
AI Agents Vs. Human Oversight: The Case For A Hybrid Approach
There has been a huge amount of doomsaying about the "AI takeover" and how machines are set to replace humans. In reality, however, this is not going to happen.
Of course, it's understandable that AI anxiety is mounting, especially with the advent of more autonomous solutions in the form of agentic AI. Deloitte predicted that 25% of companies using GenAI will start piloting agentic AI, and this figure is set to double by 2027.
While AI's role in shifting industries and professions is undeniable—an April 2025 report from the UN stated that AI could impact 40% of worldwide jobs—we must remember that these tools simply won't be able to replicate certain things. For instance, AI's ability to think independently will never match that of a human's, and human oversight cannot be removed from the equation.
Rather than seeing it as "man vs. machine," we must acknowledge AI's limitations as well as its ability to augment human intelligence, not replace it.
Smart isn't always enough.
What sets agentic AI apart is its ability to act autonomously, but let's not forget that autonomy is not synonymous with independence. All AI tools, including agentic AI, are bound by external controls: the data they're fed and continuously learn from.
AI agents may be the closest digital replica of human autonomy that we have yet, but they still require extensive training and testing through data to function. Their surrounding information ecosystem completely shapes their capabilities to be proactive, act autonomously and change their behaviors. It doesn't help that a significant number of organizations struggle with achieving quality data, and their AI solutions are at the mercy of that.
Another pain point I repeatedly see wreaking havoc is a failure to build the right architecture, leaving organizations and their AI tools vulnerable to risks like cybersecurity threats. Security breaches expose AI agents to cyberattackers' malicious manipulations—something we don't tend to worry about for humans.
Organizations can't avert these risks without a human touch. Human oversight will always be needed to mitigate failures and breaches when they occur as well as guide AI agents on strategic follow-throughs for best business outcomes.
AI can execute, but only humans can lead.
Digital environments don't restrain people like they do AI agents. We're not entirely dependent on the data we're fed, and it's our innate ability to think both creatively and critically that sets us apart from everything else on the planet. AI agents will never be able to match the human ability to think creatively, make strategic decisions and critically assess any given situation.
Humans also have an edge in adaptability and flexibility that machines simply don't. For instance, softer skills like open-mindedness, "thinking outside the box" and our ability to determine right from wrong are traits that can't just be programmed into a tool.
The role of humans in a world of AI is to act as the custodians and ensure AI tools are sticking to ethical and legal guidelines. We set the standards these tools must follow, and ultimately, the final decision rests with us.
The human touch is also crucial for ensuring accountability with agentic AI use, particularly for security considerations like accountability and distinguishing a genuine user from a covert threat.
While agentic AI is designed to autonomously decide and act on complex processes to a certain degree, people still need to take the lead on making sure these decisions and actions align with wider strategic goals. Humans are going to remain at the helm when it comes to leading companies and making those final decisions about strategic direction. Agents are simply a means of advancing our way to achieving our goals.
How can businesses build a collaborative framework?
Crucially, not every AI agent's task will require constant human input, and vice versa. Research from MIT found that a human-AI collaboration isn't the silver bullet to overhauling workflows to maximize efficiency and accuracy. However, a distinct pattern was established: Humans excelled at subtasks requiring emotional intelligence and contextual understanding, whereas AI's strength was in repetitive and data-driven processes.
The most promising scenario where that collaboration between man and machine (GenAI, specifically) really shines is in iterative processes, like creating content or drafting and editing written pieces.
For businesses to stay on top of risks, drive accuracy and profitability and empower their teams' productivity, they should start building the blueprint for a collaborative framework between AI and people. Here are some starting points for doing just that:
Identify which tasks can be allocated to AI agents and which ones absolutely need human judgment and supervision. This is also where businesses can establish KPIs and goals around agentic AI adoption to help guide the collaborative framework. For instance, time-consuming and labor-intensive tasks could be slashed significantly with an AI agent's input.
Remember that someone might need to unexpectedly step in. Make sure workflows are designed to allow for easy and swift human intervention in case of a system error or failure that undermines the AI agent. Organizations should also foster transparency and accountability by ensuring humans can audit and trace AI decisions.
Bridge technology and skills gaps so employees feel confident working alongside AI tools. Teams need to know what they're working with and should be familiar with AI agents' limitations and strengths. Another aspect crucial to mitigating security risks is embedding ethical and regulatory guidelines among teams so they can ensure AI agents are being responsibly deployed.
Alongside that, organizations must nurture cultures of continuous learning and growth, where teams keep a pulse on performance and adjust strategies accordingly for best outcomes.
AI isn't here to replace us but to work with us. The future belongs to those who can strike the right balance between human ingenuity and machine efficiency.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Wire
3 hours ago
- Business Wire
Wolters Kluwer ELM Solutions Wins Raft of Awards Celebrating Legal AI Technology and Product Innovations
HOUSTON, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Wolters Kluwer ELM Solutions' AI-powered legal solutions have been recognized with the Business Intelligence Group's award for Artificial Intelligence Excellence in the Law Organization category. The honor is one of multiple awards that ELM Solutions received in 2025 celebrating the business' technology solutions and customer service. Raja Sengupta, Executive Vice President and General Manager of Wolters Kluwer ELM Solutions: 'These awards reflect the strength of our investment in driving continuous innovation across the legal ecosystem. We are pleased to be recognized for our contributions that empower legal professionals with the technology and insights needed to better manage legal matters, control spend and drive more successful legal engagements.' Awards won in 2025 feature plaudits for LegalVIEW DynamicInsights, ELM Solutions' innovative new legal rate solution. Enhancements to LegalCollaborator introducing reverse auction functionality and GenAI-enabled RFP summarization capabilities were also celebrated. Highlights from ELM Solutions' 2025 awards successes include: The Globee Awards for Achievement celebrated LegalVIEW DynamicInsights – ELM Solutions' new interactive legal rate solution – with a gold award in the program's Legal Technology Solutions category. Additionally, the business' TyMetrix 360° and Passport platforms garnered a gold award in the Enterprise Legal Management software category. ELM Solutions was recognized with a gold award in the Globee's Vendor Management Software category. LegalCollaborator, the business' innovative legal engagement and competitive bidding software, was honored alongside AI-powered legal spend management solution LegalVIEW BillAnalyzer. LegalCollaborator was also bestowed a silver award in the Stevie Award for Technology Excellence program's New Product of the Year, Business Technology category. The ELM Solutions team's commitment to outstanding customer support was recognized in the Law Organization category of the Business Intelligence Group's Excellence in Customer Service Award. Additionally, the Stevie Award for Sales and Customer Service celebrated ELM Solutions in its Front Line Customer Service Team of the Year – Technology Industries category. For more information about Wolters Kluwer, please visit: About Wolters Kluwer Wolters Kluwer (EURONEXT: WKL) is a global leader in information, software solutions and services for professionals in healthcare; tax and accounting; financial and corporate compliance; legal and regulatory; corporate performance and ESG. We help our customers make critical decisions every day by providing expert solutions that combine deep domain knowledge with technology and services. Wolters Kluwer reported 2024 annual revenues of €5.9 billion. The group serves customers in over 180 countries, maintains operations in over 40 countries, and employs approximately 21,600 people worldwide. The company is headquartered in Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands. For more information, visit follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube and Instagram.


Entrepreneur
5 hours ago
- Entrepreneur
Funding & Infra Gaps Persist as India's GenAI Ecosystem Accelerates: Report
The data indicates that startups in this space raised USD 990 million in the first half of 2025, a 30 per cent year-on-year increase. You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. India's generative AI (GenAI) ecosystem is in the midst of rapid expansion but faces a widening funding gap at scale, according to The Nasscom GenAI Startup Landscape Report 2025, launched at FutureForge 2025 with Hitachi Digital Services. The data indicates that startups in this space raised USD 990 million in the first half of 2025, a 30 per cent year-on-year increase. According to the report, the funding growth, however, is concentrated at the early stage, with late-stage rounds continuing to shrink as investors remain cautious. Founders cite high compute costs and infrastructure challenges as the top reasons why larger rounds remain elusive, even as startup activity surges. Rajesh Nambiar, President, Nasscom, said that GenAI startups have the potential to shape the future of AI innovation for emerging markets and beyond. "The next leap will depend on how effectively the ecosystem can come together to unlock capital, scale compute access, and nurture world-class talent. With collective action, India can transform its GenAI momentum into a lasting global leadership position, creating AI solutions that are trusted, inclusive, and transformative for billions worldwide," said Nambiar. The ecosystem now counts over 890 GenAI startups, a 3.7X jump in the past year. The total number of ventures has risen 2.8X in 12 months, while patents filed have increased 1.7X. More than 83 per cent of startups are application-focused, building vertical AI and SaaS solutions for regulated sectors such as BFSI, healthcare, and legal. The funding lag behind global peers underscores a critical need for structural interventions. Nasscom report recommends a national GenAI strategy, including co-funding models, tax incentives, subsidized compute infrastructure via a National AI Compute Grid, and regulatory sandboxes. A "government as first customer" approach, it argues, could help de-risk innovation and accelerate commercialization. With Agentic AI emerging as the next big frontier, driving orchestration, workflow automation, and enterprise AI agents, India's startups have a chance to build global leadership. But to achieve it, the ecosystem must close the funding gap and overcome infrastructure bottlenecks that currently hold back scale.


Forbes
5 hours ago
- Forbes
The AI Revolution: A Boon Or Bane For Jobs And The Environment?
Vaibhav Dani, CEO of Map Communications. Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping industries, offering both significant benefits and challenges. AI can automate tasks, drive scientific progress, boost productivity and create new jobs, but it also risks displacing workers and increasing energy consumption. In this article, I will examine the dual impact of AI on employment and the environment. As an AI and GenAI professional who collaborates with academia and industry to deliver innovative, ethical and scalable solutions, this is a space I'm eager to share my insights on. AI's Dual Impact On Employment: Creation Versus Eradication AI's rapid advancement has ignited both hope and anxiety in the global labor market. Will AI create more jobs than it destroys, or vice versa? The impact of automation and AI depends on societal adaptation. While routine jobs may disappear, as evidenced by this year's job losses, I believe those with relevant skills can find new opportunities. But we must manage this transition effectively. In fact, Goldman Sachs estimates that up to 300 million jobs could be affected or lost due to AI and automation over the next decade, raising concerns about unemployment. This calls for robust worker retraining and education efforts worldwide. AI-driven automation is touching several sectors while simultaneously creating opportunities for advancement in other areas. The following are some of the observations I've made throughout the industry: • Manufacturing And Warehousing: Robots and AI are handling more repetitive tasks. However, I've seen a growing demand for skilled technicians to manage automated equipment. • Creative Industries: Generative AI is raising concerns among creative professionals about job security, as it can quickly produce content but lacks genuine creativity and originality. While AI can assist with brainstorming and editing, new roles, such as prompt engineers, are emerging. • Healthcare: Artificial intelligence can be used in diagnostics and administration, potentially impacting roles like medical scribes, while generating new needs for AI ethicists and clinical data analysts. • Customer Service: AI chatbots handle many customer inquiries, but they often lack empathy. As a result, organizations typically use them for routine questions and rely on humans for complex or sensitive issues. • Finance And Administrative Roles: AI can streamline tasks such as data entry, bookkeeping and loan approvals in banking, potentially reducing clerical jobs while creating new positions, including AI compliance officers and data scientists. Past technologies, such as the steam engine and computers, created new employment opportunities. I expect AI to do the same. While AI may not lead to widespread unemployment, I believe it will reshape work, requiring policymakers and businesses to support worker adaptation through upskilling. AI brings efficiency, cost savings and new capabilities to many industries, while also disrupting jobs and presenting ethical concerns. The key challenge is to maximize benefits while managing risks, such as job loss and bias. Environmental Implications Of AI Technologies Beyond the human workforce, AI's exponential growth is reverberating through the environment. Modern AI, especially the resource-intensive deep learning variety, relies on massive data centers and computing power. These data centers are essentially the "factories" of the AI age, drawing enormous amounts of electricity and water while also creating demand for energy-intensive hardware manufacturing. AI's rapid expansion has significant environmental impacts, chiefly due to the enormous energy and water requirements of data centers. In 2024, these centers consumed approximately 415 terawatt hours, roughly 1.5% of global electricity. Alongside this footprint, AI also creates electronic waste. However, AI also serves as a tool for sustainability. It can enhance energy efficiency in industries, facilitate utilities' power management and promote environmental monitoring and conservation through advanced data analysis. AI aids climate science by enhancing energy efficiency and streamlining energy use. Ultimately, the ecological outcome hinges on us as business leaders making choices like using renewable energy, increasing hardware efficiency and applying AI to support sustainability. Conclusion The global adoption of artificial intelligence is a story of paradoxes. On the one hand, it promises dramatic efficiency and transformative tools, yet it also disrupts jobs and strains the environment. Rather than eliminating jobs, AI must reshape them, demanding new skills and driving the need for strategic policies such as retraining and education. Organizations that utilize AI to empower, rather than replace, workers will experience greater innovation. Navigating this revolution responsibly requires careful policy, support for adaptation and a focus on using technology to benefit people. Environmentally, AI can drive up resource use but also help reduce it. The rise of data centers for AI highlights the need for sustainable technology, including renewable energy and efficient chips. Focusing on optimized models over larger ones and applying AI for clean energy and conservation can let businesses prioritize their sustainability goals. In this pivotal moment, the world stands to gain immensely from AI's capabilities; however, the benefits are not guaranteed to be equitable or sustainable. A balanced approach is essential. Policymakers, industry leaders and communities must collaborate to establish guidelines for the responsible deployment of AI, share the economic benefits of this new technology broadly and mitigate environmental costs. AI is a tool—arguably the most powerful tool humanity has ever had—and like any tool, it can build or break depending on how it's used. Our collective choices will ultimately shape the global implications of AI adoption. By learning from early examples, listening to expert warnings and proactively addressing AI's challenges, humanity can strive to ensure that this revolution becomes more boon than bane for both society and our planet. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?