Beaverdale business shutting down after 50 years
DES MOINES, Iowa — A Beaverdale business announced it would be shutting down after over 50 years in business.
The self-described travel boutique, Back Country, located at 2702 Beaver Avenue announced in a post on Instagram that it would be closing its doors due to debt.
Iowa State Fair teases another Grandstand act
In 1974 Jamie and Diana Wornson opened the first Back Country store in Ames, and 10 years later in 1990 opened the Beaverdale location. Since then, the Ames location has closed, but Back Country has become a historic fixture of the Beaverdale neighborhood, according to the store's website.
Owner Jay Kozel said in the Instagram post that the wave of support since the announcement has been overwhelming, and he's grateful to the community.
An exact close date has not been released.
Metro News:
Beaverdale business shutting down after 50 years
Urbandale School District will remain in the CIML
Fire breaks out at Des Moines duplex early Tuesday morning
'Picture of perseverance': Marshalltown man's legacy lives on 100+ years later in historically African-American school
Valley's first Black principal stepping down after 20 years
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Evonik Industries AG (ETR:EVK) Could Be Worth Watching
Let's talk about the popular Evonik Industries AG (ETR:EVK). The company's shares received a lot of attention from a substantial price movement on the XTRA over the last few months, increasing to €22.25 at one point, and dropping to the lows of €17.81. Some share price movements can give investors a better opportunity to enter into the stock, and potentially buy at a lower price. A question to answer is whether Evonik Industries' current trading price of €19.38 reflective of the actual value of the large-cap? Or is it currently undervalued, providing us with the opportunity to buy? Let's take a look at Evonik Industries's outlook and value based on the most recent financial data to see if there are any catalysts for a price change. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Evonik Industries appears to be expensive according to our price multiple model, which makes a comparison between the company's price-to-earnings ratio and the industry average. In this instance, we've used the price-to-earnings (PE) ratio given that there is not enough information to reliably forecast the stock's cash flows. We find that Evonik Industries's ratio of 30.2x is above its peer average of 21.56x, which suggests the stock is trading at a higher price compared to the Chemicals industry. In addition to this, it seems like Evonik Industries's share price is quite stable, which could mean two things: firstly, it may take the share price a while to fall back down to an attractive buying range, and secondly, there may be less chances to buy low in the future once it reaches that value. This is because the stock is less volatile than the wider market given its low beta. View our latest analysis for Evonik Industries Investors looking for growth in their portfolio may want to consider the prospects of a company before buying its shares. Buying a great company with a robust outlook at a cheap price is always a good investment, so let's also take a look at the company's future expectations. With profit expected to more than double over the next couple of years, the future seems bright for Evonik Industries. It looks like higher cash flow is on the cards for the stock, which should feed into a higher share valuation. Are you a shareholder? It seems like the market has well and truly priced in EVK's positive outlook, with shares trading above industry price multiples. However, this brings up another question – is now the right time to sell? If you believe EVK should trade below its current price, selling high and buying it back up again when its price falls towards the industry PE ratio can be profitable. But before you make this decision, take a look at whether its fundamentals have changed. Are you a potential investor? If you've been keeping an eye on EVK for a while, now may not be the best time to enter into the stock. The price has surpassed its industry peers, which means it is likely that there is no more upside from mispricing. However, the positive outlook is encouraging for EVK, which means it's worth diving deeper into other factors in order to take advantage of the next price drop. With this in mind, we wouldn't consider investing in a stock unless we had a thorough understanding of the risks. While conducting our analysis, we found that Evonik Industries has 2 warning signs and it would be unwise to ignore them. If you are no longer interested in Evonik Industries, you can use our free platform to see our list of over 50 other stocks with a high growth potential. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Cosmopolitan
34 minutes ago
- Cosmopolitan
The tragic true story of Titan: The OceanGate Disaster and the submersible implosion
On 18 June 2023, five passengers descended into the Atlantic Ocean in the hopes of seeing the famed wreckage of the doomed Titanic. They would have been prepared to see something incredible from the viewpoint of the Titan, the submersible they were travelling in. Instead, the ship's carbon fibre was struggling to uphold against the ocean's enormous pressure, and Titan imploded at supersonic speeds. All five passengers on board were instantly killed. A four-day search and rescue mission took place, with the remainder of what was left of the Titan found on the ocean floor, shredded. Netflix's latest series, Titan: The OceanGate Disaster now looks to explore this tragedy in granular detail, focusing on billionaire Stockton Rush – the man behind the submersible, who also perished onboard his own creation. Here's everything you need to know. The new Netflix documentary looks at the rise of OceanGate, an American company that wanted to launch deep sea tourism. Founded by Stockton Rush and Guillermo Söhnlein in 2009, the company built two submersible vessels – one of which being the infamous Titan. Söhnlein left the company in 2013. Rush, meanwhile, was the charismatic face of the brand. 'There's a huge demand for unique travel experiences,' he said in 2017. 'We will be profitable from the Titanic trips.' Born into a wealthy family, Rush was an American businessman with a taste for adventure. He started scuba diving aged 12 and acquired a pilot's licence when he was 18. He initially thought about being an air force pilot, but was rejected for his eyesight not being good enough. In 2006, after he went on his first submarine excursion, Rush began to toy with the idea of deep sea travel, and hoped to tap into the growing demand for adventure tourism. He wanted to build submersibles that went far deeper under the sea than other commercial submersibles. Speaking to The Independent in 2017, Rush explained: 'Shallow dives equal shallow experience. The commercial subs out there are like a Disneyland ride versus paddling yourself through the Grand Canyon. Knowing you're there changes how you observe it.' Understandably, there are strict regulations for submersible travel, which Rush previously criticised. He once decried the Passenger Vessel Safety Act of 1993 as 'needlessly prioritis[ing] passenger safety over commercial innovation'. Rush also spoke passionately about the 'move fast and break things' culture typically attributed to start-ups. At the 2022 GeekWire summit, he told audiences: 'If you're not breaking things, you're not innovating. If you're operating within a known environment, as most submersible manufacturers do, they don't break things. To me, the more stuff you've broken, the more innovative you've been.' Speaking of his former co-founder, Guillermo Söhnlein told Vanity Fair: 'I think [Rush] did see himself in the same vein as these disruptive innovators. Like Thomas Edison, or any of these guys who just found a way of pushing humanity forward for the good of humanity — not necessarily for himself. He didn't need the money. He certainly didn't need to work and spend hundreds of hours on OceanGate. You know, he was doing this to help humanity. At least that's what I think was personally driving him.' The deep-sea vessel, built by OceanGate, was to focus on diving as far as 3,800 meters below sea level to visit the wreckage of the Titanic. What made it different to other submersibles, usually comprised of titanium or steel in order to withstand the extreme levels of external pressure that are attributed to deep-sea diving, was that the Titan had a filament-wound carbon fibre hull. This material made the submersible lighter and more cost effective – but was not as reliable and could fail when too much pressure was applied. Rush was told this by numerous employees and experts in the field, who warned of potential 'catastrophic' issues, but nothing was done to amend the submersible. Titan was also not 'classed', which meant that it did not undergo formal safety inspections or meet the standards of established classification societies. In 2019, OceanGate explained why this was the case. In a press release, the company said: 'Bringing an outside entity up to speed on every innovation before it is put into real-world testing is anathema to rapid innovation.' The submersible was also controlled by a modified video game controller, with the 'pilot' receiving instructions from the surface vessel above through a text-based messaging system. No real training was required before getting on board, with any training needed to take part being provided online. However, those who paid for their seat on the submersible (a princely sum of up to $250,000, or £195,000), were expected to sign a detailed waiver that said that going on the Titan could 'result in physical injury, disability, emotional trauma or death'. Despite numerous warnings, Titan launched in 2021 with its first dive to the Titanic's wreckage. Between 2021 and 2022, the submersible made 23 dives, with 13 of these managing to reach the wreckage. On its final outing, the Titan was just 1600m away from the bow of the Titanic. Onboard the Titan's final voyage on 18 June were: Stockton Rush – 61 – OceanGate CEO Paul-Henri Nargeolet – 77 – deep sea explorer and Titanic expert Hamish Harding – 58 – businessman Shahzada Dawood – 48 – businessman Suleman Dawood – 19 – university student and Dawood's son Originally Christine Dawood was meant to be going on the dive. However, she reportedly gave up her seat for her son, because he expressed an interest in going on the trip. He reportedly took a Rubik's cube on Titan, as he hoped he would be able to break a world record while seeing the wreckage. Rear Admiral John Mauger explained in a press conference after the Titan was found that the wreckage was consistent with a 'catastrophic loss of the pressure chamber.' Effectively, the carbon fibre material could not withstand the external pressure of a deep sea dive. When the submersible did not reemerge at its scheduled time, the US coast guard was notified. Titan only had 96 hours of breathable air supply for its five passengers when it set out, which added a time pressure to finding those onboard. Four days later, on 22 June, debris from the Titan submersible was found by the US coast guard, near the Titanic's wreckage. All planned excursions by the company were immediately cancelled, with its main office closed the day the Titan wreckage was found. On 6 July, all business operations were suspended, with OceanGate now only serving as a legal entity. The family of French explorer Paul-Henri Nargeolet filed a $50 million wrongful death lawsuit against OceanGate in August 2024. The US Coast Guard launched an investigation, which also led to a public hearing in September 2024. During this time, former employees testified saying they warned of the submersible's safety. US court documents show OceanGate's former operations director David Lochridge had significant concerns with the Titan's design, including that it was made from carbon fibre which he warned would damage further with every dive. Titan: The OceanGate Disaster is available to watch on Netflix now Kimberley Bond is a Multiplatform Writer for Harper's Bazaar, focusing on the arts, culture, careers and lifestyle. She previously worked as a Features Writer for Cosmopolitan UK, and has bylines at The Telegraph, The Independent and British Vogue among countless others.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump tariffs may remain in effect during appeals process, court rules
President Donald Trump's tariffs will remain in effect, for now, a federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday night. The president's 'Liberation Day' tariffs may stay in place during the appeal process while the court considers the legality of the measures. The federal decision temporarily reverses a lower court's ruling that found Trump had overstepped his authority, according to Reuters. The decision applies to broad-based tariffs affecting most U.S. trading partners, as well as targeted duties on imports from Canada, China, and Mexico amid ongoing pressure for them to do more to stop the illegal flow of immigrants and synthetic opioids across the U.S. border, the Associated Press reported. The court has not yet ruled on whether Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs is lawful, but agreed to pause the lower court's decision while it hears arguments, which are scheduled for July 31. Trump is the first U.S. president to use IEEPA, a 1977 law historically used to impose sanctions on enemies of the U.S., to impose tariffs. Tuesday's ruling follows a May 28 decision by the U.S. Court of International Trade, which held that the Constitution grants Congress — not the president — the power to impose taxes and tariffs. The tariffs have created turbulence for global markets and American businesses, many of which have struggled to adjust supply chains and pricing strategies amid shifting policy. The ruling on Tuesday does not impact tariffs implemented under separate legal frameworks, which include those on steel and aluminum.
