logo
Another sex toy thrown onto WNBA court, this time appears to hit Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham

Another sex toy thrown onto WNBA court, this time appears to hit Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham

CTV Newsa day ago
A sex toy was thrown onto the court during an WNBA game between the Los Angeles Sparks and the Indiana Fever on Tuesday, the third such incident which has impacted the league over the past week.
In the second quarter at Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles, a green toy was thrown in the direction of Fever guard Sophie Cunningham.
The 28-year-old had previously asked people to stop throwing such objects earlier this week on social media but appeared to be struck on the leg by the toy during Tuesday's game.
'this did NOT age well,' she wrote on X after the game, replying to her own previous post calling for spectators to stop throwing sex toys on the court.
She also posted a message on her Instagram Stories, saying: 'No way that thing actually hit me. I knew I shouldn't have tweeted that.'
Tuesday's game was only halted very briefly following the incident.
After Sparks guard Kelsey Plum kicked the toy off the court, fans around the arena could be heard booing and seen pointing towards who they thought had thrown the object.
It's unclear if the perpetrator was ever identified or if any disciplinary action has been taken.
CNN Sports has also reached out to the WNBA, the Los Angeles Sparks, and the Indiana Fever for comment.
'I think it's ridiculous, it's dumb, it's stupid,' Sparks coach Lynne Roberts told reporters after her team's 100-91 win.
'It's also dangerous and players' safety is No. 1. Respecting the game. All those things. I think it's really stupid.'
Copycat behaviour
Tuesday's incident comes after two similar occurrences in the league over the past seven days.
On Friday, a sex toy was thrown from the stands at Wintrust Arena in Chicago during the Golden State Valkyries' 73-66 win over the Chicago Sky. The toy landed just out of bounds underneath one of the baskets.
That followed a similar incident three days prior during Valkyries' 77-75 victory over the Atlanta Dream at Gateway Center Arena in College Park, Georgia.
The individual involved in the incident in Atlanta was identified and arrested, according to the WNBA.
They are reportedly charged with disorderly conduct, public indecency/indecent exposure, and criminal trespass, according to Reuters, with a court date yet to be established.
According to social media posts seen by the Associated Press, green toys were also thrown in Phoenix and New York, but didn't reach the court.
Earlier this week, the WNBA said any fan caught engaging in such behavior will face prosecution as well as a ban from the league.
'The safety and well-being of everyone in our arenas is a top priority for our league,' a WNBA spokesperson told CNN Sports.
'Objects of any kind thrown onto the court or in the seating area can pose a safety risk for players, game officials, and fans.
'In line with WNBA Arena Security Standards, any fan who intentionally throws an object onto the court will be immediately ejected and face a minimum one-year ban in addition to being subject to arrest and prosecution by local authorities.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Top Trump officials discussed Epstein at White House meeting Wednesday night
Top Trump officials discussed Epstein at White House meeting Wednesday night

CTV News

time11 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Top Trump officials discussed Epstein at White House meeting Wednesday night

From left: U.S. Vice-President JD Vance, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel. (Getty Images via CNN Newsource) A much-anticipated meeting between U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, U.S. Vice-President JD Vance and others was moved from Vance's residence to the White House Wednesday night after intense media coverage, a source familiar with the logistics told CNN. They discussed a number of topics, including the Jeffrey Epstein case and potential next steps, the source said. The meeting was originally planned to take place at Vance's D.C. home and was also supposed to include White House chief of staff Susie Wiles and U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, CNN previously reported. The administration's handling of the Epstein case, as well as the need to craft a unified response, was expected to be a main focus of the dinner. Trump administration officials are weighing whether to publish an audio recording and transcript of Blanche's recent conversation with Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, CNN previously reported. The meeting was also seen as a potential chance for Bondi and Patel — who have clashed over the Epstein case strategy, including in a contentious meeting with Wiles and Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino — to clear the air. Vance had tried to play peacemaker between Bondi, Patel and Bongino previously. Vance and his office denied on Wednesday that a meeting on Epstein was taking place.

U.S. federal courts say their systems were targeted by recent cyberattacks
U.S. federal courts say their systems were targeted by recent cyberattacks

CTV News

time11 minutes ago

  • CTV News

U.S. federal courts say their systems were targeted by recent cyberattacks

WASHINGTON - The federal judiciary's information technology systems have been targeted by 'recent escalated cyberattacks of a sophisticated and persistent nature,' the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts said in a statement on Thursday. The statement follows a Politico report late on Wednesday that the judiciary's electronic case filing system had been compromised in a sweeping hack that was believed to have exposed sensitive court data in several states. Politico, which cited two people familiar with the matter, said the incident had affected the judiciary's federal case management system, which includes the Case Management/Electronic Case Files, or CM/ECF, which legal professionals use to upload and manage case documents; and Public Access to Court Electronic Records, or PACER, which provides the public with pay-for access to some of the same data. The Administrative Office's statement did not address the specifics of Politico's reporting. It said the judiciary was focused on 'further enhancing security of the system' and 'working with courts to mitigate the impact on litigants.' Reporting by Raphael SatterEditing by Rod Nickel.

U.S. judge orders temporary halt to construction at Florida's ‘Alligator Alcatraz' detention centre
U.S. judge orders temporary halt to construction at Florida's ‘Alligator Alcatraz' detention centre

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

U.S. judge orders temporary halt to construction at Florida's ‘Alligator Alcatraz' detention centre

A protester stands outside the migrant detention dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz" at the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Facility, Saturday, July 12, 2025, in Ochopee, Fla. (AP Photo/Alexandra Rodriguez) MIAMI — A U.S. federal judge on Thursday ordered a temporary halt to construction at an immigration detention centre — built in the middle of the Florida Everglades and dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz' — as attorneys argue whether it violates environmental laws. The facility can continue to operate and hold detainees for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, but workers will be barred from adding any new filling, paving or infrastructure for the next 14 days. U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams issued the ruling during a hearing and said she will issue a written order later Thursday. Environmental groups and the Miccosukee Tribe have asked Williams to issue a preliminary injunction to halt operations and further construction. The suit claims the project threatens environmentally sensitive wetlands that are home to protected plants and animals and would reverse billions of dollars' worth of environmental restoration. Plaintiffs presented witnesses Wednesday and Thursday in support of the injunction, while attorneys for the state and federal government were scheduled to present next week. Following Thursday's testimony, Paul Schwiep, an attorney for the environmental groups, asked Williams to issue a temporary restraining order that would at least prevent any new construction at the site while the preliminary injunction was argued. Williams asked Florida attorney Jesse Panuccio if the state would agree to halt construction so that she wouldn't need to issue the restraining order. She pointed out that anything built at the site would likely remain there permanently, regardless of how the case was ultimately decided. Panuccio said he couldn't guarantee that the state would stop all work. This sparked an hour-long hearing about the temporary restraining order, which will be in place for the next two weeks while the still ongoing preliminary injunction hearing continues. The crux of the plaintiffs' argument is that the detention facility violates the National Environmental Policy Act, which requires federal agencies to assess the environmental effects of major construction projects. Panuccio said during the hearing that although the detention centre would be holding federal detainees, the construction and operation of the facility is entirely under the state of Florida, meaning the NEPA review wouldn't apply. Schwiep said the purpose of the facility is for immigration enforcement, which is exclusively a federal function. He said the facility wouldn't exist if it wasn't for the federal government's desire for a facility to hold detainees. Williams said Thursday that the detention facility was at a minimum a joint partnership between the state and federal government. The lawsuit in Miami against federal and state authorities is one of two legal challenges to the South Florida detention centre which was built more than a month ago by the state of Florida on an isolated airstrip owned by Miami-Dade County. A second lawsuit brought by civil rights groups says detainees' constitutional rights are being violated since they are barred from meeting lawyers, are being held without any charges, and a federal immigration court has canceled bond hearings. A hearing in that case is scheduled for Aug. 18. Under the 55-year-old federal environmental law, federal agencies should have examined how the detention centre's construction would impact the environment, identified ways to minimize the impact and followed other procedural rules such as allowing public comment, according to the environmental groups and the tribe. It makes no difference that the detention centre holding hundreds of detainees was built by the state of Florida since federal agencies have authority over immigration, the suit said. Attorneys for federal and state agencies last week asked Williams to dismiss or transfer the injunction request, saying the lawsuit was filed in the wrong jurisdiction. Even though the property is owned by Miami-Dade County, Florida's southern district is the wrong venue for the lawsuit since the detention centre is located in neighboring Collier County, which is in the state's middle district, they said. Williams had yet to rule on that argument. The lawsuits were being heard as Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis ′ administration apparently was preparing to build a second immigration detention centre at a Florida National Guard training centre in north Florida. At least one contract has been awarded for what's labeled in state records as the 'North Detention Facility.' David Fischer, The Associated Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store