MP Abou Faour: Government must prioritize liberation, reconstruction, and reform
Abou Faour called for lifting all political immunities, stressing that officials should be held accountable before the judiciary like any ordinary citizen. He urged the government to re-launch the reform process, starting with lowering the voting age to 18, adopting a new electoral law reinforcing national unity, implementing expanded administrative decentralization, and establishing a Senate.
Addressing the ministers, Abou Faour underscored that the government is committed to the National Accord—Taif Agreement, which does not recognize or accept federalism. He hoped that its policies and actions would remain aligned with the accord's principles and not be influenced by alternative political visions.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nahar Net
an hour ago
- Nahar Net
Report: Int'l relief over Lebanon's steps on reform and arms
by Naharnet Newsdesk 07 August 2025, 15:05 There is international relief over the Lebanese state's initiation of economic reform and arms monopolization measures, Al-Arabiya television quoted sources as saying on Thursday. 'There are efforts to hold international meetings at the end of the month to prepare for supporting the Lebanese state,' the sources said. 'The Lebanese state's steps pave the way for restoring international confidence in Lebanon,' the sources added.
Nahar Net
an hour ago
- Nahar Net
Foreign Ministry slams Iran FM's remarks as attack on Lebanon's sovereignty
by Naharnet Newsdesk 07 August 2025, 14:10 The Lebanese Foreign Ministry on Thursday condemned remarks by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who said overnight that the Lebanese government's plan on arms monopolization 'will fail.' Noting that Araghchi 'tackled internal Lebanese issues that in no way concern the Islamic Republic,' the Ministry said his statements were 'unacceptable and condemned.' 'They constitute an attack on Lebanon's sovereignty, unity, and stability, and constitute interference in its internal affairs and sovereign decisions,' the Ministry added. 'Relations between states can only be built on the basis of mutual respect and reciprocity, non-interference in internal affairs, and full adherence to the decisions of legitimate constitutional institutions. It is absolutely unacceptable for these relations to be exploited to encourage or support domestic parties outside the framework of the Lebanese state and its institutions, and at its expense,' the Ministry stressed. In an interview on Iran's state TV, Araghchi said 'the stance of Hezbollah Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem and the statement issued by Hezbollah have clearly reflected that Hezbollah will hold onto its arms.' He added that the Lebanese government's plan to disarm Hezbollah 'will fail,' adding that Hezbollah's arms have proved their 'effectiveness' on the battlefield. 'Hezbollah has managed to contain all the blows that it received during the war,' Araghchi said, adding that the group has 'reorganized its ranks, deployed its forces and appointed new leaders.' 'This organization now possesses enough force to defend itself,' Araghchi added, although he said that "any decision on this matter will ultimately rest with Hezbollah itself.' 'We support it from afar, but we do not intervene in its decisions," he said.
Nahar Net
4 hours ago
- Nahar Net
What options for Hezbollah after govt's decision to disarm it?
by Naharnet Newsdesk 07 August 2025, 12:09 The government has decided to task the army with setting a plan to disarm Hezbollah. AFP looks at how the government's decision may be implemented, and whether the Iran-backed militant group can still block it. - Why is the move important? - Tuesday's announcement was the first time a Lebanese government has announced it would disarm Hezbollah, the only armed faction that kept its weapons in the aftermath of the 1975-1990 civil war. Hezbollah has kept its arms in the name of resistance against Israel, which occupied Lebanon's south until 2000. The decision effectively strips Hezbollah's weapons arsenal of political legitimacy, breaking with past government statements that recognized the "resistance" alongside the Lebanese army. The balance of power in Lebanon has shifted after a recent war between Israel and Hezbollah left the group badly weakened, and after the fall of the group's close ally Bashar al-Assad in neighboring Syria. Unprecedented Israeli strikes on Hezbollah backer Iran in June have further weakened its stance. Previous moves to limit or do away with Hezbollah's weapons and logistical network have led to major political and security crises. In May 2008, when the Lebanese government decided to shut down the group's wired communications network, clashes erupted with Hezbollah using its weapons against political opponents in Beirut and beyond. The violence killed at least 65 people. The group's arsenal has remained a divisive issue in Lebanon, with opponents demanding the state control all territories and the government have the sole power to declare war and peace. - What can Hezbollah do? - Hezbollah on Wednesday rejected the government's decision, calling it a "grave sin" and saying it will treat it "as if it did not exist". But the armed group has few choices, which all appear to come at a great cost. Hezbollah could escalate politically by having the four ministers affiliated with it and its allies resign. It could also disrupt the work of parliament, or incite chaos by mobilizing its armed supporters to the streets. Any domestic unrest blamed on Hezbollah would likely have major repercussions for the group's image among Lebanese. "Hezbollah, as much as possible, would want to reduce the chance of itself entering a confrontation with the army, because it knows that the entire country would be against it except for its supporters," said David Wood, a senior Lebanon analyst at the International Crisis Group. "It would be an absolute disaster for its image," he added. Hezbollah lawmaker Ali Ammar dismissed the possibility of any confrontation with the army, saying the two forces "understand" each other. Hezbollah could relaunch attacks against Israel, but this option could easily prove devastating with the country still reeling from last year's war. "Going into war right now, again, will be very devastating to Hezbollah because it does not have a supply line. It lost a lot with the collapse of the Syrian regime," said military analyst Riad Kahwaji. "Its intelligence capabilities, its logistical capabilities have all been severely affected." The war with Israel saw much of Hezbollah's senior leadership killed and a large part of its military arsenal destroyed, as did swathes of Beirut, Lebanon's south and other areas. Receiving weapons shipments from Iran via Syria has become more difficult as Lebanese and Syrian authorities have tightened border controls, and funding has come under stricter oversight. Hezbollah could agree to disarm, but a Lebanese source had told AFP it "would not do so without something in return". Tehran's position may also affect any decision. The Lebanese group may "play for time", according to Atlantic Council researcher Nicholas Blanford. "They can't fully disarm. I think that's impossible for Hezbollah." - How will Lebanon be affected? - Lebanon is under intense Arab and Western pressure to disarm non-state actors, a key demand to secure international support as it emerges from years of political and economic crises. "We must choose: either collapse or stability," President Joseph Aoun said last week. Should Hezbollah insist on keeping its arsenal, Beirut will find itself in a difficult position. "If Hezbollah is determined to keep the weapons, this would be very difficult for the Lebanese government to force it to give them up," said Blanford. "If they can't do it politically," the researcher said the government would not "send the Lebanese army against Hezbollah". "So it has to be a question of a compromise and some kind of agreement, which is not going to be easy." Meanwhile, Israel has already signaled it would not hesitate to launch destructive military operations if Lebanon fails to disarm Hezbollah, as stipulated in the ceasefire agreement that ended their latest war.
