Killing Floor 3 and WUCHANG: Fallen Feathers launch with NVIDIA DLSS 4
To enhance the experience, NVIDIA has released a new GeForce Game Ready Driver, ensuring both games run at their best while also preparing systems for Valorant's upcoming upgrade to Unreal Engine 5.
Developed by Tripwire Interactive, Killing Floor 3 is a co-op action-horror FPS that challenges players to survive waves of deadly Zeds. With DLSS 4 and NVIDIA Reflex, players can enjoy faster performance, reduced latency, and stunning visuals.
Meanwhile, WUCHANG: Fallen Feathers, developed by Leenzee and published by 505 Games, is a dark, soulslike action RPG set in the late Ming Dynasty. It launches with full support for DLSS 4, Reflex, and AI-powered graphics enhancements that boost 4K frame rates by nearly 6x on average.
Other updates include:
The First Descendant : A preview of its Season 3 content begins July 24, with DLSS 4 and Unreal Engine 5 support improving co-op shooter gameplay.
: A preview of its Season 3 content begins July 24, with DLSS 4 and Unreal Engine 5 support improving co-op shooter gameplay. Wildgate : This new PVP multiplayer blends spaceship combat with first-person action, powered by DLSS Super Resolution.
: This new PVP multiplayer blends spaceship combat with first-person action, powered by DLSS Super Resolution. Valorant: Set to upgrade to Unreal Engine 5 on July 29, the new NVIDIA driver ensures optimal performance and continued Reflex support.
In addition, NVIDIA's updated app lets users easily access DLSS 4 features and the latest AI enhancements to take their games to the next level.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Google, Chrome and default settings: what's at stake for Alphabet's anti-trust remedy
An antitrust remedy decision that could bring an end to Google's search dominance is expected soon. During closing arguments in late May, US District Judge Amit Mehta indicated he would be likely to release his remedy order for Google by early August. According to court filings, Mr Mehta on Tuesday asked the search company to file a brief to clarify an issue related to device manufacturers who have agreed to use the company's Chrome browser by default. Mr Mehta gave Google until August 1 to file the brief, which likely means he is nearing a decision. Because of lengthy litigation, which began in 2020, followed by the remedy portion of the trial, which began this year, it's easy to forget that Mr Mehta had decided in late 2024 that Alphabet-owned Google unfairly used its search monopoly to hurt competition, and as a result, harm consumers. And in a separate antitrust case, Google was also found to have unfairly boxed out competition in search advertising by coupling its publisher advertising server and advertising exchange technologies. The search giant is appealing part of that decision. Throughout the remedy portion of the trial, which heard testimony from technology executives, economists and regulatory experts, the Justice Department made clear that it wants Mr Mehta to enact far-reaching penalties against Google that would be a warning to other companies, while also providing more choice for consumers. Federal prosecutors want Google to divest its Chrome browser from its portfolio, and it wants the tech giant to share coveted search data with competitors. Yet, Google and its bench heavy with lawyers have pushed for a far less stringent remedy that would allow it to retain control of its Chrome browser, while also giving device manufacturers, and ultimately users, more windows of opportunity to change their default search provider within browsers. 'Our proposal allows browsers to continue to offer Google Search to their users and earn revenue from that partnership … but it also provides them with additional flexibility,' Google said during closing arguments in May. The decision has browser companies like Mozilla, maker of the Firefox browser, walking a tightrope between wanting more market share amid Google's Chrome dominance, and also not upsetting existing revenue streams provided by contracts with Google. 'Essentially, the remedies may hand even more power to Big Tech, threatening long-term competition and the health of the open web,' read an email from a public relations firm hired by Mozilla. Google's influence is unrivalled and its deep pockets have allowed it to secure a presence on various devices through lucrative contracts with companies like Apple. Depending on the severity of the remedy, Apple could lose out on reoccurring payments from Google. Eddy Cue, one of Apple's senior executives, took the witness box during the remedy hearings in May, claiming that Google's power was beginning to erode, with users starting to pivot from search engines to AI chatbots. Sceptics of antitrust intervention might look at those comments and say that a harsh penalty on Google would be superfluous, and that the free market should be allowed to, eventually, dethrone the company. Others, however, might point to the wealth that's been stockpiled from Google's search dominance, and how that wealth has enabled the company to create an arsenal of AI technologies like Gemini and its research division DeepMind, and that the Alphabet-owned company would just find ways to abuse its power in the emerging sector. Mark MacCarthy, a senior fellow at the Institute for Technology Law and Policy at Georgetown University in Washington, who has studied antitrust policy for several decades, acknowledged in a previous interview with The National that Google's dominance presents a unique challenge for Mr Mehta. He said that with Google's recent antitrust defeat over its advertising business and the forthcoming decision related to browsers and search dominance, there could be a large amount of co-operation between the courts involved. But Prof MacCarthy said that the current regulatory agencies might not be up to the challenge of properly enforcing the remedy. 'My view is that this would be better done by a new digital regulatory agency,' he said. That said, given the sweeping layoffs in the federal government under President Donald Trump, there's little indication that the White House has any appetite for a new regulatory agency. All of the moving parts, combined with a dismantling of the federal workforce, invariably forces Mr Mehta to approach his decision with delicacy, and it will also likely work in Google's favour. Yet, even if the remedy is all bark and no bite, it could be enough of a distraction that a technology company like Google dreads amid a rapid rise in competitors.
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Liam Neeson: 'Chemistry I have with Pamela Anderson is so rare for me'
If Liam Neeson learnt anything starring in his first major comedy, it's this: You can't force funny. "The only note I gave to myself each day was be serious," Neeson tells The National. "I told myself, try not to be funny – because there's nothing more embarrassing than seeing a film and someone is trying to be funny." There's another lesson, too – but it's one the Irish actor, 73, has had to relearn many times over the years. You can't force chemistry, either. Neeson has starred in more than 100 movies in his career – but he never had he connected with another actor quite the way he did with Pamela Anderson on the set of The Naked Gun. "I had lovely chemistry with Pamela, and I thought, 'don't touch this. This is just working.' Which was lovely. And it's rare – certainly for me it is,' Neeson says. Even in our conversation with Neeson and Anderson, who People reports have fallen in love in real life, their chemistry is clear. At times in the conversation, the two burst out into laughter, quoting to each other some of their favourite bits from the film, which opens on Thursday in Middle East cinemas. The Naked Gun, directed by Akiva Schaffer, is a legacy sequel to the 80s and 90s film trilogy starring the late Leslie Nielsen and helmed by the famed trio David Zucker, Jim Abrahams and Jerry Zucker (Airplane!). In it, Neeson plays the son of Nielsen's character Frank Drebin –and has followed in his footsteps as an idiosyncratic detective. Neither Neeson and Anderson are, at first glance, obvious choices for an absurdist comedy. But production went on, both discovered comedic muscles they didn't know they had – and rediscovered parts of themselves they'd long forgotten. In one long sequence, Anderson's character Beth jumps on stage with a jazz band to create a diversion for Frank. Anderson's character then launches into an extended improvisational jazz singing session – known as scat. To director Schaffer's surprise, that was a skill she already had – and it just so happened to be a already be key part of his script. Anderson says: "I used to be in a jazz band when I was in eighth grade, and I would do all the scat solos because nobody else would do it. Then, when I was doing an audition, I told Akiva, 'I do scat'. He said, 'You know what now?' I then did my eighth-grade scat for him, and he said, 'OK, I think you've got the job.'" Audiences have become used to modern comedies being heavy on improvisation and light on script. The Naked Gun, meanwhile, featured almost no improvisation – even in Anderson's improvisational jazz session. "That whole thing was scripted. I had to learn the whole thing," says Anderson. "And it was so much longer than it appears in the film. It starts a bit Fabulous Baker Boys, and then by the end I was just making Super Mario noises. Akiva was just sitting there giggling behind the camera." Paul Walter Hauser, who plays Drebin's partner, has acted in many comedies before –and was surprised to find that, for the first time, he wouldn't be improvising. "I've done dramas where I had to improvise more than this movie," Hauser says. "I'd been a fan of Akiva back from his days in the Lonely Island on Saturday Night Live, and seeing how silly they are on screen, I assumed he'd be silly in real life. But he was far more thoughtful and collegiate about the same thing. There was a severity to his approach, in a good way," Hauser continues. Schaffer got the strategy after watching nearly every spoof movie ever made, studying what worked and what didn't. In his mind, the only way that The Naked Gun would work is if he approached the film's story structure much like Neeson did in his performance – with utmost seriousness. "With those old movies, audiences leave saying, 'the story didn't matter, it's just a bunch of jokes, it's great!' And I think that's the magic trick that they're pulling off," Schaffer says. "In reality, the story has to be so clear, easy to follow and engaging that you can, as an audience member, throw it away and not pay attention to it. If the story moves too slowly or isn't interesting enough, the jokes stop working. When I watched old spoof movies that didn't work, it was because the story was less engaging. You have to make such a good story that the audience can ignore it," Schaffer continues. Neeson, meanwhile, didn't go back and watch a single one. "I had to trust the script – and trust my cast. I didn't let my ego get above any other actor. And they're all superb," Neeson says. "Pamela especially." The result has been nearly universally lauded, with the film earning rave reviews from critics across the world.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Nvidia defends H20 GPU sales to China amid criticism from Democratic senators
Nvidia has defended itself against recent criticism over a decision by President Donald Trump's administration to grant licences to the company to sell its H20 graphics processing unit (GPU) to China. The response comes after a group of Democratic senators on Monday urged the Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who largely crafts export policies, to reverse course on the licences. The lawmakers said a decision to sell H20 chips to China was "an abrupt departure" from the administration's position in April that Beijing's access to the processors posed a serious national security risk. "And it undermines the administration's recent Al Action Plan, which purports to strengthen export control efforts on Al compute,' the letter states, referring to Mr Trump's AI strategy that included 90 federal policy actions. The senators also warned that such policy reversals would bolster China's push to use AI to 'strengthen military systems'. The letter is the latest in a back-and-forth battle over how to best protect and promote US AI technology. 'The H20 helps America win the support of developers worldwide, promoting America's economic and national security,' an Nvidia representative told The National. 'It does not enhance anyone's military capabilities, and the US government has full visibility and authority over every H20 transaction.' Shortly after a trip to Beijing this month, Nvidia's chief executive Jensen Huang highlighted the Trump administration's assurances about resuming sales of the H20 to China, and said deliveries would begin soon. The H20 is designed to comply with US regulations that seek to prevent powerful AI technology from being used by countries it views as adversaries. But in recent years, and particularly during former president Joe Biden's administration, the US has sought to clamp down on the export of AI technologies to a greater degree, especially CPUs and GPUs, which have become critical for countries seeking to build up AI infrastructure. Nvidia came out in January against the stronger export controls proposed by Mr Biden, saying these undermined US leadership in AI with a 'regulatory morass'. Since his inauguration, Mr Trump has taken a softer approach to AI-related export controls. Recent deals announced with the UAE to build an AI data centre, which also included security stipulations to prevent the potential diffusion of US technology to adversarial countries, was widely seen as a win for US technology companies that have largely opposed strict export policies. Despite efforts in recent years to prevent the diffusion of US AI technology, some analysts have cast doubt on the effectiveness of the overall policy. A new report from Jefferies, an investment banking and capital market firm based in New York, indicated that strict US export policies had prompted China to recalibrate and build up its own chip-making capability, with companies like Huawei and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation making strides. Regardless, in their letter to Mr Lutnick, the senators maintained that 'restricting access to leading-edge chips has been the defining barrier for China's efforts to achieve Al parity', expressing concern that the Trump administration would make further exceptions to loosen various export policies it once advocated. 'This administration is permitting adversaries access to technologies critical to national security as part of trade discussions without consultation or input from Congress,' they wrote. A spokesperson with the US Department of Commerce said Biden administration didn't impose 'any restrictions on the H20 whatsoever and they flowed freely into China,' adding that the Trump White House was the first to implement a licence requirement for the exports to Beijing. 'The Trump administration will consider any H20 licence applications carefully, accounting for both the benefits and the costs of potential exports from America and considering the views of experts across the US Government,' the Commerce Department spokesperson told The National. White House officials have recently indicated that policies seeking to prevent the export of US AI technology might ultimately backfire. 'We don't want to create demand for Huawei,' White House AI chief David Sacks said during a round-table discussion at the Pennsylvania Energy and AI Summit.
