Amazon shares decline despite strong Q2 revenue performance
The drop followed a similar 7% decline in after-hours trading on Thursday, despite Amazon stock closing the regular session up 1.7% at $234.11.
In the second quarter, Amazon's revenue rose 13% year-over-year to $167.7 billion, surpassing the average analyst estimate of around $162 billion. Net income increased by more than one-third to $18.2 billion, reflecting strong operational performance across its core business lines.
Still, investors reacted negatively to the company's forecast for the current quarter. Amazon projected operating income in the range of $15.5 billion to $20.5 billion, with the lower end falling short of Wall Street's expectations, which averaged $19.4 billion.
The main concern was AWS, Amazon's long-dominant cloud platform. AWS revenue increased by 17.5%, roughly in line with market expectations but significantly below growth at competitors. Microsoft Azure posted a 39% year-over-year increase in cloud revenue, while Google Cloud grew nearly 32%.
All three cloud giants are investing heavily in data center expansion to support rising demand for artificial intelligence capabilities. Amazon disclosed capital expenditures of over $31 billion in Q2, with chief financial officer Brian Olsavsky stating that investment would continue at a similar pace in the second half of the year.
This raised concerns among investors about whether Amazon's aggressive infrastructure spending is delivering sufficient returns. Despite being the global leader in cloud services, AWS is facing increasing pressure from Microsoft and Google in the race to lead AI-powered cloud infrastructure.
Amazon CEO Andy Jassy defended the company's strategy during a call with analysts, saying AI adoption is still in its early stages. He emphasized Amazon's focus on offering lower operating costs for clients deploying AI software and acknowledged that demand is currently outpacing AWS's ability to scale.
In response to questions about tariffs introduced under former U.S. President Donald Trump, Jassy said it remains unclear who will ultimately bear the cost. He added that Amazon has not seen any significant decline in demand during the first half of the year, even though many goods sold on its U.S. platform are imported and subject to tariffs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Pfizer earnings strong despite Trump's new 'up to 250%' tariff threat
Pharmaceutical giant Pfizer reported better-than-expected quarterly results on Tuesday and improved its predictions for full-year profits, beating Wall Street expectations. The New York-based company reported second-quarter sales of $14.7 billion (€12.74bn) and earnings per share of $0.51 (€0.44). As of around 16.00 CEST, Pfizer shares were up over 4% at $24.58. "Our business is performing well and I'm pleased with the progress we achieved in the second quarter," chairman and CEO Albert Bourla said in a statement. "We continue to be actively engaged with policymakers as we navigate a complicated and rapidly evolving geopolitical environment while also remaining focused on advancing our business," Bourla continued. This despite several policies announced by the current US administration that could hurt drugmakers. In May, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order whereby pharmaceutical companies would be compelled to lower prices based on a "Most Favored Nation" policy. The price-slashing scheme seeks to ban drug companies from selling products in the US at prices above those in other developed countries. In Europe, the comparison becomes complex, as a significant portion pharmaceutical costs are covered by national healthcare or insurance systems, lowering prices for consumers. Experts warned at the time that this could slash their US revenues and affect availability. Even so, the president doubled down on his plans, sending letters last week to 17 drugmakers, calling for concrete steps to cut prices by 29 September. That includes agreeing to provide their full portfolio of existing medicines at no higher than European prices to every single Medicaid patient. On Tuesday, in an interview with CNBC, he announced that tariffs for pharmaceuticals and semiconductors would be coming in "next week". 'We'll be putting an initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals, but in one year, one-and-a-half years, maximum, it's going to go to 150% and then it's going to go to 250% because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country," he told CNBC.
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Change blows over the Baltic Sea as Poland bets on offshore wind
The energy transition is one of the most important challenges the European Union is facing. While the goal is clear – to achieve climate neutrality by 2050 – the road to get there is sometimes bumpy. The struggles of the energy transition are particularly evident in the wind energy sector, which, despite its dynamic development, still faces numerous barriers. Poland, being one of the largest CO₂ emitters in the EU, is an example of both the opportunities and the difficulties of this transition. For the first time in history, renewable energy sources (RES) in Poland trumped coal in the national energy mix. This is not a one-off incident, experts say, but a sign of a lasting shift in the country's energy landscape. "Every day, during daylight hours, we have much more energy from RES than from coal," comments Piotr Czopek, vice president at the Polish Wind Energy Association, emphasising that the country is just entering a new chapter in its energy transition. Renewable energy, as the cheapest source available today, can become the foundation for the future competitiveness of Polish industry in the European and global arena. Offshore wind energy plays a special role as a sector that is just coming to life. Poland has significant wind energy potential, especially in Pomerania and the central part of the country. According to the Polish Wind Energy Association (PWEA), the installed capacity of wind farms in Poland exceeded 9 GW at the beginning of 2025. However, the development of onshore wind turbines has been blocked for years by the '10H rule' - a regulation requiring wind turbines to be built no closer than ten times their height from the nearest buildings. Although a 2023 amendment softened these restrictions and gave the sector a much-needed investment boost, experts warn that further reforms are still necessary to unlock the full potential of wind energy. "Offshore wind energy? From the point of view of these renewables, it's the most stable source," says Czopek. "Anyone who has been to the Baltic Sea knows that it always blows properly there." "This makes this power industry very stable, it produces a lot of energy, on top of that, it is far away from human settlements, so no one is bothered by it. Secondly, the Baltic Sea is a relatively shallow sea, which facilitates investment," he adds. Although no offshore wind farm in Poland is yet fully operational, the first turbines are already standing in the Baltic Sea. Construction by the Baltic Power consortium (Orlen and Canada's Northland Power) aims to create a 1200 MW farm. Further projects will start next year, and by 2030, Poland plans to reach 6,000 MW of energy from offshore wind farms. As experts emphasise, this is not only an energy investment – it is also an opportunity for the industry. "We are at the initial, ascending stage. Already today, many large factories are being built in Poland – in Szczecin, in Gdansk and in other cities," Czopek says. Baltic Towers in Gdansk is just one example of a growing manufacturing base. Importantly, Poland is attracting not only domestic companies but also global players who are opening production facilities here. "No one will invest hundreds of millions of euros in Poland if they don't see that they can make money from this business," he emphasises. Offshore wind energy is also an export opportunity, as turbine components, infrastructure, or design services can go to markets all over the world. At the European level, wind energy is also growing in strength. According to WindEurope, EU countries installed a total of 18 GW of new wind capacity in 2024, mainly in Germany, Spain and the Netherlands. However, the EU faces rising component costs, inflation and global competition, above all from China, which dominates turbine production. Brussels plans to counter these trends through the European Act on Carbon Neutral Industries and strategic raw material partnerships. The aim is to increase Europe's technological and energy independence, especially given the ongoing geopolitical crisis. Social challenges are also not insignificant. In many regions – both in Poland and Western Europe – residents are protesting against the construction of wind farms, concerned about noise, landscape aesthetics or the impact on local ecosystems. Social acceptance is playing an increasingly important role, which, as research shows, can be increased through the participation of local communities in investments and a fair distribution of profits. Wind turbines have become a symbol of a green future and the fight against CO₂ emissions. However, questions are increasingly being asked about how much it really costs to build wind farms and whether their carbon footprint contradicts the idea of 'green energy'? The construction of a wind farm – whether onshore or offshore – is a financially intensive undertaking. According to WindEurope, the cost of installing one wind turbine on land ranges from €1.2 to €1.6 million for each megawatt of energy-producing capacity. For offshore or marine farms, the costs are even higher, as much as €3 to €5 million per megawatt. The total cost includes manufacturing and transporting the turbines, the construction of the foundations, network connections (often tens of kilometres of cables), engineering and maintenance work. Experts point out that, although wind energy is 'free', the infrastructure needed to generate it involves huge investment and technical costs. A typical wind turbine requires around 200-300 litres of specialised oil every 1.5-2 years. For offshore farms, the logistics and labour costs can far exceed the price of the lubricant itself. The industry is now looking for ways to reduce oil consumption or change lubrication technology altogether. Ideas are also emerging for the use of greener bio-liquids. On 18-19 November, the largest offshore wind energy conference in Poland, and also the largest in Central and Eastern Europe, will be held in Warsaw. As the organisers, the Polish Wind Energy Association, point out, the event is intended to bring together investors and supply chain companies. "It's a space to discuss investments and to do business – because that's what it's all about, to be able to meet and talk about what we can do together," it says. Poland is at a turning point today. Although only a few years ago coal dominated the domestic energy sector indivisibly, today it is wind, both literally and figuratively, that is blowing in the sails of the transformation. Renewable energy is not only changing the way we produce electricity. It is also changing the way we think about the future – greener, more competitive and more independent.
Euronews
4 hours ago
- Euronews
Most European businesses rely on US tech giants, study warns
About three-quarters of Europe's publicly listed companies rely on American technology firms to operate their businesses, a new analysis has found. Swiss cloud provider Proton analysed more than 9,600 publicly listed companies in Europe, using domain name system (DNS) searches to identify which email platform the companies use. That gave the researchers insight into which programmes a company is likely to use for its computing services, like email or calendar. The analysis found that Iceland, Norway, Ireland, Finland, and Sweden have the highest reliance on US tech companies. More than 90 per cent of their companies rely on American tech giants for their cloud services. On the other end of the spectrum were Bulgaria, Romania, and Slovakia, with 16 per cent, 39 per cent and 43 per cent reliance on US tech, respectively. Countries that are more reliant on the US tech stack could be exposed to AI training, foreign pressure, and what Proton described as 'warrantless surveillance'. 'Digital sovereignty is an illusion when Europe's infrastructure is controlled from abroad,' the report said. 'To secure its future, Europe must invest in European solutions'. The Proton report comes as experts voice concerns about national security risks that could arise from using foreign tech companies for cloud services, telling Euronews Next that there are concerns that the Trump administration could compel tech companies to share sensitive data. Some governments, for example Denmark and the Netherlands, are looking to swap providers. Meanwhile, the United Kingdom's competition authority found last week that US-based cloud providers Microsoft and Amazon Web Services (AWS) hold a combined 60 per cent to 80 per cent of the country's cloud market share, saying their dominance hurts competition. Where is dependency the highest? The study dove into the country specifics for the UK, Ireland, France, Spain, and Portugal. In these countries, larger companies tended to be more reliant on US tech.. In the UK, France, and Spain, for example, the country's largest companies – those worth over €200 billion –were entirely dependent on US tech. Tech companies in the UK and France were particularly dependent on the US, with 94 per cent and 80 per cent of their software companies using the American tech stack, respectively. The UK's reliance on American services 'is shocking for a country home to a tech sector worth $1.1 trillion [€954 billion], the largest in Europe and the third largest globally,' the report said. Other highly dependent industries include the UK's banking and telecommunications sectors; 95 percent of these companies use US cloud services. The report also claims that six Spanish sectors are '100 per cent' reliant on US tech, including critical energy and banking. All of Ireland's biotech and pharmaceuticals sector use American tech, the report found. The sectors that were less likely to see US Big Tech penetration included banks in France, real estate in Spain, telecommunications in Portugal, and automotives in Ireland, where fewer than 50 per cent of those companies use a US-based service. The findings come amid a push from the French government for 'strategic autonomy,' the report said. France's reliance on Big Tech services leaves it vulnerable to 'external influence, instability and surveillance'. What is the concern about American restrictions coming from? Pressure on Big Tech companies from the US government could pose challenges for European countries and industries that are more reliant on American services. During his first administration, US President Donald Trump signed the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Overseas Use of Data Act (CLOUD), which allows law enforcement to subpoena US-based technology companies for data stored on any server in the world to help them investigate serious crimes. Privacy experts previously told Euronews Next that while Trump hasn't specified whether he would invoke the law to compel companies to send his administration data, there are concerns that officials could force US tech companies to stop providing services in Europe. If this happens, it could create 'massive disruptions to public services,' the experts previously said. A representative from Microsoft France also told a French Senate committee last month that the company could not protect user data from an injunction under the CLOUD Act. Trump has also struck down security decisions enacted under former US President Joe Biden. In January, he demanded the resignation of an oversight board that oversaw data transfers between the US and the European Union, making it a key data privacy watchdog. Without the framework in place, thousands of EU businesses and public agencies might need to stop using Google, Microsoft, or Amazon for their cloud services, European privacy groups have warned.
