UDF, LDF spar over audit report in Kalamassery municipality
The ruling United Democratic Front and the Opposition Left front in Kalamassery municipality have crossed swords over an audit report that had allegedly detected gaps in the financial management of the civic body.
The Opposition councillors blamed the ruling front for the fiasco whereas the ruling front has rejected the allegations while stating that they were ready for any investigation into the allegations.
The audit report for the fiscal 2023-24 of the municipality had pointed out that cheques for a total amount of about ₹2.3 crore deposited in various banks from April 2010 to January 2024 had not yet been reflected in the respective accounts. The report found that there was proof for having received the cheques, but it was not reflected in the relevant accounts.
The audit department found alleged shortcomings in the collection and agreements signed in connection with the allotment of buildings owned by the civic body and given on rent. There were no rent agreements for around 15 of the 58 buildings given on rent. The audit found that the software for rent collection had showed an arrear of about ₹39.4 lakh while the balance sheet had mentioned it as only ₹18. 5 lakh.
The ruling front rejected the allegations that funds were missing from the accounts of the civic body. They blamed the glitches in the government's K-Smart software for the alleged shortcomings mentioned in the audit report. It had claimed that the transfer of various funds was not reflected in the civic body's accounts owing to software issues.
The Left front has decided to hold an agitation against the alleged financial irregularities at the municipality office on May 29. It has also demanded an inquiry into the findings in the report. The ruling front has said that it was ready to face any inquiry into the allegations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
13 hours ago
- Indian Express
Bloodhounds turns 2: Kim Sae Ron lived in a Squid Game-like society, ‘was too scared to speak'; met Sulli and Go Hara's fate
Five years ago, a Korean journalist who had reported on at least 30 Korean actors' suicides in his 30-year career said he dreads late-night phone calls, because it often means another star has died, fallen victim to the same intense 'blame game.' Most of the global audience, unaware of a DUI scandal that had blown wildly out of proportion overnight, tuned in for Bloodhounds episode 7, two years ago, only to find its lead female actor, Kim Sae Ron, completely wiped from the screen. She crashed her car into a transformer while driving drunk in Gangnam, Seoul. Netflix washed their hands clean, edited out her scenes, and claimed they were maintaining 'quality' for their audience by dropping her. 'We tried our best to minimise the actress' appearance to decrease the viewer's discomfort. We did our best to increase the quality of the drama while minimising her appearance,' said the director at the time. Within next week, the brutal internet cancel culture had completely derailed the then-22-year-old's career she started building at the age of 9. Her private life became a public spectacle. Brands dropped her. She was quietly erased after one mistake, the internet refused to let her forget. Too scared to speak, too hated to heal, and too alone to fight back, Sae Ron went down the same dark road as Sulli and Goo Hara: young women cheered on the way up, and blamed on the way out. Also read: Amid Kim Soo Hyun backlash, a look at 7 Korean actors who bounced back from controversies 'I'm too scared to say anything about them,' Sae Ron said in court after being fined 200 million won ($139,000). Trembling, she expressed fear of the media and stressed that many of the articles circulating about her private life were untrue. She paid heavy compensation, legal fees, brand penalties, and cancellation costs, adding up to nearly 700 million won. Her agency cut ties. With no work and no money, she had to take part-time jobs, using a fake name, Kim Ah Im, just to get hired. But even there, she was hunted down. Influencers secretly clicked photos of her working at a café and floated them online, mocking her. Gossip YouTubers accused her of faking the café job to gain sympathy. She was dragged into a brutal media trial before the legal system even got a word in. Between the crash and her death, over 2,000 articles mocked her finances, tore into her for trying to smile or socialise, and painted her as a public disgrace. Her family believes those content creators had a direct hand in what happened to her. Today, public sentiment might be shifting, but it's too late, just like it was for Sulli, who rebelled against the K-pop world and fell victim to cyberbullying. It took her death for people to finally see the truth. After humiliating stories about her private life, Sae Ron tried speaking out, with a picture of her cheek-to-cheek with Kim Soo Hyun. His agency denied dating rumours, and people accused her of trying to ride his fame. She was again raked over the coals online. After Sulli and Goo Hara's deaths in 2019, lawmakers promised to act against online abuse. Nothing changed. Experts say celebrities like Kim live in a Squid Game society, where one wrong move gets you thrown out like trash, and everyone just moves on like you were never there. Oscar-winning film Parasite's actor, Lee Sun Kyun's death just months before was another stark reminder for the public to stop the witch hunt against Sae Ron, but the race for views, likes, and subscriptions still topped someone's life. Also read: South Korean singer Goo Hara's death exposes pressures of K-pop stardom Sae Ron made history as the youngest Korean artist to attend Cannes with A Brand New Life, at a time when South Korean A-listers struggled to grace the French Riviera carpet. Her roles in The Man from Nowhere and A Girl at My Door earned her national acclaim. She received a Baeksang nomination, the country's highest artist award, at a remarkably young age. But fame came with its own cruelty. Kim was bullied in school for her success. She walked home barefoot, had no friends show up at her birthday, and battled loneliness from the start. She was the sole breadwinner for her family, reportedly using all her earnings to support them, while her sisters failed to break into acting. The day her car crashed into a transformer, it caused a blackout affecting 57 businesses. Her blood alcohol content was 0.2%, far above the legal limit. Kim posted a handwritten apology, saying she was working to compensate for the damage. She took her own life in March 2025. Investigators ruled out no foul play.
India.com
16 hours ago
- India.com
Why Pakistan Can't Launch Nuclear Missiles From The Sea
New Delhi: Pakistan is one of the nine countries in the world with nuclear weapons. It often issues nuclear threats, especially during periods of tension with India. However, despite having an arsenal of atomic weapons, there is a major gap in Islamabad's capabilities – it cannot launch nuclear missiles from the sea. This is a weakness in its strategic defence setup. Modern military powers aim to develop what is known as a "nuclear triad" – the ability to deliver a nuclear strike by land, air and sea. This makes the deterrent more reliable and much harder to neutralise. India has already achieved this. Its missiles like the K-15 and K-4 can be launched from submarines deep underwater, giving India second-strike capability even if its land-based systems are attacked first. Pakistan, however, remains behind in this crucial area. While it can launch nuclear weapons using ground-based missiles or aircraft, it lacks the technology and infrastructure to strike from below the ocean's surface. The country does not yet have nuclear-powered submarines capable of carrying and launching submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs). The reasons behind this gap are both technical and financial. Developing SLBM technology requires years of research, specialised engineering and a large and consistent defence budget. Pakistan's defence spending is considerably lower than India's, and its navy is relatively underdeveloped. Unlike India, which has invested in building nuclear submarines and undersea missile systems, Pakistan has not yet crossed that threshold. This limitation affects Islamabad's deterrence posture. Without a credible sea-based option, its nuclear strategy relies heavily on land and air – both of which are more vulnerable to detection and pre-emptive strikes. In a worst-case scenario, if its land and air capabilities are neutralised, Pakistan would be left with no reliable second-strike option. Meanwhile, India's nuclear submarines allow it to maintain a continuous presence in deep waters, ready to respond if deterrence fails. This undersea arm of India's nuclear strategy gives it an upper hand, especially in a region as volatile as South Asia. While Pakistan's nuclear weapons can threaten, its inability to launch from the sea remains a major blind spot – one that limits its strategic flexibility and puts it at a disadvantage in any long-term conflict scenario.
India Today
a day ago
- India Today
Illegal electric fence electrocutes 15-year-old to death in Kerala, injures two
A 15-year-old boy died of electrocution after coming into contact with an illegal electric fence in Kerala's Malappuram victim, identified as Ananthu, along with two of his friends, Yadhu Krishnan and Shanu Vijay, had gone fishing in a canal in the district's Nilambur area, when they accidentally touched the charged electric fence on Saturday evening. The fence was reportedly installed to trap wild boars and had been illegally drawing electricity from a Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) single-phase power line. Yadhu and Shanu and also sustained injuries in the police have arrested the man accused of setting up the trap, identified as Vineesh. Local residents claimed he regularly enters the forest to set animal traps and that this fence was installed to catch wild boars. They alleged there were multiple pending cases against him, and have called for strict action. The death also sparked political controversy in the ongoing Nilambur bypoll campaign. The Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) organised protests, holding the ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF) responsible for negligence in preventing such illegal installations. CPI(M) state secretary MV Govindan suggested the incident might involve political conspiracy and called for investigating whether the protests were planned in advance. He also requested authorities examine the accused's phone Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi, who represents the Wayanad constituency, expressed condolences over the incident. She emphasized the need for safety and vigilance, offered sympathy to Ananthu's family, and wished the injured children a swift a similar incident on May 26, two brothers, Nithin Biju and Ivin Biju, died of electrocution in Kozhikode after a live electric wire fell into a stream near their residence. The wire broke during strong winds and came into contact with the water, electrocuting the boys who were reportedly fishing or washing fruit in the year in April, a wild elephant was electrocuted on private agricultural land in Wayanad district's Ammaani area. The elephant likely died when it came into contact with a live electric line, possibly while uprooting a coconut tree or becoming entangled in an electric by Sneha A Suneeth IN THIS STORY#Kerala
