Labour accused of 'dithering' over huge driving test waiting times
Some 258 locations in Britain had the maximum possible waiting time of 24 weeks for a test as of May 5, which is 81% of all sites. That is up from 161 at the start of the year.
Driving tests are a reserved matter under the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA).
AA Driving School, which obtained the figures from the DVSA, warned the situation 'cannot get much worse'.
READ MORE: Petition to repeal Online Safety Act reaches 340K signatures – how to sign
The average waiting time across all test centres has reached 22 weeks, up from 14 weeks in February 2024.
The SNP have now accused Labour of leaving Scottish learner drivers "in limbo".
MSP George Adam said: "Learner drivers across Scotland are being left in limbo, unable to access work, education or essential travel, all because Labour at Westminster has failed to get a grip on this spiralling backlog.
"Labour promised action, but what we've seen is delay, dithering, and excuses. Their new target is not only too late, it's an admission that they've already broken their promise to learners.
'While officials scramble to fix Labour's mess, Scottish young people and families are paying the price. This is yet another clear example of how Westminster control is failing Scotland."
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander (below) said in April the Labour Government 'inherited an enormous backlog' but was 'acting fast'.
(Image: Jonathan Brady) She told the Commons [[Transport]] Select Committee her department aimed to reduce the average waiting time to seven weeks by summer 2026.
A Government consultation on amending the test booking system closed last week.
This featured a plan aimed at stopping bots mass-booking new slots so they can be resold on the black market for inflated prices.
The Department for Transport also instructed the DVSA to offer additional overtime payments to incentivise instructors to conduct more tests.
READ MORE: Donald Trump praises 'fantastic' Labour crackdown on immigration
Staff at the agency qualified to conduct tests are being asked to voluntarily return to the front line, while the number of permanent trainers for new examiners is being doubled.
Emma Bush, managing director of AA Driving School, said: 'With the vast majority of driving test centres now showing waits at the maximum the system will allow, the situation cannot get much worse.
'New measures designed to start bringing down waiting times were implemented at the start of April by the DVSA.
'There are signs of recovery though, putting both the industry and learners on tenterhooks for more signs of improvement in the coming months.
'While we would expect these changes to take a few months to show a positive impact, it is still disappointing to see that learners are continuing to face an uphill battle when it comes to booking their driving test.'
DVSA chief executive Loveday Ryder said: 'DVSA's goal is to make booking a driving test easier and fairer for learner drivers.
'We are making progress on our plans.
'We're really grateful to everyone who has responded to our recent consultation, including learners, parents and driving instructors.
'We're now analysing the survey responses.
'Using your feedback, we'll be able to plan our next steps on improving car test booking rules.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
All new UK cars will have breathalysers and black box-style recorders under Labour plans to align with the EU
New British cars will follow European laws and be fitted with breathalysers and black box-style recorders, amid claims the move is a political ploy by Labour to reset its post-Brexit relationship with the EU. Sir Keir Starmer 's government argues that differences in car manufacturing between Britain and Europe will lead to higher costs being passed on to the customer. But critics argue such a move shows a desire by Labour to closely align Britain to rules and regulations implemented by Brussels. Labour previously agreed the UK would align with EU plant and animal health rules as part of concessions to form a closer relationship with the union. Now Lord Hendy, Minister of State for the Department for Transport, stated earlier this week in parliament that the government 'takes an explicit presumption in favour of alignment' in regards to how cars are manufactured. He added that the government would be 'considering options for requiring the fitment of the safety technologies mandated by the EU's general safety regulation' and would discuss these with individual manufacturers, the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, and the National Franchise Dealers Association. Under the EU, new British and European cars followed the same legislation. But following Brexit, Brussels introduced the General Safety Regulation 2 (GSR2), which called for different devices and technology to be pre-installed. These include a breathalyser that prevents the car from starting if the driver fails an alcohol test. Event Data Recorders (EDRs), which can provide information on how fast a car was travelling before an accident, and Driver Drowsiness Warning (DDAW), which can alert a driver if they are becoming sleepy, are also required to be fitted into new vehicles. Northern Ireland follows GSR2 rules as part of the Brexit deal to prevent a hard border with the Republic of Ireland. But differences between new cars made under EU and UK rules could mean customers in Northern Ireland would face higher costs for purchasing a new vehicle from the mainland. Labour is understood to back an 'alignment' of the EU and UK safety laws to stop Northern Irish consumers being treated unfavourably. Car manufacturers are also said to see the advantage of aligning the rules. Mike Hawes, chief executive of the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders told The Telegraph: 'With the heavily integrated nature of the UK and European automotive sectors, regulatory alignment supports efficient production, keeping costs down for consumers while retaining the widest possible model choice.' But Brexit supporters argue that UK car manufacturers do not need to be led by Brussels and the move is simply an attempt by Labour to woo the EU. Former Tory leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith, said: 'This is a game being played out where they keep incrementally moving back towards the European Union.' Mark Francois, chairman of the Conservative European Research Group, added: 'This is still rule-taking from the EU, however you try and dress it up.' Away from the theatre of politics, in-built breathalysers - or 'alcolocks' as they are also known - are actually backed by the majority of motorists as a solution to stopping drink drivers from reoffending. A recent poll by the RAC found 53 per cent of drivers want courts to have the power to order anyone convicted of drink-driving to have alcolock breathalysers installed in their cars. Support for the interventionist approach comes as a Freedom of Information request to the DVLA found 27,000 individuals were convicted of multiple drink-driving offences in the 11 years leading up to July 2024. On the back of this evidence, the RAC is pushing for the Government to take up this method - already in use in other countries including Australia, Belgium and parts of the US - in a bid to reduce drink-driving. Simon Williams, RAC head of policy, said: 'Too many lives are lost and ruined by drink-driving. 'It's also very apparent that many of the drink-drivers caught by the police are reoffenders which implies something different needs to be done to change this dangerous behaviour.' Alcolocks – what are they? Could they become standard? Not everyone will have heard of alcolocks or alcohol-interlocks as they're properly known. Alcolock is actually a brand name – founded in the 70s - but has become the common name for breathalysers fitted to the car's ignition system. Once fitted a driver has to provide an alcohol-free breath sample in order to start the engine – usually blowing for five seconds. If there's little to no alcohol the engine will start. If it exceeds a set level it won't start. There are various options as to how they're mandated and who pays for them: For instance, courts could mandate them for reoffenders only, or anyone convicted of drink-driving. In other countries the fitting is generally paid for by the offender, although in cases of financial hardship the state can step in to cover the cost. However, it's worth noting that the EU introduced new rules in July 2024 requiring all new cars sold in the EU to be 'prepared' to have an alcolock fitted.
South Wales Argus
2 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Labour not fit to run Wales according to this reader
This last case is quite frankly disgraceful. Fancy buying a farm and in less than three years, its value has decreased by half a million, and it is no good for what it was bought for. If Eluned Morgan had any conscience, she would agree to repay that half a million from Labour's funds and resign. This is the same Labour that a few months ago did a grubby deal with the Liberals to get their finance bill passed. They should have called an early election. This was a grubby deal done by Huw Irranca-Davies, he should also resign. Labour is an absolute disgrace, and is not fit to run a bath, let alone the Welsh country. R Brafing Wales
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
New company tasked with building up to 40,000 homes on brownfield railway land
The Government has launched a property company to oversee the release of brownfield sites on surplus railway land to enable tens of thousands of new homes to be built. Platform4 will ensure up to 40,000 homes are built over the next decade, the Department for Transport (DfT) said. The organisation will initially operate across England and Wales, with potential to expand to Scotland. Its roles were previously carried out by London and Continental Railways Ltd and Network Rail's property team, with each managing different aspects of the process. The DfT said this 'fragmented approach' often led to 'inefficiencies, duplicated efforts and missed opportunities'. Profits generated from Platform4 will be reinvested into Britain's railways. The business is expected to generate an additional £227 million by delivering development faster and at a larger scale than before. Four locations already earmarked for regeneration are Newcastle Forth Yards (an opportunity for up to 600 new homes), Manchester Mayfield (up to 1,500 new homes), Cambridge (425 new homes), and Nottingham (200 new homes). Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'Our railways are more than just connections between places – they create economic opportunity and drive regeneration. 'It's exciting to picture the thousands of families who will live in these future homes, the vibrant neighbourhoods springing up, and the new businesses that will launch thanks to these developments. 'Platform4 will breathe new life into these spaces, delivering tens of thousands of new homes as part of our Plan for Change promise to build 1.5 million homes, while reviving communities around rail stations, supporting jobs and driving economic growth.' Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner said: 'We are facing a housing crisis which has led to a generation being locked out of homeownership, all while land sits empty and disused across the country. 'We said we'd do everything possible to get Britain building, and that's why today we're setting out how we'll get more homes built across surplus railway network sites in line with our brownfield-first approach.' Platform4 will be chaired by Bek Seeley, who has held several roles in regeneration projects. She said: 'Working alongside our partners and local authorities, we will create sustainable places that bring communities and customers together and leave a positive legacy for future generations.'
