logo
Ukrainians are protesting a law targeting anti-corruption agencies. Here's why

Ukrainians are protesting a law targeting anti-corruption agencies. Here's why

The Hill6 days ago
KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — Ukrainians are taking to the streets to protest a new law they worry will undermine the work of two key anti-corruption agencies, by eroding the independence of bodies meant to provide a check on power.
Discontent over the law led to the first major demonstration against the government in more than three years of war, marking the most serious fracture yet in the national unity that has helped Ukraine resist Russia's invasion.
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy defended the law as necessary to remove 'Russian influence' from the fight against corruption, though he didn't provide examples of such interference.
The law adds new oversight for anti-corruption agencies
Ukraine's parliament passed a bill on Tuesday that brings the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) under the authority of the prosecutor general, who is a presidential appointee. Zelenskyy signed it into law, even as thousands took to the streets asking him to scrap it.
Critics say it could give Zelenskyy's circle greater influence over investigations. It comes after Zelenskyy carried out a reshuffle of his wartime Cabinet, a move also widely viewed as consolidating power with his inner circle.
Before the bill was signed, the agencies warned that, if it took effect, 'the head of SAPO will become a nominal figure, while NABU will lose its independence and turn into a subdivision of the prosecutor general's office.'
NABU investigates corruption cases involving top officials, while SAPO supervises these investigations and prosecutes cases in court.
The law has unleashed criticism of the government
Ukraine has a robust tradition of pro-democracy protests, with street demonstrations twice resulting in political upheavals.
In fact, the two agencies in question were established after the 2014 Maidan revolution, which ousted then-President Viktor Yanukovych, Ukraine's pro-Moscow leader who was accused of corruption on a massive scale, stealing hundreds of millions of dollars from the government.
His corruption was so vast that ordinary Ukrainians were aghast when they toured the grounds of his lavish mansion and discovered his collection of expensive cars and even a private zoo.
Since Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022, however, rallies have largely focused on the return of prisoners of war or missing people.
But Tuesday's demonstrations trained public outrage on the government, with some calling the law a greater blow to morale than even routine Russian drone and missile attacks.
A mood of anger and frustration among the war-weary Ukrainians prevailed in the crowd. Some protesters accused Ukraine's leadership of prioritizing loyalty and personal connections over the fight against corruption.
'Ukraine has far fewer resources than Russia in this war,' said Ihor Lachenkov, a blogger and activist who urged people to join the protest through his social media platforms, which reach more than 1.5 million followers. 'If we misuse them, or worse, allow them to end up in the pockets of thieves, our chances of victory diminish. All our resources must go toward the fight.'
The protests have raised questions about the state of democracy in Ukraine — one of the values it is fighting for in the war with Russia.
'When a spectacle is staged and pushed through in 24 hours for everyone to swallow, that is not justice,' former Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba wrote on Instagram.
The government defends the move
In his address Tuesday night, Zelenskyy insisted that the country's anti-corruption infrastructure 'will continue to function' after it is 'cleansed of any Russian influence.'
He alleged that some cases had been allowed to languish and the targets of some investigations never brought to justice.
'For years, officials who have fled Ukraine have been casually living abroad for some reason — in very nice countries and without legal consequences — and this is not normal,' he said in a Telegram post.
On Wednesday, he gathered the heads of law enforcement and anti-corruption agencies and the prosecutor general. He announced that a detailed action plan will be developed within two weeks to ensure the system is more effective and fair.
'We see what people expect from state institutions to ensure justice and the effectiveness of each institution,' he said on Telegram.
Prosecutor General Ruslan Kravchenko dismissed concerns about the agencies' independence.
'I can promise that I will not misuse these rights,' he said. 'I could sign this promise in blood, if necessary.'
Fighting corruption is crucial to Ukraine's future
The Ukrainian branch of Transparency International criticized the law, saying it undermines one of the most significant reforms since the 2014 uprising and that it damages trust with international partners.
Fighting entrenched corruption is crucial to Ukraine's bid to join the European Union and maintain access to billions of dollars in Western aid. In a post on X, EU Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos called the new law 'a serious step back.'
The action against the agencies comes only a month after the NABU launched a criminal investigation into then–Deputy Prime Minister Oleksii Chernyshov — one of the highest-profile corruption cases since Zelenskyy took office. Chernyshov has denied the allegations but was removed from his post during last week's government reshuffle.
It also follows the arrest of two NABU officials on suspicion of having ties to Russia by Ukraine's Security Service.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rising: July 29, 2025
Rising: July 29, 2025

The Hill

time26 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Rising: July 29, 2025

Toggle header content Jasmine Crockett furious with MSM, has no idea how journalism works! Robby Soave | RISING Robby Soave delivers radar on how Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) is rising in the Democratic Party, possibly becoming its new leader. Trump slashes deadline for Russia-Ukraine ceasefire to 10-12 days Robby Soave and Lindsey Granger weigh in on President Trump saying he's, 'disappointed,' in Russian President Putin, threatening to decrease the deadline for a Russia-Ukraine ceasefire. Trump, Obama agree?! Presidents break with Israeli PM over starvation in Gaza | RISING Robby Soave and Lindsey Granger react to President Trump admitting Gaza is in a starvation crisis. Pete Buttigieg says Dems are too attached to a 'failing' status quo — Lindsey Granger | RISING Lindsey Granger delivers monologue on Pete Buttigieg's NPR interview in which he offered some advice to the Democratic Party ahead of 2028. Ghislaine Maxwell urges SCOTUS to overturn conviction after DOJ meeting | RISING Robby Soave and Lindsey Granger react to reports that Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is filing a brief with the Supreme Court to overturn her conviction. Zohran Mamdani under fire for 'defund the police' posts amid Manhattan skyscraper shooting | RISING Robby Soave and Lindsey Granger react to Zohran Mamdani's reaction to NYC's skyscraper shooting, specifically his past anti-law enforcement comments and posts. Dems grapple with 35-year low polling, Trump immigration, inflation approval slips | RISING Robby Soave and Lindsey Granger react to new CNN polling showing the Democratic Party is clocking in at record low approval. Robby Soave and Lindsey Granger discuss the latest shakeup among top journalists at The Washington Post.

Police clash with anti-government protesters in Serbia over student expulsion
Police clash with anti-government protesters in Serbia over student expulsion

San Francisco Chronicle​

time26 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Police clash with anti-government protesters in Serbia over student expulsion

BELGRADE, Serbia (AP) — Protesters clashed with police on Tuesday in a southwestern Serbian town following the reported forced expulsion of a group of students from a faculty building where they had been camping for months as part of nationwide anti-government demonstrations. Hundreds of protesters in Novi Pazar chanted slogans against Serbia's populist President Aleksandar Vucic and demanded that the students be allowed to return to the building. Protesters threw bottles at police who responded with batons and shields. Police said in a statement they were attacked and acted with restraint while preserving public peace. Officers later withdrew as the students chanted 'victory.' The students alleged that the unidentified men who broke into the state university building between 3 a.m. and 4 a.m. on Tuesday, with faculty officials, were members of a private security company in nearby Kraljevo. Videos of the alleged break in were posted on social media. Parliamentary speaker Ana Brnabic said the intervention was requested by the faculty management. Tensions are high in Novi Pazar, a multi-ethnic town some 300 kilometers (180 miles) from the capital Belgrade. There is a divide between Bosniak Muslims, who make up the majority of the population, and Serbs which stems from ethnic wars in the 1990s triggered by the breakup of former Yugoslavia. Student-led demonstrations first erupted in Serbia after the collapse of a concrete canopy collapse at a renovated train station killed 16 people in November. Many blamed the tragedy on alleged widespread corruption in state-run infrastructure projects. Vucic has stepped up pressure on universities to curb the protests challenging his increasingly authoritarian rule. A large student-led gathering in Novi Pazar in April was seen as an important step toward bridging the ethnic divide there.

UCLA to pay $6.45 million to settle suit by Jewish students over pro-Palestinian protests
UCLA to pay $6.45 million to settle suit by Jewish students over pro-Palestinian protests

Los Angeles Times

time26 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

UCLA to pay $6.45 million to settle suit by Jewish students over pro-Palestinian protests

UCLA has agreed to pay $6.45 million to settle a lawsuit brought by three Jewish students and a medical school professor who alleged the university violated their civil rights and enabled antisemitic actions during a pro-Palestinian campus encampment hit with violence in spring 2024. Each plaintiff will receive $50,000. About $2.3 million will be donated to eight groups that work with Jewish communities or issues. Another $230,000 will be directed a UCLA initiative to combat antisemitism and the rest of the funds will go toward the legal fees. As part the deal, UCLA has also agreed that it is 'prohibited from knowingly allowing or facilitating the exclusion of Jewish students, faculty, and/or staff from ordinarily available portions of UCLA's programs, activities, and/or campus areas.' This provision extends to any actions taken on campus, including measures to de-escalate tensions during a protest, for instance, and it includes 'exclusion ... based on religious beliefs concerning the Jewish state of Israel.' That agreement, which would be in effect for 15 years, is awaiting approval from U.S. District Judge Mark C. Scarsi, who is overseeing the case. The organizations to receive the money are: Hillel at UCLA, Academic Engagement Network, the Anti-Defamation League, the Jewish Federation Los Angeles Campus Impact Network, Chabad of UCLA, Jewish Graduate Organization, the Orthodox Union's Jewish Learning Initiative on Campus, and The Film Collaborative, Inc. for use toward producing a film related to the Holocaust called Lost Alone. The lawsuit stems from the days-long pro-Palestinian encampment that protesters erected on the UCLA quad in front of Royce Hall in late April 2024. Pro-Palestinian activists were demanding the university divest from companies with ties to Israel's war in Gaza. The encampment became a global news story after a melee instigated by pro-Israel counter-demonstrators erupted. UCLA and law enforcement's failure to quickly stop the violence sparked intense criticism. The people involved hurled objects, sprayed irritants and tossed fireworks — attacks that continued for hours until officers from the Los Angeles Police Department and the California Highway Patrol quelled the violence. Calling UCLA a 'hotbed of antisemitism' with a 'rampant anti-Jewish environment,' the students sued the UC regents and several school officials in June 2024, alleging that the encampment blocked their access to part of campus, violating their civil rights. The professor later joined the suit. Among the six individual defendants in the case are former UCLA Chancellor Gene D. Block, who stepped down at the end of July 2024; and Michael V. Drake, president of the University of California. The lawsuit alleged that UCLA provided support to pro-Palestinian activists who 'enforced' what it termed a 'Jew Exclusion Zone,' which segregated Jewish students and prevented them from accessing the 'heart of campus,' including lecture halls. It also alleged that the university's 'cowardly abdication of its duty to ensure unfettered access to UCLA's educational opportunities' violated the students' freedom of speech and other rights. UCLA's outlook over the suit dimmed beginning about a year ago, when the federal judge overseeing the case admonished campus leaders for how they handled the encampment. Scarsi ordered the university to ensure equal access to Jewish students. 'In the year 2024, in the United States of America, in the State of California, in the City of Los Angeles, Jewish students were excluded from portions of the UCLA campus because they refused to denounce their faith,' Scarsi wrote in the order last July. UCLA faced stronger headwinds after the presidential election, as President Trump embarked on a series of high-stakes challenges to higher education institutions by threatening to pull federal research grants over alleged antisemitism. In March, the U.S. Department of Justice filed court documents in support of the students, arguing that UCLA had tried to 'evade liability' for what transpired on campus. The department's 'statement of interest' filing said that the plaintiffs 'were excluded from portions of the UCLA campus because they refused to denounce their faith,' calling this 'abhorrent to our constitutional guarantee of religious freedom.' In court filings, UCLA lawyers said campus leaders were not responsible for the actions of protesters and that UCLA officials were focused on de-escalation and safety during the encampment. Pro-Palestinian groups also filed briefs in the case, arguing that the encampment was not antisemitic but anti-Zionist and pointing out that a large segment of its members were Jewish. They also alleged that UCLA's actions in response to the case ended up cutting into academic freedom by limiting campus lessons about Palestinians. After the unrest of spring 2024, UCLA and the University of California enacted several major changes related to security and how protests would be handled going forward. Now, protesters cannot block paths or wear masks if it's to conceal their identity while breaking campus rules, and demonstration areas are restricted, among other changes. UCLA also hired LAPD veteran Steve Lurie to lead the new Office of Campus Safety. On Monday, Lurie announced that LAPD veteran Craig Valenzuela would be UCLA's police chief, effective Sept. 1. Valenzuela, a UCLA alumnus who joined the city's police force in 1996, will take over a department that has not had a permanent chief since May 2024, when then-UCLA Police Chief John Thomas was reassigned before resigning in the fall. Thomas faced blame for the police mishandling of violence at the encampment. Although UCLA has increased protest restrictions, added security officers and quickly shut down some pro-Palestinian events since spring 2024, many on campus have said that demonstration policies are unevenly or sporadically enforced. The concern has been repeatedly voiced at UC and campus forums by pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian campus groups. There was another major change on campus: Julio Frenk — whose German Jewish father fled Nazi Germany in the 1930s — becoming chancellor on Jan. 1. Three months later, Frenk banned Students for Justice in Palestine as a campus organization after a protest the group held in front of a UC regent's house that was vandalized. Frenk also launched a campuswide initiative to combat antisemitism. Times staff writer Libor Jany contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store