Asian shares mostly gain ahead of Friday's US jobs report
Asian shares were mostly higher Friday ahead of an update on the U.S. job market that will offer insights into how the economy is faring.
U.S. futures edged higher and oil prices fell.
Tokyo 's Nikkei 225 index rose 0.5% to 37,730.67, while the Kospi in South Korea jumped 1.5% to 2,812.05.
Hong Kong's Hang Seng lost 0.4% to 23,817.10 and the Shanghai Composite index edged 0.1% higher, to 3,385.91.
Australia's S&P/ASX 200 was nearly unchanged at 8,536.40.
India's Sensex gained 0.6%.
On Thursday, the S&P 500 fell 0.5% to 5,939.30 for its first drop in four days. After sprinting through May and rallying within a couple good days' worth of gains of its all-time high, the index at the center of many 401(k) accounts has lost momentum.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 0.3% to 42,319.74, and the Nasdaq composite sank 0.8% to 19,298.45.
The U.S. Labor Department is due to report how many more jobs U.S. employers created than destroyed during May. The expectation on Wall Street is for a slowdown in hiring from April.
A resilient job market has been one of the linchpins that's propped up the U.S. economy, and the worry is that all the uncertainty created by President Donald Trump's on-and-off tariffs could push businesses to freeze their hiring.
A report on Thursday said more U.S. workers applied for unemployment benefits last week than economists expected. The number remains relatively low compared with history, but it still hit its highest level in eight months.
The data came as Procter & Gamble, the giant behind such brands as Pampers diapers and Cascade dish detergent, said it will cut up to 7,000 jobs over the next two years. Its stock fell 1.9%.
The day's heaviest weight on the market was Tesla, which tumbled 14.3%. It's lost nearly 30% of its value so far this year as CEO Elon Musk's relationship with Trump sours amid a disagreement over the president's signature bill of tax cuts and spending. In after-hours trading Tesla gained 2.2%.
Brown-Forman, the company behind Jack Daniel's and Woodford Reserve, dropped 17.9% for its worst day since it began trading in 1972.
Hopes that Trump will lower his tariffs after reaching trade deals with other countries have been among the main reasons the S&P 500 has rallied back so furiously since dropping roughly 20% from its record two months ago. It's now back within 3.3% of its all-time high.
Trump boosted such hopes Thursday after saying he had 'a very good phone call' with China's leader, Xi Jinping, about trade and that 'their respective teams will be meeting shortly at a location to be determined.'
It's an easing of tensions after the world's two largest economies had earlier accused each other of violating the agreement that had paused their stiff tariffs against each other, which threatened to drag the economy into a recession.
Markets took the latest signs of detente with Beijing coolly, given that nothing is assured in Trump's on-and-off rollout of tariffs.
Among Wall Street's winners was MongoDB, which jumped 12.8% after the database company likewise delivered a stronger profit than analysts expected.
Circle Internet Group, the U.S.-based issuer of one of the most popular cryptocurrencies, surged 168.5% in its first day of trading on the New York Stock Exchange.
The yield on the 10-year Treasury held steady at 4.40%, up from 4.37% late Wednesday after tumbling from 4.46% the day before.
Yields dropped so sharply on Wednesday as expectations built that the Federal Reserve will need to cut interest rates later this year to prop up an economy potentially weakened by tariffs.
In other dealings early Friday, U.S. benchmark crude oil lost 21 cents to $63.16 per barrel. Brent crude, the international standard, fell 18 cents to $65.16 per barrel.
The U.S. dollar rose to 143.77 Japanese yen from 143.49 yen. The euro fell to $1.1438 from $1.1448.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geeky Gadgets
an hour ago
- Geeky Gadgets
The Dark Side of AI: Are We Racing Toward a Future We Don't Want?
What if the future everyone is racing toward isn't the one we actually want? As artificial intelligence hurtles forward, promising to transform industries and redefine the workforce, the conversation often centers on its dazzling potential—efficiency, innovation, and progress. But beneath the surface lies a far more unsettling reality: the very foundation of our professional lives is shifting, and not necessarily for the better. Imagine a world where entry-level jobs vanish, career ladders collapse, and economic inequality deepens as millions are left scrambling to adapt. This isn't science fiction; it's a looming possibility that few are willing to confront openly. The AI future we're building may not be the one we're prepared to live in. Ai Grid explore the uncomfortable truths about AI's impact on work, society, and identity—realities that are too often glossed over in the race to embrace automation. From the disappearance of critical stepping-stone jobs to the psychological toll of widespread job displacement, the challenges ahead are as profound as they are complex. Yet, within these challenges lie opportunities to rethink what work means and how we can shape a more equitable future. By examining the risks, the societal implications, and the potential solutions, this piece invites you to grapple with the question: Are we ready for the AI future we're creating? AI's Impact on Jobs How AI Is Transforming the Workforce AI is already transforming industries such as finance, law, consulting, and technology by automating tasks traditionally performed by humans. Entry-level positions are particularly vulnerable, with experts estimating that up to 70% of these roles could be affected. This shift could result in a 10-20% increase in unemployment as AI systems take over tasks such as: Document review: Automating the analysis of legal and financial documents. Automating the analysis of legal and financial documents. Data analysis: Using AI to process and interpret large datasets more efficiently than humans. Using AI to process and interpret large datasets more efficiently than humans. Customer service: Replacing human representatives with AI chatbots and virtual assistants. These roles, often seen as critical stepping stones for career growth, are at risk of disappearing, creating an 'experience gap' that could hinder younger workers from advancing professionally. Even physical labor jobs, once considered less susceptible to automation, are increasingly at risk. Advances in robotics are allowing machines to perform tasks in manufacturing, warehouse operations, and other traditionally human-dominated fields. This trend is shrinking job opportunities across multiple sectors, leaving fewer options for workers at all skill levels and intensifying the need for adaptability. Economic and Societal Implications The widespread adoption of AI is expected to create profound economic and societal challenges. As jobs disappear, securing sustainable employment or advancing in your career may become more difficult. The loss of entry-level roles disrupts traditional career pathways, leaving many workers without the foundational experience needed to transition into higher-level positions. On a broader scale, economic inequality could widen as individuals with AI-related skills thrive while others struggle to adapt. This disparity may exacerbate social tensions, as the psychological toll of job insecurity and financial instability grows. The potential for social unrest underscores the urgency of addressing these challenges through proactive measures. The societal impact extends beyond economics. Communities may face shifts in identity and purpose as traditional industries decline. The psychological effects of widespread job displacement, including stress and anxiety, could further strain social systems. These challenges highlight the importance of fostering resilience and adaptability at both individual and societal levels. The AI Future Nobody Wants To Talk About Watch this video on YouTube. Enhance your knowledge on AI job displacement by exploring a selection of articles and guides on the subject. Corporate Strategies: Automation as a Priority Many companies are adopting 'AI-first' strategies, prioritizing automation to reduce costs and improve efficiency. This trend is evident across various industries, with notable examples including: Amazon: Using warehouse robots to streamline operations and reduce reliance on human labor. Using warehouse robots to streamline operations and reduce reliance on human labor. Media outlets: Organizations like Business Insider employing AI tools for content generation, leading to workforce reductions. Organizations like Business Insider employing AI tools for content generation, leading to workforce reductions. Freelance platforms: Platforms such as Fiverr encouraging workers to integrate AI tools into their services to remain competitive. These corporate strategies emphasize the importance of staying ahead of technological advancements. By understanding how AI is reshaping industries, you can better position yourself to adapt and remain competitive in an increasingly automated job market. Addressing the Challenges: Potential Solutions To mitigate the challenges posed by AI, several strategies are being proposed to ensure a smoother transition for workers and society: Upskilling and Adaptation: Developing expertise in AI tools and focusing on areas where human creativity, emotional intelligence, and critical thinking remain essential. Combining technical skills with uniquely human capabilities will be crucial for long-term success. Developing expertise in AI tools and focusing on areas where human creativity, emotional intelligence, and critical thinking remain essential. Combining technical skills with uniquely human capabilities will be crucial for long-term success. Universal Basic Income (UBI): As automation reduces job opportunities, UBI is gaining traction as a potential safety net. This approach aims to provide financial stability while society adjusts to the new economic landscape. As automation reduces job opportunities, UBI is gaining traction as a potential safety net. This approach aims to provide financial stability while society adjusts to the new economic landscape. Policy and Regulation: Governments must prioritize discussions on AI governance, creating policies that manage the transition and ensure equitable distribution of AI's benefits. Effective regulation can help mitigate economic disruption and promote societal well-being. These solutions require collaboration between individuals, corporations, and governments to address the multifaceted challenges posed by AI. By taking proactive steps, society can better navigate the complexities of this technological transformation. Emerging Opportunities in the AI Era While AI is expected to displace many jobs, it will also create new opportunities in emerging fields. Growth is anticipated in areas such as: AI-related roles: Careers in machine learning, data science, and AI system development. Careers in machine learning, data science, and AI system development. Green technologies: Jobs in renewable energy solutions and sustainable development. Jobs in renewable energy solutions and sustainable development. Healthcare: Roles in AI-driven diagnostics, personalized medicine, and advanced medical research. However, administrative, clerical, and repetitive physical labor jobs are likely to decline. The World Economic Forum emphasizes the importance of reskilling to bridge the gap between displaced workers and the demands of the future job market. By focusing on education and skill development, you can position yourself to thrive in these emerging industries. Adapting to Rapid Change The rapid pace of AI development is compressing the timeline for societal adaptation. Automation of automation—where AI systems improve themselves—further accelerates this transformation, making traditional economic adjustments more challenging. This raises critical questions about the future of work: Will AI augment human labor or replace it entirely? For you, this means staying informed and adaptable is more important than ever. Understanding AI's trajectory and its implications can help you make strategic decisions about your career and future. By embracing lifelong learning and focusing on areas where human skills remain indispensable, you can navigate the uncertainties of the AI era with confidence. Shaping the Future with AI The fantastic impact of AI demands preparation and collaboration at every level. As a worker, prioritizing education and skill development is essential to remain competitive in an AI-driven economy. Companies must adopt ethical approaches to AI deployment, making sure that technological advancements benefit both businesses and employees. Governments, meanwhile, have a critical role in establishing regulatory frameworks and supporting societal adaptation. The AI era presents both challenges and opportunities. By taking proactive steps today, you can help shape a future where technology enhances human potential rather than replacing it. The choices made now will determine whether AI becomes a tool for empowerment or a source of disruption. Your ability to adapt and prepare will be key to thriving in this rapidly evolving landscape. Media Credit: TheAIGRID Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Britain is heading for utter oblivion. Here is why
At the moment I feel like Britain has a confluence of problems. There is no one single issue which is damaging the nation; there are several. And from demographics to immigration, family background to welfare, these huge challenges are all reinforcing each other. Disastrous demographics Even if we do nothing to restrict migration, the UK's demographic outlook threatens to make this a miserable country in multiple ways. We are a rapidly ageing society with a collapsing birth rate; births hit a record low last year. If you go back 20 years and apply today's spending and tax rates to the demographics of 2004 – changing nothing else, that would give the Chancellor an extra £84 billion a year to play with, enough to cut the basic rate of tax by about 13p in the pound. Unless something is done, every budget will feel like an austerity budget. Taxes per person will go up; public services will crumble under the load of an old population. To counteract these trends with migration without fixing the underlying problem is impossible – you would require totally implausible and ever-accelerating amounts of migration to make up for it. Ultimately, you have to fix the hole in the boat rather than just try to bail out water faster and faster. But the direct fiscal implications are only part of the story. There's every reason to think an older population will mean a less dynamic economy. Japan gets many things right – their productivity growth is not at all bad. But, nonetheless, over the last 30 years growth in GDP per capita is worse than anywhere in the G7 except Italy – and this is just because so many people are retired. Ageing and the growing birth gap will change our society. More people will grow old without kids or younger relatives. The ONS says the number of women over 80 in Britain who have never had children will triple over the next fifteen years alone. We are on course to become a very lonely country. Demographics are the driver of history. Today, South Korea and Israel are both developed countries. But at current fertility rates every 100 Israelis can expect 210 grandchildren and the Koreans just 15. South Korea has created an economic miracle in my lifetime, but unless they fix this, that's basically the end of the country. If we in the UK had kept the same fertility rate we had in 2010, then for every 100 people we would expect them to have 92 grandchildren. But the rate is dropping sharply: at current rates it would be just 55 grandchildren. Gulp. Mass migration & breakneck social change Among private renters in Greater London, around a third are white British. In greater London's schools just over one in five school children are white British. The old conversations about 'integration' and 'assimilation ' don't really even make sense any more. In many places people cannot really integrate into the traditional majority culture because it doesn't exist any more. The effects of this are non-linear. Britain's political system has held sectarianism at bay for a long time, but the last election saw sectarian MPs elected and similar candidates come close in many other places. The local elections saw the victory of Azhar Ali as an independent in Rochdale, having been suspended by Labour for anti-Semitism last year. They also saw the election of Maheen Kamran – a young woman who pledged to 'end free-mixing' between men and women. Worries about a 'two tier' society are growing, driven by various forms of unequal treatment based on skin colour. The pace of change has been astonishing – around one in 60 people in the UK arrived in the country in the last year, and around one in 25 in just the last four years. The ONS predicts that all population growth will in future come from net migration, with deaths in the UK outnumbering births. Even before the recent migration boom, the 2021 Census found over a million people could not speak English well or at all. Near where I live, English was not the main language of 30 per cent of people in Leicester back in 2021; in several London Boroughs the figure was even higher. Oikophobia and the undermining of anything we can unite around What we really badly need in the face of such unprecedented changes is a really strong, confident, unifying national culture that people can assimilate into as much as what we have got is the very opposite. Most of Britain's cultural institutions are locked into a highly self-hating mindset. On Remembrance Sunday 2021, the Imperial War Museum in London allowed a rap group to perform a piece criticising Winston Wellcome Collection in London closed its 'Medicine Man' exhibition, which displayed objects collected by Henry Wellcome, after declaring it 'racist, sexist, and ableist.' The Pitt Rivers Museum in Oxford removed its display of shrunken heads and other ethnographic artefacts from public view, citing their role in perpetuating 'racist stereotypes' about indigenous cultures. The Fitzwilliam Museum in Cambridge updated its exhibition labels to highlight issues of 'racism, sexism, and class disparity', while the National Trust has done similarly across its properties. There's an entire industry trying to make everything about slavery. Tate Britain's 'Hogarth and Europe' exhibition included a label for a William Hogarth self-portrait that suggested the chair he sat in, possibly made from colonial timbers, could 'stand in for all those unnamed black and brown people enabling the society that supports his vigorous creativity.' Jane Austen and William Shakespeare's old houses have been 'decolonised'. The Royal Institution's Faraday Museum introduced a display examining the 'racist,' 'slave-trading,' or 'problematic' links of celebrated scientists like Sir Humphry Davy. The Church of England has agreed to pay £100 million in slavery 'reparations.' This sustained campaign of demoralisation by cultural elites is also reflected in many educational institutions – and it's working. Young people have come to dislike Britain more than they did 20 years ago, and are more likely to think it racist, disunited and shameful. Social breakdown and welfarism More than 40 per cent of children of GCSE age live in lone parent households in Southwark, Lambeth, Islington, Lewisham, Hackney, Knowsley, Blackpool, Liverpool and Greenwich. There are whole groups for whom this is the norm: 63 per cent of kids from a Caribbean background were in lone parent households in 2021. And many two adult households are re-formed. In 2023, 46 per cent of first-born children aged 14 years old did not live with both natural parents – roughly twice the rate of the 1970s. Children are much more likely to have a smartphone than live with their biological father. Sometimes people split up. Sometimes that's better than not doing. But the dramatic growth in the number of families that split is a huge change. And it has lifelong consequences that start early. Among 5–10 year olds, 6 per cent of children with married parents experienced diagnosable mental health issues compared to 12 per cent of children with cohabiting parents and 18 per cent of children raised by a lone parent. Similar trends are apparent for school attainment, interaction with the criminal justice system and so on. Social breakdown interacts with welfarism, with arrows running in both directions: lone parent households are more likely to require welfare, and the welfare state incentivises social breakdown – the benefits system creates a strong couple penalty for those in work, which creates a strong incentive to live apart. The scale of the welfare problem is breathtaking. There are nearly half a million people living in households where no one has ever worked – this has doubled since winter 2020. There are almost one million young people not in education, employment or training. Around one in ten working age adults are not in work because they are unemployed or long term sick. 4.1 million people in England and Wales are on an incapacity or disability benefit – that's one in seven adults in the North East and Wales: the big thing driving up working age claims is the growth of various forms of mental disorder and fragility. We've gone from 2 per cent of 16 year olds claiming in 2002, to 8 per cent in 2023. That's about two kids in every average classroom. Historically, people have (unsurprisingly) got sicker as they age, but 16 year olds are now as likely to be claiming to be sick as 50 year olds. An ONS breakdown found that in 2022, nearly two thirds (63 per cent) of those aged 16 to 34 cited either mental illness or 'depression, bad nerves or anxiety' as their reason for being long term sick. The cost of this is accelerating – real terms spending on sickness and disability benefits is forecast to grow to £100 bn by the end of this parliament, up from £50 billion in 2008. Despite this, the present government has abandoned plans to tighten the Work Capability Assessment, which means 400,000 more people will be signed off as unfit to work. Despite promises of reform, the OBR notes that welfare spending will continue to rise overall, and since the Spring Statement the government has also announced plans to spend a further £3.5 billion a year removing the two-child cap on benefits. The Mental Health Culture, together with the shift to a smartphone-based childhood, is likely to accelerate this. Well-meaning people have created a culture in which young people are constantly prompted to worry about their mental health. Social breakdown and welfarism have a kind of momentum too. When I was in government, DWP officials used to say claims are contagious. People copy what those around them are doing. In many parts of the UK we are now several generations into self-reinforcing cycles of deprivation and dysfunction. A beached, hollowed-out economy The OBR's forecast for growth in living standards is pretty bleak, and got worse as a result of Rachel Reeves's first budget: there are numerous reasons for these problems – the growth of welfare; an unselective migration policy; bad demographics and an ageing society; the loading up of the struggling economy with costly objectives like net zero; issues with state capacity and the furring up of the economic arteries by excessive planning processes. 1 Amazingly, public services productivity fell from 1997-2010. It then grew to 2019, but the pandemic reversed this progress, meaning the ONS measure of productivity in 2024 was at 1997 levels. That's mindblowing stagnation. As well as failing on the basics, the UK seems to be poorly placed for the future. One reason countries in Asia have so dramatically caught up with or overtaken the UK in terms of living standards since the 1970s is that they have created a successful innovation-industrial ecosystem, and consciously aimed to grow their capabilities. In contrast, the UK has deindustrialised more than many other developed countries, struggles to scale successful companies, and has steadily lost the areas of technological leadership it had. Our research budget goes on academic stuff, mainly in universities, with excruciating bureaucracy, while Asia dominates the kind of applied, industrial research that leads to economic growth. You can see that in the way the UK's share of patent applications has collapsed – the graph below needs a log scale so you can even see the UK, but we file only one patent for every 16 the South Koreans do, even though South Korea is a smaller country. Even in 2021 China filed 123 applications for every one we did – and the gap is probably bigger now. Unless something changes, the future will be made in Asia, not here. The confluence But the really worrying thing is the confluence of all this – the way all these problems reinforce one another. Arrows run between them in all directions like a Jeremy Deller mindmap. Unless things change, the demographic crisis will doom the economy, and with it drag down the public realm – lower growth, less money for public spending, worse public spaces. Unselective mass migration creates a burden on the economy. The asylum system alone costs around £7 billion a year. Migrants move to poorer places, and many of the places that have had the most migration have the greatest problems with welfarism, social breakdown and the decay of the public realm. It is harder to create a sense of shared purpose when fewer people have much history in the country. A more divided society makes it harder to solve the other problems. Why come to, or stay in, such a country? Why fight for it when the chips are down? Elite cultural self-hate and two-tier justice pour petrol on the sparks of conflict that rapid migration and social change inevitably creates. Social breakdown and welfarism cramp the economy – welfare payments drain the public funds we need for investment in the future, while scuzzy places don't attract investment. The soft-touch welfare state helps to drive the worst kinds of illegal immigration and creates a more divided society. A faltering economy, meanwhile, makes it harder to do the things we need to do to tackle the demographic crisis. Weak growth compounds welfarism and erodes the public realm – from potholed roads to the urban streets that are covered in stickers and graffiti and smell of wee or weed. In a struggling economy the dynamics of a newly hyperdiverse society become more dangerous.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Meta in talks for Scale AI investment that could top $10 billion, Bloomberg News reports
June 8 (Reuters) - Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab is in talks to make an investment that could exceed $10 billion in artificial intelligence startup Scale AI, Bloomberg News reported on Sunday.
