Democrats Vote Against Gun Control in Surprise Move
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A gun control measure in Hawaii failed by a narrow vote this week, after several state Democrats crossed the aisle to vote against it.
The defeat of Senate Bill 401, which sought to ban assault-style rifles in the state, shows an unexpected division in a party typically unified on gun control.
Kainoa Kaku, president of the Hawaii Rifle Association, checking one of his personal firearms while at his home, June, 23, 2022, in Honolulu. This is not the sort of firearm which was protected by the...
Kainoa Kaku, president of the Hawaii Rifle Association, checking one of his personal firearms while at his home, June, 23, 2022, in Honolulu. This is not the sort of firearm which was protected by the recent ruling. More
Marco Garcia, File/AP Photo
Why It Matters
The vote marks a rare instance of Democratic lawmakers breaking with their party on a high-profile gun measure, especially as Democratic Governor Josh Green was prepared to sign the bill if it passed through the Senate.
Assault rifles such as AR-15s and AK-47s are the types of guns which have been used in some of the most high-profile school shootings. They will remain legal in Hawaii for now, although assault pistols are not legal in the state.
What To Know
On Wednesday, the state Senate blocked the bill after some Democrats raised concerns about its effects on gun owners.
Hawaii state Senator Joy Buenaventura, who is typically a supporter of gun control measures, said the bill would criminalize existing owners of assault rifles, per Hawaii News Now.
She said: "Now, by their mere possession, because we decide to pass this bill, we decide to label them as criminals and that to me, it's unethical and should not be tolerated by this body."
However, Senate Judiciary chair Karl Rhoads disagreed with this take on the bill saying it allowed for "grandfathering."
He supported the bill saying its prohibition on the number of bullets a gun can fire at a time would limit fatalities in the event of a shooting, and would allow the police to get to the scene before more people could be killed.
The bill also made it illegal for guns to be given to anyone who did not purchase them directly. The gun used in the most recent fatal school shooting at Florida State University did not belong to the chief suspect.
The bill failed in a 13-12 vote, which not only went against typical Democratic positions, but also countered Hawaiian polling which shows 75 percent of Hawaiians support a ban on military-grade rifles.
Assault style weapons and hand guns for sale at Capitol City Arms Supply on Jan. 16, 2013, in Springfield, Illinois.
Assault style weapons and hand guns for sale at Capitol City Arms Supply on Jan. 16, 2013, in Springfield, Illinois.
Seth Perlman, File/AP Photo
What People Are Saying
Erica Yamauchi, a volunteer with the Hawaii chapter of the gun control advocacy group Moms Demand Action, said in a statement: "Today, lawmakers had an opportunity to right a wrong—instead they doubled down by allowing the weapon of choice for mass shooters to continue to be sold across our islands. Whenever tragedy strikes next, we'll ask ourselves what could have we done to prevent it. That moment of reckoning? It was right now. The answer was passing SB 401. Instead, Senate lawmakers caved to the pressure of the gun lobby and our communities will pay the price."
Democrat State Senator Joy Buenaventura said on the Senate floor: "But we are actually making [gun owners] criminals by possession of magazines that we had legalized before they bought it. Now, by their mere possession, because we decide to pass this bill, we decide to label them as criminals and that to me, it's unethical and should not be tolerated by this body."
What Happens Next
While Hawaii Democrats voted against this gun control measure, Democrats in the Senate in Washington DC introduced a federal Assault Weapons Ban of 2025. This bill will likely not go through as the Republicans control both chambers of Congress.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
5 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Denmark seeks to make it illegal to spread deepfake images, citing concern about misinformation
COPENHAGEN, Denmark (AP) — Denmark is taking steps toward enacting a ban on the use of 'deepfake' imagery online, saying such digital manipulations can stir doubts about reality and foster misinformation. The government said in a statement published Thursday that a 'broad cross section' of parties in parliament support greater protections against deepfakes and a planned bill is expected to make it illegal to share them or other digital imitations of personal characteristics. Culture Minister Jakob Engel-Schmidt, in a statement, said that it was 'high time that we now create a safeguard against the spread of misinformation and at the same time send a clear signal to the tech giants.' Officials said the measures are believed to be among the most extensive steps yet taken by a government to combat misinformation through deepfakes, which refers to highly realistic but fabricated content created by artificial intelligence tools. Deepfakes usually come in the form of pictures or video but can also be audio. They can make it appear that someone said or did something that they didn't actually say or do. Famous figures who have been depicted in deepfakes include Taylor Swift and Pope Francis. Authorities in different countries have taken varying approaches to tackling deepfakes, but they've mostly focused on sexually explicit images. U.S. President Donald Trump signed bipartisan legislation in May that makes it illegal to knowingly publish or threaten to publish intimate images without a person's consent, including deepfakes. Last year, South Korea rolled out measures to curb deepfake porn, including harsher punishment and stepped up regulations for social media platforms. Supporters of the Danish idea say that as technology advances, it will soon be impossible for people online to distinguish between real and manipulated material. 'Since images and videos also quickly become embedded in people's subconscious, digitally manipulated versions of an image or video can create fundamental doubts about — and perhaps even a completely wrong perception of — what are genuine depictions of reality,' an English translation of a ministry statement said. 'The agreement is therefore intended to ensure the right to one's own body and voice.' The proposal would still allow for 'parodies and satire' — though the ministry didn't specify how that would be determined. It said that the rules would only apply in Denmark, and violators wouldn't be subject to fines or imprisonment — even if some 'compensation' could be warranted. The ministry said that a proposal will be made to amend Danish law on the issue this summer with an aim toward passage late this year or in early 2026. Any changes must abide by the country's international obligations and European Union law, it said.
Associated Press
9 minutes ago
- Associated Press
UN commission says Syria must end violence against Alawites and protect places of worship
BEIRUT (AP) — The head of a U.N. investigative commission on Friday called commitments made by the new authorities in Syria to protect the rights of minorities 'encouraging' but said attacks have continued on members of the Alawite sect in the months since a major outbreak of sectarian violence on Syria's coast. Paulo Pinheiro, the head of the U.N. Commission of Inquiry on Syria, told a meeting of the U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva that the current Syrian government — led by Islamist former insurgents who ousted former Syrian President Bashar Assad — had given his team 'unfettered access' to the coast and to witnesses of the violence and victims' families. 'Disturbingly, reports continue to circulate of ongoing killings and arbitrary arrests of members of the Alawite community, as well as the confiscation of the property of those who fled the March violence,' he said. Pinheiro's commission also 'documented abductions by unknown individuals of at least six Alawite women this spring in several Syrian governorates,' two of whom remain missing, and has received 'credible reports of more abductions,' he said. Pinheiro also called on authorities to put in place more protections for places of worship after Sunday's suicide bombing attack on a church outside of Damascus. The attack, which killed at least 25 people and wounded dozens more, was the first of its kind to take place in the Syrian capital in years. The Syrian government has said that the perpetrators belonged to a cell of the Islamic State group and that they thwarted a subsequent attempt to target a Shiite shrine in the Sayyida Zeinab suburb in Damascus. 'Attacks on places of worship are outrageous and unacceptable,' Pinheiro said. 'The authorities must ensure the protection of places of worship and threatened communities and ensure that perpetrators and enablers are held accountable.' Assad was deposed in a lightning rebel offensive in December, bringing an end to a nearly 14-year civil war. In March, hundreds of civilians, most of them from the Alawite minority to which Assad belongs, were killed in revenge attacks after clashes broke out between pro-Assad armed groups and the new government security forces on the Syrian coast. Pinheiro said his commission had documented scattered 'revenge attacks' that happened before that, including killings in several villages in Hama and Homs provinces in late January in which men who had handed over their weapons under a 'settlement' process set up for former soldiers and members of security forces under Assad, believing that they would be granted an amnesty in exchange for disarmament, were then 'ill-treated and executed.' He praised the interim government's formation of a body tasked with investigating the attacks on the coast and said government officials had told his team that 'dozens of alleged perpetrators' were arrested. Pinheiro said the government needs to carry out a 'reform and vetting program' as it integrates a patchwork of former rebel factions into a new army and security services and enact 'concrete policies to put an end to Syria's entrenched cycles of violence and revenge, in a context where heightened tensions and sectarian divisions have been reignited.'
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court weighs voter rights and party autonomy in constitutional challenge to SQ836
The Oklahoma Supreme Court heard oral arguments over a challenge to SQ 836, an initiative that would create open primaries, allowing all voters to participate regardless of party affiliation. The Oklahoma Republican Party and other plaintiffs are suing to declare the measure, also known as Initiative Petition 448, unconstitutional before it reaches voters. Vice Chief Justice Dana Kuehn said constitutional authority ultimately rests with voters. 'My question is, does our constitution directly state that the people get to vote on these measures before the court can actually make a determination on the constitutionality of something, do you agree?' Kuehn said. Robert McCampbell, attorney for the pro-836 petitioners, agreed, referencing constitutional principles of citizen petition rights. 'Our constitution comes very close to those exact words,' he said. Benjamin P. Sisney, attorney for the Republican Party, argued that 836 represents a 'radical shift' in Oklahoma's electoral system. According to Sisney, the initiative would create 'a so-called 'open primary' but which is actually a system where individuals can register themselves as candidates of and can affiliate themselves with a political party and the ambience and auspices of that party and its name with no affirmation of its platform or values.' Justices questioned the timing of challenging the measure before voters have decided on it. Tony Stobbe, an independent voter and military veteran, advocated for the initiative, saying that the current system excludes nearly half a million independent voters from meaningful participation. 'Fundamentally, I come down to brass taxes,' Stobbe said, expressing his desire to participate in the elections that his taxes fund. Oklahoma ranks among the nation's lowest in voter participation, with 436,041 registered independents as of January 2024 unable to vote in primaries that can decide elections. In sheriff races across Oklahoma's 77 counties, fewer than 10 featured both Republican and Democratic candidates in the general election, meaning most races were decided in closed Republican primaries. 'I would like every citizen of the state of Oklahoma, Republican, Democrat, 480,000 independents, Green Party. I don't care to be able to go to the polls on primary day and cast a vote in the election that actually currently matters,' Stobbe said. 'I just want to be clear, I don't see this as republican or democrat issues. I just think it's an issue just to cast a ballot,' he said. Robert McCampbell, attorney for the pro-836 petitioners, argued that the initiative preserves party rights while ensuring taxpayers aren't forced to fund exclusive nomination processes. 'The parties – they retain all of their first amendment rights,' McCampbell said, noting parties can select candidates through any method 'except for one.' 'A political party cannot force the taxpayers to pay for their nomination process,' McCampbell said. McCampbell clarified that under the proposed system, voters wouldn't be selecting party nominees but rather advancing candidates to the general election. 'The bottom line is, under IP 448, the voters are not selecting a nominee for a political party. The voters are voting for candidates to advance, and there is no interference with the party's first amendment rights,' he said. Opposition to the measure includes gubernatorial candidate Charles McCall, who has vowed to defend against it if elected. McCall said it sounded like 'California Chaos,' arguing in a press release Tuesday that 'California's top-two primaries have left voters with limited choices and often two Democrats on the general election ballot.' 'We cannot let that happen here,' McCall said. If approved, SQ836 would establish a single primary election where all candidates appear on one ballot with their party registration displayed alongside a disclaimer that registration 'does not imply the candidate is nominated or endorsed by the political party.' The top two vote-getters would advance to the general election regardless of party affiliation. The measure would cover statewide positions, county offices, district attorney, state legislature members, and congressional representatives while excluding Presidential Elector, municipal offices, judicial positions, and school board members. In Cleveland County, the change would affect elections for 185,554 registered voters, including 41,832 independents and over 2,000 libertarians currently excluded from Republican primaries. For the 2024-2025 election cycle, the Democratic Party opened its primaries to independents, while Republican and Libertarian parties maintained closed primaries. The constitutional amendment would take effect 90 days after approval and would repeal Article 3, Section 3 of the Oklahoma Constitution while preserving the current Presidential Elector nomination system. Oklahoma recorded the nation's lowest voter turnout in both the 2020 and 2024 November elections.
