Telangana HC directs Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO) to decide PIO's petition to remove India entry ban
The petitioner, a doctor, was placed on a blacklist by Indian immigration authorities after it was found she had obtained an Indian passport by allegedly suppressing her Canadian nationality.
Justice NV Shravan Kumar directed the FRRO to review the representation in view of the urgency on personal grounds claimed by the petitioner.
You Can Also Check:
Hyderabad AQI
|
Weather in Hyderabad
|
Bank Holidays in Hyderabad
|
Public Holidays in Hyderabad
The petitioner had obtained an Indian passport in 2021, claiming to be a resident of Hyderabad.
But authorities found that she was a Canadian citizen since Sept 2003 and had obtained a Canadian passport in Jan 2021.
Since she had obtained the Indian passport by suppressing information about her nationality, which is an offence, she was directed to surrender it immediately at the Regional Passport Office, Bengaluru. Accordingly, she surrendered the passport and a surrender certificate was issued to her in July 2021.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Providers are furious: Internet access without a subscription!
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
The doctor said she approached the court after authorities did not respond to her email sent on April 2025, urging them to lift the ban on her entry.
When the matter came up for hearing, the FRRO sought multiple adjournments on the grounds that it was yet to get instructions. During the final hearing, when the Foreigners Regional Registration Office sought more time, the HC directed it to consider her email and pass orders at the earliest.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
RBI Governor says FTA with UK will help India, bats for more such pacts with other nations
MUMBAI: Reserve Bank Governor Sanjay Malhotra on Friday welcomed the signing of the free trade agreement with the UK, saying it will help multiple sectors of the Indian economy. Speaking at the FE Modern BFSI Summit here, Malhotra said multilateralism has "unfortunately" taken a back seat, and the country needs more such pacts (like the UK FTA) with countries and added that negotiations with the US are in advanced stages. "Hopefully, it (UK FTA) should help is the way going forward now, because unfortunately multilateralism seems to have taken a back seat," Malhotra said in the central bank's first comments on the trade deal with the UK signed in London. "It should help various sectors in our manufacturing as well as on the services side," Malhotra added. Malhotra said that given the current realities, where multilateralism has taken a back seat, it is necessary for India to have more such pacts with other countries. He also acknowledged that there are many more such pacts in the negotiation stage. India and the UK signed the FTA during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's two-day visit to the UK. The agreement has been in the making for many years now and will open up markets for both countries across goods and services. Meanwhile, Malhotra backed his US counterpart Jerome Powell for his work on upholding the Federal Reserve's independence, at a time when US President Donald Trump has gone public with his disagreement with its policies. "He (Powell) is doing a very good job. Maintaining the independence of the central bank is very important. I think he has done a commendable job," Malhotra said. On cryptocurrency regulations, Malhotra said the government-appointed panel to look into the issue in India will take into account the RBI's concerns. There is no work for a separate currency for the BRICS grouping, the RBI governor said, maintaining that like any other country, India is working on popularising its own currency, and the US dollar is here to stay. India has an agreement with the UAE and is also looking at some arrangement with Maldives on the rupee trade, he said. "The dollar is here, as you're all aware, it's going to be here, you know, for some time, for a longish time. It's because you need some universal cross-border currency," the RBI governor said. Meanwhile, he also appreciated the work done by the Ministry of Petroleum in managing the oil procurement despite the sanctions on Russia.
Scroll.in
22 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
India should stop deporting people to Bangladesh without due process, says human rights group
India should stop unlawfully deporting people to Bangladesh without due process, international non-governmental organisation Human Rights Watch said in a report released on Wednesday. The organisation said that the government should instead 'ensure everyone's access to procedural safeguards to protect against arbitrary detention and expulsion'. Since the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, the police in several states ruled by the Bharatiya Janata Party have been detaining Bengali-speaking persons – mostly Muslims – and asking them to prove that they are Indian citizens. Several persons have been forced into Bangladesh after they allegedly could not prove their Indian citizenship. In some cases, individuals who were mistakenly sent to Bangladesh returned to the country after state authorities in India proved that they were Indians. Indian authorities have not provided official data on the total number of expulsions till now. However, the Border Guards Bangladesh has alleged that over 1,500 persons have been forced into Bangladesh from May 7 to June 15. Elaine Person, the Asia director at Human Rights Watch, alleged that the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party in India was 'fueling discrimination by arbitrarily expelling Bengali Muslims from the country, including Indian citizens'. She added: 'The authorities' claims that they are managing irregular immigration are unconvincing given their disregard for due process rights, domestic guarantees, and international human rights standards.' Human Rights Watch said that India is bound by international treaties to protect human rights and 'to prevent deprivation of citizenship on the basis of race, color, descent, or national or ethnic origin'. Detaining and expelling people without due process violates these obligations, the NGO said. The group also urged authorities to prevent the use of excessive force, investigate abuses by security forces, and provide proper food, shelter and medical care for those detained. In May, the Union Ministry of Home Affairs directed the states and Union Territories to verify the credentials of persons suspected to be undocumented migrants from Bangladesh and Myanmar. On July 19, the police in Gurugram detained at least 74 migrant workers on the suspicion that they were from Bangladesh, The Wire reported. Of these, 11 were from West Bengal and 63 from Assam.
The Wire
22 minutes ago
- The Wire
Why Parliamentary Rituals and Performative Gestures Won't Save Our Cities
On July 9, 2025, Gurugram – a city waterlogged by floodwaters – witnessed severe inundation that crippled traffic and claimed lives. In the days that followed, other major cities such as Delhi, Chandigarh, Jaipur, and Lucknow faced similar scenes of urban flooding, exposing the vulnerability of Indian cities to monsoon extremes. Just days before these events, on July 3–4, at a gathering of municipal representatives and bureaucrats in Manesar near Gurgaon, Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla unveiled the "Viksit Bharat Vision 2047", a document of aspirations. While the vision itself may remain in the realm of future projections, Birla had a suggestion to civic bodies of cities: make your councils function like Parliament. He called for the institutionalisation of mechanisms like Question Hour and Zero Hour in municipal governance to enhance accountability and transparency. At first glance, the proposal seems commendable. After all, urban governance in India does suffer from opacity and a lack of responsiveness. However, the suggestion reveals a deeper disconnect between the the vision of those in power n the Centre and the grounded realities of urban India. To put it plainly: parliamentary rituals will not fix broken cities. They may offer an illusion of democratic functioning, but without addressing the structural incapacities of urban local bodies (ULBs), such gestures risk becoming performative. Not a new idea—States have been ahead It's important to point out that many state governments have already institutionalised question hours in city councils. Himachal Pradesh and Kerala are prime examples, where councillors have since a long time had the right to raise pressing civic issues and demand accountability from the municipal administration. It seems the Speaker's suggestion stems either from a lack of awareness or a disregard for the fact that urban development is a state subject. Therefore, while the central government's nudges can be welcome, they must tread carefully so as not to trample over the constitutional autonomy of the states. The real question: Where do Indian municipalities stand? Rather than mimic Parliament, a more urgent question is: What is the status of Indian municipalities today? Far from being autonomous, empowered institutions of self-governance as they were envisioned in the 74th Constitutional Amendment, most ULBs are little more than administrative appendages of state governments. In several of my previous articles, I have repeatedly highlighted how urban local bodies remain structurally weak, financially starved, and politically marginalised. The key issue here is decentralisation in form, but not in substance. City councils may exist on paper, but in practice, they are often bypassed by state-appointed commissioners and parastatal bodies. Elected representatives are rendered powerless in decisions related to urban infrastructure, housing, transport, and even garbage collection. This is not democracy at the grassroots; it is a technocratic management system masquerading as one. Show us the money: Devolution is the litmus test No city can function without resources. Yet, Indian cities are asked to perform miracles with peanuts. The fiscal devolution to ULBs in India is around 0.5% of the GDP – a staggering deficit when compared with international benchmarks. Brazil, South Africa, and China, for instance, devolve approximately 3-5% of their GDP to cities. This isn't merely a matter of generosity; it reflects the recognition that cities are engines of both economic productivity and human development, and they need resources to perform that role. Without financial autonomy, expecting cities to deliver on basic services is unrealistic. Be it solid waste management, drainage systems, public health, or affordable housing – the implementation gap widens when the purse strings are controlled by distant bureaucracies. Gurugram drowns, yet again The irony of choosing Gurugram as the venue for this conference could not have been sharper. Just a week later, the city was again submerged, with residential colonies, roads, and commercial areas inundated after moderate rainfall. If there was ever a metaphor for the failure of urban planning in India, this was it. Gurugram represents the worst of top-down, capital-intensive urbanism, where gleaming glass towers and expressways take precedence over drainage, stormwater management, and public transport. The problem is not the lack of resources in Gurgaon, but their misallocation, guided by the profit motives of private developers and aided by technocratic urban missions that have little space for people's voices. Need-based planning has taken a backseat to "smart" solutions – digital dashboards, surveillance infrastructure, and consultancy-heavy projects – that do little to address core vulnerabilities. Cities don't flood because of poor rainfall predictions; they flood because of concretised riverbeds, encroached wetlands, and clogged drains. And these are decisions rooted in political economy, not meteorology. The growing waste crisis India's urban waste problem is spiralling. According to data from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), Indian cities generate more than 150,000 tonnes of municipal solid waste per day, and barely 25% of it is processed. The rest ends up in overflowing landfills, open dumps, and even rivers. From Delhi's Ghazipur to Mumbai's Deonar, these towering garbage mountains are ticking ecological bombs. What's worse is that most municipalities lack the capacity and the autonomy to deal with this crisis. Waste collection is increasingly being privatised, leading to labour rights violations for sanitation workers and uneven service delivery for marginalised communities. Instead of democratic accountability, we are witnessing contractual governance – outsourcing responsibility without oversight. The city as a private enclave Urban India is also becoming disturbingly segregated. The rise of privatised urbanism – gated communities, privately managed infrastructure, and exclusive commercial zones – has pushed the working poor to the fringes. Slums are being demolished in the name of beautification, street vendors evicted for violating "aesthetic" norms, and affordable housing replaced by luxury high-rises. This transformation is not accidental. It is deeply ideological: cities are being remade as zones of capital accumulation rather than as habitats for all. As neoliberal planning deepens, the space for the urban commons – parks, pavements, public toilets, community centres – shrinks. Instead of inclusive urbanisation, we are witnessing elite capture of urban space and governance. Climate change: Cities on the edge All of this unfolds against the backdrop of an escalating climate crisis. Indian cities are on the frontline of climate vulnerability, yet they remain woefully underprepared. Heatwaves, floods, air pollution, and water scarcity are no longer episodic – they are structural. And still, most cities have no climate resilience plans worth the name. Adaptation is spoken of in policy forums, but rarely implemented on the ground. Informal workers, slum dwellers, women, and the elderly– those most vulnerable to climate shocks – remain outside the ambit of planning and policy. A truly climate-resilient city must begin by being socially just. Unfortunately, justice is in short supply in the Indian urban vision. The way forward: Empower, don't perform If the government is serious about empowering cities, then performative gestures like introducing Question Hour won't cut it. What we need is: Genuine fiscal devolution to the tune of at least 2% of GDP for cities. Strengthening of elected municipal councils with real decision-making powers. Participatory planning that includes the voices of marginalised communities. Focus on ecological urbanism rooted in local contexts – not capital-intensive fantasies. Reimagination of urban infrastructure that prioritises the commons over corporate interests. India's urban future cannot be scripted in auditoriums in Gurugram. It must be built in the everyday struggles of councillors, sanitation workers, street vendors, and residents who are fighting to make their cities liveable. If the government listens to them – not just replicates Parliament rituals – it may yet redeem the idea of Viksit Bharat. Tikender Singh Panwar was once directly elected deputy mayor of Shimla. He was linked with the Leh Vision document and has written vision documents for a dozen cities. Author of three books, he is an urban specialist working in the design of inclusive cities and also a member of the Kerala Urban Commission.
