logo
All of the world's clocks may need to be adjusted as Earth is spinning faster than ever, shaving over a second off a day in August

All of the world's clocks may need to be adjusted as Earth is spinning faster than ever, shaving over a second off a day in August

New estimates released this month suggest that the first Tuesday of August will be around 1.25 milliseconds shorter than it should be.
The average rotation of our planet is 24 hours, or 86,400 seconds. However, there are several variables that cause Earth to spin faster or slower.
The moon's gravitational influence on Earth typically causes it to slow time over time and for days to lengthen.
There is no conclusive reason for why Earth's rotation is accelerating, but a 2024 study suggested that melting polar ice caps and rising sea levels could be influencing it.
The shortest day ever recorded was on July 5 last year, measuring 1.66 milliseconds shorter, with recent years seeing the rotation speeding up.
Scientists have proposed a negative leap second to compensate for the lost time, meaning all of the world's clocks will need to be adjusted.
'This is an unprecedented situation and a big deal,' said geophysicist Duncan Agnew from the University of California, who wrote about the issue in a paper published in the journal Nature last year.
'It's not a huge change in the Earth's rotation that's going to lead to some catastrophe or anything, but it is something notable.
'It's yet another indication that we're in a very unusual time.'
There have been 27 leap seconds added to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) since 1972, when the present form of the time standard was adopted, in order to match atomic time to astronomical time.
This would be the first time that a second has been subtracted, and it is not clear how current computing infrastructure would cope with the shift.
Patrizia Tavella from the Time Department at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures, wrote in an ­accompanying article to the Nature paper that any potential risks should be assessed before a negative leap second is applied.
'A negative leap second has never been added or tested,' she said, 'so the problems it could create are without precedent.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sexual assault defendants and complainants equally prone to memory gaps, study says
Sexual assault defendants and complainants equally prone to memory gaps, study says

Irish Examiner

time4 days ago

  • Irish Examiner

Sexual assault defendants and complainants equally prone to memory gaps, study says

Both defendants and complainants in sexual assault cases are equally prone to memory distortions, new research suggests. The results of the study from University College Dublin and University College Cork puts a focus on why complainants' memories in sexual assault cases are scrutinised in court when the accused can be equally prone to error. Published in Nature's Scientific Reports, the 'He Said, She Said' study involved a series of experiments using an immersive first-person video playing out a date scenario. Those taking part were later assigned the role of either the complainant or the accused before being shown fabricated 'witness' accounts that included misleading details and altered key facts from the video. For example, some participants were shown testimony from a barman claiming that the accused was plying the complainant with drinks, even though this was not in the original video. The study found that individuals in the role of both complainant and accused were equally likely to absorb and recall false details, even when those details supported their assigned narrative. There were more than 1,300 participants in three separate experiments. 'We hope that this study will encourage people to re-examine their assumptions regarding the role of memory in sexual assault cases,' said lead author Associate Professor Ciara M Greene of UCD School of Psychology. 'We have noticed that these cases often hinge on discussions of the complainant's memory. 'As memory scientists, we find this strange, since we know that everyone — male or female, complainant or accused — is human and has the same memory frailties. 'This study provides concrete evidence that memory errors and distortions are not unique to one side of contentious legal cases.' For the study, two versions of the simulated date were filmed, one featuring a male actor and the other featuring a female actor. The two videos were identical in all other respects, with each filmed from the perspective of a person going on a date with the man or the woman. The first cohort of participants in both roles received the same misinformation details (experiment 1), wherein those in experiment 2 and 3 were provided misinformation that was tailored to their assigned roles — that is, information designed to make the sexual assault appear more likely or less likely to have occurred. Strong misinformation effects were observed in both groups, with the complainant and accused equally likely to misremember details of the events leading up to the sexual encounter. The study included both male and female victims and perpetrators, but interestingly found that memory distortion effects were not affected by gender. While the study was based on fictional scenarios, its authors argue it highlights that memory is reconstructive and subject to bias, regardless of one's role in a dispute. Co-author and Associate Professor Gillian Murphy said: 'We have a responsibility as memory scientists to banish myths about memory. 'In our book and in this paper, we stress that our memories mostly serve us very well and provide a good account of our experiences, but they can sometimes be prone to error, no matter what side of the courtroom you're on.'

UCC palaeontologists discover new fossil reptile species
UCC palaeontologists discover new fossil reptile species

RTÉ News​

time24-07-2025

  • RTÉ News​

UCC palaeontologists discover new fossil reptile species

An international team of researchers, including palaeontologists at University College Cork (UCC), has discovered a new species of fossil reptile from the Triassic period that had a large crest made of complex plume-like structures - long before modern-type feathers evolved. The 247-million-year-old Mirasaura grauvogeli, from the Grès à Voltzia locality in northeastern France, had a bizarre showy plume of long outer layer structures. These share similarities with feathers, despite existing 70 million years before the oldest fossil feathers. The research, published today in the journal Nature, includes UCC palaeontologists Prof Maria McNamara, Dr Valentina Rossi and Dr Tiffany Slater. The study was led by an international team from Germany, Italy, France and the USA. The UCC team analysed the fossil outer layer structures, using scanning electron microscopy and synchrotron X-ray analyses. The fossil tissue is rich in cell organelles that contain melanin pigments that are common in skin, hair, feathers and internal organs of fossil and modern vertebrate animals. The team in Cork discovered that the melanosomes in Mirasaura are similar in shape to those in feathers, but not mammal hair or reptilian skin. "We know that in modern animals, melanosome shape is closely linked to tissue type," said Dr Rossi. "We can therefore be confident that the Mirasaura structures share some common developmental features with feathers". Unlike feathers in modern birds, however, the Mirasaura structures lack branching, showing instead a simple long, medial feature that superficially resembles the shaft of modern bird feathers. "We were looking in the right time window, but we were shocked to find long integumentary structures in a completely different group of ancient reptiles," said Prof McNamara. "The next step is to consider the effects of fossilisation. "By integrating this with more detailed characterisation of the fossil tissues, we will learn more about the shared history of the Mirasaura structures and other structures, such as feathers." Dr Slater said: "It's amazing - this creature forces us back to the drawing board for when feather-like structures first evolved. Mirasaura reveals a deeper, more complex evolutionary story than we ever expected."

All of the world's clocks may need to be adjusted as Earth is spinning faster than ever, shaving over a second off a day in August
All of the world's clocks may need to be adjusted as Earth is spinning faster than ever, shaving over a second off a day in August

Irish Independent

time24-07-2025

  • Irish Independent

All of the world's clocks may need to be adjusted as Earth is spinning faster than ever, shaving over a second off a day in August

New estimates released this month suggest that the first Tuesday of August will be around 1.25 milliseconds shorter than it should be. The average rotation of our planet is 24 hours, or 86,400 seconds. However, there are several variables that cause Earth to spin faster or slower. The moon's gravitational influence on Earth typically causes it to slow time over time and for days to lengthen. There is no conclusive reason for why Earth's rotation is accelerating, but a 2024 study suggested that melting polar ice caps and rising sea levels could be influencing it. The shortest day ever recorded was on July 5 last year, measuring 1.66 milliseconds shorter, with recent years seeing the rotation speeding up. Scientists have proposed a negative leap second to compensate for the lost time, meaning all of the world's clocks will need to be adjusted. 'This is an unprecedented situation and a big deal,' said geophysicist Duncan Agnew from the University of California, who wrote about the issue in a paper published in the journal Nature last year. 'It's not a huge change in the Earth's rotation that's going to lead to some catastrophe or anything, but it is something notable. 'It's yet another indication that we're in a very unusual time.' There have been 27 leap seconds added to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) since 1972, when the present form of the time standard was adopted, in order to match atomic time to astronomical time. This would be the first time that a second has been subtracted, and it is not clear how current computing infrastructure would cope with the shift. Patrizia Tavella from the Time Department at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures, wrote in an ­accompanying article to the Nature paper that any potential risks should be assessed before a negative leap second is applied. 'A negative leap second has never been added or tested,' she said, 'so the problems it could create are without precedent.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store