EU delays decision on 18th sanctions package on Russia
"I'm really sad that we didn't reach this agreement today," said EU foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas, after a ministerial meeting in Brussels with the war in Ukraine being at the top of the agenda.
The proposed set of punitive measures targets Russia's financial and energy sectors in response to President Vladimir Putin's refusal to agree to an unconditional ceasefire in Ukraine.
The sanctions were however put on hold after Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico last month said he is not ready to endorse the proposal, citing concerns over Slovakia's gas imports.
"I must say that we were really close to reassure Slovakia," Kallas said. "Now, the ball is in Slovakia's court, and we must get this deal done."
All of the EU's 27 members have to back new sanctions before they can be implemented.
"Sanctions are necessary to starve Russia of the means to wage this war. The European Union will keep rising the cost, so stopping its aggression becomes the only path forward to Moscow," Kallas said.
Arriving at the meeting, German Minister of State for Europe Gunther Krichbaum said the new measures should be adopted "as quickly as possible."
"It is important to take decisive action now to ensure that Russia is put under pressure and that Ukraine is put in a very strong negotiating position," he said.
"Only then will it be possible to reach a fair agreement at the end of the day."
Under the plans, the international price cap on Russian oil exports would be lowered to $45 per barrel, down from $60 per barrel, but the measure failed to receive unanimous backing at a meeting of the Group of Seven (G7) advanced Western democracies last month.
"Even if the Americans are not onboard, but the other G7 countries are onboard, then we will move on with this," Kallas said.
Kallas said she welcomed the announcement by the US that it is sending defensive weapons to Ukraine, adding that she hopes "they will get all [that] they have been promised."
EU ministers also discussed Russia's war with their Ukrainian counterpart Andrii Sybiha, who joined the meeting by video-link.
The situation in the Middle East was also on the agenda of the meeting, after the EU announced last week a deal with Israel on improving access to humanitarian aid in Gaza.
(vib)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
8 hours ago
- Euractiv
Germany, France pledge to settle row over FCAS fighter jet by year end
BERLIN – The German and French defence ministers sought to downplay tensions over the European FCAS next-generation fighter jet programme at a meeting on Thursday, but made clear that major questions around the project must be answered before the close of 2025. France's Sébastien Lecornu and Germany's Boris Pistorius both expressed their support for the programme, which also includes Spain and has been riven by conflict between top aerospace contractors, particularly France's Dassault Aviation and Germany's Airbus Defence. "We want to clarify the situation at FCAS by the end of the year. We will need to discuss the obstacles," Pistorius said. Lecornu said the FCAS programme is approaching "the moment of truth" as development move toward building a prototype of the fighter jet, "and of course there are many issues that need to be clarified". Conflict over FCAS burst into public this summer as Dassault's CEO lobbed criticism at key partners in the project, while executives at Airbus Defence fired back. Media reports that Dassault was seeking to reconfigure contracts to take a greater share of the programme triggered further wrangling over the project. "It comes as no surprise in large-scale projects that some of the companies involved not only have a wealth of expertise, but also their own interests and their own will," Pistorius said on Thursday. "We knew that from the outset." The German defence minister said both countries remain "completely clear and unanimous" in their support for FCAS, as well as the Franco-German Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) effort to develop a next-generation main battle tank. His French counterpart, however, sought to keep the future tank programme – in which German defence contractors are taking the lead – separate from the FCAS issue, saying it was a project with a very different timeline and set of agreements. The overriding concern for France and Germany, Lecornu contended, is whether the FCAS project can deliver a fully capable aircraft by 2040, the project's current target delivery date. For the French Air Force, Lecornu noted, those capabilities will include carrying nuclear weapons. "Project management requires a clear organisational structure of the companies' responsibilities and accountabilities," the French minister said. "We are putting a lot on the line with FCAS." Lecornu said that the sprawling complexity of the project – involving numerous contractors – "is of course a weak point, as we may not be able to keep to the schedule." "But the Chinese and others (...) will not wait for us. And if we lose time here with lengthy discussions, then a major battle will already have begun. In 2040, we will either be at the forefront or we will be left behind," he said. "We have developed various scenarios that we will present to the chancellor and the president for a decision." (jp)
Euractiv
8 hours ago
- Euractiv
Parliament study pushes to bring AI liability law back from the dead
The Commission should revive and even beef up a proposed law on AI liability that the EU's executive put on the chopping block earlier this year, urges a Parliament study published today. The legislative proposal lays down rules on who would have to pay up if an AI system harms someone – and also make AI providers responsible for proving their systems complied with liability rules, instead of putting the burden of proof on people who suffered harm to prove that an AI system had failed. But all that became moot in February when the Commission announced it would withdraw the proposal, causing consternation among MEPs working on their negotiating position for the file. Council and big tech lobbies, on the other hand, welcomed the Commission bid to can the law as part of an ongoing regulatory simplification drive. But that's the wrong way to think about it, per the study commissioned by Parliament and penned by Andrea Bertolini, a law professor at the University of Pisa. Without an EU law, member countries will just make their own rules – as Germany is a doing for automated driving and Italy is contemplating – the study warns. This would then lead to overregulation by fragmentation, is the concern. 'Ultimately, the only way to avoid excessive regulatory burdens is to adopt efficient legal norms,' Bertolini argues. The study suggests both reviving the AI Liability proposal but also revising it to clarify its scope and rules. It also advocates for opting for a Regulation (rather than the proposed Directive) – so it would be directly applicable in the whole EU – to 'deliver the highest degree of harmonization, efficiency, and user protection'. A prior study, released by Parliament last year, had also recommended the AI Liability law should be a Regulation too. Sergey Lagodinsky, Green shadow rapporteur on the file, said the latest study confirms the legal affairs committee's call for a harmonised European framework. Tiemo Wölken – a substitute member of the committee who is currently suing the Commission over the file's withdrawal – said the analysis offers a 'stark warning' against leaving AI liability unregulated. 'Simply withdrawing the AI Liability Directive, as the Commission intends, is clearly not a viable option,' he also told Euractiv. The Commission has been contacted for comment (nl)
Euractiv
8 hours ago
- Euractiv
The Brief – Brand Zelenskyy loses its lustre
Since Russia's all-out invasion of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy has been Brussels' golden boy. Red carpets have rolled wherever he sets foot, he has been granted an honorary seat at summits, and his sombre addresses have stirred even the most stoic of dignitaries. In him we see defiance, and each time he steps onto the world stage he bears the weight of human sacrifice. As leader of a nation oppressed by the West's arch-nemesis, he stands on a moral pedestal that grows with every Russian drone raid. He was Time Magazine's 'person of the year' in 2022 and his book, A message from Ukraine, was published by Penguin and took pride of place in bookshops around Europe. His function as the face of Ukraine's struggle completely subsumed his democratic duties at home (which, after all, have been partially suspended). Brand Zelenskyy was untouchable. Until this week. The outcry prompted by his attack on Ukraine's anti-corruption infrastructure is surprising on several counts. How could he have so miscalculated the reaction from EU partners? Then again, how could those EU partners have waited so long to draw the line at democratic backsliding? Ukraine's existential challenge has stifled criticism of its government, but the West hasn't been under any illusions about foul play by the country's ruling classes. Former Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker said it outright and strongly opposed EU accession so long as the corruption wasn't addressed. Zelenskyy is hardly the man for this job. Long before this week's swipe at anti-graft bodies, his own scorecard has been tarnished. In 2019, his closure of three Russian television networks was sharply rebuked by the EU. It was all the more reprehensible given his previous pledge to 'never, ever shut down any TV networks.' And whilst he railed against Ukraine's "traditional oligarchic order' in his presidential campaign, Zelenskyy himself was implicated in the Pandora Papers, which revealed he had held a 25% stake in Maltex, a capital holdings entity registered in the tax haven of the British Virgin Islands. Despite promising to restore the independence of Ukraine's two anti-corruption agencies, this week's episode shows how Zelenskyy's priorities have drifted. His suppression of opponents and critical media has gone unchecked by EU partners; why not let him off the hook once more? The EU's darling may have sparked more of a backlash than he expected, but it's nothing he can't shake off. What counts, opposition MPs told Euractiv, is the US response, which so far has been limited to expressions of concern among some members of Congress. Zelenskyy has already shifted key diplomats from Brussels to Washington in a bid to secure vital weapons – a decision also motivated by frustration about the lack of progress towards EU accession. This week may not bring a victory for democracy, but at the very least we can stop pretending Zelenskyy is someone he never was. The Roundup Von der Leyen announced Thursday that the EU will aim to form a 'pragmatic' relationship with China , with aims to ease the EU's trade deficit and encourage Beijing to pressure Russia to accept a Ukraine ceasefire. ECB waits, watches – The European Central Bank held interests at the same level for the first time in more than a year Thursday, adopting a 'wait and watch' approach to US tariff concerns. Analysts expect at least one more 0.25 percentage point cut before the end of 2025. EU bites back – All EU member states except for Hungary overwhelmingly approved retaliatory tariffs targeting €93 billion worth of US goods on Thursday, as the bloc seeks to pile pressure on Washington to agree a trade deal that would lower Donald Trump's threatened blanket levy from 30% to 15%. Across Europe Belgium saw a 22.5% decline in honeybee populations over the winter, up from the norm of around 10%, a part of a larger but somewhat clear trend across the EU due to a combination of factors including parasites and pesticide use. Age chX – Elon Musk's social media platform X faces a 10% fine of its annual turnover as the company has until tomorrow to comply with an Irish law requiring age checks to protect minors after an initial review by the regulator found it falling short. FCAS fracas – Belgium is re-evaluating whether to join the multi-billion European Future Combat Air System project, scheduled to be operational by 2040, the country's defence minister stated publicly on Thursday morning, following pushback from the head of French aerospace firm Dassault.
