Trump says he will put 100% tariff on all foreign films
In a social media post on Sunday, Trump said he had directed the US Department of Commerce and the US Trade Representative to immediately begin the process of imposing the tariff on 'any and all' films produced in 'foreign lands'.
'Other Countries are offering all sorts of incentives to draw our filmmakers and studios away from the United States. Hollywood, and many other areas within the U.S.A., are being devastated,' Trump said on his Truth Social platform.
'This is a concerted effort by other Nations and, therefore, a National Security threat. It is, in addition to everything else, messaging and propaganda!'
Trump did not elaborate on how such a tariff would work in practical terms, including whether it would be applied to Hollywood features that involve shooting and production across multiple countries.
Trump's announcement follows his appointment in January of actors Sylvester Stallone, Mel Gibson and Jon Voight as 'special ambassadors' tasked with bringing back business that Hollywood has lost to other countries.
At the time, Trump said the actors would be 'my eyes and ears' as he set about instituting a 'Golden Age of Hollywood'.
Hollywood has faced tough business conditions in recent years amid the fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2023 actors' and writers' strike.
Hollywood studios grossed about $30bn worldwide last year, down about 7 percent from 2023, according to Gower Street Analytics.
While last year's performance was an improvement on revenues in 2020, 2021 and 2022, it was still about 20 below the pre-pandemic average, according to Gower Street Analytics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin to meet in coming days, Kremlin aide says
US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin are preparing to meet 'in the coming days', a Kremlin official has said, as a United States deadline for Russia to agree to a ceasefire in its war on Ukraine or face economic penalties approaches. Kremlin adviser Yuri Ushakov said on Thursday that a Trump-Putin meeting could happen as early as next week. A location has been chosen, he added, though it would be revealed at a later stage. 'At the request of the American side, both parties have effectively agreed to hold a high-level bilateral meeting in the coming days,' Ushakov told reporters. The announcement follows Trump's remarks on Wednesday that he was hopeful of holding a joint meeting with both Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy 'very soon'. Trump has warned Moscow that unless a ceasefire is reached by Friday, it will face broader sanctions. Ushakov said the prospect of a three-way summit came up during talks in Moscow with Trump's envoy, Steve Witkoff, who met Putin for the fifth time earlier this week. Russia offered no official comment on the potential trilateral meeting. Zelenskyy signalled support for such a summit, writing on X that 'Ukraine is not afraid of meetings and expects the same brave approach from the Russian side'. He added that discussions had included 'two bilateral and one trilateral' format, insisting Europe must be involved in efforts to end the war. Despite multiple visits to Moscow by Witkoff since Trump entered office in January after promising to end the war, no breakthrough has materialised. Trump acknowledged the lack of progress, saying: 'I don't call it a breakthrough … we have been working at this for a long time. There are thousands of young people dying … I'm here to get the thing over with.' The Kremlin described Witkoff's latest discussions as 'constructive' and said both sides had exchanged 'signals', though it provided few specifics. Meanwhile, Zelenskyy confirmed he had spoken with Trump about the meeting, alongside European leaders. Expectations remain low that a peace deal will be reached before Trump's deadline. Russia continues to launch air strikes across Ukraine, and Moscow's conditions for ending the war, such as Kyiv's demilitarisation, neutrality and renunciation of NATO membership, remain non-starters for Ukraine and its Western allies. Putin also demands Ukrainian withdrawal from Russian-occupied regions, the formal recognition of Crimea, and the lifting of international sanctions. Kyiv has consistently rejected those terms. Meanwhile, the White House has approved an additional $200m military aid package for Ukraine, including support for drone manufacturing. And in a separate move, Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday imposing 25 percent tariffs on Indian imports over its ongoing purchases of Russian oil.
Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Columbia University agrees to rules making teaching 'Impossible'
Trump rules to make teaching some topics 'impossible' Quotable Video Duration 01 minutes 00 seconds 01:00 Video Duration 00 minutes 45 seconds 00:45 Video Duration 00 minutes 53 seconds 00:53 Video Duration 01 minutes 14 seconds 01:14 Video Duration 01 minutes 34 seconds 01:34 Video Duration 01 minutes 21 seconds 01:21 Video Duration 00 minutes 42 seconds 00:42
Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Can Donald Trump take federal control of Washington, DC?
After a group of teenagers severely beat a prominent employee of President Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency in an attempted carjacking in Washington, DC, Trump threatened a federal takeover of the nation's capital. Trump shared an image on August 5 on Truth Social of a bloodied Edward Coristine, also known by his online alias as 'Big Balls'. 'If D.C. doesn't get its act together, and quickly, we will have no choice but to take Federal control of the City, and run this City how it should be run, and put criminals on notice that they're not going to get away with it anymore,' Trump wrote. 'Perhaps it should have been done a long time ago, then this incredible young man, and so many others, would not have had to go through the horrors of Violent Crime. If this continues, I am going to exert my powers, and FEDERALIZE this City. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' Trump repeated the idea to reporters on August 6, saying he was 'going to look at' revoking the city's home rule, citing the attack on Coristine. Data shows that in recent years, the district has had a significant crime problem, but offences such as homicide, gun-related and aggravated assault, carjacking, vehicle theft, robbery and sexual assault have declined from COVID-19-era peaks. But a big question remains: can Trump undertake a federal takeover of the District of Columbia? Experts say it's possible, but not necessarily simple – he'd have to get Congress to agree. What is DC's 'home rule'? The United States Constitution created the District of Columbia as a 10-square-mile seat of the federal government. Because the district is not a state, its residents lack full congressional representation; it has one House delegate who cannot vote on the floor, and no senators. For about a century until 1973, the city was run by three presidentially appointed commissioners. That year, President Richard Nixon signed the Home Rule Act, enabling district residents to elect a mayor and city council. While the home rule law granted the district significant autonomy for local governance, the city still answers to Congress on certain matters, including budgetary oversight and the ability to overturn local legislation. 'Since 1974, and indeed for all of DC history, members of Congress have interfered in city affairs to fiddle with everything from how long pools are open to banning the city from using its own tax money for a needle exchange programme,' said George Derek Musgrove, a University of Maryland-Baltimore County historian. What does it mean to federalise DC? Trump hasn't detailed how federalisation would work, or said whether there are specific services he wants to take over. Legal scholars agreed, given the explicit language in the Constitution, that Trump cannot simply take over the district and oust its home rule-elected leadership. He would have to work with Congress, the entity entrusted with overseeing the capital. 'Congress may exercise this authority, not exercise it, or delegate it,' Musgrove said. 'With the Home Rule Act of 1973, it delegated a good bit of that authority – though not all – to a local government. It would have to act to reclaim that authority, or to delegate it to another entity, like the executive branch.' Congress's Republican majorities have so far supported Trump's agenda with near-unanimity, but a repeal of home rule isn't a sure thing. It would need to win passage in the House, which the Republicans narrowly control and where Trump might be able to enforce his will with the majority. But it would also need to clear the Senate, which would take 60 votes, including at least seven Democratic votes, to proceed to final consideration. Democrats have generally been supportive of home rule for the district. In February, Senator Mike Lee and Representative Andrew Ogles introduced legislation to repeal home rule. But the measure has only three Senate co-sponsors and three House co-sponsors. 'According to the Constitution, Congress makes the laws for the district,' said University of North Carolina law professor Michael Gerhardt. If Trump wants to 'federalise DC in order for him to wipe out its Democratic leadership and replace it with people who are loyal only to him, that strikes me as precisely what the framers did not want'. Short of a law, the president has other ways to exert influence in the district, including the authority to mobilise the DC National Guard without local consent. That's a possibility he floated in remarks to reporters on August 6. The Home Rule Act also allows the president to assume temporary control over the city's police department in an emergency – something Trump threatened to do in 2020 amid nationwide protests over the killing of George Floyd. What has Trump said over time about this? Trump has talked broadly since his 2024 campaign about expanding the federal government's powers over the district, including enhanced oversight and direct management. During the March 2023 Conservative Political Action Conference, Trump spoke about driving through the district, lamenting dirty roads. 'It looked like somebody just took their garbage and just threw it all over the highways, the Beltway. It's so disgraceful, so disgusting,' Trump said. '… Frankly, the federal government should take over control and management of Washington, DC.' During a July 2024 Florida campaign rally, Trump promised to 'take over the horribly run capital of our nation in Washington, DC, and clean it up, renovate it, and rebuild our capital city so that it is no longer a nightmare of murder and crime, but rather it will become the most beautiful capital anywhere in the world'. Trump echoed this in February, again focusing on blight and crime: 'I think the federal government should take over the governance of DC and run it really, really properly.' In March, Trump signed an executive order establishing the 'DC Safe and Beautiful Task Force'. It mandates beautification efforts such as graffiti removal and enhanced park maintenance, and it includes provisions to address violent crime and issues related to homelessness. In a July Cabinet meeting, Trump pitched the idea again: 'We have tremendous power at the White House to run places where we have to. We could run DC. I mean, we're … looking at DC. We don't want crime in DC. We want the city to run well.' Has home rule been revoked before? There is precedent for removing home-rule powers, but not recently. In 1874, local conservatives angry about voting rights for local Black and working-class white residents teamed up with opponents of Reconstruction-era voting in the South and some of their Northern allies to roll back democratic laws in the district, Musgrove said. The changes lasted until Nixon signed the home rule bill a century later. A repeal of home rule would not be popular with Washingtonians. In 2024, Trump won less than 6.5 percent of the district's vote. While no city is perfect, the district has built a functioning city government under home rule, Musgrove said. 'There is no question that people would be mad,' Musgrove said.
