Nobel Committee ‘Alarmed' By Threats Against Iranian Activist Mohammadi
The Norwegian Nobel Committee says it is 'alarmed' that Narges Mohammadi, who won the 2023 Nobel Peace Prize, has been receiving 'serious threats' against her life.
In a statement on July 11, it said Mohammadi had informed committee chair Jorgen Watne Frydnes in an 'urgent phone call' that she has been receiving warnings through her lawyers and indirect channels.
'I have been directly and indirectly threatened with 'physical elimination' by agents of the regime,' Mohammadi was quoted as saying in the statement.
The warnings, the statement said, made it clear that she would have to agree to cease all public activities within Iran, along with any international advocacy or media appearances promoting democracy, human rights, and freedom of expression.
'The Norwegian Nobel Committee is deeply concerned about the threats against Narges Mohammadi and, more broadly, all Iranian citizens with a critical voice, and call upon the authorities to safeguard not only their lives, but also their freedom of expression', Frydnes said.
Mohammadi has spent decades advocating for human rights in Iran and has repeatedly faced imprisonment over the past 20 years.
Since March 2021, she has been convicted five times and is currently serving a 12-year sentence for 'spreading propaganda' against the Islamic Republic.
Mohammadi was 'temporarily released' from prison in December after receiving urgent medical care.
Despite being nearly continuously incarcerated since 2010, Mohammadi has often tried to raise awareness about prison conditions and alleged abuses faced by female prisoners.
On July 7, she issued a statement saying she remains being sent back to prison and resuming serving her sentence.
She has received two official orders to return to prison, but her lawyers have advised that she not go back voluntarily.
'If they want me, they should pay the price and arrest me themselves — I will not go to prison quietly,' she said, noting she has chosen to remain outside as an act of 'civil disobedience.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
a few seconds ago
- CNBC
European powers threaten 'snapback sanctions' if Iran doesn't return to nuclear talks
France, the U.K. and Germany have told the United Nations they support reinstating snapback sanctions on Iran, if it doesn't re-enter dialogue with the West over its nuclear program, according to reporting by the Financial Times. "We have made it clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism," ministers of the three countries — using an acronym that describes the European signatories to the 2015 nuclear deal — said in a letter obtained by the FT. The reported letter was delivered to the U.N. Security Council and U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres two months after Israel and the U.S. bombed Iran's nuclear facilities over the course of a 12-day conflict that set regional tensions and energy prices soaring. CNBC was not able to immediately verify the report and has contacted the Iranian foreign ministry and mission to the UN for comment. 'Snapback' sanctions are part of a mechanism that was built into the original 2015 Iranian nuclear deal — formally titled the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or the JCPOA. The deal removed a number of sanctions on Iran in exchange for curbs to its nuclear program. They were designed to act as a guardrail: if Iran commits a "significant non-performance" of the deal, any of the JCPOA signatory countries can trigger the automatic reimposition of U.N. sanctions lifted under the agreement, and no other permanent member can veto it. The EU said in mid-July that it would start the process of reinstating UN sanctions on Tehran from Aug. 29 if it does not make sufficient progress on limiting its nuclear program. Those sanctions are set to expire on October 18 unless one of the remaining parties of the deal — Russia, China, or a member of the E3 — triggers the snapback option. "'Snapback' looks set to be the word of the summer in European negotiations with Iran," Ellie Geranmayeh, Deputy Director, Middle East and North Africa program at the European Council on Foreign Relations, wrote in a July report. The consequences for Iran could be dire and could once more spike tensions and the possibility of conflict. Iranian officials have suggested the country could withdraw from the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) if those sanctions are reimposed. For its part, Tehran has said that it remains open to direct talks with the U.S. once more, but stopped short of accepting the terms to abandon its uranium enrichment program. The sixth round of talks with the U.S. was dropped after Israel and the U.S. began bombing Iran's nuclear facilities in mid-June. Iran's economy has deteriorated dramatically in the years since Trump in 2018 withdrew the U.S. from the JCPOA. Trump has made is abundantly clear that he will not accept a nuclear-armed Iran. The stakes have been raised in recent years: in the time since Trump withdrew from the deal, Iran has been enriching and stockpiling uranium at its highest levels ever, prompting the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations' nuclear watchdog, to issue numerous warnings. Tehran insists that its program is for civilian energy purposes only, but Iran's nuclear enrichment has reached 60% purity, according to the IAEA — dramatically higher than the enrichment limit posited in the 2015 nuclear deal, and a short technical step from the weapons-grade purity level of 90%.
New York Post
9 hours ago
- New York Post
Controversial Princeton prof with Iran ties steps down amid criticism from dissidents, senators
A controversial Princeton professor with strong ties to the Iranian regime has quietly stepped down from the Ivy League school, following a campaign from dissidents to remove him. Seyed Hossein Mousavian, a Middle East security and nuclear policy specialist, retired from his position after 15 years as the head of the school's Program on Science and Global Security on June 1, according to an announcement listing retiring employees on Princeton's website. The professor is controversial for being heavily involved in Iran's chemical and nuclear programs beginning in 2004, long before the country was known to have been building up its nuclear arsenal, according to Swiss journalist Bruno Schirra. Advertisement 4 Seyed Hossain Mousavian, an Iranian security specialist, quietly stepped down from Princeton University after 15 years and amid a federal crackdown on alleged antisemitism at the school. Getty Images The move comes amid the news Princeton could lose more than $200 million in grants from the Trump administration for not tackling antisemitism on campus, The Post has learned. Iranian opposition activists as well as Texas Republican Senator Ted Cruz, a Princeton alumnus, had long urged the school to fire Mousavian. Advertisement 4 The Trump administration reportedly paused the payment of more than $200 million in grants. to the Ivy League school amid allegations of antisemitism. LightRocket via Getty Images 'It's a victory, but one has to wonder if he's staying behind the scenes somehow,' said Lawdan Bazargan, a former political prisoner in Iran, a human rights activist and member of the US-based Alliance Against Islamic Regime of Iran Apologists. The group has waged a two-year campaign to get the university to ditch Mousavian. 'We exposed the truth,' the group said in a press release last week. 'Mousavian is not a neutral scholar but a former ambassador of the [Islamic Republic of Iran] who defended the fatwas to kill author Salman Rushdie. Advertisement 4 Former Iranian Kurdish leader Sadiq Sharafkindi (left) and Nuri Dehkordi were two of the four opposition politicians killed in the Berlin restaurant Mykonos in 1992, while Mousavian was Iranian ambassador to Germany. Associated Press Shirin Ebadi, a former Iranian judge who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2003, has also previously accused Mousavian of supporting the fatwa. Before being hired by Princeton in 2009, Mousavian had also worked as a diplomat and editor of the Tehran Times, the English-language newspaper which is a mouthpiece for the regime. Mousavian was also Iran's ambassador to Germany in 1992 when four dissidents were murdered in the back of a restaurant in Berlin. Advertisement The group of dissidents which campaigned to get him fired from Princeton has previously alleged when Mousavian was ambassador to Germany, 23 Iranians were killed in Europe for being enemies of the mullahs. In 1997, a German court concluded that the Iranian leadership, including the foreign ministry, masterminded the murders and that the headquarters for plotting them was the Iranian embassy, but did not name Mousavian. During the trial, German newspaper Tagesspiegel reported a former Iranian spy, Abolghasem Mesbahi, said under oath, 'Mousavian was involved in most of the crimes that took place in Europe. 4 Former Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad tours a nuclear facility in 2008. The country's nuclear program is much older than many Western intelligence sources had predicted. AP 'Specifically, in Germany, it concerns the crimes that were committed against Iranian opposition members.' Following the trial Mousavian was called back to Tehran. Mousavian, whose Princeton email address is still active and who is still prominently featured on the school's website, did not return a request for comment Tuesday. He wrote of his retirement on Twitter: 'After 15 years of service at Princeton University, I retired at my own request at the end of May 2025. Advertisement 'I am deeply grateful to the university officials for their support and especially for their commitment to freedom of expression.' The retirement coincides with the imminent publication of a 2004 interview with Mousavian by Schirra. The interview, which is now being published by the Middle East Research Institute, a US-based nonprofit that studies extremism, suggests Iran's nuclear program was secretly active for decades before Western intelligence sources warned of its existence. Advertisement 'After Iraq's attack [in 1980], we announced our defensive chemical and nuclear programs,' said Mousavian in the interview, who was then deputy of Iran's National Security Council. In April, Cruz urged the school to fire Mousavian, saying: 'His presence at Princeton makes students feel justifiably afraid for their safety.'
The Hill
16 hours ago
- The Hill
Give the Nobel Peace Prize to McCain, not Trump
As President Trump heads to Alaska for his momentous meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, he seems to have one thing on his mind — not peace in Ukraine, but a prize for peace. Trump has been obsessed with winning the Nobel Peace Prize for some time now. Even those not cynical about the president must concede that his foreign policy moves to end conflicts are less about ending the conflicts and more about looking like is the one ending them. We will see what Trump demands of Putin in Alaska and if Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will even have a seat at the table. But we do know that Trump is very keen to end the war because he thinks that the Nobel Committee will come calling if he does. Now some might argue, what's the big deal? If Trump wants the prize and it makes him eager to force solutions to end conflicts, then maybe he does deserve it. Yeah, he might be self-serving, but ultimately, we can see an end to conflicts in places like Ukraine, Gaza, the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Caucasus and South Asia. And what would be wrong with that? Well, if it's a peace made in bad faith that will ultimately break apart, then there is a lot wrong with it. Allowing Russia to keep the territory it seized in its invasion and forcing Ukraine to go along with it, doesn't promote peace. It encourages war. It lets Russia and Putin claim that they were justified to invade and take territory. It bolsters their arguments against the sanctions and embargoes that have made them the pariah of the world. And it would also tell them that they could invade other places (Baltic states, Poland, Finland, Central Asian states) take territory and just nominate Trump for a peace prize when he tells them to stop, after they have taken what they wanted. World leaders have noticed and teased Trump with nominations for the peace prize just to get him eager to settle conflicts on their terms. The Pakistanis and the Israelis have presented Trump with official nominations, even though he had nothing to do with the cessation of hostilities in South Asia and the war in Gaza. Expect to see more of this. Meanwhile, there is a McCain who has been working for the last two years to feed starving populations around the world. Cindy McCain has been the executive director of the United Nations' World Food Program and has been advocating for the end of the blockade of humanitarian aid by the Israelis on the people of Gaza. She has met with officials around the world, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio to push for the end of the blockade. A Republican (even if some people aren't happy about it), McCain has been more outspoken about the treatment of Gazans than many Democrats. What makes McCain interesting is that, like many high-level political appointees, she initially sought to play it safe and not overtly talk about the plight of the Palestinians. Like many in the U.S. and Western Europe, she probably felt she had to walk a fine line, so as to not insult the Israeli government. She was even confronted by her own staff for not having spoken out enough. McCain could have just played it safe, but she listened to her staff and her own heart and has pushed for the end to famine, not just in Gaza but in Africa and other parts of the world. Now, we all know she isn't the only one. Chef José Andrés, the founder of the World Central Kitchen, may be even more deserving of the Peace Prize. His organization, which lost seven employees in an Israeli airstrike has helped mitigate the fallout from worldwide disasters, famines and wars. The common denominator between McCain and Andrés — and what separates them from Trump — is that their actions are more likely to ensure peace. Go anywhere in the world and people just want to have security, food, water and stability. The aims of the World Food Program and the World Central Kitchen do just that. Trump is trying to force ceasefires without solving the underlying reasons for conflicts which means the conflicts will eventually go on. It must be said that the Nobel Committee can just be content with Trump's politicking because they just want world leaders to just stop fighting, even if the underlying issues are not addressed. They have awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to dubious recipients in the past. Henry Kissinger, Yassir Arafat, Yitzak Rabin and Shimon Peres all got the award, even though it's hard to attach the word peace to their names. President Obama received the award early in his first term on the mere hope that he would bring peace. He went on to set new records with drone strikes in several Muslim-majority countries. And infamously, the Nobel was never awarded to Mahatma Gandhi, who inspired quite a few Nobel Laureates in their own quests for peace. So, we can't pretend that the award isn't a political award. There is definitely a lot of bias that comes to selecting the winner, and there will always be a controversy around the award. But the Nobel Committee can look at the current conflicts and decide what will ensure proper peace in the world. If it's a choice between bullying people into accepting injustice, or feeding children and working to bring stability to the world so that peace can prosper, I think the answer is clear. Jos Joseph is a published writer and is a graduate of the Harvard Extension School and Ohio State University. He is a Marine veteran who served in Iraq. He currently lives in Anaheim, Calif.
