Median US CEO pay hits record $16.8 million on soaring stock awards
April 24 (Reuters) - Median pay among top U.S. CEOs rose 7.5% to a record $16.8 million for 2024, a new study found, as big stock grants boosted leaders' reported earnings well beyond the pay received by U.S. workers.
The CEOs of Axon (AXON.O), opens new tab and Union Pacific (UNP.N), opens new tab were among those getting big pay boosts from stock awards, according to the review of pay among S&P 500 CEOs by ISS-Corporate, the corporate advisory arm of Institutional Shareholder Services.
Other CEOs also did well as their targets were set during the relatively stable days of 2023, said Roy Saliba, Managing Director at ISS-Corporate who oversaw the study. That was before U.S. President Donald Trump kicked off a trade war that has sparked turmoil in global markets in recent weeks.
"One thing that jumps out is that these numbers don't mesh with year-to-date stock performance or current company performance and the looming uncertainty. The time gap explains that, the pay decisions for 2024 would have been made at least a year ago," Saliba said.
He said his unit is advising companies to wait before changing plans to adjust pay to account for uncertainty in the markets. Boards could use a different set of performance measures that compare an executives' work against their peers, he said.
Saliba's study looked at 320 companies in the S&P 500 with pay data filed so far this year. The executives did relatively well; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data shows average hourly earnings for U.S. workers rose 4% last year, while Commerce Department data shows inflation ran at just below 3% in 2024.
Company shares performed above those rates, helping drive the CEO's gains. Among the 320 companies Saliba reviewed the median total shareholder return was 15.1% in 2024.
At Axon, maker of the Taser stun gun, CEO Patrick Smith was at one extreme, officially receiving $164.5 million last year, up from $40,058 in 2023. In that year he received only a salary of $31,201 and $8,857 in other compensation including private air transportation.
The stock units that accounted for most of Smith 2024 pay are "an incentive for future performance in the form of a high-risk, high-reward compensation plan, and the value is realizable only if and when each set of stock price and operational goals are achieved," Axon's filing states.
Axon declined to comment.
At Union Pacific CEO James Vena was paid $17.6 million for 2024 versus $2 million for his service for part of 2023, after he was hired in August of that year. The majority of his pay last year reflects big stock and option awards that a spokesperson for the railroad said are performance-based.
"If the company does not perform well, his actual bonus and equity will reflect that and be less," said the spokesperson.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Asian shares mostly gain ahead of Friday's US jobs report
Asian shares were mostly higher Friday ahead of an update on the U.S. job market that will offer insights into how the economy is faring. U.S. futures edged higher and oil prices fell. Tokyo 's Nikkei 225 index rose 0.5% to 37,730.67, while the Kospi in South Korea jumped 1.5% to 2,812.05. Hong Kong's Hang Seng lost 0.4% to 23,817.10 and the Shanghai Composite index edged 0.1% higher, to 3,385.91. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 was nearly unchanged at 8,536.40. India's Sensex gained 0.6%. On Thursday, the S&P 500 fell 0.5% to 5,939.30 for its first drop in four days. After sprinting through May and rallying within a couple good days' worth of gains of its all-time high, the index at the center of many 401(k) accounts has lost momentum. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 0.3% to 42,319.74, and the Nasdaq composite sank 0.8% to 19,298.45. The U.S. Labor Department is due to report how many more jobs U.S. employers created than destroyed during May. The expectation on Wall Street is for a slowdown in hiring from April. A resilient job market has been one of the linchpins that's propped up the U.S. economy, and the worry is that all the uncertainty created by President Donald Trump's on-and-off tariffs could push businesses to freeze their hiring. A report on Thursday said more U.S. workers applied for unemployment benefits last week than economists expected. The number remains relatively low compared with history, but it still hit its highest level in eight months. The data came as Procter & Gamble, the giant behind such brands as Pampers diapers and Cascade dish detergent, said it will cut up to 7,000 jobs over the next two years. Its stock fell 1.9%. The day's heaviest weight on the market was Tesla, which tumbled 14.3%. It's lost nearly 30% of its value so far this year as CEO Elon Musk's relationship with Trump sours amid a disagreement over the president's signature bill of tax cuts and spending. In after-hours trading Tesla gained 2.2%. Brown-Forman, the company behind Jack Daniel's and Woodford Reserve, dropped 17.9% for its worst day since it began trading in 1972. Hopes that Trump will lower his tariffs after reaching trade deals with other countries have been among the main reasons the S&P 500 has rallied back so furiously since dropping roughly 20% from its record two months ago. It's now back within 3.3% of its all-time high. Trump boosted such hopes Thursday after saying he had 'a very good phone call' with China's leader, Xi Jinping, about trade and that 'their respective teams will be meeting shortly at a location to be determined.' It's an easing of tensions after the world's two largest economies had earlier accused each other of violating the agreement that had paused their stiff tariffs against each other, which threatened to drag the economy into a recession. Markets took the latest signs of detente with Beijing coolly, given that nothing is assured in Trump's on-and-off rollout of tariffs. Among Wall Street's winners was MongoDB, which jumped 12.8% after the database company likewise delivered a stronger profit than analysts expected. Circle Internet Group, the U.S.-based issuer of one of the most popular cryptocurrencies, surged 168.5% in its first day of trading on the New York Stock Exchange. The yield on the 10-year Treasury held steady at 4.40%, up from 4.37% late Wednesday after tumbling from 4.46% the day before. Yields dropped so sharply on Wednesday as expectations built that the Federal Reserve will need to cut interest rates later this year to prop up an economy potentially weakened by tariffs. In other dealings early Friday, U.S. benchmark crude oil lost 21 cents to $63.16 per barrel. Brent crude, the international standard, fell 18 cents to $65.16 per barrel. The U.S. dollar rose to 143.77 Japanese yen from 143.49 yen. The euro fell to $1.1438 from $1.1448.
BBC News
7 hours ago
- BBC News
Should you be eating food products with fewer ingredients?
For gluten-free, citrus-free and tomato-free Kerry Clayton, shopping and cooking is a well as her own food requirements, her 10-year-old son is dairy and family shops at multiple stores each week to get the best free-from options, cooks adaptable meals like jacket potatoes and pasta, and makes cakes and cookies from spends about an hour a week baking, on top of running two online jewellery businesses and parenting another M&S launched its Only range in March, with products featuring six or fewer ingredients, Ms Clayton described it as "a dream".That was despite higher prices - its one-ingredient corn flakes cost £2.50 for a 325g box, compared with 90p for 500g of the standard kind."For standard shoppers, it seems a lot, but for us with allergies, it's about normal," says Kent-based Ms Clayton."It's hard to find enjoyable things we can all eat. If you're used to the luxury of standard cereal, you might not enjoy alternatives, or understand the extra cost - but for those of us that need low ingredient food, it's perfect." Life might just be about to get a lot easier for Ms Clayton. More retailers and food brands are taking M&S's lead to offer more items containing fewer ingredients, prompted by the concern around ultra-processed food (UPF) that has been growing since Dr Chris Van Tulleken released his book, "Ultra-Processed People", in is ultra-processed food?Less processed is growing in Hopkins, founder of IND!E, a platform which helps small food and drink brands get into big retailers, says he's seen a 40% increase in retailer enquiries over the past year about products with fewer ingredients. He is taking bigger orders specifically from Ocado, Selfridges and John Lewis."Retailers are responding to growing consumer demand for simpler, more recognisable ingredient lists," says Harrogate-based Mr Hopkins. Feeling the need to offer a less-processed product, plant-based brand THIS, which makes meat-free sausages, burgers, chicken and bacon, has recently launched a new Super Superfoods designed to be the protein component of a meal, and features natural ingredients, like beans, seeds and is also responding to surveys indicating that shoppers are avoiding meat replacement products, due to their processed nature and the presence of artificial Byrne, innovation and sustainability director at THIS is concerned about "consumer confusion and hesitation"."We understand we are classified as a UPF, however, that has little bearing on whether our products are healthy, because their nutritional properties are extremely good. Our products are high in protein, high in fibre, low in saturated fat and low in sugar," says London-based Mr Byrne."It has been frustrating in many ways as it has shifted the focus away from the most important thing about food, which is the nutrition aspect." So has the public been misled that all ultra-processed food is bad, and all unprocessed food is good?Nutritionist Dr Laura Wyness thinks so, expressing disappointment that the M&S Only range puts "hype over health"."It may be that consumers are looking for products with shorter ingredient lists, but to leave out fortified nutrients is a backwards step for public health nutrition. We should be encouraging more nutrient dense foods in the diet, and fortifying products such as plant milk and dairy alternatives and breakfast cereals," says Edinburgh-based Dr Wyness."This seems like one occasion that the customer is not always right - mainly due to the misinformation that is informing their food choices."Dr Jibin He says UPF as a term is not a helpful indicator of whether something is healthy or unhealthy, as the concept, and how it is explained to the public, is food, Dr He notes, will remain an essential part of feeding a large and growing human population, as processing ensures food safety, extends shelf life, and reduces waste."Take tofu as an example. It is a great source of protein, low in fat and considered as a healthy alternative to meats, particularly red meat. It is also more environmentally tofu would be considered as a UPF whereas red meat would be an unprocessed food," says Dr He, who is head of science and a chartered food scientist at Teesside University. He has also collaborated with food manufacturers and food technology companies to improve processing technologies. For food brands wanting to create less processed products, Dr He advises that it can be done by simplifying the formulas of existing products, and looking at new processing and packaging technologies that mean fewer ingredients can be used."Many food products have extremely complex formulas, and a manufacturer may not fully understand the functions of each listed ingredient in their formula."I would advise food manufacturers to closely examine their formulas and identify which ingredients are absolutely necessary and which they can do without," Dr He recommends."Novel food processing technologies can also help produce products with higher nutritional retention and longer shelf life without significantly altering the physical structure and chemical composition of the food." Dr He is also expecting a rise in marketing to push the virtues of less processed food products, as well as to justify their higher price porridge brand 3Bears, for example, recently launched its own range of low ingredient breakfast cereals, in partnership with footballer Harry Kane. Mr Kane appears in product promotion, and is also a company shareholder.3Bears' oat cinnamon loops, containing seven ingredients, are priced at £3.99 for compared with Only multigrain hoops from M&S, containing five ingredients, at £2.50 for 300 grams, while Waitrose Essential multigrain hoops are £1.25 for 375 grams, and contain 22 ingredients."With our oat flakes it was really hard to get the texture and crunchiness right – as we only wanted to use three ingredients, and oats are very different to process than other grains. With the costs of creating products with fewer ingredients higher and the process harder, the price points are reflective of this," explains 3Bears co-founder Caroline Nichols. For some foods, the debate over UPF, seems less of a problem. The UK confectionery market continues to grow steadily, and is worth about £14.8bn, despite it having a high proportion of UPF cream ball brand Little Moons might list over 30 ingredients on some of its flavours, but it now exports from the UK to 35 countries, and supermarkets have copied it with own-brand Farquhar, the company's marketing, innovation and sustainability director, is confident that treat food brands can ride out the UPF storm, so he isn't in a hurry to slash Little Moon's ingredient list."The reality of a category like ice cream is that certain ingredients are needed to keep the product stable through the food supply chain, like emulsifiers and stabilisers. So unless we're all going to start making ice cream at home regularly then off-the-shelf ice cream still has a role to play," says London-based Mr Farquhar."I'm sure the M&S 'Only' chocolate bars are delicious, but they're speaking to a very specific audience, and I doubt the big confectionery brands are going to be willing to compromise the core product attributes consumers love."
Daily Record
8 hours ago
- Daily Record
Elon Musk to halt SpaceX's NASA astronaut missions after Trump's contract threat
The SpaceX founder and CEO said Dragon would "no longer be able to service the ISS" after Trump said on Truth Social he would "be ending all government contracts" with the company Elon Musk has significantly escalated his row with President Trump, with a veiled threat of leaving NASA astronauts potentially stranded on the International Space Station. The tech tycoon announced this Thursday that he's retiring his company's Dragon spacecraft "immediately." This move follows Trump's post on Truth Social, implying he might cut all US government ties with Musk's space enterprise, SpaceX. Just two months earlier, SpaceX's Dragon capsule played a critical role in saving astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore after their 286-day stint on the ISS. The cessation of the Dragon service leaves NASA bereft of a reliable American craft for shuttling astronauts to the ISS and back, reports the Express. Presently, four NASA astronauts reside on the ISS after the safe return of Williams and Wilmore. There's no clarity on whether Musk will permit the return of those astronauts aboard the currently docked Dragon capsule. Despite NASA having an alternative arrangement with Boeing for the Starliner spacecraft, persistent technical setbacks render it unsuitable for crewed missions as of now. The rift between Musk and Trump flared up post Musk's criticism of the GOP-endorsed"Big Beautiful Bill." The controversial budget bill, feared to drastically hike the national deficit, spurred Musk to sever ties with the Trump administration in dissent. Musk had been at the helm of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), boasting significant savings for the U.S. through its targeting of unnecessary federal expenditure. DOGE's overarching aim was to achieve multi-trillion-dollar savings. The tension between Musk and Trump escalated on social platforms after Musk stepped down. On Thursday, Musk stirred controversy by asserting that Trump features "in the Epstein files," igniting an already fiery dispute. He also suggested that Trump ought to be impeached, proposing 40 year old Vice President JD Vance as a successor. Musk's incendiary Epstein comment followed Trump's assertion on Truth Social that he'd requested Musk's departure from the administration, alleging Musk had gone "CRAZY!". Trump subsequently hinted at a fresh approach to cut federal expenses, implying potential "Billions and Billions of Dollars" in savings by cutting off SpaceX and Tesla. ABC News reported that since 2015, over $17 billion has flowed into SpaceX from federal contracts, predominantly with NASA and the Department of Defense.
