Why everyone is talking about lymphatic drainage—and what it really does
What it actually does (and doesn't do)
Despite the influencer hype, lymphatic drainage does not melt fat or deliver permanent slimming effects. What it does do is reduce water retention and localised swelling, particularly after long-haul flights, illness or salty meals. Manual lymphatic drainage (MLD)—a technique performed by a trained therapist—involves light, rhythmic strokes that guide lymph toward the body's drainage points, such as the collarbones or groin.
Studies support its efficacy in reducing post-surgical swelling, alleviating chronic inflammation, and improving circulation in sedentary individuals. However, its 'detoxifying' effects are often misunderstood. The liver and kidneys are responsible for detoxification, not the lymphatic system. That said, lymphatic drainage supports the body's natural waste-removal processes by helping prevent stagnation and puffiness. What is not lymphatic drainage
Above Gua sha, although often touted as a lymphatic drainage treatment, is a technique that improves blood flow and reduces inflammation.
Not everything labelled as lymphatic drainage delivers on its promise. Gua sha, for instance, is rooted in Traditional Chinese Medicine and is primarily designed to enhance blood flow and relieve muscle tension—not necessarily lymph flow. While its gentle motions may look similar to MLD, unless the practitioner is trained in lymphatic anatomy, the effects remain mostly superficial.
The same goes for foam rolling, deep tissue massages, and aggressive facial-sculpting devices, which often fall under the same marketing umbrella. These may improve circulation or ease muscle tension, but they don't always support lymphatic function. In fact, excessive pressure can compress lymph vessels, making matters worse.
True lymphatic drainage relies on feather-light, directional techniques aligned with the body's lymphatic pathways. If your treatment leaves you sore or bruised, it wasn't done correctly. Why lymphatic drainage is trending now
Lymphatic drainage taps into a bigger shift in wellness culture: the growing appeal of restorative rituals over punishing routines. Unlike high-intensity workouts or juice fasts, it offers gentle results with minimal effort—just time, access and a skilled practitioner. Social media has propelled its popularity, with up-close videos of facial massages and 'post-drainage glow-ups' reinforcing its appeal. Influencers often link it to aesthetic buzzwords like 'sculpted', 'de-puffed' and 'snatched jawline', though the biological mechanisms are more circulatory than structural.
Luxury clinics in Hong Kong, Manila and Singapore now feature lymphatic drainage alongside LED facials, fascia tools and body-sculpting devices. Some treatments are manual, while others use pneumatic compression suits or radiofrequency. The real draw? A feeling of recalibration. In fast-paced cities where burnout is common, the idea of inner rebalancing sells—and lymphatic drainage delivers just that. Book only with trained experts
When performed correctly, lymphatic drainage is generally low-risk. However, it's not suitable for everyone. Individuals with acute infections, heart failure or kidney issues should avoid the treatment unless cleared by a physician. Technique matters. TikTok tutorials and at-home tools can't replace professional training in anatomy or clinical contraindications.
As wellness continues shifting from performance to restoration, demand for treatments that regulate rather than push the body will likely increase. Once a niche therapy, lymphatic drainage is now central to self-care conversations, sitting alongside fascia release and high-tech skin treatments. Will it transform your body overnight? No. But if what you're seeking is subtle relief, less puffiness and a deeper sense of ease, then it's worth the attention it's getting.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
24 minutes ago
- Business Times
Iran says no plan for new US nuclear talks, plays down impact of strikes
[TEHRAN] Iran on Thursday denied it is set to resume nuclear talks with the United States after the end of a 12-day war with Israel, and accused Washington of exaggerating the impact of US strikes. The most serious conflict yet between Israel and Iran derailed nuclear talks between Iran and the United States, yet President Donald Trump said Washington would hold discussions with Tehran next week, with his special envoy Steve Witkoff expressing hope 'for a comprehensive peace agreement'. But Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi shut down what he said was 'speculation' that Tehran would come to the table and said it 'should not be taken seriously'. 'I would like to state clearly that no agreement, arrangement or conversation has been made to start new negotiations,' he said on state television. 'No plan has been set yet to start negotiations.' Araghchi's denial came as Iranian lawmakers passed a 'binding' bill suspending cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog and after supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei accused Trump of exaggerating the impact of US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. In a televised speech - his first appearance since a ceasefire in the war with Israel - Khamenei hailed what he described as Iran's 'victory' over Israel, vowed never to yield to US pressure and insisted Washington had been dealt a humiliating 'slap'. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'The American president exaggerated events in unusual ways, and it turned out that he needed this exaggeration,' Khamenei said, rejecting US claims Iran's nuclear programme had been set back by decades. The strikes, he insisted, had done 'nothing significant' to Iran's nuclear infrastructure. Araghchi, for his part, called the damage 'serious' and said a detailed assessment was under way. Trump said key facilities, including the underground Fordo uranium enrichment site, had been 'obliterated' by American B-2 bombers. Posting on his Truth Social platform, he dismissed speculation Iran might have removed enriched uranium prior to the raid, saying: 'Nothing was taken out... too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move!' He added that satellite images showed trucks at the site only because Iranian crews were attempting to shield the facility with concrete. Khamenei dismissed such claims, saying 'the Islamic republic won, and in retaliation dealt a severe slap to the face of America'. Both sides have claimed victory: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called it a 'historic win', while Khamenei said Iran's missile retaliation had brought Israel to the brink of collapse. US defence In Washington, the true impact of the strikes has sparked sharp political and intelligence debates. A leaked classified assessment suggested the damage to Iran's nuclear programme may be less severe than initially claimed - possibly delaying progress by only a few months. That contrasts with statements from senior US officials. CIA Director John Ratcliffe said several facilities would need to be 'rebuilt over the course of years'. Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth accused the media of misrepresenting the operation. He said the United States used massive GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs on Fordo and another underground site, while submarine-launched Tomahawk missiles targeted a third facility. 'President Trump created the conditions to end the war, decimating - choose your word - obliterating, destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities,' Hegseth said. Doubts remain about whether Iran quietly removed some 400 kg of enriched uranium from its most sensitive sites before the strikes - potentially hiding nuclear material elsewhere in the country. Netanyahu says Iran 'thwarted' Following waves of Israeli attacks on nuclear and military sites and retaliatory missile fire from Iran since mid-June - the deadliest between the two countries to date - the US bombed three key Iranian atomic facilities. Initial intelligence reports, first revealed by CNN, suggested the strikes did not destroy critical components and delayed Iran's nuclear programme only by months. Experts questioned if Iran had pre-emptively moved enriched uranium to protect it. The US administration has forcefully rejected such suggestions. The Israeli military said Iran's nuclear sites had taken a 'significant' blow, but cautioned it was 'still early' to fully assess the damage. Netanyahu said Israel had 'thwarted Iran's nuclear project', warning any attempt by Iran to rebuild it would be met with the same determination and intensity. Iran has consistently denied seeking a nuclear weapon while defending its 'legitimate rights' to the peaceful use of atomic energy. It has also said it is willing to return to nuclear negotiations with Washington. The Israeli strikes on Iran killed at least 627 civilians, Tehran's health ministry said. Iran's attacks on Israel killed 28 people, according to Israeli figures. AFP
Daily Mirror
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Viewers 'in tears' during John Hunt's first interview since triple murder
BBC racing commentator John Hunt and his surviving daughter Amy appeared on the BBC Two show to discuss the lives of their late family members and the lead up to their tragic deaths BBC viewers were left in floods of tears just minutes into John Hunt's heart-wrenching first interview since the devastating loss of his wife and two daughters. The BBC racing commentator, alongside his daughter Amy, opened up to Victoria Derbyshire about the cherished memories of their family and the harrowing events leading to their untimely deaths. Kyle Clifford, 26, brutally took the lives of his former partner Louise, aged 25, her sister Hannah Hunt, 28, and their mother Carol Hunt, 61. In the emotional interview, Victoria, aged 56, revealed how Louise had sent Clifford a text the day after they split, thanking him for their time together and expressing hope for no hard feelings. John spoke with pride about his youngest daughter's maturity in handling the breakup, saying: "It was textbook from Louise. She dealt with it perfectly." He then shared a poignant TikTok video that Louise had posted following the end of her relationship with Clifford. John recounted: "It starts off with the question 'Don't you feel embarrassed for sticking around that long? Embarrassed? My heart is the best part about me. And who I am as a person." Overcome with emotion, John paused to gather himself before continuing, "It goes on to say, I will never be embarrassed for loving someone with everything in me because that is how I would want someone to love me. Yes it didn't work out but I don't regret loving him and how hard I loved", reports the Express. The BBC star's voice broke as he expressed: "I'm proud of myself for realising that love is always worth giving when it may not be received. I truly think they needed that love a lot more than I did at that time and maybe this will be the reason they never treat a person like that." Struggling to hold back tears, he continued: "So no I don't feel embarrassed about loving someone deeply and wholeheartedly." Concluding with pride, he remarked: "And as you can tell from my reaction now. They weren't Louise's words but they could well have been. And I'm so proud of her for living like that and loving like that." This poignant admission moved viewers deeply, as one commented on social media: "His voice breaking actually is so sad! I'm amazed at how strong they both are to be able to sit and even talk about this." One found the segment difficult, describing it as a "very hard watch" accompanied by crying emojis, while another marveled: "I'm both baffled and in awe of how together these two are. It's extraordinary. I wouldn't be able to function ever again! !" A fellow viewer shared their admiration: "John & Amy Hunt are two amazing human beings. They deserve all the love and luck in the world after what they've been through." A fifth chimed in with praise, "In awe of how well John Hunt and his daughter Amy are coping and conducting themselves - especially given the extreme trauma and grief they've lived through. Shortly into his candid interview, John sought to dispel several fallacies spread about his daughter in the press. One media source alleged: "Kyle Clifford tried to ban Louise from wearing makeup, attempted to control the way she dressed, refused to let her go out without him and did not want her to socialise with any male friends." In response, John retorted: "Extraordinary, off the scale inaccurate. That bears no representation of Louise's existence with Kyle, I would say at any stage, let alone so early." Amy chimed in: "I think she would be aghast by that portrayal." John added: "That's why we're here, Victoria, it's to point fingers at how that sort of thing ever goes to print. But it's our role to correct that, it's so important to do that."
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
PETER HOSKIN: Death Stranding 2 elevates the humble postie to heroic status, and nothing - not bandits, ghosts or weird, oily tentacle-monsters - will stand in his way
Death Stranding 2 (PlayStation, £69.99) Verdict: Out there and outstanding Never has a game celebrated the good ol' postie as Death Stranding 2 does. Here, the people who deliver our packages are considered so heroic that you even play as one, Sam Porter Bridges, trudging from place to place to ensure those deliveries happen. It helps, though, that, in this case, the risks are greater than the occasional heel-snapping dog. As anyone who's played the original Death Stranding (2019) will know, this series takes place in a future where the boundaries between this life and the afterlife have broken down in cataclysmic ways. Bandits, ghosts and weird, oily tentacle-monsters lie in Sam's path. His job isn't just to pop things through letterboxes — it's to reconnect all human society. If that makes Death Stranding sound weird, then good. It is. Most of your time with DS2 will be spent planting one foot in front of the other, struggling across the unforgiving terrain of Australia, deploying ladders and ropes to progress. You'll do a lot of rearranging of your cargo. You'll try, often in vain, not to fall over. This is not a normal gaming experience. But it is a stunning one. With DS2, series creator Hideo Kojima has delivered on the odd promise of its forerunner. There are more options, both in terms of skills and equipment, for turning Sam (voiced once again by The Walking Dead's Norman Reedus) into your Sam. The stealth and combat segments are exhilarating, almost the equal of Kojima's own Metal Gear Solid V (2015). The land- and skyscapes are among the most beautiful ever programmed. And the story, as performed by digitised versions of big-time Hollywood actors and filmmakers, including Elle Fanning, Lea Seydoux and Guillermo Del Toro? All I'll say is that it goes to places no other game has gone before. DS2 is ambitious, mad and more than a little self-indulgent. But much like its doughty protagonist, it delivers. System Shock 2: 25th Anniversary Remaster (PC, £23.99) Verdict: Still shockingly good Rating: Something has gone wrong aboard the Von Braun. In 2114, this faster-than-light spaceship was sent well beyond the constraints of our solar system and came across a distress signal on a distant planet. Now most of the crew are ravening zombies thanks to alien eggs, mind parasites, malfunctioning computers... y'know, the usual. Except now, in this year 2025, something has finally gone right aboard the Von Braun. Twenty-six years after the game in which the spaceship's catastrophic story was first told — System Shock 2 — was first released, we now have a proper remastered edition. Prettier graphics, modern controller support, various ease-of-life enhancements... y'know, the usual. Just playing System Shock 2 again is a total blast. Even though its gameplay has been repeated and refined in hundreds of subsequent releases (including the brilliant Bioshock series), this remains one of the greatest games of all time. Its blend of first-person shooting and character-building mechanics is still extremely compelling. The sense of dread it inspires is still overwhelming. Its famous twist — let's just say it involves the malevolent AI, known as SHODAN, from the first game — is still, well, shocking. As for the remastered edition itself, it's by one of the best game-preservation operations in the biz, Nightdive Studios, so it's all skilfully and lovingly done. This is System Shock 2 as you remember it looking — which is to say, much better than it actually looked, but nowhere near, say, a modern Call Of Duty game. It's the 1990s, given a heavy polish. The only problem, if you can call it that, is that System Shock 2 had already been enhanced plenty in the years since its original release — by fans publishing homemade updates online. So this new version isn't quite as revelatory as Nightdive's full remake of the original System Shock, which they put out in 2023. Still, if you want to play the best version of one of history's best games, this is it.
