AI Startup Decagon In Talks To Raise $100 Million At A $1.5 Billion Valuation
CEO Jesse Zhang (left) and CTO Ashwin Sreenivas (right) competed in science and math Olympiad competitions growing up. Now Decagon is in talks to raise $100 million in funding at a $1.5 billion valuation.
AI startup Decagon, which is building customer service-focused agents, is in talks to raise $100 million in fresh funding at a $1.5 billion valuation, according to five sources familiar with the deal.
Andreessen Horowitz and Accel are leading the round, with participation from existing investors, according to four of the people. The company has more than $10 million in signed contracts (often denoted using the term annual recurring revenue), according to two sources.
Decagon confirmed it has been in talks to raise additional funding, but said the round hasn't been closed yet and the figures could change. Andreessen Horowitz and Accel did not immediately respond to comment requests.
Decagon is building customer support chatbots and agents— software that can autonomously perform basic tasks— for things like answering questions on how a product works, processing refunds and canceling subscriptions. Companies like Notion, Bilt, Duolingo, Substack and Rippling use Decagon customer support chatbots.
The latest investment comes less than a year after Decagon raised a $65 million Series B round led by Bain Capital Ventures at a $650 million valuation, Forbes reported in October. The new investment would bring Decagon's total funding to $200 million. The company, which was featured on the Forbes AI 50 list, was cofounded by 27-year-old CEO Jesse Zhang and Ashwin Sreenivas in 2023 after the duo surveyed dozens of companies to find the problem that could best be solved with AI.
Customer support, a tedious but pivotal part of any business, has long been targeted for automation as a means to save millions in labor costs by eliminating largely outsourced customer support teams. Credit card provider Bilt downsized its customer support team from hundreds to 65 with Decagon, Forbes reported last year. And fitness giant ClassPass, which uses Decagon's AI agents to carry out 2.5 million conversations with its customers, has reduced its customer support costs by 95%, according to The Information. 'We think AI agents can be 10x employees,' Zhang told Forbes in March.
Under the hood, Decagon's agents are built on the most advanced models from OpenAI, Anthropic and Cohere, and trained on internal data like how-to blogs, manuals and past customer service conversations. Staff rate and review responses generated by the AI to improve it. In February, Decagon partnered with audio generation startup ElevenLabs to create voice agents to have more natural, human-like conversations with customers.
Customer service software is a competitive market and Decagon is up against companies like $4.5 billion-valued Sierra, helmed by former Salesforce co-CEO and OpenAI board Chairman Bret Taylor, and Salesforce, which has its own AI agents for customer support. The products themselves are also increasingly identical to each other and businesses regularly do what are called bake offs to pit one AI tool against another to see how well they perform on the job.
'Decagon claims they win almost every time they go up against Sierra head to head,' said one investor involved in the talks. 'Ultimately, they are both going to have exactly the same product and it will really be a race to see who can solve a higher percentage of the support calls with the best accuracy.'
MORE FROM FORBES
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Week in Numbers: trade deal and oil shock
STORY: From a new conflict sending oil prices soaring, to a trade war that might be cooling off, this is the Week in Numbers. GRAPHIC 14% Up to 14% was the initial jump for oil prices following news of Israel's attack on Iran. Traders are worried Tehran could respond by blocking the flow of crude through the Gulf. One estimated Iranian action could hinder the movement of up to 20 million barrels per day. GRAPHIC 55% 55% is now the U.S. tariff on goods from China, after two days of intense negotiations between the pair. Talks in London produced a deal to roll back measures including China's curbs on the export of vital rare earth minerals. And Donald Trump seemed to approve: 'We made a great deal with China. We're very happy with it.' But details remained scant, and tariffs were far from eliminated. GRAPHIC 5% Almost 5% was the fall in Boeing shares after a fatal crash involving one of its 787 jets. All but one of the 242 people on the Air India jet were killed, with more fatalities on the ground. Officials say there's no reason yet to think problems with the plane were to blame, but it all comes with Boeing still trying to repair its reputation following previous crashes. GRAPHIC $2.7 trillion About $2.7 trillion will be the total UK government spending over the coming years. The number came in plans set out by finance minister Rachel Reeves. 'In place of chaos, I choose stability. In place of decline, I choose investments.' But figures later in the week showed GDP shrinking fast, and ministers face mounting pressure to show turnaround plans are working. GRAPHIC $10 billion And $10 billion was the annualized revenue at OpenAI by June. After posting billions in losses last year, analysts say the number suggests ChatGPT and rival bots are now fast becoming big business. Sign in to access your portfolio
WIRED
2 hours ago
- WIRED
This Chatbot Tool Pays Users $50 a Month for Their Feedback on AI Models
Jun 13, 2025 7:00 AM On Yupp, chatbot users earn cash by saying which of two prompts they prefer—info that has great value to the AI companies running the models Photo-Illustration: Wired Staff; Yupp/Getty Images To show off how easy it is for users to earn money by using his new chatbot platform, Pankaj Gupta offers to cash out $1 worth of Yupp credits, sending it to me over Venmo or PayPal. I'm talking with Gupta in the WIRED office during a prelaunch demo of Yupp, which comes out of stealth mode today. Journalistic ethics forbid accepting gifts from sources, so I politely decline. He proceeds to send it over PayPal to his Stanford alumni email. Gupta is the CEO of Yupp, which is free to use and available globally. The website looks similar to other generative AI tools like ChatGPT. There's a prompt box, a way to attach files, and a log of past conversations. The main difference is that every time users ask Yupp a question, they'll see two answers, generated by two different models and displayed side by side. Yupp routes prompts to a pair of LLMs, choosing from a pool of over 500 models that includes products from leading US generative AI companies like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic, as well as international releases, like models from Alibaba, DeepSeek, and Mistral. After looking over the two answers, users pick the response they like best, then provide feedback explaining why. For their effort, they earn a digital scratch card with Yupp credits. "You're not being employed, but you can make a little bit of money,' says Gupta. In my testing, the Yupp credits on the scratch cards typically ranged from zero to around 250, though they occasionally went higher. Every 1,000 credits can be exchanged for $1. Users can cash out a maximum of $10 a day and $50 a month. Not sure where to start while testing this web app, I turned to the range of pre-written topics flickering beneath Yupp's prompt bar, which spanned from news topics, like David Hogg leaving the DNC, to ideas for image-creation prompts, like generating a crochet-looking surfer. (Yupp's models can generate text or images.) I eventually chose to have the bots explain different perspectives on the current Los Angeles protests. I was interested in how it would pull from news reports and other sources to generate the analysis about a political issue. Yupp notified me that generating this answer would cost 50 of my 8,639 Yupp credits; users have to spend credits to make credits on Yupp. It generated two answers, one from Perplexity's Sonar, on the left side, and one from an 'AI agent' for news built by Yupp, on the right. AI agents are buzzy right now; they're basically task-based AI programs that can perform a string of simple operations on your behalf when given a single prompt. The output based on Perplexity's model answered the question citing five online sources, including CBS News and a YouTube video uploaded by the White House titled 'Third-World Insurrection Riots on American Soil.' The other answer, generated by the news agent, cited twice as many sources, including the socialist magazine Jacobin and MSNBC. In addition to having more sources, the answer on the right side included more context about what Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass has been doing. I clicked the button saying I preferred that generation and gave my feedback, which Yupp anonymizes before aggregating. A shiny card resembling a lottery scratcher ticket popped up afterwards, and I used my mouse to scratch it off. I got a measly 68 credits for that feedback, not exactly a windfall. But since I spent 50 credits to run the prompt, it put me up by 18 credits. After about an hour of messaging with the chatbot about different topics and giving my feedback on the models, the total points accrued equaled about $4. The cash-out options include PayPal and Venmo, but also cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. 'Crypto and stablecoin allow us to instantly reach anywhere in the world,' Gupta says. While I didn't earn much money, the free outputs did include answers generated by newly released models that are often locked behind subscription paywalls. If someone wants to use a free chatbot and doesn't mind the friction of providing feedback as the web interface flips between models, Yupp could be worth trying out. During the demo, Gupta asked Yupp where the WIRED office was located. Both models spit out wrong answers initially, though subsequent tries got it right. Still, he sees the side by side outputs as potentially helpful for users who are concerned about AI-generated errors, which are still quite prevalent, and want another point of comparison. ''Every AI for everyone' is kind of our tagline,' says Gupta. 'We have organized all the AI models we can find today.' Yupp's website encourages developers to reach out if they want their language or image model added to the options. It doesn't currently have any deals with AI model builders, and provides these responses by making API calls. Every time someone uses Yupp they are participating in a head-to-head comparison of two chatbot models, and sometimes getting a reward for providing their feedback and picking a winning answer. Basically, it's a user survey disguised as a fun game. (The website has lots of emoji.) He sees the data trade off in this situation for users as more explicit than past consumer apps, like Twitter—which he's quick to tell me that he was the 27th employee at and now has one of that company's cofounders, Biz Stone, as one of his backers. 'This is a little bit of a departure from previous consumer companies,' he says. 'You provide feedback data, that data is going to be used in an anonymized way and sent to the model builders.' Which brings us to where the real money is at: Selling human feedback to AI companies that desperately want more data to fine tune their models. 'Crowdsourced human evaluations is what we're doing here,' Gupta says. He estimates the amount of cash users can make will add up to enough for a few cups of coffee a month. Though, this kind of data labeling, often called reinforcement learning with human feedback in the AI industry, is extremely valuable for companies as they release iterative models and fine tune the outputs. It's worth far more than the bougiest cup of coffee in all of San Francisco. The main competitor to Yupp is a website called LMArena, which is quite popular with AI insiders for getting feedback on new models and bragging rights if a new release rises to the top of the pack. Whenever a powerful model is added to LMArena, it often stokes rumors about which major company is trying to test out its new release in stealth. 'This is a two-sided product with network effects of consumers helping the model builders,' Gupta says. 'And model builders, hopefully, are improving the models and submitting them back to the consumers.' He shows me a beta version of Yupp's leaderboard, which goes live today and includes an overall ranking of the models alongside more granular data. The rankings can be filtered by how well a model performs with specific demographic information users share during the sign-up process, like their age, or on a particular prompt category, like health-care related questions. Near the end of our conversation, Gupta brings up artificial general intelligence—the theory of superintelligent, human-like algorithms—as a technology that is imminent. 'These models are being built for human users at the end of the day, at least for the near future,' he says. It's a fairly common belief, and marketing point, among people working at AI companies, despite many researchers still questioning whether the underlying technology behind large language models will ever be able to produce AGI. Gupta wants Yupp users, who may be anxious about the future of humanity, to envision themselves as actively shaping these algorithms and improving their quality. 'It's better than free, because you are doing this great thing for AI's future,' he says. 'Now, some people would want to know that, and others just want the best answers.' And even more users might just want extra cash and be willing to spend a few hours giving feedback during their chatbot conversations. I mean, $50 is $50.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Apple's Siri Struggle: New Report Explains What Went Wrong
PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing. A lot has been said about Siri in the past year after Apple failed to deliver on its promise of a supercharged voice assistant. Multiple delays and lawsuits later, we now have details on what went wrong at Cupertino. According to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, Apple rushed the development of its AI features after OpenAI's ChatGPT launched in 2022. Things began falling apart when the team tried merging Siri's old code with the new one. Sources tell Gurman that Apple had no plans to launch Apple Intelligence until ChatGPT arrived. Apple's software chief, Craig Federighi, realized the chatbot's potential a month after its launch when he used it to write code for a personal project. Soon, Federighi, along with Apple's then AI head, John Giannandrea, and a few other executives, started meeting with OpenAI, Anthropic, and other AI companies to learn more about these AI models. Federighi also told his team that iOS 18 should infuse as many AI-powered features into an iPhone as possible. Giannandrea then assembled a team and started working on building large language models (LLMs) for AI features. However, as Apple inched closer to Apple Intelligence's public reveal in June 2024, internal tests showed that the chatbot lagged significantly behind ChatGPT, with OpenAI's product delivering 25% better accuracy. The desperate need for AI forced Apple to look for partners. For stronger user privacy, Giannandrea suggested Google, but Apple announced OpenAI as its first AI partner at WWDC 24. Many AI-powered features were announced at the June event, including the ability to summon ChatGPT for requests Siri can't fulfill. A delay pushed that feature to December 2024, but many others that were announced are still MIA, resulting in lawsuits and a new chapter in Apple's ever-growing Siri struggles. Some Apple Intelligence features were too buggy when Federighi started testing them on his personal phone before iOS 18.4. Worse, the communication between Apple's product development and marketing teams was poor. Apple had to pull down TV ads for iPhone 16 features that were nowhere close to being ready. Internally, Giannandrea has absorbed much of the blame for Siri's failure. Several employees claim that Giannandrea lacked urgency for generative AI; another Apple executive says Giannandrea believed consumers don't trust it enough and that AI agents are far away from replacing humans, Bloomberg reports. The exec has blamed overhyped marketing. CEO Tim Cook eventually lost faith in Giannandrea and replaced him with Vision Pro's head, Mike Rockwell, in March. Aside from these issues, Siri's code was seen to have a major technical flaw. To add AI features, Apple engineers split Siri's infrastructure in half. When they tried to merge Siri's new AI features with legacy features, such as setting the alarm, things started falling apart. A team in Zurich is now creating a new software architecture built entirely on an LLM-based engine, called LLM Siri. Their aim is to make Siri more conversational and better at processing information. In the EU, Apple will also let users replace Siri with third-party assistants, according to a source. According to an earlier New York Times report, some of Siri's announced but unreleased features are expected this fall. Meanwhile, Apple is prepping for a huge iOS revamp scheduled for WWDC 25 next month.
