Reduced 19pct US tariff fuels hope
The new rate — a reduction from the original 25 per cent — is on a par with regional neighbours such as Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand and Cambodia.
The White House issued a presidential order dated July 31, outlining broader changes to the US Reciprocal Tariff framework under Executive Order 14257.
It saw sweeping revision to the "liberation day" tariffs announced by President Donald Trump in April, reducing or slightly increasing rates on US trading partners.
The April announcement saw Malaysia facing a 24 per cent tariff, adjusted to 25 per cent in July, before being reduced to 19 per cent effective Aug 8. This sits above the global baseline of 10 per cent.
Industry players welcomed the lower rate, saying it reflects the result of constructive dialogue and engagement between the Malaysian and US governments.
The cut may seem modest but it marks a significant boost for Malaysian exporters navigating increasingly competitive and cost-sensitive global supply chains, they added.
At Bursa Malaysia, the news prompted a positive market reaction.
The stock exchange's benchmark index FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI (FBM KLCI) saw an immediate rise as investors quickly priced in the positive impact on Malaysian exporters, particularly in sectors such as semiconductor, palm oil and rubber products.
The key index rose 1.33 per cent, gaining 20.10 points to close at 1,533.35, up from Thursday's close of 1,513.25.
Following the tariff clarity, the FBM KLCI is expected to trade higher next week, driven by clearer investor outlook.
Enhancing Competitiveness
While it is still too early to assess the full extent of the impact, several export-oriented industries may benefit from improved competitiveness and increased demand.
Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers (FMM) president Tan Sri Soh Thian Lai said the tariff cut enhances the cost competitiveness of Malaysian-manufactured goods in the US market and reflects improved bilateral trade relations.
He commended Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's direct engagement with US President Donald Trump as well as the Investment, Trade and Industry Ministry and other relevant agencies for their continued efforts in advocating for the interests of Malaysian industry on the international stage.
Malaysian Furniture Council president Desmond Tan said the tariff reduction brings Malaysia's treatment more in line with that of neighbouring Asean nations, helping to preserve its relevance within the regional supply chain.
"Hopefully these latest tariffs can reduce uncertainty. However, exporters will still need to adapt to a higher-cost trade environment and continued support from the government remains valuable," Tan told the New Straits Times.
Trade talks between the Malaysian and US governments began on May 6 and concluded on July 31, involving multiple platforms of engagement, according to the Investment, Trade and Industry Ministry.
The US is Malaysia's largest export market, with trade valued at RM198.65 billion and its largest source of foreign direct investment, with RM32.82 billion in approved investments recorded in 2024.
Underlying Risks
While the 19 per cent tariff is "less damaging" than the initially proposed 25 per cent, some industry specialists said it still represents a hurdle that will weigh on Malaysia's exports in the global market.
Moomoo Malaysia head of dealing Ken Low said the tariff easing is a short-term relief as there remains underlying risks that investors and exporters must navigate in the coming months.
"While the tariff reduction is a positive development for Malay-sia's export sectors, it is far from a comprehensive solution," he said.
For exporters, particularly in industries like semiconductor, palm oil and medical devices, the 19 per cent tariff could still pressure margins and profitability, Low said.
Companies will likely face higher costs for their goods entering the US market, with potential price hikes or margin erosion.
Additionally, supply chain disruptions caused by tariffs could delay shipments and reduce overall demand.
In the glove sector, Malaysia — which is a major glove producer and exporter — no longer holds a rate advantage over Thailand, Indonesia or Cambodia.
But the country's 19 per cent tariff is still lower than Vietnam's 20 per cent and China's 30 per cent, offering marginal competitiveness in the US market, according to CIMB Securities.
In 2024, Malaysia held the largest share (about 45 per cent) of the global rubber glove market, followed by China (28 per cent) and Vietnam (10 per cent).
CIMB Securities expects some incremental shift in the US glove orders to Malaysia, but higher tariffs will still increase US buyers' cost base, which may limit restocking or lead to leaner inventories.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
A leap backwards
BURSA Malaysia's third market, Leading Entrepreneur Accelerator Platform (LEAP), has been designed to fail from day one. The irony is that LEAP Market rules and requirements are the very reasons why investors and businesses have slowly distanced themselves in recent years.
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Jitters over Jakarta's land seizure
THE Indonesian government is moving to confiscate palm oil plantation land parcels that was either illegally developed or linked to corruption investigations. And Malaysian plantation companies operating there are having the jitters. Industry insiders and analysts say Malaysian plantation companies face the risk of losing some of their estate land as Jakarta's forestry task force has set a target of confiscating three million hectares by August.
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: Agrofood sector set for major reforms under 13MP
THE 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP) has big ideas for the agrofood sector. High time, we say. It has been treated as a stepchild since the country transitioned to manufacturing in the 1980s. That should change by 2030, when the 13MP reforms the sector, leading to RM58 billion in value creation. Self-sufficiency rates are also being scaled up to 80 per cent for rice, 98 per cent for fisheries, 83 per cent for fruits, 79 per cent for vegetables, 140 per cent for poultry, 123 per cent for eggs and 50 per cent for beef and buffalo meat. Ambitious? Yes, given that the Agriculture and Food Security Ministry has to hit the targets within five years, on top of resolving numerous issues plaguing the agrofood sector. Surely, an unenviable task. Land is a big ticket item, with most of what is available being devoted to industrial crops such as oil palm and rubber, because they are more profitable. In 2020, 7.6 million hectares of arable land was used for agriculture, of which 5.2 million was dedicated to industrial crops. Little wonder, our Asean neighbours' agrofood products are everywhere. Former director of Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute, Rozhan Abu Dardak, provides another reason why this is so in his article published in the Food and Fertilizer Technology Centre Agricultural Policy Platform website on April 14: Vietnam dedicated 33 million hectares for rice cultivation. Thailand 9.2 million hectares, Indonesia 10.6 million hectares and the Philippines 5.6 million hectares. What about Malaysia? Of the 996,950ha dedicated to the agrofood sector, only 373,383ha is being used to cultivate rice. The rest is used for growing fruits, other food crops and vegetables, the last, a measly 64,220ha to work on. If that is not enough, the agrofood sector has to compete with industries and housing for land. More land for agrofood should certainly be a reform to aim for. There is one reality our policymakers often miss. Malaysia is a land of small things. Like the small and medium enterprises (SMEs) that dominate the country's economy, so do small-scale farms. According to Rozhan, more than 90 per cent of Malaysian farmers own small plots of land, averaging 2.5ha per person. Logically, bigger means better yields. But that doesn't mean technology can't be made to work on small plots to increase yields. Like we have learnt to live with SMEs, we must learn to live with small-scale farms. What the agrofood sector reform should focus on are the farms themselves: the what and how of the trade. The skyrocketing prices of farm inputs, too, are making farming a challenging vocation. Farmers need help. Providing subsidies to those who deserve it is one way. The 13MP's move to incentivise young agroentrepreneurs takes the reform to a good place. We are a nation of old farmers, most of whom are in their 60s. At that age, farming is a struggle. Malaysians will be keeping a keen eye on the agrofood sector reforms, because what happens in the farms will determine whether or not we have home-grown food on the table.
