UAT outraged as Gauteng returns unspent R1bn to National Treasury
Provincial Treasury department head, Ncumisa Mnyani said on Monday that the department of health did not spend R724.6m of its R66bn allocated budget, while the department of education also failed to use R317.35m of its R66.1bn budget, Sowetan reported.
The political party said people of Gauteng cannot continue to suffer because government officials are too slow, too disorganised, or too complacent to do their jobs.
'How does a government with a R66bn health budget fail to spend R724m, when clinics remain understaffed and healthcare infrastructure is crumbling?
'How does a department with a R66.1bn education budget fail to spend R317m, while township schools face overcrowding, poor sanitation and infrastructure backlogs?' the party said.
It said Gauteng's infrastructure and services were in dire need of attention. This included roads with unaddressed potholes and maintenance needs, continuous power outages affecting daily life and economic productivity and underfunded schools requiring renovations for a conducive learning environment.
'The returned funds could have fixed our roads, schools and many more. Instead, we're stuck with potholes and darkness, crime, unemployment, lack of housing etc.'
TimesLIVE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
6 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
From liberation to integrity: Ruth First can inspire anti-corruption advocacy
Ruth First's 'activist research' approach, combining rigorous inquiry with political purpose, offers a guide for the fight against graft. Photo: File Ruth First's life and work remain a powerful reminder that research, when combined with political purpose and moral clarity, can become a weapon for justice. Her research approach evolved from her fearless work as an investigative journalist exposing injustice and her academic studies examined grassroots conditions in Namibia and Mozambique, combining on-the-ground inquiry with critical analysis to inform transformative action. First's intellectual activism was never detached from the realities of those at the margins. It was rooted in rigorous evidence, focused on the lived experience and directed towards influencing policy and practice. More than 40 years after her assassination by the apartheid government, her methodology offers vital lessons for confronting one of South Africa's most corrosive contemporary crises — systemic corruption. Her approach has recently been described as 'activist research' by Saleem Badat and Vasu Reddy, authors of a new edited volume called Today's anti-corruption landscape is paradoxical. South Africa has a strong constitutional framework, independent oversight bodies and a vocal civil society. Yet corruption scandals in procurement, public enterprises and political party funding continue to erode public trust, drain resources and entrench inequality. Even the most exhaustive inquiries, such as the One of the enduring concepts associated with her work at Mozambique's In anti-corruption advocacy, this balance is equally relevant. Civil society organisations, investigative journalists and policy advocates often work alongside government departments and political leaders who claim to share their goals. Proximity can create either complacency or self-censorship. Drawing on First's example, advocates should affirm progress where it exists while interrogating gaps and failures. The credibility of anti-corruption work depends on this ability to praise and criticise in equal measure, ensuring that advocacy does not drift into legitimising superficial reforms. Equally important is First's insistence that finding the right question often matters more than finding the right answer. In Mozambique, this meant asking why agrarian policy prioritised state farms over small-scale agriculture, even when politically sensitive. In South Africa today, anti-corruption work often focuses on 'who stole' rather than 'why systems enable theft' and 'how those systems can be dismantled'. Scandal-driven responses tend to chase symptoms, while the structural enablers remain untouched, including political financing rules that incentivise patronage, procurement loopholes, weak whistleblower protection and community disenfranchisement that allows corrupt networks to thrive. Asking the deeper, systemic questions can redirect advocacy towards reforms that change incentives and close avenues for abuse. First also championed a collective approach to research, exemplified by the Centre for African Studies development course, which brought together students, officials and communities. Research was conducted, not on people, but with them, combining different experiences and forms of expertise. In South Africa's anti-corruption context, this could mean building investigative and monitoring collaborations that unite whistleblowers, journalists, honest officials, reform-minded business figures and affected communities. Corruption manifests differently across contexts, from municipal service delivery to national infrastructure projects and understanding these variations requires multiple perspectives. Reports emerging from these collaborations, like those produced under First's leadership, would be methodologically rigorous and politically actionable. Her rejection of South African exceptionalism is another valuable lesson. First understood that national political economies are shaped by regional interconnections. Labour migration, trade flows and shared infrastructure linked the fate of Mozambique to that of its neighbours. Corruption, similarly, is rarely contained within borders. Cross-border illicit financial flows, procurement cartels operating across jurisdictions and transnational organised crime demand a regional lens. Anti-corruption advocacy that draws on her approach would foster partnerships across Southern Africa, sharing data, coordinating investigations and jointly advocating for stronger asset recovery mechanisms. First's career also speaks to the balance between objectivity and political involvement. She rejected the pretence of value-free research, arguing instead for objectivity rooted in methodological rigour, transparency and openness to challenge. In today's political climate, where corruption allegations can be weaponised for factional battles, this insistence on credibility is crucial. Advocacy that can demonstrate rigorous methodology and verifiable data stands a better chance of influencing both public opinion and policy. Maintaining this standard also means challenging false or unfounded claims, even when they come from allies, to protect the integrity of the anti-corruption cause. As we mark Women's Month, we must recognise that corruption is not gender-neutral; it disproportionately harms women and girls, particularly in marginalised communities. When public funds are siphoned off or mismanaged, it is often women who bear the brunt of failing services. Mothers are unable to get their children to school because roads are impassable. Caregivers struggle without access to clean water or functioning clinics. Young women's futures are compromised when textbooks are dumped in rivers while contractors are still paid in full. These failures not only deepen poverty but also entrench gender inequality, denying women and girls the opportunities and resources they need to thrive. An anti-corruption agenda informed by First's activist research would make it clear that integrity in governance is not an abstract ideal but a prerequisite for women's empowerment and the fulfilment of their rights. Finally, First understood that political work is a long game and that endurance matters. She worked relentlessly but also valued rest, conversation and joy as strategic resources for sustaining struggle. In the anti-corruption field, where burnout, threats and disillusionment are real risks, this is more than a personal wellness issue, it is about movement resilience. Whistleblowers like First's activist research was never just about producing knowledge. It was about shifting the terms of debate, empowering those on the front lines and insisting that truth-telling is a form of solidarity. In South Africa today, where corruption corrodes trust and undermines development, adopting her principles could reinvigorate advocacy. The battle against corruption is not only legal and technical, but also political, cultural and moral. It requires evidence that speaks to courts and commissions, communities and consciences. By fusing the rigour of research with the urgency of activism, anti-corruption advocates can honour First's legacy and help shift South Africa toward a more accountable and just future. Good Governance Africa's work, as the convening partner for Africa, to raise awareness and support for the establishment of the Ruth Kolevsohn is the executive director of Good Governance Africa's group governance programmes.
Mail & Guardian
7 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
ANC to discipline Malusi Gigaba and Senzo Mchunu over public criticism
Suspended Police Minister Senzo Mchunu. (@Senzo_Mchunu/X) The In a statement, ANC spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu-Motsiri said their conduct 'represents a flagrant violation of ANC internal communication protocols and undermines the fundamental discipline of the movement'. 'These comrades acted outside of any sanctioned organisational mandate or collective structure,' she said. 'Their remarks do not reflect the views of any legitimate structure of the movement and must be seen as an opportunistic assault on the collective image, credibility and cohesion of the African National Congress.' In an interview published in the Sunday Times , Gigaba said the NEC had failed to meet its responsibilities and that the ANC shouldn't have gone into a coalition with the Democratic Alliance after losing the general elections last year. 'I think we are [too] preoccupied with our little corners, our little groupings,' he told the publication. 'There doesn't seem to exist the possibility for us to get up briefly from these little groupings, so that we can now discuss what is … in the best interest of our country, of our movement, of our people, so that we achieve a postcolonial society. And until we are ready to do that, I think we are failing in our duty.' Mchunu came under fire last week after he said the ANC risked losing relevance if it was not successful in next year's local government elections. 'If we do not win municipalities in the upcoming local government [elections] next year, come the national government elections, we will be history,' Mchunu said at the tombstone unveiling for struggle stalwart Nokuhamba Nyawo in northern KwaZulu-Natal. Bhengu-Motsiri said Gigaba and Mchunu were 'casting aspersions on the character and unity of the ANC, portraying the organisation as divided, incoherent and collapsing'. 'These actions serve only the strategic agenda of counter-revolution and weaken the people's confidence in their movement.' 'No comrade will be exempt from the discipline of the organisation, which demands unity, discipline and revolutionary morality from all,' she added. 'The renewal programme cannot coexist with ill-discipline; we have no tolerance for conduct that seeks to weaken the collective.' The ANC has instructed the two not to make further unsanctioned public statements. Gigaba, who was a strong defender of Jacob Zuma during the state capture period, has criticised ANC veterans, including former Robben Island prisoner Ahmed Kathrada, for calling on the former president to step down. He said he still respected Zuma as a former ANC leader despite his decision to form his own party outside of the ANC. Zuma's uMkhonto weSizwe party drew away a large swathe of ANC votes in the May 2024 elections. Mchunu was placed on special leave by President Cyril Ramaphosa after corruption allegations against him made by KwaZulu-Natal provincial police commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. Mchunu has denied any wrongdoing.
The Herald
8 hours ago
- The Herald
Mike Sutcliffe charged with turning around Msunduzi municipality
Mzila said Sutcliffe had successfully completed a major service delivery turnaround in eThekwini municipality over the past 12 months. 'His immediate task is the implementation of a turnaround plan with a specific and urgent focus on restoring service delivery, strengthening good governance, restoring investor confidence and ensuring sound financial management. 'In his address to the council, the MEC emphasised the collective responsibility of all councillors to support Dr Sutcliffe in his critical role. He underscored the support is essential to benefit the broader Msunduzi community and all ratepayers. The MEC also called on councillors to uphold the highest standards of transparency and accountability to the residents they serve.' He said the executive committee supported Sutcliffe. 'All exco members welcomed Dr Sutcliffe's appointment, expressing full support for what they view as a timely and necessary intervention. They believe the move will significantly strengthen the municipality's ability to tackle its challenges. 'The MEC was accompanied on the visit by the acting head of department, Dr Krishnan. The appointment underscores the department's commitment to ensuring the Msunduzi municipality is placed on a sustainable path to recovery and effective service delivery.' Sutcliffe resigned as eThekwini municipal manager 13 years ago. During his term he faced criticism for renaming streets, wasting funds on statues that never saw the light of day and for his handling of tender processes. TimesLIVE
