
It's not quite enough a victory for Liberals in Canada, yet it's a 'game changer'
The ex-banker Mark Carney has won the Canadian polls, edging out his Conservative rival Pierre Poilievre. The Liberals can celebrate. The latest news emerging out of Ottawa on Tuesday noon, suggests that Liberals picked up an extra seat in Quebec, and thereby managed to increase their number of seats, but not quite enough to get to their coveted majority.
The National Post
said that Liberals were on course to win a projected 169 seats — three seats short of a majority.
Carney began his victory speech with the questions, "Who's ready? Who's ready — who's ready — to stand up for Canada with me? And who's ready — who's ready — to build Canada strong?"
He struck some right notes, talking about humility, which he said "underscores the importance of governing as a team in cabinet and in caucus and working constructively with all parties across Parliament, of working in partnership with the provinces and the territories and with Indigenous peoples..." Although he spoke about the "American betrayal," he has already had a telephonic conversation with US President Donald Trump, the elephant in the room. Carney also said, "We will strengthen our relations with reliable partners in Europe, Asia and elsewhere. "
"It's time to build new trade and energy corridors, working in partnership with the provinces, territories and Indigenous peoples. It's time. It's time to build hundreds of thousands of not just good jobs, but good careers in the skilled trades," he added.
Now, Carney has his hands full, to make as he has promised, "Canada strong, Canada, free, Canada, forever. ."
The first thing he has to look into is transforming the economy. Then comes foreign policy. He will be meeting US President Donald Trump "in the near future."
To nobody's surprise, as mentioned earlier, both leaders spoke on the phone on Tuesday. A rather good beginning, so to say.
Writing about Carney's victory, the
noted that Canada's 2025 federal election will be remembered as a "game-changer."
To understand the nuances, one need to read it along with
The Guardian
piece by Leyland Cecco who rightly attributed Carney's victory to Trump and circumstance.
He recalled that half a year ago the Liberal was in crisis before political reality forced Justin Trudeau to step down.
While Labour struggled with internal issues, Donald Trump began to suggest – seemingly in earnest – that the US should annex Canada and making it the 51st state, a mission he said could be accomplished with economic coercion.
'The thing to remember is that Carney candidacy, absent this crisis, would have felt different,' Cecco quoted Peter Donolo, a political strategist and director of communications for prime minister Jean Chrétien. 'His mistakes would have been more, would have been enlarged. He would have come under more criticism and scrutiny."
However, Tonda MacCharles writing in
, saw the outcome this way: "In fact, Canadian voters delivered a rebuke to all parties — denying the Liberals a majority; denying the Conservative leader his own seat, never mind the chance to form a government as his strategists had believed was possible; reducing the Quebec separatist party to a much smaller Bloc; depriving the NDP of official party status; and stripping the Greens down to a lone seat in Parliament."
"Mark Carney, whom British readers will remember from his stint running the Bank of England, is the model of a modern central banker: competent, conventional and colourless, more likely to be popular at Davos than in retail politics, writes Archie Bland and Leyland Cecco from Ottawa for
While the conventional wisdom for years has been that such figures are no longer viable political leaders, the specific circumstances in Canada this year have turned that analysis on its head. As he said himself in March: 'I'm most useful in a crisis. I'm not that good in peacetime,' the duo wrote.
They also noted that Carney has promised to negotiate a new trade deal with the US, and has said he hopes to meet Trump in person soon – but that Canada has the leverage to wait until the time is right to do so. In the meantime, he wants to focus on lowering internal trade barriers and bolstering major investment projects, such as housing construction, to spur the economy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's Big Message To Khamenei After Israel Bombards Iran Nuke Sites
/ Jun 13, 2025, 02:31PM IST U.S. President Donald Trump has surprised many by confirming he knew about Israel's plan to strike Iran in advance. While the U.S. claims it had no role in the actual operation, Trump reaffirmed his firm stance against Iran obtaining nuclear weapons and expressed hope for renewed negotiations. He hinted that some Iranian leaders may not survive the fallout from this escalation. An Israeli official confirmed the U.S. had been informed a week earlier and remains in constant contact with Israeli authorities. Meanwhile, Israeli opposition leaders criticized Prime Minister Netanyahu for not consulting them. As tensions rise, both Iran's response and regional stability hang in the balance.#trump #mossad #IsraelIranConflict #KhameneiWarning #MiddleEastTensions #IDFStrikes #IranRetaliation #NuclearCrisis #BreakingNews #OperationRisingLion #TehranStrikes #MilitaryEscalation


United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
PM visits AI plane crash site, meets injured and sole survivor
Ahmedabad, June 13 (UNI) Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday visited the Air India plane crash site and talked to officials and teams supervising relief efforts. Modi also went to the hospital to meet the injured and check their condition. The Prime Minister also met Ramesh Vishwas, the only survivor of the crash, and inquired about his health. He also checked on the well-being of other injured individuals. Modi, who reached Ahmedabad early morning, has been closely monitoring the situation since the accident left 241 passengers dead and several injured. The Prime Minister met emergency response teams and officials at the disaster site, and extended his condolences to the families of those who lost their loved ones. He was accompanied by Union Civil Aviation Minister Ram Mohan Nair, Gujarat Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel, and several senior officials, conducting a thorough assessment. Modi expressed his deep sorrow over the tragic plane crash, emphasising that the entire nation is in shock. He said that the incident has left everyone devastated. On social media platform X, Modi shared several messages, stating, 'The plane crash in Ahmedabad has left us all in shock. The sudden and heartbreaking loss of so many lives is beyond words. My heartfelt condolences go out to all the grieving families. We share their pain, and the emptiness created will be felt for many years. Om Shanti.' He added, 'Today, I visited the site of the accident in Ahmedabad. The scene was tragic. I met officials and teams working tirelessly since the incident. My thoughts are with those who have lost their loved ones in this unimaginable tragedy.' The tragedy occurred on Thursday afternoon when the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner went down just two minutes after takeoff. The aircraft was carrying 242 passengers, including 12 crew members. Among the deceased was former Gujarat Chief Minister Vijay Rupani. The passengers included 169 Indian citizens, 53 British nationals, seven Portuguese, and one Canadian. Ramesh Vishwas, a British citizen of Indian origin, is the sole survivor and is currently receiving medical treatment. Besides those onboard, at least 24 people, including four medical students, were killed on the ground, as the plane crashed into the hostel building of the B J Medical College in Meghaninagar area of Ahmedabad. Air India has set up a dedicated passenger hotline number, 1800 5691 444, to provide more information. Home Minister Amit Shah who visited the site last evening to review the situation has asked for a probe into the incident. A high-level committee has already been set up to oversee the inquiry. UNI AJ PRS


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
How US and Trump fooled Tehran with nuclear talks, helped Israel attack Iran's military and nuclear program leadership
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel US President Donald Trump was engaging with Iran on the latter's nuclear program and had held five rounds of talks before Israel decided to show its might. According to a report by Israel's Channel 12, the United States conducted a campaign to convince Iran that an Israeli military strike was not imminent. This misinformation effort put the Iranian leadership into complacency and reportedly helped enable Israel's June 13, 2025, airstrike on its nuclear and military sites, including the Natanz enrichment facility Trump, in a public statement on Thursday, June 12, acknowledged the possibility of Israeli military action but indicated that diplomacy remained viable. 'An Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear sites could very well happen,' he said. However, he also added that a diplomatic deal was 'fairly close' if Iran showed flexibility regarding its nuclear activities in ongoing talks with the read: Stocks sell off, oil surges as Israel strikes Iran Meanwhile, US Ambassador to Israel , Mike Huckabee, stated in an interview that Israel was unlikely to carry out such an attack without approval from Washington. His remarks appeared to support the narrative that military escalation was not a foregone suggest that these coordinated public statements along with the nuclear talks may have contributed to Iran lowering its alert levels, giving Israel a tactical advantage. While Iranian officials have not directly commented on the report, sources in Tehran acknowledged they were caught off guard by the timing and scope of the Israeli government has not officially commented on the alleged US role, but Israeli media widely reported that high-level coordination occurred in the days leading up to the development raises questions about the broader strategy employed by the US and Israel in managing Iran's nuclear program, especially in light of stalled nuclear negotiations and Tehran's continued enrichment activities.