The average home is now worth $1 million. This boom is blowing up in a bad way
The nation's home owners would have been pleased by recent news from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) that the national mean price of residential dwellings had risen to $1,002,500, the first time it has passed the million-dollar mark.
Of course, that level was exceeded long ago in many city suburbs, with prices in regional areas also going sky-high as sea and tree changers took real estate windfalls and relocated.
Around 66 per cent of Australian households own their own home with or without a mortgage. Home ownership, with a consistent rise in values, is Australians' most important asset, along with superannuation, which ticks over in the background, accessible only in later years.
Renters, numbering one-third of Australian households, have also experienced the impacts of the ongoing property boom, except not in a good way.
They are mostly dependent on the one-in-five households that own residential properties other than their usual domicile.
For the record, one in 25 of these owners has four or more properties.
Yet very few are affordable to low-income earners.
Anglicare Australia's 2025 Rental Affordability Snapshot surveyed 51,238 rental listings across Australia and found that just 352 rentals (0.7 per cent) were affordable for a person earning a full-time minimum wage.
Almost none was affordable for a person on JobSeeker wanting a room in a share house, and none for a person on Youth Allowance.
Median advertised rents have risen 35 per cent since this government came to office, more than three times the rise in wages.
Another recent report, Rights at risk: Rising rents and repercussions, by ACOSS and the University of NSW, carries further alarming findings. Almost seven in 10 people who rent privately worry about asking for repairs in case they face a rent increase, with 56 per cent fearing it would lead to eviction and 52 per cent fearing being placed on a blacklist that would prevent them renting another property.
Half of all renters live in homes that need repairs, one in 10 urgently.
Almost one-in-five bathrooms has mould, which is a major health risk. Some 82 per cent of renters would find a 5 per cent rent hike "difficult or very difficult".
A significant problem, and a major eyesore, is that many potential rentals are left empty - around a million Australia-wide. If occupied, these so-called "speculative vacancies" could greatly assist would-be renters.
St Vincent de Paul Society calls for taxation reform to incentivise the use of long-term vacant residential properties and land.
Homes that are rented have the added benefit (to owners) of generous tax concessions, both during ownership and at point of sale.
This creates a considerable loss to the Treasury, with the Parliamentary Budget Office calculating that tax revenue foregone over the decade to 2034-35 due to negative gearing deductions and the capital gains tax (CGT) discount on residential investment properties will total a massive $165 billion.
This is money lost to healthcare, education, housing and other social essentials.
St Vincent de Paul Society regards housing as a basic human right and we firmly believe all Australians deserve a secure place to live. Properties should be treated primarily as homes, not investment opportunities.
The Society supports reducing CGT concessions from 50 per cent to 37.5 per cent to generate revenue that could be used to improve social services, plus a review of negative gearing.
The government should increase needs-based funding of homelessness services and permanent supportive housing, including client-led support services.
If not now, when?
The last census recorded 122,494 people experiencing homelessness, and that was four years ago.
Governments should fund and perhaps mandate policies that improve energy efficiency in low-income households, including apartment buildings.
This goes hand in hand with funding and legislating national minimum standards for renters. The package known as "A Better Deal for Renters" was endorsed by national cabinet in 2023 with the promise that, "These changes will make a tangible impact for the almost one-third of Australian households who rent".
The plan is yet to be fully implemented.
Meanwhile, rent increases have accelerated, and pests are the most common tenant complaint, affecting one-third of premises.
We're urging for a compassionate review of the base rate of working-age payments to lift recipients above the poverty line. So many people simply cannot afford decent housing.
Achieving this basic goal is fundamental to Australia's future and for our much-prized social harmony.
As the Human Rights Law Centre puts it, "every person should have a safe, secure and healthy place to call home, regardless of your postcode or bank balance. Yet too many Australians are homeless, live in inadequate, insecure or unsafe housing, or need to sacrifice other necessities - from food to school uniforms - to keep a roof over their heads."
Our members see these challenges every day, and while we can offer assistance within our means, structural change to the national housing market is needed urgently.
More than two decades ago, former prime minister John Howard said, "I don't get people stopping me in the street and saying, 'John you're outrageous, under your government the value of my house has increased".'
The nation's home owners would have been pleased by recent news from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) that the national mean price of residential dwellings had risen to $1,002,500, the first time it has passed the million-dollar mark.
Of course, that level was exceeded long ago in many city suburbs, with prices in regional areas also going sky-high as sea and tree changers took real estate windfalls and relocated.
Around 66 per cent of Australian households own their own home with or without a mortgage. Home ownership, with a consistent rise in values, is Australians' most important asset, along with superannuation, which ticks over in the background, accessible only in later years.
Renters, numbering one-third of Australian households, have also experienced the impacts of the ongoing property boom, except not in a good way.
They are mostly dependent on the one-in-five households that own residential properties other than their usual domicile.
For the record, one in 25 of these owners has four or more properties.
Yet very few are affordable to low-income earners.
Anglicare Australia's 2025 Rental Affordability Snapshot surveyed 51,238 rental listings across Australia and found that just 352 rentals (0.7 per cent) were affordable for a person earning a full-time minimum wage.
Almost none was affordable for a person on JobSeeker wanting a room in a share house, and none for a person on Youth Allowance.
Median advertised rents have risen 35 per cent since this government came to office, more than three times the rise in wages.
Another recent report, Rights at risk: Rising rents and repercussions, by ACOSS and the University of NSW, carries further alarming findings. Almost seven in 10 people who rent privately worry about asking for repairs in case they face a rent increase, with 56 per cent fearing it would lead to eviction and 52 per cent fearing being placed on a blacklist that would prevent them renting another property.
Half of all renters live in homes that need repairs, one in 10 urgently.
Almost one-in-five bathrooms has mould, which is a major health risk. Some 82 per cent of renters would find a 5 per cent rent hike "difficult or very difficult".
A significant problem, and a major eyesore, is that many potential rentals are left empty - around a million Australia-wide. If occupied, these so-called "speculative vacancies" could greatly assist would-be renters.
St Vincent de Paul Society calls for taxation reform to incentivise the use of long-term vacant residential properties and land.
Homes that are rented have the added benefit (to owners) of generous tax concessions, both during ownership and at point of sale.
This creates a considerable loss to the Treasury, with the Parliamentary Budget Office calculating that tax revenue foregone over the decade to 2034-35 due to negative gearing deductions and the capital gains tax (CGT) discount on residential investment properties will total a massive $165 billion.
This is money lost to healthcare, education, housing and other social essentials.
St Vincent de Paul Society regards housing as a basic human right and we firmly believe all Australians deserve a secure place to live. Properties should be treated primarily as homes, not investment opportunities.
The Society supports reducing CGT concessions from 50 per cent to 37.5 per cent to generate revenue that could be used to improve social services, plus a review of negative gearing.
The government should increase needs-based funding of homelessness services and permanent supportive housing, including client-led support services.
If not now, when?
The last census recorded 122,494 people experiencing homelessness, and that was four years ago.
Governments should fund and perhaps mandate policies that improve energy efficiency in low-income households, including apartment buildings.
This goes hand in hand with funding and legislating national minimum standards for renters. The package known as "A Better Deal for Renters" was endorsed by national cabinet in 2023 with the promise that, "These changes will make a tangible impact for the almost one-third of Australian households who rent".
The plan is yet to be fully implemented.
Meanwhile, rent increases have accelerated, and pests are the most common tenant complaint, affecting one-third of premises.
We're urging for a compassionate review of the base rate of working-age payments to lift recipients above the poverty line. So many people simply cannot afford decent housing.
Achieving this basic goal is fundamental to Australia's future and for our much-prized social harmony.
As the Human Rights Law Centre puts it, "every person should have a safe, secure and healthy place to call home, regardless of your postcode or bank balance. Yet too many Australians are homeless, live in inadequate, insecure or unsafe housing, or need to sacrifice other necessities - from food to school uniforms - to keep a roof over their heads."
Our members see these challenges every day, and while we can offer assistance within our means, structural change to the national housing market is needed urgently.
More than two decades ago, former prime minister John Howard said, "I don't get people stopping me in the street and saying, 'John you're outrageous, under your government the value of my house has increased".'
The nation's home owners would have been pleased by recent news from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) that the national mean price of residential dwellings had risen to $1,002,500, the first time it has passed the million-dollar mark.
Of course, that level was exceeded long ago in many city suburbs, with prices in regional areas also going sky-high as sea and tree changers took real estate windfalls and relocated.
Around 66 per cent of Australian households own their own home with or without a mortgage. Home ownership, with a consistent rise in values, is Australians' most important asset, along with superannuation, which ticks over in the background, accessible only in later years.
Renters, numbering one-third of Australian households, have also experienced the impacts of the ongoing property boom, except not in a good way.
They are mostly dependent on the one-in-five households that own residential properties other than their usual domicile.
For the record, one in 25 of these owners has four or more properties.
Yet very few are affordable to low-income earners.
Anglicare Australia's 2025 Rental Affordability Snapshot surveyed 51,238 rental listings across Australia and found that just 352 rentals (0.7 per cent) were affordable for a person earning a full-time minimum wage.
Almost none was affordable for a person on JobSeeker wanting a room in a share house, and none for a person on Youth Allowance.
Median advertised rents have risen 35 per cent since this government came to office, more than three times the rise in wages.
Another recent report, Rights at risk: Rising rents and repercussions, by ACOSS and the University of NSW, carries further alarming findings. Almost seven in 10 people who rent privately worry about asking for repairs in case they face a rent increase, with 56 per cent fearing it would lead to eviction and 52 per cent fearing being placed on a blacklist that would prevent them renting another property.
Half of all renters live in homes that need repairs, one in 10 urgently.
Almost one-in-five bathrooms has mould, which is a major health risk. Some 82 per cent of renters would find a 5 per cent rent hike "difficult or very difficult".
A significant problem, and a major eyesore, is that many potential rentals are left empty - around a million Australia-wide. If occupied, these so-called "speculative vacancies" could greatly assist would-be renters.
St Vincent de Paul Society calls for taxation reform to incentivise the use of long-term vacant residential properties and land.
Homes that are rented have the added benefit (to owners) of generous tax concessions, both during ownership and at point of sale.
This creates a considerable loss to the Treasury, with the Parliamentary Budget Office calculating that tax revenue foregone over the decade to 2034-35 due to negative gearing deductions and the capital gains tax (CGT) discount on residential investment properties will total a massive $165 billion.
This is money lost to healthcare, education, housing and other social essentials.
St Vincent de Paul Society regards housing as a basic human right and we firmly believe all Australians deserve a secure place to live. Properties should be treated primarily as homes, not investment opportunities.
The Society supports reducing CGT concessions from 50 per cent to 37.5 per cent to generate revenue that could be used to improve social services, plus a review of negative gearing.
The government should increase needs-based funding of homelessness services and permanent supportive housing, including client-led support services.
If not now, when?
The last census recorded 122,494 people experiencing homelessness, and that was four years ago.
Governments should fund and perhaps mandate policies that improve energy efficiency in low-income households, including apartment buildings.
This goes hand in hand with funding and legislating national minimum standards for renters. The package known as "A Better Deal for Renters" was endorsed by national cabinet in 2023 with the promise that, "These changes will make a tangible impact for the almost one-third of Australian households who rent".
The plan is yet to be fully implemented.
Meanwhile, rent increases have accelerated, and pests are the most common tenant complaint, affecting one-third of premises.
We're urging for a compassionate review of the base rate of working-age payments to lift recipients above the poverty line. So many people simply cannot afford decent housing.
Achieving this basic goal is fundamental to Australia's future and for our much-prized social harmony.
As the Human Rights Law Centre puts it, "every person should have a safe, secure and healthy place to call home, regardless of your postcode or bank balance. Yet too many Australians are homeless, live in inadequate, insecure or unsafe housing, or need to sacrifice other necessities - from food to school uniforms - to keep a roof over their heads."
Our members see these challenges every day, and while we can offer assistance within our means, structural change to the national housing market is needed urgently.
More than two decades ago, former prime minister John Howard said, "I don't get people stopping me in the street and saying, 'John you're outrageous, under your government the value of my house has increased".'
The nation's home owners would have been pleased by recent news from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) that the national mean price of residential dwellings had risen to $1,002,500, the first time it has passed the million-dollar mark.
Of course, that level was exceeded long ago in many city suburbs, with prices in regional areas also going sky-high as sea and tree changers took real estate windfalls and relocated.
Around 66 per cent of Australian households own their own home with or without a mortgage. Home ownership, with a consistent rise in values, is Australians' most important asset, along with superannuation, which ticks over in the background, accessible only in later years.
Renters, numbering one-third of Australian households, have also experienced the impacts of the ongoing property boom, except not in a good way.
They are mostly dependent on the one-in-five households that own residential properties other than their usual domicile.
For the record, one in 25 of these owners has four or more properties.
Yet very few are affordable to low-income earners.
Anglicare Australia's 2025 Rental Affordability Snapshot surveyed 51,238 rental listings across Australia and found that just 352 rentals (0.7 per cent) were affordable for a person earning a full-time minimum wage.
Almost none was affordable for a person on JobSeeker wanting a room in a share house, and none for a person on Youth Allowance.
Median advertised rents have risen 35 per cent since this government came to office, more than three times the rise in wages.
Another recent report, Rights at risk: Rising rents and repercussions, by ACOSS and the University of NSW, carries further alarming findings. Almost seven in 10 people who rent privately worry about asking for repairs in case they face a rent increase, with 56 per cent fearing it would lead to eviction and 52 per cent fearing being placed on a blacklist that would prevent them renting another property.
Half of all renters live in homes that need repairs, one in 10 urgently.
Almost one-in-five bathrooms has mould, which is a major health risk. Some 82 per cent of renters would find a 5 per cent rent hike "difficult or very difficult".
A significant problem, and a major eyesore, is that many potential rentals are left empty - around a million Australia-wide. If occupied, these so-called "speculative vacancies" could greatly assist would-be renters.
St Vincent de Paul Society calls for taxation reform to incentivise the use of long-term vacant residential properties and land.
Homes that are rented have the added benefit (to owners) of generous tax concessions, both during ownership and at point of sale.
This creates a considerable loss to the Treasury, with the Parliamentary Budget Office calculating that tax revenue foregone over the decade to 2034-35 due to negative gearing deductions and the capital gains tax (CGT) discount on residential investment properties will total a massive $165 billion.
This is money lost to healthcare, education, housing and other social essentials.
St Vincent de Paul Society regards housing as a basic human right and we firmly believe all Australians deserve a secure place to live. Properties should be treated primarily as homes, not investment opportunities.
The Society supports reducing CGT concessions from 50 per cent to 37.5 per cent to generate revenue that could be used to improve social services, plus a review of negative gearing.
The government should increase needs-based funding of homelessness services and permanent supportive housing, including client-led support services.
If not now, when?
The last census recorded 122,494 people experiencing homelessness, and that was four years ago.
Governments should fund and perhaps mandate policies that improve energy efficiency in low-income households, including apartment buildings.
This goes hand in hand with funding and legislating national minimum standards for renters. The package known as "A Better Deal for Renters" was endorsed by national cabinet in 2023 with the promise that, "These changes will make a tangible impact for the almost one-third of Australian households who rent".
The plan is yet to be fully implemented.
Meanwhile, rent increases have accelerated, and pests are the most common tenant complaint, affecting one-third of premises.
We're urging for a compassionate review of the base rate of working-age payments to lift recipients above the poverty line. So many people simply cannot afford decent housing.
Achieving this basic goal is fundamental to Australia's future and for our much-prized social harmony.
As the Human Rights Law Centre puts it, "every person should have a safe, secure and healthy place to call home, regardless of your postcode or bank balance. Yet too many Australians are homeless, live in inadequate, insecure or unsafe housing, or need to sacrifice other necessities - from food to school uniforms - to keep a roof over their heads."
Our members see these challenges every day, and while we can offer assistance within our means, structural change to the national housing market is needed urgently.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
19 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Jacinta Allan shows ‘complete and total contempt' for Victorians
IPA Deputy Executive Director Daniel Wild slams Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan for showing 'complete and total contempt' for mainstream Victorians for not ruling out the Yoorrook Justice Commission's final report recommendations. 'What this shows is that the elites in this society don't care what you think, they don't care how you vote, they've got their own ideology, and they are going to implement it anyway,' Sky News host Danica De Giorgio. 'The fundamental problem of this report is that it comes from a place of hate … this is punishment being meted out by the activist class because Australians voted no to their divisive policy at the referendum.'
Perth Now
24 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Tech giant to cut 9k jobs
Tech behemoth Microsoft has announced it will slash 9000 roles across every jurisdiction, as it looks to claw back some of its spending throughout the year. Microsoft says the cuts – which total less than 4 per cent of its total workforce – will be across teams' geographies and tenure. Bloomberg previously reported Microsoft was planning to slash thousands of jobs in July, targeting salespeople and divisions including Xbox. Tech giant Microsoft has announced 9000 roles will go. Photo by: NewsWire / Gaye Gerard Credit: News Corp Australia It is the second round of redundancies, following job cuts earlier this year. Microsoft says Wednesday's job losses are aimed at reducing the organisation's layers, with middle management to be most impacted. It is believed this will help streamline processes and procedures. It comes as the tech industry continues to struggle against the rapidly advancing AI race spending billions on training large language models, building servers and data centres, and pushing for further developments in AI applications. It is as yet unconfirmed how the cuts might impact Australian workers. 'We continue to implement organisational changes necessary to best position the company for success in a dynamic marketplace,' a Microsoft spokesperson said. The company, which had about 228,000 employees worldwide as of June last year, previously announced the termination of about 6000 workers in May. More to come
9 News
an hour ago
- 9 News
Microsoft lays off 4 per cent of global workforce, impacting thousands of jobs
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here Microsoft says it is laying off about 9000 workers, its second mass layoff in months and its largest in more than two years. The tech giant began sending out layoff notices today that hit the company's Xbox video game business and other divisions. Among those losing their jobs are 830 workers tied to Microsoft's US headquarters in Redmond, Washington, according to a notice sent to state officials. Microsoft says it is laying off about 9000 workers, its second mass layoff in months and its largest in more than two years. (Getty) contacted Microsoft Australia to ask how many Australian workers the lay-offs would impact. It was unable to provide a number but issued a statement saying the company would continue to "implement organisational changes necessary to best position the company for success in a dynamic marketplace". Microsoft said the cuts will affect multiple teams around the world, including its sales division, part of the "organisational changes". The company won't say the total number of layoffs except that it was about 4 per cent of the workforce it had a year ago. A memo to gaming division employees today from Xbox CEO Phil Spencer said the cuts would position the video game business "for enduring success and allow us to focus on strategic growth areas". Xbox would "follow Microsoft's lead in removing layers of management to increase agility and effectiveness," Spencer wrote. Microsoft employed 228,000 full-time workers as of June 2024, the last time it reported its annual headcount. Its latest layoffs would cut fewer than 4 per cent of that workforce, according to Microsoft. The tech giant began sending out layoff notices that hit the company's Xbox video game business and other divisions. (Getty) But it has already had at least three layoffs this year and it's unlikely that new hiring has matched the amount lost. Either way, a 4 per cent cut would amount to somewhere in the range of 9000 people. Until now, this year's biggest layoff was in May, when Microsoft began laying off about 6000 workers, nearly 3 per cent of its global workforce and its largest job cuts in more than two years. The cutbacks come as Microsoft continues to invest huge amounts of money in the data centres, specialised computer chips and other infrastructure needed to advance its AI ambitions. The company anticipated those expenses would cost it about $US80 billion ($121 billion) in the last fiscal year. Its new fiscal year began on Tuesday. Microsoft just last month cut another 300 workers based out of its Redmond headquarters, on top of nearly 2000 who lost their jobs in the Puget Sound region in May, most of them in software engineering and product management roles, according to information it sent to Washington state employment officials. Microsoft says it is laying off about 9000 workers, its second mass layoff in months. (Getty) Microsoft's chief financial officer Amy Hood said on an April earnings call that the company was focused on "building high-performing teams and increasing our agility by reducing layers with fewer managers". The company has repeatedly characterised its recent layoffs as part of a push to trim management layers, but the May focus on cutting software engineering jobs has fueled worries about how the company's own AI code-writing products could reduce the number of people needed for programming work. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said earlier this year that "maybe 20, 30 per cent of the code" for some of Microsoft's coding projects "are probably all written by software". The latest layoffs, however, seemed centred on slower-growing areas of the company's business, said Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives. "They're focused more and more on AI, cloud and next-generation Microsoft and really looking to cut costs around Xbox and some of the more legacy areas," Ives said. "I think they overhired over the years. This is Nadella and team making sure that they're keeping with efficiency and that's the name of the game in Wall Street." The trimming of the Xbox staff follows Microsoft's years-long expansion of the business surrounding its gaming console, culminating in 2023 with the $US75.4 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard — the California-based maker of hit franchises like Call of Duty and Candy Crush. Before that, in a bid to compete with Sony's PlayStation, it spent $US7.5 billion to acquire ZeniMax Media, the parent company of Maryland-based video game publisher Bethesda Softworks. Many of those game studios, which have locations across North America and Europe, were struggling with the layoffs, according to social media posts from employees who announced they were looking for new jobs. World national Microsoft jobs USA Sydney New South Wales CONTACT US
