Government rules out cost-of-living package despite another surge in corporation tax receipts
The exchequer returns, published on Thursday, show a strong surplus of €4.5bn for the first six months of the year, as wrangling over the budget is due to kick off in the coming weeks with the publication of the summer economic statement.
The Government has already warned the next budget will be more restrained than previous years, as global economic uncertainty means it will be taking a cautious approach after a giveaway budget ahead of last year's general election.
Exchequer returns for the first half of 2025 show corporation tax generated €7.4bn last month, up 25% on the same month last year.
The Government pointed out that the overall surplus drops to €1.2bn when the proceeds from the EU Apple Tax case are excluded.
The Coalition's proposed cautious approach to the next budget comes as households face increased financial challenges.
Food prices are now rising by 4%, more than twice the general inflation rate.
Households also face some of the largest electricity bills in Europe, and mortgage interest rates, while coming down, remain among the highest across the EU.
Defending the decision not to include another cost-of-living package in the next budget to help families cope with soaring prices, Jack Chambers, the public expenditure minister, said the Government is aware of pressures on households but said there are other ways to support people aside from one-off giveaways.
'We need to balance the risks, which are real in terms of the economic context we are in, with the pressing needs that citizens have,' he said.
'Central to the decisions we make in Government would be the improvement of living standards and supporting greater affordability of public services.'
Paschal Donohoe, the finance minister, said he had not anticipated the international volatility around trade rules and US tariffs.
'The way things are settling at the moment means there will be a new normal to come to terms with as global trade is going to look very different,' he said.
Mr Donohoe also warned of a potential future decline in the corporation tax receipts that have helped the economy to record surpluses.
Both ministers emphasised the need for a 'careful, sensible, and sustainable' approach to Budget 2026.
The overall amount collected in tax in the first half of the year rose almost 7% to €47.7bn despite fears over the impact of US tariffs.
Total spending was €58.2bn, which included payments of €3bn to the State's two long-term savings funds: The Future Ireland Fund and the Infrastructure, Climate, and Nature Fund.
During an event last month, Mr Donohoe said that, in the event of an economic downturn, he would make every effort possible to protect capital expenditure, including using the money set aside in these two funds.
In June, €2.9bn was collected in income tax, bringing the total receipts so far this year to €17.4bn — up €700m year on year.
Corporation tax receipts of €7.4bn were collected last month, bringing the total for the year to €14.8bn. However, this drops to €13.1bn when the Apple tax case proceeds are excluded.
This is still €900m higher than last year and 'slightly ahead of profile' for this year, according to the Department of Finance.
Vat receipts were also ahead of projections at €11.6bn, which is 5.6% up on the same period last year.
Excise duty receipts during June stood at €500m — up by €100m.
Exchequer debt service expenditure in the year to the end of June was €2.2bn, down by €300m compared to last year.
Read More
Budget should focus on infrastructure and tax measures, says Central Bank governor
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
3 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Tariff fallout set to harm Irish growth this year even if EU strikes deal with Trump administration
The EU has until Wednesday to clinch a crucial trade agreement with the US administration before tariffs on almost all exports to America surge to 50pc. Brussels appears willing to accept an outline agreement that includes a 10pc baseline levy, with lower rates for key sectors such as cars, chemicals and pharmaceuticals. Ireland would feel an economic aftershock even if such a deal is secured, according to Kate English, chief economist at Deloitte Ireland. I am not on the page that Ireland is about to crash She said the Irish economy was demonstrating resilience, with strong consumer spending, but believes growth will slow this year. The Department of Finance recently warned growth is expected to slow to 2pc if Trump's 10pc tariffs remain in place. 'There is no world in which there isn't a fallout from this and a reduction of growth,' English said. Despite this, she does not believe Ireland is about to experience a crash or a recession. Some businesses will feel more pain than others, especially those in low-margin sectors, such as the food industry. 'I am not on the page that Ireland is about to crash, or that a recession is coming,' she said. 'But, I definitely would believe growth will be slower than what we have been used to experiencing for the past few years.'¶She warned that extending the trade deal deadline would create more uncertainty, which had been damaging for investment decisions. 'Whatever comes from next week, if we get a deal, it provides some element of clarity or certainty to companies,' she said. 'At the moment, that uncertainty is causing the greatest amount of damage. People are pausing decisions by it. It is impacting sentiment. We know sentiment drives everything.' Since Trump's tariff announcement, the euro has rallied against the dollar and is up nearly 14pc since the beginning of the year. This means Irish products have already become more expensive for American buyers. ADVERTISEMENT Some of the noise is louder than what will actually be implemented Oliver Moloney, chief investment officer with wealth manager Fordel, said the euro's strength was acting like another tariff for Irish exporters. He has been heartened by the market's stability since the significant declines that accompanied Trump's tariff announcements. Markets have more than recovered from the initial shock in April and appear to be heading on a positive trajectory, barring any huge surprises. 'Whenever markets are calm, they are probably more liable to some bad news on the downside,' Moloney added. 'If Trump comes out in a day or two and says: 'We are not going to cut any deal with Europe, they are not negotiating,' that may well cause a bit of a shock downwards,' Moloney said. 'But it seems like since April, people have digested this trade tension and understood that some of the noise is louder than what will actually be implemented in reality. Markets do fall, but they take it in their stride Moloney said investors should not panic if there is not a deal and the markets fall by 10-20pc next week. Such problems can create opportunities. 'Anyone that still has cash that they are due to invest or in the middle of building out a portfolio, a 20pc fall is usually a good time to buy in,' he said. 'Take Covid or the rapid interest rate hikes — markets do fall, but they take it in their stride.' Pressure is mounting strike a deal with Washington, although fractures have emerged within the EU. Germany and Italy are leading a pack of countries eager to cut a quick deal, even if it means a baseline of 10pc tariffs. However, last Friday, France described this was a bad deal for Europe. Tánaiste Simon Harris has appeared to accept trade with the US will involve 10pc tariffs. US threatened Sefcovic with 17pc tariffs on agricultural exports He has not given up on a better deal, telling Edward Walsh, the new US ambassador, that the two countries should 'use every hour' to reach a zero-for-zero tariff settlement in as many areas as possible. What shape any deal looks like will have to wait a little longer. On Friday, Europe's chief negotiator, Maros Sefcovic, revealed he was returning to Brussels after failing to strike an agreement last week with his US counterparts. Talks are set to continue following what he called a 'productive week'. However, the Financial Times reported the US threatened Sefcovic with 17pc tariffs on agricultural exports. Trump also wants US companies to have wide-ranging exemptions from regulations to help cut America's trade surplus.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Expect plenty of cribbin' and moanin' as the budget games begin
The budget games are under way, right enough. Impending decisions about spending priorities for next year and into the future are now the unavoidable context of every political exchange – especially those within Government , some of which you'll see, most of which you won't. They are the subtext of every interview, news story and speech between now and October. As ever, the management of expectations at the centre is essential at this stage. At the recent National Economic Dialogue Paschal Donohoe solemnly warned of deep uncertainty about the future and that (inconveniently) positive headline economic figures so far this year mask 'considerable vulnerabilities'. 'The mood music is changing,' Donohoe warned. His party leader saw 'dark clouds on the horizon'. For the Taoiseach , 'challenging,' was the mot juste. In the Dáil this week, Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers returned to the theme. READ MORE 'We face significant economic uncertainty,' he said. 'Everyone in this House needs to realise the level and degree of ... corporate risks that exists right now.' As the Bert used to say during the late stage hubris of the Celtic Tiger, sure this is all cribbin' and moanin' and talkin' down the country. Still, you can see what they're at. The country and its political system have become accustomed to massive giveaway budgets, and cannot contemplate restraint. Well, let me qualify that thought: everyone can contemplate restraint, just not for themselves. Everyone has a demand for extra spending, sourced from the public purse. Some have a good case; all believe they deserve priority. Much of our media – especially RTÉ – is in the habit of promoting the causes of all comers relentlessly and uncritically. Of course, RTÉ might feel a special affinity with bodies looking for money from the Government. But still. Some context would not go amiss – how much would this cost? What is the existing budget? Where might the money come from? What should not be done in order to pay for this? What taxes should be increased? The list of supplicants for greater public funding is literally unending. A casual glance at a political correspondent's inbox gives a flavour of the requests bombarding the budget ministers: extra provision for education for people with disabilities; extra funding for school capitation; VAT cuts for the embattled hospitality industry; a €25 per week increase in welfare rates; this week's cause celebre – retaining the €1,000 discount on fees for third level students; and so on, and so on. [ The Irish Times view on college fees: Government has a choice to make Opens in new window ] Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan played a more subtle hand. Speaking at the Free Legal Advice Centre in Dublin, he said it was clear that Ireland has 'a big problem' with domestic violence. He would like to provide more resources for Flac and for civil legal aid – but 'I'm limited in terms of budget'. He is getting to the heart of the entire question of budgeting: it's all a question of priorities. Few people would quibble with increasing the budget for legal aid to ensure that people can have access to justice and to the protection of the law, when that question is taken in isolation. But governments cannot take any of these questions in isolation – they must weigh it all up as part of a coherent and credible whole of Government budgetary plan. Within the justice budget, for example, how does that measure up as a priority against recruiting more gardaí? Or fixing the problem of prison overcrowding? Or supporting the victims of crime? Or rehabilitating young people who have fallen into criminality? And how should the justice allocation be compared to the other budgets within Government? Should justice be constrained so that we can spend more money on health? On disabilities? On child poverty? Not so simple now, is it? And, yes, you might want to do all these things. But you can't. Anyone who pretends you can isn't being straight. You have to choose. Now let's not feel too bad for Messers Donohoe and Chambers. It may be hard being in charge of budgets during a time of plenty, but it's better than being Rachel Reeves . As the tears rolled down Reeves' cheeks in the House of Commons on Wednesday, both sterling and the UK's standing in the bond markets were headed in the same direction. Whatever the problems of prosperity that Jack and Paschal have to manage, they are far, far preferable to the other kind of problem, now facing Reeves and her prime minister. Better to have surpluses than deficits. So you might think that an overriding national priority would be to maintain steady and stable public finances. To do that, the budget ministers and the leaders of the Government parties have decided, they must eliminate the once-off giveaways of the last three budgets. 'We can't and we won't' continue with them, Donohoe told Ivan Yates on Newstalk on Thursday. But how firm is that determination? My sense is that Donohoe's is rock solid. He is not, however, in charge of the Government. Both Simon Harris and Micheál Martin, while ruling out another goody basket of one-off giveaways, have insisted that they will also seek to help people with rising costs in the budget. Does this signal a middle ground will be found? This week's controversy over student fees shows just how hard it is to withdraw benefits to which voters have become accustomed. Does the Government have the political will and the capacity to restrain itself and take politically difficult but necessary decisions to position the country for future growth and to protect it against future adversity – or will we cross our fingers, plough on and hope for the best? We'll see. But I know one thing: the politics of no hard choices never, ever ends well.
Irish Independent
5 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Students in line for permanent fee cut as Coalition parties move on to budget battle over welfare payments
The Sunday Independent can also reveal Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael are on a collision course over welfare in the budget talks, after the first major row last week, on college fees. Further and Higher Education Minister James Lawless will now push for budget measures to reduce the €3,000 annual fees for college students by several hundred euro permanently. Students will also be in line for more targeted measures, with disadvantaged students set to get greater support with paying their college fees. Permanent cuts to college fees will be seen as a win for Fine Gael, after the party clashed with its coalition partner last week after Fianna Fáil minister Mr Lawless initially poured cold water on the prospect of reducing fees. In previous budgets, college fees fell by €1,000 due to a temporary subsidy introduced in cost-of-living packages. However, the Government had signalled there would be no cost-of-living supports in Budget 2026, and that they would also end the €250 energy credit to help reduce household bills. This weekend, Mr Lawless insisted he would seek 'discounts to the student contribution fee'. 'I am going into the budget negotiations this autumn seeking the very best possible outcome for students and their families, of course by seeking discounts to the student contribution fee, and in line with our Programme for Government commitments, but also by examining complementary, targeted measures which can be very impactful for cohorts like larger families or the 'squeezed middle',' he said. The Kildare North TD also hit out at Tánaiste Simon Harris, by saying families have faced 'uncertainty' in recent years as 'support schemes were, by design, temporary and not guaranteed year-on-year'. I feel it's important that I'm straight with people Mr Harris had cut fees on a temporary basis when he was further and higher education minister, but these were not put on a permanent footing. 'I feel it's important that I'm straight with people, and that whatever I do in this budget is there to stay — repeatable, costed and sustainable,' Mr Lawless said. He also told Sinn Féin TD Donna McGettigan, the party's spokesperson on further and higher education, that the Government is 'committed to reducing the student contribution fee over the lifetime of the Government, in a financially sustainable manner'. Mr Lawless called on Sinn Féin to provide a 'costed, evidence-based appraisal', prompting Sinn Féin to accuse the minister of being 'tone deaf'. The latest Sunday Independent/ Ireland Thinks poll shows most people believe cuts to student fees should apply to all students and not just those on lower incomes. Most people also believe the Government should cut fees further after previously cutting them by €1,000. But Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael are set to clash on weekly welfare hikes for the unemployed, with Fine Gael believing people who 'refuse' to work should not be 'rewarded'. The party instead wants lower increases — or none at all — for Jobseeker's Allowance, with higher rates for pensioners and the disabled. I've never been into the characterisation of people on welfare However, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said he does not like 'drawing distinctions'. 'I've never been into the characterisation of people on welfare. I've never been into those politics,' he said. The Taoiseach instead spoke about 'turning the dial' on child poverty. 'We do have to make priorities. In terms of how we allocate, my view is that we have, over the last two years, committed to doing something significant on child poverty, to turn the dial around on child poverty — and that's where I would like to see a targeted set of measures emanating from the Department of Social Protection,' he added. His comments stand in stark contrast to those of Mr Harris, who said he believes there is 'merit' to get rid of 'uniformity' in rising all welfare payments — such as Jobseeker's and the pension — by the same weekly amount. 'Roughly speaking, the equivalent of €1.20/€1.25 on every social welfare payment is roughly the equivalent of reducing college fees by €1,000. So budgets are all about choices,' he said last week. 'I'm not convinced that you need to see as significant a rise in the dole as in the pension, at a time when our country is in full employment and when there's lots of supports out there for people getting into work. There's other supports out there for people who can't work for very many good reasons.' Chair of the Oireachtas Social Protection Committee, Fine Gael TD John Paul O'Shea, previously called for 'vulnerable groups' to be prioritised over the unemployed. Proposals to have smaller increases to Jobseeker's than to pensions were rejected by previous governments.
