logo
Claim that US has secret $150T 'trust fund' is exaggerated

Claim that US has secret $150T 'trust fund' is exaggerated

Yahoo04-05-2025

Jim Rickards, a financial commentator who reportedly worked on Wall Street for 35 years, claimed in March 2025 that the U.S. had an untouched $150 trillion "national trust fund" or "endowment" waiting to be tapped into, thanks to a key provision in Title 30 of the U.S. Code (30 U.S.C.). The rumor then spread across multiple platforms, including Bluesky (archived), X (archived) and Reddit (archived).
Rickards made the assertion during a promotional interview posted in February 2025, though the claim goes back at least as far as 2013.
Rickards publishes a financial newsletter called "Strategic Intelligence," where he made the claim in a featured video. We reached out to Rickards for comment on the claim's veracity and will update this story if we receive any response.
"Decades ago, the U.S. Congress inserted a key provision in 30 U.S.C. creating what one could call a 'national trust fund.' You can go read the sections 22 to 42 to be exact … it's pretty dry stuff," Rickards said in the video. "It's been this big secret for years. Yet over time, the estimated size of this fund has grown and grown to the point where its raw value sits near $150 trillion and counting."
Title 30 involves mineral lands and mining, which includes oil, gas, salts, precious metals and other materials. Rickards claimed that the 42nd Congress, under then-President Ulysses S. Grant, changed 30 U.S.C., thus establishing this "secret trust." He also claimed that "it all ties to a pivotal decision made by Trump's Supreme Court," and when the money "is unleashed … as soon as this summer … it will silence Trump's most outspoken critics." This Supreme Court decision involved broader access for mining in lieu of environmental protections that "locked up" this "trust fund."
Rickards' statements appeared to echo a long-standing claim made by the Institute for Energy Research, which wrote in a 2013 report (archived) that "the government owns an enormously large mineral estate (oil, natural gas, and coal resources) that has an estimated total worth to the economy of over $150 trillion." According to Influence Watch, fuel companies such as ExxonMobil and the American Petroleum Institute financially support the IER.
It is important to note, too, that Rickards isn't necessarily an impartial adviser; although he claims "We don't have any sponsors or backers in a traditional sense," he sells a newsletter that provides subscribers with market predictions.
(profitablenews.com)
In the newsletter video, he claimed five specific mineral-rights companies "are about to soar" (meaning companies he suggested his viewers buy stocks in), but didn't name the companies outright. A viewer would have to request a copy of a report he claimed his research team compiled called "THE AMERICAN BIRTHRIGHT: How to Claim Your Share of America's $150 Trillion Mineral Endowment." He said the report was available free as long as "you join forces and take a look at my work."
(Paradigm Newsletters)
It should also be noted that Rickards did not make these claims in an impartial interview setting. For example, the "interviewer," Aaron Gentzler, primarily lent credibility to Rickards' claims with comments such as, "All that sounds incredible," "A number this big … it's unfathomable" and "I've got to say that sounds great, on paper." Additionally, the transcript (archived) of the conversation appeared to have been prewritten. It included supplemental links, images, charts and formatting that went beyond the scripted conversation. (Any added formatting to quotes we feature below comes directly from this transcript in question.)
A number of news releases appeared online after Rickards published the video. Rickards wrote all of them.
Below, we break down each of Rickards' claims, including whether the 42nd Congress established a "secret trust" of mineral wealth and whether a Supreme Court decision will unleash the now reportedly $150 trillion of American mineral wealth.
Rickards didn't provide specific information, such as exactly what changes the 42nd Congress made that established a "secret trust." He noted that he was not referring to an actual trust fund or endowment, but that he used those terms to "make the most sense to viewers." He said:
The last time the government allowed regular Americans to tap into our vast endowment was 1872.
That's when Congress and President Ulysses S. Grant changed Title 30 of the U.S. Code and established this secret trust for the American people.
What happened was this: In 1872, following the peak of the Gold Rush, the 42nd Congress passed a law called the General Mining Act of 1872, which legalized the practice of acquiring and protecting mining claims on public lands. Congress had granted the right to mine silver, gold, cinnabar (an ore of mercury) and copper in 1866, but the 1872 law expanded this right by changing the wording to include "or other valuable deposits." It began:
https://media.snopes.com/2025/04/general_mining_act_of_1872.pdf
The "$150 trillion" estimate (which apparently originated with the Institute for Energy Research) is just that, an estimated value of mineral wealth available for extraction on federal land, adjusted for inflation. Rickards did not name a source or provide proof for this figure.
As Rickards claimed, this law does make up sections 22-42 of 30 U.S.C. He claimed environmental bureaucracy tied up this mineral wealth — "Obama and Biden chose to protect plants … birds … and fish instead of protecting and enriching the American public" — and cited an unnamed "former Department of the Interior insider" who he claimed said: "[We have] all these essential materials right under our feet. Incredibly, insanely, however, the United States is the only nation in the world that locks them up."
Rickards cited findings from a think tank called the Capital Research Center, which published a report in 2020 on "the consequences of locking up American mineral wealth."
(Capital Research Center)
This report (archived) claimed an area "larger than that of 25 of the 27 states east of the Mississippi River is no longer accessible for mineral exploration, much less mining" and that the "drawn-out mining permitting processes and burdensome environmental lawsuits" were two major factors preventing access to this domestic mineral wealth. However, it claimed the biggest and most underreported factor is "public land withdrawals," or increasingly limiting mining access on federal or state lands.
The Capital Research Center claims on its About page to be tax-exempt and "fiercely independent." We reached out to the organization for comment and will update this story if we receive a response.
Trump elevated the importance of mineral wealth early in his second term; he announced an executive order titled "Immediate Measures to Increase American Mineral Production" on March 20, 2025. The order mentioned the Mining Act of 1872, and it required various government bodies to identify federal lands known to hold mineral deposits and reserves.
(whitehouse.gov)
In regard to "unlocking" this mineral wealth, Rickards claimed the Trump administration would make it happen. When Gentzler prompted Rickards in the video interview by claiming Trump "failed to unlock this $150 trillion endowment" during his first term, Rickards answered that that was because "Trump was sabotaged from Day One fighting 'the fake Russian hoax,' a 'fake' impeachment trial," the COVID pandemic and the "collapse of the stock market and economy." Gentzler responded: "So he never had a chance to do things HIS way," to which Rickards agreed and pointed to a pivotal Supreme Court decision that would change this.
The Supreme Court decision Rickards referred to is the June 2024 decision to overturn a 40-year-old precedent — the Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. decision of 1984 — that directed courts to defer to federal agencies' interpretations of ambiguous laws.
In overturning the decision, the Supreme Court handed the ability to determine ambiguous language from administrative agencies to courts, using the "plain meaning" of statutory interpretation.
Public Policy Institute of California senior fellow Brian Gray, a retired environmental law professor, said in July 2024 that he was "concerned that future decisions will pay less attention to both the scientific realities that underlie our environmental laws and the agency expertise that enables these laws to function in the real world."
Contrary to Rickards' exaggerated imagery of $150 trillion being enough to distribute $1.1 million to every household in America, that's not how revenue from public lands works. Although Rickards clarified in the interview that he didn't "think any of this is going to happen," the quote without context is misleading.
(pro.paradigmnewsletters.org)
In reality, the government distributes revenue from public lands across several specific funds, local governments or government agencies. Companies, perhaps such as the ones Rickards suggested his viewers invest in, pay the government to extract energy and minerals on federal lands, Native American lands and the Outer Continental Shelf. The payments these companies make include bonuses, rents and royalties. The Office of Natural Resources Revenue then collects these payments and distributes them to the following recipients, as listed by the U.S. Department of the Interior (archived):
Historic Preservation Fund: This fund helps preserve U.S. historical and archaeological sites and cultural heritage. This fund supports grants to state and tribal historic preservation offices.
Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF): This fund provides matching grants to states and local governments to buy and develop public outdoor recreation areas across the 50 states. The Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act (GOMESA) (Gulf of America) of 2006 specifies that 12.5% of revenues from certain Gulf of America leases be directed to the LWCF stateside program. States can receive up to $125 million a year in funding. This portion of LWCF funds is not subject to the congressional appropriation process. Otherwise, they are treated similarly to regular LWCF funds.
Native American Tribes and Individuals: ONRR disburses 100% of revenue collected from resource extraction on Native American lands back to Native American tribes, nations, and individuals.
Other: Certain funds are directed back to the federal agencies that administer these lands to help cover the agencies' operational costs. Agencies that receive funds include: BLM, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S. Forest Service. The Ultra-Deepwater Research Program and the Mescal Settlement Agreement also receive $50 million each.
Reclamation Fund: Established by Congress in 1902 to pay for Bureau of Reclamation projects. This fund supports the establishment of critical infrastructure projects like dams and power plants.
State and Local Governments: Funds disbursed to states fall under the jurisdiction of each state. Each state determines how the funds will be used.
U.S. Treasury: Funds disbursed to the Treasury go to the General Fund, which is the federal government's basic operating fund. The General Fund pays for roughly two-thirds of all federal expenditures, including the U.S. military, national parks, and schools.
Rickards sells subscriptions to his market prediction newsletter for financial gain, and his claims are often sensational and misleading. He quoted the $150 trillion figure without citing any sources, credible or otherwise, and directed viewers to his own investment recommendations for mineral-rights companies poised to benefit from the Supreme Court's decision to overturn the Chevron decision. "I'm talking about the businesses who get a jump on this, and the regular folks who know how to take advantage," Rickards said.
Although there is a possibility the court's decision and Trump's March 2025 executive order to increase American mineral production will yield an increase in domestic mineral revenue in the U.S., the predictions Rickards made are purely speculative and the revenue generated by mineral extraction is not distributed to individual households, but to specific funds, local governments or government agencies. Rickards himself clarified that it was not a "trust fund," per se, but that he used that term in order to make the most sense to viewers.
AMERICA'S SECRET TRUST FUND. https://pro.paradigmnewsletters.org/p/awn_birthright_0325/PAWN5331/Full?h=true. Accessed 18 Apr. 2025.
Federal Land Withdrawals: Endangering the Nation. https://capitalresearch.org/article/federal-land-withdrawals-part-1/. Accessed 18 Apr. 2025.
https://revenuedata.doi.gov/?tab=tab-disbursements. Accessed 20 Apr. 2025.
'Immediate Measures to Increase American Mineral Production'. The White House, 20 Mar. 2025, https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/03/immediate-measures-to-increase-american-mineral-production/.
read, Ex-CIA Jim Rickards 3. min. 'The Asset Washington Couldn't Touch: Former Pentagon Insider Reveals the $150 Trillion Fortune That Survived Generations of Political Greed'. Yahoo Finance, 17 Apr. 2025, https://finance.yahoo.com/news/asset-washington-couldn-t-touch-140000321.html.
'U.S. Code: Title 30 — MINERAL LANDS AND MINING'. LII / Legal Information Institute, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/30. Accessed 18 Apr. 2025.
'{{meta.pageTitle}}'. {{meta.siteName}}, https://www.oyez.org/cases/1983/82-1005. Accessed 18 Apr. 2025.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge Orders J&J Subsidiary to Pay $442 Million in Antitrust Lawsuit
Judge Orders J&J Subsidiary to Pay $442 Million in Antitrust Lawsuit

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Judge Orders J&J Subsidiary to Pay $442 Million in Antitrust Lawsuit

Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) is one of the best Dow stocks to invest in. Recently, a federal judge ruled that a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary must pay $442 million in damages after a jury concluded last month that the company had broken antitrust laws by withholding support from hospitals that used reprocessed catheters. U.S. District Judge James Selna ordered the company to pay three times the $147 million in damages awarded by the jury, as permitted under antitrust regulations. This sum does not include legal fees or other related costs. Daniel Vukelich, CEO of the Association of Medical Device Reprocessors, described the decision as 'a seismic result.' In response, a Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) spokesperson said the company intends to appeal the verdict but will comply with the court's decision and any required relief for now. The spokesperson added, 'We strongly disagree with the jury's verdict and believe it will not withstand appellate review.' Innovative Health sued Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ)'s Biosense Webster in 2019, claiming the company used its market power to block hospitals from using reprocessed heart-mapping catheters by tying support for its Carto 3 system to purchases of its own products. A jury found Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) violated antitrust laws by withholding support for the reprocessed devices. AMDR's CEO said the ruling signals that anti-competitive tactics against reprocessing won't be tolerated. The case was heard in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. While we acknowledge the potential of JNJ as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure. None.

LA Protests: National Guard Troops Have Detained Protesters (Live Updates)
LA Protests: National Guard Troops Have Detained Protesters (Live Updates)

Forbes

time9 minutes ago

  • Forbes

LA Protests: National Guard Troops Have Detained Protesters (Live Updates)

The National Guard has at times detained protesters in its deployment to Los Angeles, an official said Wednesday, as demonstrations against Immigration and Customs enforcement raids spread to other major cities. Protesters face members of the California National Guard and US Customs and Border Protection agents ... More in Los Angeles. June 11, 4:30 p.m. EDTMaj. Gen. Scott Sherman of the National Guard told reporters federal troops have made brief detainments of protesters in Los Angeles before handing them over to law enforcement for arrests, adding about 500 National Guard troops have been trained to assist immigration operations, the Associated Press reported. 5 a.m. EDTAn LAPD spokesperson told the Los Angeles Times they arrested 25 people for violating the curfew in the city's downtown area on Tuesday night. In a post on X on Tuesday night, the agency said 'multiple groups' were continuing to 'congregate on 1st St between Spring and Alameda' and added 'Those groups are being addressed and mass arrests are being initiated.' 2.30 a.m. EDTTexas Gov. Greg Abbott said he will deploy the Texas National Guard across several parts of his state 'to ensure peace & order,' as protests against ICE are planned in parts of San Antonio on Wednesday. In an X post, Abbott wrote: 'Peaceful protest is legal. Harming a person or property is illegal & will lead to arrest.' June 10, 11.45 p.m. EDTIn a televised address on Tuesday evening, Newsom blasted Trump and described him as 'a president who wants to be bound by no law or constitution, perpetuating a unified assault on American traditions.' Newsom said, 'California may be first, but it clearly won't end here,' adding that other states and eventually democracy itself were 'next.' The governor added: 'Democracy is under assault right before our eyes — the moment we've feared has arrived.' Newsom also hit out at Trump for pardoning the perpetrators of the January 6 Capitol riots, saying: 'Trump, he's not opposed to lawlessness and violence as long as it serves him. What more evidence do we need than January 6th.' 11.30 p.m. EDTA significant portion of downtown Los Angeles is under a curfew, which was announced earlier in the evening by the city's Mayor Karen Bass, who said the restriction will be in effect from 8 p.m. to 6 a.m. local time. Bass said she has introduced to the curfew 'to stop bad actors who are taking advantage of the President's chaotic escalation,' and added: 'Law enforcement will arrest individuals who break the curfew, and you will be prosecuted.' 4:56 p.m. EDTU.S. District Judge Charles Breyer turned down Newsom's request for an emergency ruling that would have blocked federal troop deployment in Los Angeles, giving Trump until Wednesday at 2 p.m. EDT to file a response to Newsom's lawsuit (Newsom can file his response to Trump by Thursday at 12 p.m. EDT). 4:47 p.m. EDTThe Trump administration asked the judge to reject Newsom's request and allow it to respond by Wednesday, calling Newsom's attempt to block the deployment of federal troops 'legally meritless' and saying it would jeopardize the safety of Homeland Security personnel and interfere with the government's ability to carry out operations. 2:20 p.m. EDTNewsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta, in a filing at the U.S. District Court for Northern California, requested the federal judge quickly block the Trump administration's deployment of the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles, arguing the order is 'unlawful' as there 'is no invasion or rebellion' in the city and asking the judge to act by 4 p.m. EDT 'to prevent immediate and irreparable harm.' 11:30 a.m. EDTInterim Defense Department comptroller Bryn MacDonnell told the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense the cost of sending federal troops to Los Angeles was estimated at $134 million, 'which is largely just [temporary duty assignment] costs, travel, housing, food, et cetera.' 10:44 a.m. EDTHouse Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said Newsom should be 'tarred and feathered' for how he has handled the protests, in response to a question about calls for the governor's arrest, provoking a response from Newsom, who said Johnson gave a 'fitting threat given the GOP want to bring our country back to the 18th Century.' 8:27 a.m. EDTIn a Truth Social post, Trump claimed Los Angeles 'would be burning to the ground right now' if he didn't deploy the National Guard to the city and appeared to reference wildfires that destroyed thousands of homes earlier this year, suggesting city and state permits are 'disastrously bungled up and WAY BEHIND SCHEDULE' to rebuild. About 700 active-duty Marines could start arriving in the Los Angeles area as soon as Tuesday, defense officials told CBS and the BBC, after a spokesperson for U.S. Northern Command told the New York Times the troops would arrive in the city overnight. 7:30 a.m. EDTSecretary of Defense Pete Hegseth will participate in the first of a series of congressional hearings he is scheduled to face this week, where he is expected to be grilled about the deployment of the Marines in Los Angeles—he will appear before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense on Tuesday. Hegseth was the first Trump administration official to suggest the deployment of active duty Marines to tackle the protests in an X post. 4 a.m. EDTThe Prime Minister of Australia, Anthony Albanese, on Tuesday addressed the incident involving Australian news reporter Lauren Tomasi, who was struck on her leg by a rubber bullet while covering the protests on Sunday, saying the incident was 'horrific' and claimed footage showed that police had 'targeted' the journalist. Albanese said he has raised the matter with the Trump administration, and added: 'We don't find it acceptable that it occurred, and we think that the role of the media is particularly important.' 3 a.m. EDTThe San Francisco Police Department issued a statement about the demonstrations taking place in the city in support of the Los Angeles protests and said: 'Thousands of people participated in today's demonstrations, which were overwhelmingly peaceful.' However, the police arrested 'multiple individuals' at the end of the night 'two small groups broke off' and allegedly 'committed vandalism and other criminal acts.' 1:30 a.m. EDTAccording to the U.S. Northern Command, the 700 Marines being deployed in Los Angeles are from the 2nd Battalion of the 7th Marines Regiment, 1st Marine Division, and they will 'seamlessly integrate' with the 1700 California National Guard unit deployed to protect 'federal personnel and federal property in the greater Los Angeles area.' 12:40 a.m. EDTThe San Francisco Chronicle reported that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem wrote a letter to Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth on Sunday, asking him to order the military to detain or arrest 'lawbreakers' in Los Angeles. Legal experts cited by the report said Noem's letter may be attempting to circumvent federal laws, which prevent the military from participating in domestic law enforcement, by invoking the Insurrection Act. 12 a.m. EDTIn an interview with CNN, Trump's border czar Tom Homan defended the troop deployment plan and when asked about the role the Marines will play, he said: 'It all depends on the activities of these protesters – I mean, they make the decisions.' 'We don't know what's going to happen tonight – it seems like at night, the crowds get bigger, the violence be well prepared for the military here to protect government property and protect officers' lives,' Homan added. Earlier on Monday, LAPD chief Jim McDonnell said 'The possible arrival of federal military forces in Los Angeles — absent clear coordination — presents a significant logistical and operational challenge for those of us tasked with safeguarding this city.' June 9, 11.30 p.m. EDTNewsom criticized the move to deploy Marines, saying the 'The Secretary of Defense is illegally deploying them onto American streets so Trump can have a talking point at his parade this weekend.' The governor said the state would sue to stop what he described 'a blatant abuse of power,' as he urged Courts and Congress to 'act.' 4 p.m. EDTUp to 700 Marines from a battalion based out of Twentynine Palms, California, were mobilizing to respond to the protests, according to ABC News, and are expected to deploy to the city within 24 hours. The Marines will aid the more than 2,000 members of the National Guard Trump deployed to Los Angeles, according to CNN. 2 p.m. EDTBonta announced he is filing a lawsuit against Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, alleging Trump's order to deploy the National Guard to Los Angeles was 'trying to manufacture chaos and crisis on the ground for his own political ends' while federalizing the National Guard 'is an abuse of the President's authority under the law.' Bonta claims the deployment deprived California of emergency response resources, infringed on Newsom's authority and violates the state's 'sovereign right to control and have available' the National Guard. 9:40 when asked about Newsom daring Homan to arrest him, said he 'would do it if I were Tom—I think it's great,' claiming Newsom is 'grossly incompetent.' Earlier on Monday, Homan told Fox News that while 'no one's above the law,' there was 'no discussion' about arresting Newsom. 9:40 a.m. EDTWaymo removed vehicles from the downtown Los Angeles area and suspended service 'out of an abundance of caution' following guidance from the Los Angeles Police Department, though the robotaxi firm noted it was still operating in the greater Los Angeles region. At least six Waymo vehicles set ablaze Sunday and the company was in touch with the Los Angeles Police Department for an investigation, Waymo spokesperson Chris Bonelli told Forbes, as law enforcement warned burning lithium-ion batteries used in the cars release toxic gases, posing possible health risks, and to avoid the area. 8:54 a.m. EDTNewsom signaled he would sue Trump over his decision to send the National Guard into the state, alleging Trump 'flamed the fires and illegally acted.' June 9, 5 a.m. EDTAt least 60 people were arrested in San Francisco after police reportedly clashed with a group of protestors who gathered to show solidarity with the Los Angeles protestors and oppose the Trump administration's immigration crackdown and deployment of National Guard troops to quell protests. 4 a.m. EDTIn a post on his Truth Social platform Trump mentioned the LAPD's comments from the press conference about reassessing the situation about bring in the National Guard, and wrote 'He should, RIGHT NOW!!! Don't let these thugs get away with this.' In follow up posts Trump wrote: 'Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS,' and 'ARREST THE PEOPLE IN FACE MASKS, NOW!' 3:30 a.m. EDTThe LAPD told reporters at a late night press conference that it had arrested 10 people on Sunday, bring the day's total tally to 27 after adding to the California Highway Patrol's 17 arrests. LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell told reporters that he was aware of the 'deep fear and anxiety' among the immigrant community, and said the department is 'committed to transparency, accountability, and treating every Angeleno with respect, regardless of their immigration status.' When asked about the need for National Guard presence, McDonnell told reporters, 'tonight this thing has gotten out of control' but he would have to know more about their intended role before making that determination and added: 'we got to make a reassessment.' 2:30 a.m. EDTLos Angeles Police Department said an 'UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY' declaration has been issued 'for the area of the Civic Center part of Los Angeles' and said people with with 'Cell Phones in the received the alert.' 1:30 a.m. EDTAccording to the New York Times, a man tried to aim his van at protesters near a gas station in downtown Los Angeles, but it is unclear if any people were harmed. The LAPD later told the Times that it had detained the van driver, and noted 'multiple charges to follow.' 12:30 a.m. EDTThe Los Angeles Police Department has announced that gatherings at Downtown Los Angeles have 'been declared as an UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY,' as it ordered people to 'leave the Downtown Area immediately.' June 8, 11.45 p.m. EDTIn an interview with MSNBC, Newsom dared the Trump administration to come and arrest him in response to earlier comments by the president's border czar Tom Homan threatened to go after any official who interferes the immigration crackdown. Newsom told MSNBC, 'Come after me, arrest me, let's just get it over with, tough guy...I don't give a damn, but I care about my community.' In his interview, Newsom once again accused Trump of 'putting fuel on the fire,' with his actions and confirmed that his state will file a lawsuit against the Trump administration on Monday. 11.30 p.m. EDTCalifornia's Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis told CNN that she expects state officials to file a federal lawsuit on Monday against the Trump administration's move to federalize and deploy the National Guard in Los Angeles. Kounalakis said the lawsuit will say that the president did not have the 'authority to call in the National Guard for 400 people protesting in a way that local law enforcement could clearly handle it.' Earlier in the evening, Newsom said he had made a formal request to the White House to 'rescind their unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles county and return them to my command,' The governor said: 'This is a serious breach of state sovereignty — inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed.' 4 p.m. EDTWhen asked by reporters whether he would invoke the Insurrection Act, the law that gives presidents the authority to deploy the military domestically, Trump said, 'Depends on whether or not there's an insurrection,' adding he does not think the Los Angeles protests are an insurrection, though he said there are 'violent people, and we're not going to let them get away with it.' Trump said he called Newsom and told him he had to 'take care' of the protests, otherwise he would 'send in the troops,' and he told a reporter who asked whether California officials who obstruct deportations would face federal charges: 'If officials stand in the way of law and order, yeah, they will face charges.' 1:30 p.m. EDTAbout 300 members of the National Guard have been stationed across Los Angeles so far, The New York Times reported, the first soldiers as part of the 2,000 Trump has promised to station across the city as more protests are expected to take place this afternoon. 1 p.m. EDTLos Angeles Mayor Karen Bass told the Los Angeles Times said she tried to talk to the Trump administration to 'tell them that there was absolutely no need to have troops on the ground here in Los Angeles,' stating the protests on Saturday were 'relatively minor' and 'peaceful,' with about 100 protesters. 3:22 a.m. EDTBass appeared to rebuff Trump's claim the National Guard did a 'great job' in the city, stating in a post on X that the National Guard had not yet been deployed at that time in Los Angeles, while praising Newsom and local law enforcement. 2:41 said in a late-night Truth Social post the National Guard did a 'great job' in Los Angeles, while slamming Newsom and Bass and the 'Radical Left' protesters and stating protesters will no longer be allowed to wear masks: 'What do these people have to hide, and why???' 12:14 slammed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for 'threatening to deploy active-duty Marines on American soil against its own citizens' as 'deranged behavior.' June 7The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department said it had arrested two people Saturday evening for alleged assault on a police officer, stating multiple officers had been injured by a Molotov cocktail, the Los Angeles Times reported. 10:34 exhibited 'violent behavior' toward federal agents and local law enforcement, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department said in a statement, while clarifying it is not involved in federal law enforcement response and is instead focused on crowd and traffic control. 10:22 a post on X, Newsom said the federal government is taking over the California National Guard and deploying soldiers in Los Angeles solely to create a 'spectacle.' 10:06 announced in a post on X the Department of Defense is 'mobilizing the National Guard IMMEDIATELY to support federal law enforcement in Los Angeles,' stating Marines are standing by for deployment in case of violence. 9:17 House press secretary Karoline Leavitt announced Trump would deploy 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles to address 'lawlessness,' citing protests targeting immigration officers. Similar protests have spread to other cities across the U.S., including San Francisco, New York, Chicago, Denver, Las Vegas, Philadelphia, Seattle, Boston, Santa Ana, California, and parts of Texas, including Dallas, Houston, San Antonio and Austin. At least 80 protesters were arrested in New York, while 15 were arrested in Philadelphia, more than a dozen were arrested in Austin and one was detained in Dallas. At least two police officers were injured during protests in Philadelphia. Los Angeles Metro Police officers stand on the road in front of city hall Tuesday night. People take part in an anti-ICE protest in New York City on Tuesday. Protesters walk by the Cloud Gate sculpture in Chicago on Tuesday. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass will hold a press conference at 2 p.m. EDT Wednesday. Protests broke out Friday and Saturday in Paramount and Compton, cities adjacent to Los Angeles, over immigration raids conducted by ICE, during which the agency detained 44 immigrants Friday and 118 immigrants Saturday, the Associated Press reported. Police and protesters clashed over the weekend, according to local reports and videos on social media, with law enforcement using tear gas and flash grenades to break up the crowds while some protesters threw rocks and lit vehicles on fire. Glendale, California, announced Sunday the city had terminated an agreement with Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement that allowed the agencies to house federal detainees at the city's police facility. Glendale officials said the move was 'a local decision and was not made lightly,' as the city 'recognizes that public perception of the ICE contract—no matter how limited or carefully managed, no matter the good—has become divisive.' Glendale's city manager opted to end the contract after 'careful evaluation of legal, operational and community considerations,' the city said, noting the decision was not 'politically driven.' Trump reportedly said in a memo he is invoking Title 10 of the U.S. Code on Armed Services, which allows the federal government to deploy the National Guard if the United States is 'invaded or is in danger of invasion by a foreign nation,' or if there is a 'rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' Vice President JD Vance said in a post on X on Saturday night the influx of immigrants, which he called 'Biden's border crisis,' amounts to an 'invasion,' rebuffing critics who have questioned whether Trump had the authority to deploy troops. Trump's move has faced some pushback from constitutional scholars. 'For the federal government to take over the California National Guard, without the request of the governor, to put down protests is truly chilling,' Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California Berkeley School of Law, told the Los Angeles Times. The legal issues raised by Trump sending the National Guard to L.A. (Los Angeles Times)

OSU falls victim to budget cuts, putting a damper on scientific research
OSU falls victim to budget cuts, putting a damper on scientific research

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

OSU falls victim to budget cuts, putting a damper on scientific research

PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — The awarding of an OSU microfluidics research fund of $45 million has been called off by the Trump administration, leaving researchers fumbling for options. Microfluidics, the scientific study of the behavior of liquid on a microscopic level, is a recently established field and is hoped to aid in the medical realm as well as the manufacturing of semiconductors, a partially conductive component of many day-to-day electronic devices. The grant's cancellation has been a source of upset for researchers, but OSU is already looking ahead to future opportunities. Anti-ICE protests escalate outside Southwest Portland facility 'While we are disappointed in the notification of the EDA award cancellation for CorMic [Corvallis Microfluidics Tech Hub], we fully intend to participate in the EDA's next Notice of Funding Opportunity and remain well positioned to further national security interests as a global leader in microfluidics for semiconductor manufacturing, ' Tom Weller, Gaulke Professor and Head said. 'Oregon State University will continue to work alongside HP and other partners to further the commercialization of new microfluidics-connected technologies for semiconductor manufacturing, biotechnology, and advanced materials manufacturing.' This is not an isolated incident, with Trump having attempted to cut billions in allocated federal funding to scientific research since the beginning of his current term. White House spokesperson Kush Desai said, 'The Trump administration is spending its first few months reviewing the previous administration's projects, identifying waste, and realigning our research spending to match the American people's priorities and continue our innovative dominance.' Universities are getting hit with the full force of these budget cuts, with biomedical research being classified as 'waste.' Just in February, the National Institutes of Health proposed cutting billions of dollars to OHSU research looking at cancer and heart disease, among other afflictions. These cuts were immediately met with lawsuits from, but not limited to, the Association of American Universities and 22 state attorneys general. These lawsuits are still in progress. The Association of American Universities' lawsuit called the NIH cuts 'flagrantly unlawful' and expressed concern that 'our country will lose its status as the destination for solving the world's biggest health problems.' Scientists of the NIH itself have begun to speak out, publicly disagreeing with the institute's actions, claiming that the cuts 'undermine the NIH mission.' Cuts to scientific research are becoming a recurring source of contention as Trump's second term continues. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store