, it was only much later, March 29, 2025, that the Union Government issued a gazette notification amending the Act by deleting this Section. This amendment does not have retrospective effect. Yet the Union government is taking the position that since the Act has been amended, it cannot provide assistance anymore, said the release.
Indian Express
43 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Beed caste atrocity shows we are still far away from achieving caste equality
Written by Neeraj Bunkar On June 4, a chilling incident in Beed district, Maharashtra, again laid bare the persistent scourge of caste-based violence in India. Vaibhav Khandagale, a Dalit man, was brutally assaulted by a mob of 10–12 'upper caste' Maratha men, some of whom were his classmates and supposedly friends. The attack, driven by casteist hatred, was not just an assault on Vaibhav's body, but also an affront to the principles of equality enshrined in our Constitution. The SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, enacted on September 11, 1989, was designed to protect marginalised communities from caste-based discrimination and violence. It defines atrocities as 'offences' committed against Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) by non-SC/ST individuals, including acts like physical assault, humiliation, and the denial of rights. Section 3(1)(r) of the Act, cited in the FIR registered by Vaibhav in Beed, addresses intentional insults or intimidation meant to humiliate SC/ST members in public view, punishable with imprisonment from six months to five years and a fine. Section 3(1)(s) covers abuses using casteist slurs, while Section 3(2) (va) enhances penalties for offences under the Indian Penal Code (now Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023). The FIR, registered under multiple sections of the BNS, 2023 (Section 119(1) for causing hurt, Section 333 for cheating, and Section 351(2) for criminal force), alongside SC/ST Act provisions, reflects the gravity of the incident. However, the response from local authorities raises serious concerns about the Act's enforcement. Vaibhav's brother, Dhananjay, according to reports, alleges that the police delayed registering the FIR, forcing the family to wait hours at the Shirur Kasar police station. Even after persistent pressure, the police initially resisted including critical BNS sections related to attempted murder. Shockingly, a counter-complaint was reportedly filed by the wife of the main accused, falsely alleging theft and threats by Vaibhav's family. This case mirrors broader trends documented by the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB). In 2022, India recorded 57,582 cases of atrocities against SCs, up from 50,291 in 2020. Maharashtra alone reported 2,743 cases in 2022, a steady rise from 2,569 in 2020. Uttar Pradesh topped the list with 15,368 cases, followed by Rajasthan (8,752) and Madhya Pradesh (7,733). In Maharashtra, however, the conviction rates for these crimes remain alarmingly low, undermining the Act's purpose. For SCs, the conviction rate was a mere 8.8 per cent in 2018, dipping to 7.2 per cent in 2019, rising slightly to 11.8 per cent in 2020, then falling again to 10.7 per cent in 2021 and 8.9 per cent in 2022. For STs, the rates were similarly dismal: 11.3 per cent in 2018, 11.9 per cent in 2019, 12.5 per cent in 2020, 11.8 per cent in 2021, and 12.8 per cent in 2022. By the end of 2022, 14,504 cases involving crimes against SCs and 4,149 against STs were still pending trial in Maharashtra, reflecting a backlog that delays justice for victims. The Act mandates robust mechanisms like Special Courts and Special Public Prosecutors to ensure speedy trials (Sections 14 and 15). It also prohibits anticipatory bail (Section 18) and mandates state governments to provide legal aid and rehabilitation (Section 21). Yet, Dhananjay's account of delayed police response, insensitive officers, and hospital negligence in initiating a medico-legal case highlights a gap between the law's intent and its execution. The Beed incident also exposes the social and political pressures that undermine justice. The Act's provisions for externment (Section 10) and forfeiture of property (Section 7) could deter such intimidation, but their application remains rare. The collective silence of 200 villagers during the assault further illustrates the social boycott faced by Dalit families. The SC/ST Act remains a vital shield for India's marginalised, but its effectiveness hinges on impartial enforcement and societal change. Without systemic reforms — stronger police accountability, proactive legal aid, and widespread awareness — the Act risks remaining a paper promise, leaving countless Vaibhavs vulnerable to the enduring shadow of caste. The writer is a research scholar at Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Karnataka Labour Minister Calls for United Effort to Eradicate Child Labour
Bengaluru: Karnataka Labour Minister Santhosh Lad has urged officials and citizens alike to commit themselves to the complete eradication of child labour across the state. He said society must not entertain expectations of labour from children whose rightful place is in schools and playgrounds. Speaking at an event organised to mark World Day Against Child Labour near the Mahatma Gandhi statue on MG Road, the minister said, "The observance of this day should not be limited to a symbolic annual event. Every two months, Deputy Commissioners, Police Superintendents, and Chief Executive Officers of all districts must carry out awareness campaigns and enforcement drives to identify child labourers, especially in dhabas, hotels, factories, shops, and malls." Mr. Lad underlined that children found working in such establishments must be rescued, rehabilitated, and re-integrated into the education system. 'No child should be deprived of education. This is a primary objective of the government,' he said. The minister pointed out that child and adolescent labourers are most often found in remote or informal setups like home-based industries or small workshops, where regulatory oversight is limited. These areas, he said, require targeted interventions to detect and rescue child workers. He further blamed a flawed education system for indirectly encouraging the continuation of child labour. "Unless every citizen actively participates in this movement, the government alone cannot eliminate the scourge of child labour,' Mr. Lad said, calling for community-level vigilance and cooperation. Highlighting Karnataka's early response to the issue, he said the state had become the first in India to launch a Child Labour Eradication Action Plan back in 2001. The state's multi-departmental task forces now include 11 government departments ranging from labour and education to social welfare and industry. These task forces conduct joint field visits in 22 districts to identify, rescue, and rehabilitate children. Strong Legal Provisions Against Child Labour Reiterating that employing children is a punishable offence, Lad cited the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, amended in 2016. Under the law, first-time offenders may face six months to two years in prison and fines ranging from ₹20,000 to ₹50,000. Repeat offences could attract up to three years' imprisonment. Parents or guardians involved in such violations are also liable for penalties. However, the minister clarified that the law's intention is not to instil fear, but to foster awareness and ensure that children receive fair opportunities for growth and education. In the past three years, the state has conducted 1,02,213 inspections, rescued 2,084 children, and filed 705 cases under child labour laws. Lad cited data from the International Labour Organisation, which estimates that over 138 million children globally are engaged in child labour, including around 33 million in India. "This is an alarming reflection of our social priorities. We cannot claim to be humane while allowing such exploitation to persist,' he said. The Minister encouraged the public to report any incidents of child labour through the 24/7 Childline helpline 1098. Over one lakh complaints have already been received via this channel, prompting necessary action from the Labour Department, he added. Film actress Aditi Prabhudeva, who also spoke at the event, urged citizens to look beyond blaming the government and instead contribute through small personal initiatives. 'Even paying a struggling student's school fees can be a step towards ending child labour,' she said. The event included an awareness rally jointly flagged off by Minister Lad and Ms. Prabhudeva. Labour Commissioner Dr H.N. Gopalakrishna administered an anti-child labour pledge.
