‘Planning for my disabled son after I die keeps me awake at night'
Zac needs one-to-one care around the clock and lives full-time in a specialist school in Thatcham, Berkshire, called Prior's Court, funded by his local authority.
While his care is paid for, having a disabled child is hugely expensive for Robinson and Matt, Zac's father. On average, parents spend an extra £322 a month on their child's condition, such as higher energy bills and food costs, according to disability charity Contact.
'Everything he needs is expensive. We've spent a lot on private therapies. We still spend loads on supplements and things, which may or may not help, but you do everything you can,' adds Robinson. 'We've spent hundreds of thousands of pounds, probably, over 15 years, trying to help him as much as we can, really with pretty little result, if I am honest.'
But the big concern for the couple is about what will happen to Zac – and their daughters – when they die.
In England, a council will generally help to pay for care costs if a person has savings of less than £23,250. An inheritance could change the picture, especially if a home is inherited, as councils can require that homes be sold to help pay for care.
Having a live-in carer costs between £800 and £1,600 a week, according to the NHS, while rooms in a residential or nursing home can cost as much as £850 a week.
'The worry is for the future. You're trying to protect your child as much as possible and provide for them without it affecting their entitlement to social care, because this stuff is ruinously expensive,' Robinson says. 'You don't want to leave it all to the girls, because that's not fair, but also we don't want our entire estate to be taken for his care so that they have nothing.'
She adds: 'It keeps me awake at night. What's going to happen when we're not around? I don't want the burden of it to fall on my daughters.'
The Robinsons are far from the only family to have to deal with this dilemma.
Rhiannon Gogh, 47, also has a 15-year-old son, Tristan. Like Zac, he has severe autism, although he lives at home.
The family realised something wasn't right when Tristan didn't hit the same milestones as his older brother, Henry. She says: 'We could never put him down. He cried a lot. He wanted to be rocked constantly, even when he was asleep.
'He never, ever looked at me. He never answered to his name. He never pointed at anything. He never responded to me talking to him. He seemed to be locked into a separate world. He used to run away from me at nursery when I would go to pick him up.'
Like the Robinsons, Gogh has had to think about what will happen to Tristan when she and her husband die. Handing down estates to those without mental capacity is much harder than she expected. Not only does she need to think about making sure he can still access funded care, but levelling a large sum on a person without full mental capacity could make them a magnet for scammers.
'I quickly realised that all of the traditional financial planning that I'd put in place was completely wrong,' she says.
'It was going to cause him harm. He wouldn't be able to access his inheritance, he would be very, very vulnerable in receipt of it, and he would lose his access to care, support and benefits if I were to suddenly just land a chunk of money on him.'
Parents of disabled children often have to give up work – which only exacerbates money worries. Robinson, 50, previously an actor and events organiser, is now a therapist. But when Zac was small, she stopped working to look after him, leaving her husband Matt, 49, who works as a business coach, as the sole breadwinner.
'Because of Zac's needs, no nursery would take him, we couldn't get him looked after, so the reality is that my career went completely on the back burner while my husband's took off.'
She claimed carers' allowance, which worked out at £66.15 a week by 2019. It is now £83.30 a week. By the time Zac was nine – and with two younger daughters to care for – Robinson says she was 'on her knees'.
Things got easier once Zac began attending residential school. But when he turns 16, his case will be passed to adult social care.
The family faced a three-year battle to get him into residential care originally, and will face a similar process once again, including hiring lawyers to argue Zac's case. 'We'll have to go through the whole process again of proving his level of need and trying to get them to pay for it.'
If the family fails to get his care extended into adulthood, their world could be upended again. Zac would have to move home, and Suzanne is particularly worried about how she will look after a fully-grown man as she ages. She asks: 'When he's 35, I'll be 70. Am I going to have to change a 35-year-old man's nappy at 70?'
Gogh also gave up her corporate job 10 years ago to look after Tristan after he ran away from school. She now works as a financial adviser, specialising in helping families with severely disabled children. She has written a book, Planning with Love, on the subject.
'It's incredibly draining on finances,' Gogh says. 'He breaks things, he falls into things, he drops things, he bites clothing. He loves to see things dismantled and broken.
'He took an iPad once and smashed it on the corner of the table to see what happened. He's thrown a television out of a window.'
A £400 car seatbelt was used just once before being thrown aside, because Tristan 'hated it'. She and her husband are planning a 'retirement for three', as he will be unable to support himself.
Setting up your estate to ensure the future of your disabled child can be complex and often requires expert help, which is another cost. To ensure that the disabled person is eligible for care, while also receiving an inheritance, money can be left in trust.
A disabled person's trust – which can be set up for someone eligible for disability living allowance or personal independence payments (PIP) – is specially designed for those without capacity.
A discretionary trust can also be used, although it may attract higher tax bills. Trustees will need to be appointed to make decisions about what happens to the money.
Those who cannot look after their own money may also need a deputy, who is appointed by the courts to make decisions for them, or might have their benefits managed directly by the Department for Work and Pensions.
Choosing trustees is a minefield of its own. Gogh says: 'Who would a natural trustee be? You might think the natural choice would be a sibling, but then you think: 'Is it really fair to put that pressure on them by making them a trustee?''
Her eldest son, Henry, is just 17. He is very aware that, at some point in the future, he will become responsible for his younger brother. It's a heavy burden for a teenager. Gogh says: 'My poor other son has no choice, and he plays second fiddle, which is heartbreaking.
'I remember him saying to me in the car about a year ago: 'What if I go on holiday to Japan, in the future, when you're not here. Do you think someone will know how to get hold of me if something happens to Tristan?'
'He's already thought about that. He was only 15 at the time.'
Planning for the future also raises the question of fairness between siblings. Robinson says that she doesn't want to leave all the money to her daughters, cutting Zac out entirely. But on the other hand, leaving everything in trust for Zac would feel equally unfair.
'You don't want to leave it all to the girls, but we don't want our entire estate to be taken for his care so they have nothing. That's just not fair. It's something families don't have to think about until you're in that position.
'You assume that you'll be able to split the estate between your children and they will all be able to look after that money themselves, and have the capacity to manage money. And of course, none of that applies in this case,' she says.
Planning with Love: A Guide to Wills and Trusts for Parents of Children with Special Needs by Rhiannon Gogh (£15.99)
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Brentford Send Firm Message to Newcastle United Over Yoanne Wissa's Future
Newcastle's Wissa Pursuit Hits Brentford Brick Wall Newcastle United's move for Yoane Wissa remains firmly in limbo, with Brentford refusing to sanction the sale unless a suitable replacement is secured. According to iNews, the Magpies have tabled a £30 million valuation for the DR Congo international, viewing him as a direct replacement for Callum Wilson, not Alexander Isak. However, while Newcastle's price is deemed fair, it is not the money that is stalling negotiations. With Bryan Mbeumo having already departed for Manchester United, Brentford are wary of further weakening their attacking ranks. Wissa, who notched an impressive 19 goals in 36 Premier League games last season, has become essential to their structure. The Bees are unwilling to let another key forward depart without a replacement, regardless of the fee. 'Wissa, who is desperate to move to Newcastle and play Champions League football, is not training with the Brentford first team and is understood to be unhappy at the deal having stalled.' Photo: IMAGO Transfer Limbo at St James' Park While Wissa is pushing for the move, Newcastle's pursuit has been marked by complexity. With cordial talks ongoing and no deadlock over valuation, a breakthrough remains possible if Brentford can act swiftly in the market. Yet, Brentford's reluctance is understandable. As iNews reports, the claim of a £50m price tag is wide of the mark, and the stalling point is about depth, not money. Newcastle have been left scanning alternative options, including Chelsea's Nicolas Jackson and RB Leipzig's Benjamin Sesko. But fresh problems loom there too. Jackson's price is 'astronomical,' with Chelsea reportedly quoting £80 million, while Newcastle's valuation sits closer to £65 million — around the figure they were willing to pay for Hugo Ekitike. Isak and the Striker Domino Effect An irony not lost on anyone at St James' Park is how Newcastle find themselves on both sides of a similar dilemma. Alexander Isak, withdrawn from the club's pre-season tour, has shown interest in a Liverpool switch. Like Brentford, the Tynesiders won't sell unless a viable replacement is lined up. Yet Liverpool's anticipated bid, following Luis Diaz's £65.5m sale to Bayern Munich, could be too tempting to ignore. 'Newcastle's official line – repeated publicly and privately – is that he is not for sale and that is more than just PR.' Still, the transfer market remains volatile. A late bid from Liverpool could shift internal thinking. Until then, Newcastle fans will be left wondering if either striker saga will find resolution before the window slams shut. Forward Thinking Required For Newcastle, the Wissa situation isn't just about this window. It's emblematic of the club's broader squad-building strategy, shaped by Champions League ambitions and Financial Fair Play constraints. Wissa may be eager, and Newcastle may be ready, but unless Brentford act fast in their own market, this deal may not materialise before the season kicks off. Our View – EPL Index Analysis From a Newcastle fan's point of view, this Wissa link is both exciting and slightly frustrating. £30 million for a Premier League-proven forward who hit 19 goals last season feels like smart business, especially given our need for a more consistent goal threat. But Brentford's stance is understandable — they've already lost Mbeumo, and letting Wissa go without a replacement would gut their attack. Still, it's heartening that Wissa wants to join Newcastle and play in the Champions League. That ambition fits with the club's direction under Eddie Howe. His desire and current stand-off with Brentford might actually push this deal over the line if the player keeps pressing behind the scenes. The big worry is Isak. If he ends up at Liverpool, it would be a huge blow, and Wissa alone wouldn't be a like-for-like swap. We'd still need to bring in another top-level striker. Fans are anxious because this window feels slow and reactive. With the season around the corner, we need clarity — and quickly.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Report: Personal Terms Agreed as Liverpool Begin Move for Forward
Isak's Intent Clear as Liverpool Make Their Move Swedish Star Wants Merseyside Stage Alexander Isak has made his choice: he wants to join Liverpool Football Club. In a move that could define Liverpool's next attacking era, the Reds are preparing to formally open talks with Newcastle United. The process is already in motion, with Liverpool's hierarchy informed that 'a written offer will be submitted shortly'. According to Sky Sports Switzerland, 'the Reds' management has already received the green light from the Swedish giant regarding personal terms. A five-year contract has been duly finalised, and perfectly matches his salary expectations.' The signing of a player of Isak's calibre represents a calculated leap forward under new head coach Arne Slot. Liverpool's fresh approach in recruitment looks sharp, focused and ambitious. The contract terms are reportedly done. Now, the battle is at the negotiating table. Newcastle's Stance and Liverpool's Strategy Liverpool's opening gambit with Newcastle is set to be more diplomatic than aggressive. 'The Reds have a fairly simple strategy in place, with the aim of establishing an initial dialogue to understand what would suit Newcastle's Saudi leadership in order to secure a deal.' Patience could be vital. Photo: IMAGO Behind the scenes, the numbers are already being prepared. 'Liverpool's sporting officials are expected to send an offer of around £100 million to gauge the Black and Whites' intentions and begin negotiations in full force.' What It May Cost to Land Isak Newcastle United's valuation of their Swedish striker remains lofty. 'Liverpool are aware that Newcastle are demanding £150 million, but believe they can secure the deal for around £120 million, with performance-related bonuses.' That figure feels closer to Liverpool's comfort zone. The next 48 hours are pivotal, as 'a specific meeting is scheduled between the clubs… to determine the Merseyside club's clear intentions.' Big Striker, Big Expectations This isn't just about numbers. Isak has long been admired for his movement, technique and maturity beyond his years. With personal terms agreed, Liverpool know they are close. Now, it is about meeting Newcastle's threshold without blinking first. This could be Liverpool's defining deal of the summer window. Our View – EPL Index Analysis This would be a truly monumental signing for Liverpool. Alexander Isak ticks every box. At just 25, he already boasts Premier League experience, Champions League potential and international pedigree. He is tall, quick, composed, and technically gifted. For many fans, this feels like a statement of intent following the painful loss of Diogo Jota. Isak could carry the emotional weight of that void with quality and class. 'Isak wants to join Liverpool' – that alone is thrilling. The fact a player of his standing is actively choosing Anfield, especially under the relatively fresh tenure of Arne Slot, bodes well. The £150 million asking price is steep, but £120 million with bonuses? That's the sort of deal that makes sense if Liverpool genuinely want to evolve their attacking identity. There's anticipation too. How would Isak link up with Darwin Núñez, Luis Díaz or even Cody Gakpo? This signing could rejuvenate Liverpool's frontline. And while £100 million is a bold opening bid, we've seen this club play the long game well. If this happens, it could be Liverpool's biggest striker signing since Fernando Torres. The fans are ready.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Barclays joins rival in cautioning against hiking bank taxes
The boss of Barclays has become the latest to caution the Chancellor against hiking taxes for banks in her autumn budget as she looks to bolster the public finances. Group chief executive CS Venkatakrishnan, who is also known as Venkat, said that increasing taxes for banks – or other important sectors of the economy – was not consistent with aims to boost economic growth. He said banks were already 'among the biggest tax payers in this country' and an important sector to help drive economic activity, with growth 'the primary objective for the UK'. 'There are many other important sectors. 'We want all those sectors to prosper,' he added. His comments come after Lloyds Banking Group chief executive Charlie Nunn said last week that raising taxes on banks would be at odds with the Government's pro-growth aims. There has been increasing speculation that Chancellor Rachel Reeves may look to raise taxes, with the banking sector rumoured to be among those potentially in the firing line, as she faces pressure over the UK's public finances following higher-than-expected Government borrowing and U-turns on some spending cuts. Venkat's comments came as the group revealed that half-year profits jumped by nearly a quarter thanks to an investment banking boost amid financial market volatility sparked by US President Donald Trump's tariff war. The high street lender reported a 23% rise in pre-tax profits to £5.2 billion for the six months to June 30. This came despite it booking credit impairment charges of £1.1 billion, up from £897 million a year earlier, after putting by another £469 million in the second quarter. The bank said the rise was largely due to its takeover of Tesco Bank and a more uncertain economic outlook, especially in the US. Its results were better than expected for the second quarter, with profits up 28% to £2.5 billion thanks to forecast-beating revenues in its investment banking arm amid market volatility. Income in its investment banking business lifted 10% to £3.3 billion in the second quarter. Venkat said: 'We remain on track to achieve the objectives of our three-year plan, delivering structurally higher and more stable returns for our investors.' Barclays unveiled more returns for investors, with plans for another £1 billion in share buybacks, and said it has cut around £350 million of costs out of the £500 million in savings planned for 2025.