Rachel Reeves eyeing VAT hikes on energy bills, SNP claim
But under questioning on BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Monday, the top Labour minister failed to rule out expanding the tax's scope – meaning it could be applied to more products.
Jones's comments have sparked fears Labour could be moving to ending exemptions, given that planned cuts to plug a shortfall in the public finances must be filled by cuts elsewhere or tax hikes to meet the party's self-imposed fiscal rules.
VAT is applied to things like fast food and many snacks but not to fruit and vegetables; likewise, adults' clothes are taxed where children's clothes and babywear are not.
Household energy bills incur a 5% VAT charge and there are concerns this could be hiked as this is not the headline rate of VAT, which is 20%.
The SNP have written to Chancellor Rachel Reeves to demand she does not hike taxes on 'everyday essentials'.
(Image: House of Commons)
Dave Doogan (above), the party's economy spokesperson, said: 'As the UK economy continues to falter on your watch, there are growing concerns about the austerity cuts and tax rises the Labour government will impose on families to fill the black hole in your government's finances.
'The Labour Party has already broken your election pledge not to increase National Insurance taxes – and as a result the UK economy is now in an even worse state as businesses shed jobs and investment and UK unemployment hits a 4-year high.
READ MORE: Rachel Reeves set to ape Margaret Thatcher with bank regulation bonfire
'Now there are concerns that the Labour government intends to increase the cost of food, energy bills, baby clothes and other everyday essentials by increasing VAT charges on items that are currently VAT exempt or charged at a lower rate than the headline 20%.'
He added that Jones's (below) Today programme interview had 'left the door open to such a move', adding: 'Families must not be forced to pay the price for Labour Party failure on the economy with regressive tax hikes that will hit send the cost of living even higher.
'People are already paying through the nose for everyday essentials under the Labour government - with the cost of food, energy and household bills even higher than they were under the Tories. They cannot afford yet another Labour Party-imposed hike in living costs. Such a tax hike would also squeeze economic growth even further.
'Labour Party policies are actively damaging the UK economy and public finances - with both in a worse state than when you came to office.'
A Treasury spokesperson said: 'The Government stands by its promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of Income Tax, employee National Insurance or VAT.'
The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) warned earlier this month that Labour's efforts to cut Government borrowing had mostly failed, saying there had been a 'a substantial erosion of the UK's capacity to respond to future shocks and growing pressures on the public finances'.
Reeves has also been hamstrung by a shrinking economy after promising growth, with gross domestic product falling for the second month running in May.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Popular card chain launches closing down sale as it shuts more stores
Clintons closed 38 stores leading to over 300 jobs losses in the previous financial year. A leading card retailer has kicked off a massive closing down sale as it continues to close more outlets. Clintons saw 38 of its stores shut down, resulting in over 300 job losses during the last financial year. In its most recent financial briefing, the firm conceded that further store closures could be on the cards. The Rugby Central branch of Clintons is set to shut its doors following the launch of a closing down sale, The Sun reports. Although an exact date hasn't been confirmed, Warwickshire World was informed by employees that "it could be next April.", reports the Express. Last month, the Keighley store in West Yorkshire bid farewell to customers on June 14. Leading up to its closure, the shop slashed prices by 20 per cent across various products. Leamington Spa's outlet also enticed shoppers with discounts of up to 50 per cent in an "everything must go" sale. The final closure date for the Warwickshire store has not yet been announced. April saw two additional Clintons stores in Halifax and Andover close permanently. Why are Clintons Cards shops shutting down? Clintons has cited escalating costs due to labour tax increases and the rising minimum wage as reasons for some of its stores becoming financially unsustainable. The well-known card chain reported a pre-tax profit of £8 million for the financial year ending 29 June 2024, marking a significant recovery from a £5.3 million pre-tax loss the year before. Pillarbox Designs took ownership of Clintons in March 2024. A statement from Clintons revealed: "The company has continued to close loss-making stores and the portfolio of retail stores is now down to approximately 170 high street continues to be unpredictable and the company is seeing reduced footfall in the stores year on company continues to monitor the performance of the existing estate and to close the poor performing stores, which, whilst impacting on turnover, should improve profitability moving forwards." Is Rachel Reeves to blame for Clintons Cards closures? Moreover, the threshold at which these contributions must be paid has been reduced from £9,100 to £5,000. These alterations to the tax system were announced by the Chancellor in the Autumn Budget last October and took effect on 1 April. Simultaneously, the national minimum wage experienced a significant rise, climbing to £12.21 per hour. For employees aged 18-20, the minimum wage jumped by £1.40 to £10 per hour. Clintons first opened its doors back in 1968 - and swiftly established itself as a destination for Britons seeking greeting cards. During its heyday, the chain operated more than 1,000 outlets nationwide. This figure has now plummeted to merely 163 physical shops.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Why doctors are striking … again
When Labour came into power they agreed to give resident doctors, formerly known as junior doctors, a 22% rise over two years to end their strikes. They then turned their attention to updating the NHS, unveiling an ambitious 10-year plan to change the way the system is run. But now doctors have gone back to the ballot box. The Guardian's health policy editor, Denis Campbell, tells Helen Pidd that the British Medical Association (BMA), the doctors' union, says the value of their salaries has dropped 29% since 2008 thanks to inflation and serial low pay rises. They want this restored. But with public finances more stretched than ever, Wes Streeting is unlikely to accede. Denis explains why the BMA is saying this pay rise is 'non-negotiable', and also why it looks as if the resident doctors are losing public support. And even the support of their senior colleagues. What could this clash mean for Labour, trust in doctors – and patients?
North Wales Chronicle
3 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Tory ex-ministers defend record as pressure mounts after Afghan data leak
Members of the previous administration are distancing themselves from the handling of a breach which saw a defence official release the details of nearly 19,000 people seeking to flee Kabul. Shadow justice secretary and former immigration minister Robert Jenrick said he first learned of the 2022 data breach after a legal gagging order had been put in place the following year. Former home secretary Suella Braverman said there is 'much more that needs to be said about the conduct of the MoD (Ministry of Defence), both ministers and officials' and that she was not involved in the superinjunction decision. Ex-veterans minister Johnny Mercer claimed he had 'receipts' regarding the previous government's actions in relation to Kabul but said it was 'absurd' to accuse him of failing to grasp the scale of the crisis. 'I know who is covering their tracks, and who has the courage to be honest,' he said. 'I would caution those who might attempt to rewrite history.' Thousands of people are being relocated to the UK as part of an £850 million scheme set up after the leak, which was kept secret as a result of a superinjunction imposed in 2023 which was only lifted on Tuesday. At Prime Minister's Questions, Sir Keir Starmer insisted there would be scrutiny of the decision, telling MPs: 'Ministers who served under the party opposite have serious questions to answer about how this was ever allowed to happen.' Former prime minister Liz Truss, who was foreign secretary at the time of the breach in February 2022, but a backbencher when the superinjunction was sought, said she was 'shocked' by the 'cover-up'. She said the revelations pointed to a 'huge betrayal of public trust' and 'those responsible in both governments and the bureaucracy need to be held to account'. Mr Mercer said: 'I've spilt my own blood fighting for a better Afghanistan, lost friends, fought to get operators out of the country and away from the Taliban, and visited hundreds of resettled families and hotels in the UK under direct commission from the previous prime minister after the schemes were dangerously failing. 'Others were with me in this process and we have all the receipts.' Shadow justice secretary Mr Jenrick said he had 'strongly opposed plans to bring over' thousands of Afghan nationals during 'internal government discussions in the short period before my resignation' in December 2023. 'I first learned of the data leak and plan to resettle people after the superinjunction was in place,' he said. 'Parliamentary privilege is not unlimited; I was bound by the Official Secrets Act.' Mr Jenrick said the secret scheme had been 'a complete disaster' and that the previous government 'made serious mistakes' but that 'thousands more (Afghan people) have come since Labour came to power'. The Commons Defence Committee will be setting out plans for an inquiry straight after the parliamentary recess in September. A dataset of 18,714 who applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) scheme was released in February 2022 by a defence official who emailed a file outside authorised government systems. The Ministry of Defence only became aware of the blunder when excerpts from the dataset were posted anonymously on a Facebook group in August 2023, and a superinjunction was granted at the High Court in an attempt to prevent the Taliban from finding out about the leak. Then-defence secretary Sir Ben Wallace said he had applied for a four-month standard injunction shortly before leaving office but, on September 1 2023, when Grant Shapps took the role, the government was given a superinjunction. Mr Shapps has not yet publicly commented on the revelations. Sir Ben has insisted he makes 'no apology' for applying for the initial injunction, saying it was motivated by the need to protect people in Afghanistan whose safety was at risk. The leak led to the creation of a secret Afghan relocation scheme – the Afghanistan Response Route – in April 2024. The scheme is understood to have cost about £400 million so far, with a projected final cost of about £850 million. The key facts on the Afghan Resettlement data incident that took place in 2022, and the action we are taking to support those impacted. Defence Minister @LukePollard explains 👇 — Ministry of Defence 🇬🇧 (@DefenceHQ) July 16, 2025 A total of about 6,900 people are expected to be relocated by the end of the scheme. The official responsible for the email error was moved to a new role but not sacked. The superinjunction was in place for almost two years, covering Labour and Conservative governments. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has apologised on behalf of the Conservatives for the leak, telling LBC: 'On behalf of the government and on behalf of the British people, yes, because somebody made a terrible mistake and names were put out there … and we are sorry for that.'
