logo
Blue Zones are meant to help you live longer but are they real?

Blue Zones are meant to help you live longer but are they real?

Telegraph15-03-2025

If you've come to be buried in Quirimán, chances are you've had a pretty good life. Of the 50 or so graves in this hillside village on the Nicoya peninsula, eastern Costa Rica, a significant number of residents surpass the 80 and 90 mark – proof, perhaps, that the area is part of a much-vaunted 'Blue Zone'.
The designation was given almost 20 years ago to a handful of places around the world where people live the longest, healthiest lives, making this, and parts of Italy, Greece, Japan and the US, globally famous. The idea – that people in these hubs are 10 times more likely to live to 100 than the average American – has spawned eight books, a Netflix series and, across Costa Rica, everything from tasting menus to yoga retreats, tours, breweries and branded souvenir shops.
Fifteen kilometres away in the centre of Nicoya, however, the longevity-boosting lifestyle being touted has shrunk from view. Here, waking with the sun, tending to the land all day and eating only what you grow – hailed as the secrets to Nicoyans' long lives – are nowhere to be seen. The town's main intersection houses a McDonald's on one side, a KFC and Burger King on another. On a sunny Tuesday lunchtime they are packed, dozens of families in each outpost jostling over their Happy Meals and buckets of 'mega alitas' (chicken wings). In less than half a generation, the creep of fast food, cars and touch-of-a-button digital dominance seems to have killed this longevity hotspot off stone dead. Although, according to Blue Zones' principal detractor, they never existed to begin with.
Saul Newman, a senior research fellow at the Centre for Longitudinal Studies at University College London, has spent the past five years as the chief thorn in Blue Zone architect Dan Buettner's side. In September, he won the Ig Nobel Prize (awarded to those who have made unusual contributions to science, the arts or humanities) for rubbishing the concept. The theory was originally born out of a 2004 paper on 'extreme longevity' in Sardinia and followed by a National Geographic article hailing the Italian island, Japan's Okinawa and Loma Linda in California as turning out the world's longest-living people (Nicoya was added in 2007, along with Ikaria, Greece, in 2009). But, according to Newman, it was built on 'junk data' – never more than a business idea crafted to shift magazine copies.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Baby Reindeer's real life Martha 'going blind' after stress over lawsuit
Baby Reindeer's real life Martha 'going blind' after stress over lawsuit

Daily Mirror

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Baby Reindeer's real life Martha 'going blind' after stress over lawsuit

Fiona Harvey, who is the inspiration behind Martha from Netflix's Baby Reindeer, has claimed she's going blind due to the mounting stress from the series Fiona Harvey, the inspiration behind Martha from Baby Reindeer, has said she's going blind. The Scot who inspired the character in Richard Gadd's series is currently embroiled in a multi-million-dollar defamation lawsuit with streaming giant Netflix. But the 59-year-old law graduate has said the stress surrounding the Netflix series has caused her so much stress, which she has linked to her diagnosis of background retinopathy. "I'm going blind, and it's not surprising with the stress I have been under as a result of Baby Reindeer," she said. ‌ In a new interview, Fiona said: "I am diabetic and had always been able to keep my blood sugars under control, but my blood sugars have been wild ever since Richard Gadd's show aired." She says that since the series, which has racked up countless awards, aired, she has not been able to sleep or eat properly. ‌ "I'm not able to get proper exercise because I'm virtually a prisoner in my own home," she said. Fiona received a confirmation letter from a hospital on Thursday after undergoing eye tests at a London hospital. The condition is a complication which affects people with diabetes. It happens when high blood sugar levels damage light-sensitive tissues at the back of the eye. Although stage one of the condition doesn't always affect vision, there is a likelihood that it could lead to significant vision loss. Speaking to the Daily Record, Fiona said: "It is something that diabetics can get if your sugars are out of control. My sugars were fine until Baby Reindeer, that led to all my physical health problems. "I don't have money for proper food. I feel it could lead to blindness very quickly in both eyes." A letter from a doctor, seen by the publication, reads: "Dear Dr Fiona Harvey, Your test results show that you do have ­background retinopathy." The letter also states that Fiona needs to manage her health in order to prevent any further damage. The series, which aired over a year ago, has seen Fiona identify herself as the woman who allegedly stalked Gadd while he was working in London. The series was billed as a "true story," which showed the character, Martha, following him to his home, his workplace at The Hawley Arms in Camden and various other locations. ‌ But since its release, it has become quite controversial. Harvey has filed a £132 million defamation lawsuit against the streaming giant that released the series, claiming she was easily identifiable as Martha. Netflix have defended the lawsuit and Mr Gadd's "right to tell his story." The hearing is said to be delayed until next year due to a series of appeals, as well as requests for adjournments. In the series, Martha was sent to jail twice, but Ms Harvey has no criminal convictions. She told the Record: "I have no ­criminal record. I am not Myra Hindley. I am not Rose West. "I'm not Dennis Nilsen. I have not received an indefinite life sentence. My life was normal before this started. Mr Gadd has made my life intolerable. I've had to send people out to do the food shopping. I can't have workmen in my house, lest they go off to Netflix." Now living in a "cramped" flat in London, she says: "At this rate, it's only a matter of time before I will lose my sight. "I have cataracts as well, so I have difficulty typing on a little screen, but due to NHS resources, they won't operate until you are practically blind. I will be stuck on a waiting list, and I will go blind. So congratulations, Richard Gadd. He can strut around while the rest of us involved in this saga have to suffer." While Ms Harvey states she has been defamed in the series, Netflix have said the alleged defamatory statements are non-actionable as they are "substantially true." Harvey fumed: "The court case gives Netflix loads and loads of publicity, and they hope I'll withdraw the motion or just die off."

SpaceX readies private launch of four astronauts to International Space Station
SpaceX readies private launch of four astronauts to International Space Station

NBC News

time2 hours ago

  • NBC News

SpaceX readies private launch of four astronauts to International Space Station

Four crew members are set to launch Wednesday on a privately funded mission to the International Space Station. The flight, organized by the Houston-based company Axiom Space, is slated to lift off at 8 a.m. ET from NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The foursome will journey into orbit in a SpaceX Crew Dragon capsule atop a Falcon 9 rocket. NASA will broadcast live coverage of the launch beginning at 7:05 a.m. ET on NASA+. The flight was scheduled to launch Tuesday but high winds along the Florida coast forced a one-day delay. The mission, known as Ax-4, is expected to last about two weeks at the International Space Station. The mission will be led by retired NASA astronaut Peggy Whitson, who has already logged a record 675 days in space — more than any other American astronaut. Joining her will be pilot Shubhanshu Shukla, an astronaut with the Indian Space Research Organization; mission specialist Sławosz Uznański-Wiśniewski, a Polish scientist with the European Space Agency; and mission specialist Tibor Kapu, a mechanical engineer from Hungary. Shukla, Uznański-Wiśniewski and Kapu will make history by becoming the first people from their countries to live and work on the International Space Station. During their two-week stay at the orbiting lab, the Ax-4 crew members will conduct a host of scientific experiments, according to NASA, including studies of muscle regeneration, how sprouts and edible microalgae grow in microgravity and how tiny aquatic organisms survive at the ISS. If the launch goes according to plan, the four astronauts will dock at the space station on Thursday at around 12:30 p.m. ET. The upcoming flight will be Axiom Space's fourth crewed mission to the International Space Station. The company's first private expedition to the ISS was in 2022 with an all-civilian crew. The price tag for the Ax-4 mission has not been publicly disclosed, but space tourists reportedly paid around $55 million per seat on previous Axiom Space expeditions.

Vaccine sceptic RFK Jr disbands government advisory committee on immunisations
Vaccine sceptic RFK Jr disbands government advisory committee on immunisations

Telegraph

time6 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Vaccine sceptic RFK Jr disbands government advisory committee on immunisations

Robert F Kennedy Jr, the US Health Secretary and a prominent vaccine sceptic, has dismissed all 17 members of a committee that issues official government recommendations on immunisations. In an editorial in the Wall Street Journal, Mr Kennedy claimed that 'retiring' the Advisory Committee on Immunisation Practices (ACIP) was necessary to help rebuild trust in vaccines and ensure 'unbiased' health recommendations. 'The committee has been plagued with persistent conflicts of interest and has become little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine,' he said, adding that he wanted to 'ensure the American people receive the safest vaccines possible'. The move – which some committee members found out about via the media – has been widely criticised by public health experts and scientists, who point to Mr Kennedy's long track record questioning the efficacy and safety of vaccines, sometimes based on dubious science. 'We have just watched politics bury science,' said Dr Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP) at the University of Minnesota. 'If you look at [Kennedy's] accusation that he's doing this because of growing problems with vaccine trust – well, that's kind of like an arsonist complaining that so many houses are on fire,' Dr Osterholm said. 'He's the one that's been seeding these doubts for the last decade.' Since he became the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Mr Kennedy has taken a number of controversial decisions related to vaccines – including from bypassing ACIP to issue new Covid vaccine guidance, to stopping adverts for seasonal influenza shots and cancelling a $766 million contract with Moderna to develop a bird flu jab for humans. Now, Mr Kennedy has claimed the ACIP needs a complete overhaul because members have too many conflicts of interest, and are immersed 'in a system of industry-aligned incentives and paradigms that enforce a narrow pro-industry orthodoxy'. But his move appears to directly contradict promises given during his confirmation hearings. Bill Cassidy, a Republican Senator from Louisiana who is also a doctor, said he only voted for the appointment after Mr Kennedy committed to maintain ACIP 'without changes'. 'Of course, now the fear is that the Acip will be filled up with people who know nothing about vaccines except suspicion,' Mr Cassidy wrote on X on Monday. 'I've just spoken with Secretary Kennedy, and I'll continue to talk with him to ensure this is not the case.' In a statement, Dr Bruce A Scott, executive director of the American Public Health Association, added that Mr Kennedy's move would help drive an increase in vaccine-preventable diseases, at a time when vaccine coverage is declining across America. 'Today's action to remove the 17 sitting members of ACIP undermines that trust and upends a transparent process that has saved countless lives,' Dr Scott said. 'Rapid destruction' of critical oversight The committee is attached to the Centre for Disease Control (CDC) and included 17 experts – including epidemiologists, infectious disease doctors, vaccine experts and paediatricians – who typically serve overlapping four-year terms. Eight of the members were appointed in January 2025. But it has been in flux since Mr Kennedy assumed office, with its first meeting delayed by the department, before the Health Secretary announced new Covid-19 recommendations in a video posted on social media – unilaterally changing the guidance without an ACIP consultation. Still, retiring all panellists – and deleting a webpage listing the members – has come as a shock to some. Dr Noel Brewer, a professor in public health at the University of North Carolina who was a member of the ACIP, told the Telegraph his removal was 'very unexpected,' given he was meant to serve for three more years. He added that he heard about it only when 'received a copy of the Wall Street Journal article from a journalist', and later received an email confirming it at 5:48pm. 'The most immediate impact of this action is to destroy trust among healthcare providers in ACIP,' said Dr Brewer, a behavioural scientist who specialises in research about why people do or don't get vaccinated. 'The top priority right now is to restore trust in ACIP recommendations. If that is not possible, then it is time for medical organisations to create an alternative vaccine advisory committee for the nation.' On this, there has already been some progress. Earlier this year, CIDRAP launched the Vaccine Integrity Project, which aims to facilitate conversations and offer advice about US vaccine policy – almost like a version of ACIP that's not aligned to the government. 'When I started the vaccine integrity project, there were a lot of doubters that anything of major consequence would happen… [especially after] Kennedy promised in his Senate hearings that he would not take vaccines away from anyone,' said Dr Osterholm. 'Well, look at all this change. 'We are watching the very rapid destruction of critically important vaccine evaluation oversight efforts of the US government, both at the FDA [Food and Drug Administration] and the CDC. These are committees that have performed marvellously well.' He added: 'It's terribly significant. The real victims are the public, specifically young children, who are going to face a very different world of vaccine preventable diseases than even a decade ago… I don't know what happens next, but it doesn't bode well.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store