EU's von der Leyen defends record in face of censure motion
FILE PHOTO: European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen speaks during a press conference with European Council President Antonio Costa and Moldovan President Maia Sandu at the first Moldova-EU summit in Chisinau, Moldova July 4, 2025. REUTERS/Vladislav Culiomza/File Photo
BRUSSELS - European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen defended her record on Monday as the European Union's executive body faced a censure motion proposed by a group of mainly far-right lawmakers in the European Parliament.
The vote on the motion, scheduled for Thursday, is destined to fall far short of the two-thirds majority needed to force out von der Leyen's Commission as centrist groups that hold a majority in the parliament have said they will not support it.
But the motion was an unwelcome political headache for the EU executive chief just as her Commission is in the midst of negotiations to try to avoid hefty tariffs on European products from U.S. President Donald Trump's administration.
Speaking in the European Parliament in Strasbourg, von der Leyen pushed back against criticism in the motion of her handling of the COVID-19 crisis, arguing her strategy had ensured all EU members had equal access to vaccines.
"This is the Europe of solidarity that I love - and this is the Europe that the extremists hate," von der Leyen, a German former defence minister, declared to applause in the chamber.
Speaking before von der Leyen, the motion's lead sponsor, Romanian nationalist Gheorghe Piperea, accused the Commission of lacking transparency and failing to respect justice.
"The decision-making process has become opaque and discretionary and raises fears of abuse and corruption," he said.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Eligible S'poreans to get up to $850 in GSTV cash, up to $450 in MediSave top-ups in August
Singapore Four golf courses to close by 2035, leaving Singapore with 12 courses
Singapore Singapore's second mufti Sheikh Syed Isa Semait dies at age 87
Singapore Fewer marriages in Singapore in 2024; greater marital stability for recent unions
Singapore Competition watchdog gives SIA, Malaysia Airlines conditional approval to continue cooperation
Singapore About 20 delivery riders meet Pritam Singh to discuss platform worker issues
Business OCBC sets loan target of $5b and covers more territories in boost for serial entrepreneurs
Singapore Reform Party to leave opposition group People's Alliance for Reform; two parties remain
Von der Leyen rejected those accusations. But, in an apparent nod to discontent from some lawmakers who see her governing style as high-handed, she said she was committed to working with the parliament "every step of the way".
"I want to say that I hear your concerns loud and clear," she said.
Even as the centrist groups rejected the motion, the debate exposed tensions among them. Several criticised von der Leyen's centre-right European People's Party for siding with the far right on migration, climate and other policies.
"Do you want to govern with those who want to destroy Europe or those of us who fight every day to build it?" Iratxe Garcia Perez, leader of the centre-left Socialists and Democrats group, asked von der Leyen in her speech. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
17 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Germany's top court dismisses complaint against US drone missions
Find out what's new on ST website and app. BERLIN - Berlin is not required to intervene in U.S. drone activities at the Ramstein air base in southwestern Germany, the country's top court ruled on Tuesday in dismissing a complaint brought by Yemeni nationals whose family members were killed in a strike. The constitutional court's ruling rejected the complaints of two men living in Yemen who lost two relatives - one an imam who had preached against al Qaeda and the other a police officer - in a 2012 U.S. drone strike. The men say they have since been living in fear for their lives and that Germany bears joint responsibility for the deaths because the drone missions were supported from Ramstein. At issue was the question of whether Germany had a responsibility to ensure a relay station at Ramstein that sends satellite data to drones did not violate international law. The court ruled that, while Germany did have a general duty to protect fundamental human rights including those of foreigners abroad, the conditions triggering that duty were not met. Berlin was acting within its purview on foreign and security policy when it accepted the United States' interpretation of what was allowable under international law, the court said. "It could not be established that the U.S. is applying unacceptable criteria for distinguishing between legitimate military targets and protected civilians in the conflict in Yemen," wrote one of the judges in the ruling. In a statement, the two Yemeni plaintiffs, Ahmed and Khaled bin Ali Jaber, criticized the ruling as "dangerous and shocking", saying it sent a message that states supporting the U.S. drone programme were not held responsible when civilians were killed. Germany's foreign and defence ministries welcomed the ruling as confirmation of the government's legal opinion. The judges confirmed that "the federal government has broad discretion in assessing the conformity of third countries' actions with international law". The Ramstein public affairs office was not able to comment on the court case. The German government had argued that Germany's ability to take part in military alliances would be jeopardised if it had to ensure operations conducted by foreign militaries abroad adhered to Germany's understanding of international law simply because they had a base on German soil. The United States and Germany are allies in NATO and Washington has had a military base at Ramstein since 1948. REUTERS
Straits Times
35 minutes ago
- Straits Times
French PM stakes political survival on budget squeeze
Find out what's new on ST website and app. PARIS - French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou will outline a 40 billion-euro budget squeeze on Tuesday, with opposition parties threatening to topple his minority government if they feel the savings cut too close to the bone. President Emmanuel Macron has left Bayrou the task of repairing the public finances with the 2026 budget, after his own move to call a snap legislative election last year delivered a hung parliament too divided to tackle spiralling spending and a surprise tax shortfall. Long-time debt hawk Bayrou has tried to warn the French that broad sacrifices are unavoidable, although defence spending will be allowed to increase next year. The squeeze, to be detailed in a late afternoon news conference, will probably involve freezing most social benefits while some tax breaks will likely be capped. Bayrou, a veteran centrist, must persuade the opposition ranks in France's fractured parliament to at least tolerate his cuts or risk facing a no-confidence motion like the one that toppled his predecessor in December over the 2025 budget. When announcing a new hike in defence spending on Sunday, Macron urged lawmakers not to trigger another no-confidence motion, saying that the one in December had hurt companies and set a defence build-up back by delaying the 2025 budget. "That vote has delayed the defence budget. It is now up to the government to allocate the necessary funds in a timely manner so we can continue to innovate more quickly, to produce more quickly," he said. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Business MAS records net profit of $19.7 billion, fuelled by investment gains Business Singapore financial sector growth doubles in 2024, assets managed cross $6 trillion in a first: MAS Singapore $3b money laundering case: MinLaw acts against 4 law firms and 1 lawyer over seized properties Singapore Man charged with attempted murder of woman at Kallang Wave Mall Singapore Ex-cleaner jailed over safety lapses linked to guard's death near 1-Altitude rooftop bar Singapore SJI International resumes overseas trips amid ongoing probe into student's death in Maldives in 2024 Singapore Sengkang-Punggol LRT gets 15.8 per cent capacity boost with new trains Singapore 'Nobody deserves to be alone': Why Mummy and Acha have fostered over 20 children in the past 22 years Left-wing parties will likely baulk at welfare cuts, while the far right warns a broad spending freeze is unfair to French citizens and could prompt them to oppose Bayrou's plans. In the final two years of his second term, the dramatic deterioration of the public finances may tarnish Macron's legacy. A political outsider, he was first elected in 2017 on promises to break the right-left divide and modernise the euro zone's second-biggest economy with growth-friendly tax cuts and reforms. Successive crises - from protests, COVID-19 and runaway inflation - have shown he has failed to change the country's overspending habit, however. Bayrou aims to reduce the budget deficit from 5.4% of GDP this year to 4.6% in 2025, ultimately targeting the EU's 3% fiscal deficit limit by 2029. With interest payments potentially becoming the biggest budget outlay, financial markets and ratings agencies are keen to see whether Bayrou can get his plans through parliament without triggering another political collapse. REUTERS
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Eroding US exceptionalism will impact world economy
GLOBAL investors have long grown wealthy by following the maxim of never betting against the US economy. Yet, there are growing signs that key foundations of this 'US financial exceptionalism' are eroding in what could be an era-defining moment. Unchecked, the impact could be a dramatically different global financial system for years to come – not only with lower volumes of international trade, but also smaller capital flows, fewer economies of scale for businesses, and slower growth in productivity and living standards worldwide. Longstanding pillars of US financial exceptionalism include institutional integrity, the rule of law, predictable and stable economic policies, central bank independence, deep capital markets, and a core government belief in private enterprise. Underpinning these foundations are the strengths of the US university research system, excellence in science and medicine, traditions of venture capital and entrepreneurship, supportive regulatory and tax structures, and transparent government procurement processes. Global investors also have benefited greatly from US openness to foreign students. Indeed, in recent decades, a very significant portion of all US companies that have gone public with a market capitalisation of more than US$1 billion (so-called 'unicorns') were founded by foreigners who studied at US universities and stayed afterward to become leading entrepreneurs. Over the past decade, this has helped fuel US productivity growth which has increased at more than double Europe's rates. US per capita income is now more than one third higher than European levels, and US equity markets today represent more than half of total global equity valuations. Yet, US financial exceptionalism is today potentially facing its biggest challenge in at least a generation. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up President Donald Trump's attempts to boost domestic manufacturing through imposition of large-scale tariffs is causing major disruption. It is true that some countries engage in 'beggar-thy-neighbour' trade policies that have harmed many workers in industrial countries, including lost manufacturing jobs. However, launching a global trade war is misguided. Instead, policies should promote high value-add US manufacturing jobs, like in transportation equipment, capital equipment, semiconductors, clean energy and chemicals. Tariffs on many low value-add products, including on agricultural products that the US does not grow, make little sense. Meanwhile, vilification of US universities and foreign students in an attempt to undo diversity, equity and inclusion policies, and because of an anti-foreigner philosophy, are misguided. Billions of dollars of government research grants are being cut, and many foreign student visa applications are being blocked. In the immediate future, consequences include sharp losses of important service exports. For example, the US exports roughly US$60 billion each year in education services to foreign students attending US universities – more than corn, wheat and soybeans exports combined. Longer term, there will be fewer discoveries, fewer startup companies formed, and a smaller US financial base. There also are concerns about a reverse brain drain, where highly skilled US-based researchers choose to relocate to their home countries or to other nations offering more favourable conditions for academic and professional growth. The US will always get back up Of course, Trump administration officials predict a golden economic era ahead of renewed, even outsized, US exceptionalism. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, for instance, recently said that 'throw whatever you will at our capital markets – the Great Depression, two World Wars, 9/11, a global recession, the Covid pandemic, or the last few years of sky-high inflation. Each time the American economy gets knocked down, it gets back up again. And it gets back up even stronger than it was before'. This narrative is powerful, and many investors still share it. The US economy has multiple formidable advantages, including high levels of household wealth, a secure supply of energy, and a powerful science and technology base. Nevertheless, global investor scrutiny of US exceptionalism is becoming a significant headwind as the financial foundations of US soft power erode. Not only is US economic growth slowing, but business investment is weakening and key industries, such as energy and sustainable infrastructure, are scaling back projects amidst budget cutbacks and trade uncertainty. Even the oil and gas sector, traditionally a beneficiary of Republican deregulatory policies, is moving sideways with its investment plans. This appears to be largely driven by tariffs whose impact includes increasing costs of new drilling equipment due to higher metal prices. Although US equity markets have rebounded since April, and indeed the Nasdaq and S&P 500 have reached record highs again recently, this recovery may reflect more short-term optimism rather than a fundamental improvement in economic conditions. Many investors may still be underestimating potential risks of heightened policy uncertainty, rising inflation expectations, and weakening consumer confidence. Particularly concerning is the sharp decline in the value of the dollar, which had its worst first half performance in 2025 in around half a century. Many global institutional investors are now reassessing US financial exceptionalism with a view to redeploying more capital back to home markets, including in Europe. The future direction of trade negotiations and tariff deals is still uncertain, but there are strong clues. Only two countries so far, the UK and Vietnam, have secured final agreements with the US. While it is likely that additional deals will be secured, the US Commerce Department is actively researching support for potential Section 232 sector-by-sector tariffs that could be imposed on top of previously announced 'retaliatory' tariffs, which are currently facing court challenges. It seems likely that the president will reach for these tariff tools next. The consequences of reduced US financial exceptionalism include smaller foreign capital flows to the United States and slower US investment spending. Innovative US companies will grow less quickly, and the pace of global productivity growth is likely to slow. Moreover, world living standards are likely to post smaller gains. More capital will flow to other markets, including the UK, EU, Japan and South Korea, and there will be a lower cost of funds in these places. This should spark more innovation and growth in these markets. However, it is not yet clear how potential benefits will net out for these countries, because they also will experience downside effects from a less dynamic US economy. This is not a zero-sum game. Less trade, less confidence in global markets, less innovation, fewer economies of scale, and softer demand from the world's largest economy are likely to reduce prosperity not just in the US, but much of the rest of the world too. Dr Robert Wescott served during the Bill Clinton administration as special assistant to the president for economic policy and as chief economist in his Council of Economic Advisers. Andrew Hammond is a former UK special adviser in the government of Tony Blair.
