logo
London's IPO drought deepens but could Trump's tariffs shake things up?

London's IPO drought deepens but could Trump's tariffs shake things up?

CNBC2 days ago

The London Stock Exchange has struggled to entice companies looking to go public — but some market watchers say a tariffs-driven diversification away from the U.S. could help the U.K. win back a greater share of the IPO market. On Thursday, British fintech giant Wise dealt a fresh blow to the London Stock Exchange by announcing plans to move its primary listing from the U.K. capital to New York. It came soon after metals investor Cobalt Holdings scrapped plans for a London IPO. The firm confirmed to CNBC on Thursday that its U.K. listing would not go ahead, but declined to comment further. Meanwhile, reports emerged last week that Chinese fast fashion giant Shein was now looking to list in Hong Kong instead of London when it floats on the public market. These developments raise fresh questions about London's appeal to companies looking to raise capital. In recent years, the London Stock Exchange has seen dwindling interest, with just 18 companies floating on the U.K. stock market in 2024, according to EY data — a far cry from the 119 companies that listed in London just three years earlier. More recent figures from professional services giant PwC showed that in the first quarter of this year, proceeds raised from IPOs on the London Stock Exchange fell to £100 million ($135.86 million) from £300 million a year earlier. Companies that have listed in London over the past year include RC Fornax, which joined the FTSE AIM in February, and Canal+ . The French broadcaster saw lackluster demand for its December IPO, with shares falling 22% on its debut in London . Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell, pointed out that there is much more appetite to list in the U.S. than Britain, likening the U.K. stock market to "a boxer determined to keep going in a grueling fight" after Wise unveiled its plans to move its preliminary listing. "While the FTSE 100's share price performance might have beaten the main U.S. indices this year, the broader U.K. stock market continues to take a succession of blows to the head from a reputational perspective," he said. "Takeovers are coming thick and fast, IPOs remain scarce, and more companies are looking Stateside for their main stock listing in hope of a higher valuation." The slowing trend in IPOs is being seen across the globe — but on Wall Street, significant capital is still being raised by new listings. Global IPO volumes fell by 10% year-on-year in 2024, according to EY's data, but the U.S. market raised the most from IPOs at $27.6 billion — taking the top spot for the first time in three years. Year-to-date, Mould pointed out, there had been just eight new floats in London, compared to the 136 IPOs seen so far this year in the United States. "But even those numbers are way down from the all-time high of 1,035 in the USA in the frenzied days of 2021," he added. "And those dates do carry their own warning … the 2021 frenzy led to a nasty hangover in 2022." A pivot toward Europe and the U.K.? Chris Clement, senior portfolio manager at BRI Wealth Management, told CNBC that the slowdown in London listings had occurred as companies eyed "significant premiums" on U.S. versus U.K. valuations — but he added that growing diversification away from the U.S. had the potential to change the picture. U.S. President Trump's controversial trade policies have already pushed some investors to look beyond the USA — and Clement said the same could happen with businesses looking to list. "At a time when investors are starting to question U.S. exceptionalism, we may see this trend slow or even stop as investor focus moves away from the U.S. back to Europe, the U.K. and further afield," he said in an email on Thursday. Mark Williams, global chief revenue officer at M & A platform provider Datasite, agreed that Trump's policies could "significantly reshape" dealmaking this year and "spark a pivot … to European and U.K. markets." "The risks to U.S. equities have begun to prompt a reappraisal of diversification, triggering a switch from the U.S. to European and U.K. equities, which could mean greater investment in U.K. companies and even a boost in IPO activity," he told CNBC in an email. Looking ahead, Mould urged investors to carefully consider new entrants to any index before jumping onto an IPO bandwagon — wherever they list. "Any offering should be treated on its merits and investors should assess a market newcomer as thoroughly as they would assess an existing listing," he said. "Check out its competitive position, management acumen and financial strength, before ultimately deciding whether the valuation leaves enough upside to more than compensate for any downside risks."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The ultimate loser of Trump and Musk's bloody battle royale could be the nation
The ultimate loser of Trump and Musk's bloody battle royale could be the nation

New York Post

time25 minutes ago

  • New York Post

The ultimate loser of Trump and Musk's bloody battle royale could be the nation

Godzilla vs King Kong. Ali vs Frazier. Yankees vs. Red Sox. Trump vs. Musk is bigger than all of them because — unlike the first match — this one is real. And unlike the other two, it has real-world consequences. The future of the republic — not to mention the future of Tesla, ­SpaceX and Musk's other cutting-edge tech companies — could be at stake, depending on how bad it all gets. Of course, with this pair, they could make up while this column is at the printer. Musk is known to do 180s in business like most people breathe, and he seems open (at least for now) to rapprochement. That's why, after tanking during early rounds of the fight, Tesla shares spiked on Friday. Trump, meanwhile, can be forgiving when he sees an opportunity. Remember how he mocked 'Little Marco,' who after a ­MAGA-esque transformation is now Secretary of State Marco ­Rubio. Trump wanted to ban TikTok but as I was first to report, he's extending its life in the US. He came to believe that even if it is Chinese spyware, it helped him win a second term. But there's a better case that the Trump-Musk feud will linger. These men maintain some of the biggest egos on the planet; Musk actually thinks he's the reason Trump got elected since Elon owns X (formerly Twitter), which became a MAGA megaphone. If you know Trump like I do, someone taking credit for his success is a third rail. Plus, Musk isn't a natural convert to MAGA. These dudes bonded because Musk, a former Democrat, believed his party lost its mind on woke. His EV maker Tesla, a darling of the environmental movement, has a big operation in China, the main target of Trump's trade war. Musk called Peter Navarro, Trump's lead trade warrior, 'Peter Retarrdo' because Elon's no fan of tariffs. For his part, Trump is no budget hawk. It's telling that this fight started with Musk's critique that the president's 'big, beautiful bill' spends too much money. It quickly exposed other fissures lurking beneath the surface, according to my sources, and now it has gotten messy. No way to treat a pal Trump is teeing up killing all of Musk's lucrative government contracting after Musk outrageously — and foolishly — claimed the president is holding back the Jeffrey Epstein files because Trump's in the docs in some nefarious way. Not a way to treat a friend, particularly a powerful one. All of which gets me to laying odds on the winner if this feud keeps going. I say Trump is the heavy favorite. Musk has no political base, even if he splinters and begins spending his billions on Dems. Yes, some lefties are relishing the battle, but Musk will never be acceptable to most Democrats for the unforgivable sin of aiding Trump, then via DOGE cutting all that government lefty spending. Charlie Gasparino has his finger on the pulse of where business, politics and finance meet Sign up to receive On The Money by Charlie Gasparino in your inbox every Thursday. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Meanwhile, Musk poses little threat to MAGA. He's not a natural politician — he's not even comfortable in his own skin. He controls X and has a huge following, but Trump has his own following and social media platform that attracts as much media attention. And Trump can hit him where it hurts — his pocketbook. Musk is the world's richest man, but mostly on paper. It could diminish fast given how much of it is built on government work. Recall Musk smoking a joint on Joe Rogan, which is a no-no when you do defense contracting as SpaceX does. I reported how it sparked scrutiny by the feds that went nowhere. Maybe now it goes somewhere. Musk's accounting at Tesla has drawn regulatory attention in the past; it now might get some more. The company just had a lousy quarter as its lefty EV-buying base went somewhere else. Shares have recovered somewhat but remain under pressure. They fell as much as 16% when the feud went defcon. Trump could go after other parts of the Musk empire. The president could throttle SpaceX's government contracts, using the weed issue as an excuse to re-examine the relationship. Maybe more of those go by the wayside along with all his other government contracts. Musk is obviously miffed that Trump's tax bill didn't cut enough fat, but what might have really stoked his anger is that it did take aim at various green-tax credits that Tesla has feasted upon. Musk's recklessness in his attacks underscores one of his weaknesses as a CEO; he once said he had a buyer to take it private at a premium but no one emerged. And you wonder why the Epstein barb shouldn't be taken seriously. The smarter move Yes, Trump has a lot of levers to pull to get at what makes Musk so powerful. But here's why he shouldn't: For all of Musk's flaws, he's smart and has his finger on the pulse of the emerging economy. Tesla's tech is first-rate. ­SpaceX is transformational, and serves a significant national security function. Musk is rich and can continue to elect Republicans to keep Trump from being impeached and derailing what is really working in his second term, such as his war on woke, closing the border and, when this tariff stuff subsidies, tax cuts to grow the economy. And they did make beautiful music together exposing stuff with DOGE. Someone please call a timeout.

Capitol Hill steakhouse to temporarily close while owner shuts down multiple café locations
Capitol Hill steakhouse to temporarily close while owner shuts down multiple café locations

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Capitol Hill steakhouse to temporarily close while owner shuts down multiple café locations

This story was originally published on A collection of restaurants and eateries run by James Beard Award-winning Seattle chef Renee Erickson is set to close, with some locations closing either temporarily or permanently. Bateau, a contemporary steakhouse, and Boat Bar, a French-inspired oyster bar, are shutting down temporarily on June 19. Both restaurants are expected to reopen in the next three to six months. 'We're incredibly proud of what Bateau and Boat Bar have brought to Seattle's dining scene,' Erickson said in a prepared statement. 'This closure will allow us the time and space to refresh and retool these restaurants after a long 10 years, so they can evolve and continue to inspire.' However, Beataeu's next-door neighbor, The General Porpoise café, also owned and operated by Erickson, is set to close permanently in order to be converted into a private dining room. The General Porpoise location in Laurelhurst is also closing permanently by June 24. These restaurants fall under the umbrella of Sea Creatures Restaurants, a network of eateries locally owned and operated by Erickson and partners. Sea Creatures Restaurants also owns Willmott's Ghost, The Whale Wins, The Walrus and the Carpenter, Barnacle Bar, Deep Dive, Westward, and Lioness. The closures, both permanent and temporary, came after a unionization effort led by some Sea Creatures employees earlier this year, according to The Seattle Times. 'We are comfortable with the union,' Sea Creatures Restaurants co-owner Jeremy Price told The Seattle Times. 'That's an employee's right, and we are all good with that.' Erickson and Price's goal is to relocate all doughnut shop employees working at the now-permanently closed General Porpoise cafés to the remaining locations.

Britain's debt is a threat to national security
Britain's debt is a threat to national security

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Britain's debt is a threat to national security

Our sky high debt is a threat to our national security. This year, the cost of servicing our debt will be almost double what we are spending on defence. And in today's turbulent world, the fiscal buffer to cushion us from shocks is paper thin. The smallest tap could shatter our economic credibility. The Prime Minister has made defence and security the organising principle of his government. Given that, putting our debt on a downward path should be his government's priority. It isn't. Debt will be higher at the end of the Parliament than today. And with global government debt already around $100 trillion, and Donald Trump about to increase that by a further $2.4 trillion, who will buy our debt – and at what price? Last year, the cross-party House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee raised a red flag that UK debt risks becoming unsustainable unless tough decisions are taken in this Parliament. We set out a choice: taxes would have to rise, or the state would have to do less. Being cross-party, we did not opine on which option was best. The Government has taken tough decisions – but in my mind the wrong ones. Taxes are rising to record highs. The Chancellor said last year that her strategy would deliver growth, and that she would not come back for more tax. But the growth forecast has been halved, and further tax hikes are on the cards. Meanwhile, pressure to spend more on defence is going to increase. At the upcoming Nato summit, nations are likely to be asked to commit to spending 5 per cent of GDP on defence – double Labour's current commitment. So what is to be done? We need to confront the other option: the state should do less. The Government rightly says that the relentless rise in welfare spending is 'unsustainable'. Spending on disability and incapacity benefits alone is more than on defence. But having announced that action would be taken to curb the growth in the welfare budget, the Prime Minister is now blinking in the face of opposition. The Government – and the nation – cannot afford ministers losing their nerve to keep a lid on spending. The bond vigilantes have saddled up and are on the prowl. Nor can the Chancellor tax her way out of the debt quagmire: to do so would risk us entering into a doom loop of ever lower growth and ever higher debt. If defence and security is the organising principle of government, the Chancellor must set out a credible plan to stop debt's relentless rise and bring it down from today's giddying heights. Not doing so risks economic catastrophe – and our national security. Lord Bridges of Headley is a former Government minister; he was Chairman of the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee between January 2022 and January 2025 Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store