How will AI change the restaurant business?
No tax on tips or overtime, with a catch: What to know as Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' passes the Senate
Psychologists now know exactly what makes someone cool. Turns out, the definitions are universal
'Alligator Alcatraz' merch appears on Amazon and Florida GOP website, making light of controversial facility
But many feel unprepared to handle its implementation.
That's according to a new survey from consulting firm Deloitte that asked hundreds of restaurant industry executives about their current use and future plans for AI. Overwhelmingly, respondents cited AI's potential to enhance the guest experience; to make a customer's time more enjoyable, comfortable, and memorable, as a top benefit of the tech. In fact, almost all—98%—operators in the survey said they expect a high impact on the customer experience in three years.
AI is already showing up to help restaurant guests. It answers the phones, works the back office, and helps with marketing efforts. Eventually, it'll show up during table service. Plenty of restaurants are already using AI to their advantage; 8 in 10 industry leaders surveyed by Deloitte say they'll increase spending on the tech in the next year.
Most of the survey's respondents work in quick service restaurants; nearly half work as franchise operators for larger brands. But that doesn't mean AI and its benefits are reserved for corporate restaurants.
'Big chains are usually first to test new technologies in the restaurant space, and AI is no different,' says Emma Blecker, a New York-based operations consultant. 'It makes sense, the tools are often built for them, and they've got the resources to spend on research and development, pilot programs, training, and rollouts. But that doesn't mean small operators are missing out.'
For now, she advises, restaurants of all sizes can learn from industry early adopters, experimenting with new tech tools and ideas, like these:
According to Deloitte's survey results, less than 1 in 5 surveyed leaders use conversational voice AI—tech that can talk—in their restaurant's daily operations now. But they plan to; roughly a third are testing or piloting the tech, with another third planning or developing a conversational AI strategy.
Voice AI can staff a drive-thru, taking orders and upselling to guests with smart add-ons—think: 'Do you want fries with that?' except instead of blindly suggesting a side of fries to every customer, it uses factors like their order, time of day, or even the weather to suggest something else.
It can also answer their phone, providing diners with info on location, hours, reservations, and other details, a boon for busy restaurants, like perennial San Francisco favorite Flour + Water, which tapped a local service called Hostie to work the phones. It's already made guests and employees happier.
'We're finding that people walking in the door already have answers to some of the questions they'd walk in with prior,' says Amanda Flores, director of operations for the Flour +Water restaurant group. 'That means fewer people walk in frustrated and the host gets to spend more time with people that are stoked to be here with their questions already answered.'
Restaurant software has long collected data on diners—average spend, visit frequency, dining preferences—and AI can help make sense of all the numbers.
For example, a text-based feature from reservations and customer relationship management platform SevenRooms helps restaurants segment customers into target groups and generate text messages to invite them to special events, share new menu items, or offer same-day reservation nudges. Celeb-chef backed Fabio Viviani Hospitality group, an early product tester for SevenRooms, said the tech helped book 1,800 reservations and drove close to half a million dollars in revenue in six months. The group's chief marketing officer said the texts had a 98% open rate.
About half of restaurant operators in the survey say they already see a high impact from AI-enhanced loyalty tech; another quarter think they'll see a high impact in three years.
The case for AI at fast food and other casual restaurants is straightforward; it can make the experience faster, easier, and more pleasant for people on both sides of the transaction. But integrating technology into full-service dining is a trickier proposition; even the best bots can't replace warm, in-person hospitality.
But it can certainly help, and a new generation of devices has the potential to enhance human service. Plenty of companies are working on new, hands-free devices—pins, glasses, earpieces—though transformational change is likely years away. (Jony Ive, the longtime Apple design exec and architect of the iPhone, recently sold his new company to OpenAI with vague promises to right the iPhone's wrongs, moving our eyes from screens to reality.)
In fact, it's already being tested. Yum China, the Shanghai-based parent company of American brands KFC, Taco Bell, and Pizza Hut, and also the largest restaurant company in that country, just debuted a hands-free AI assistant for some of its KFC restaurant managers. They wear earphones and smart watches wired to process language and offer help, from inventory reminders to real-time troubleshooting. It's a pilot program, but the point is to help employees look up from screens and better interact with the physical world in front of them.
Still, practicalities might slow progress. In Deloitte's survey, less than a third of industry leaders said their business's tech and talent are ready to implement big AI-related changes.
In a recent conversation, Kelly Esten, chief marketer for restaurant point of sale company Toast, declined to speculate on how soon transformative new hardware might arrive at America's restaurants. But Esten agrees it's coming.
'I do think we're going to go through another platform shift,' she told me, 'and it creates a tremendous amount of opportunity for restaurants and for restaurant tech.'
This post originally appeared at fastcompany.comSubscribe to get the Fast Company newsletter: http://fastcompany.com/newsletters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tiger Woods News Emerges Before US Open
Tiger Woods News Emerges Before US Open originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The golf world is focused on Oakmont Country Club in Pennsylvania this week as the third major championship of the 2025 season gets underway Thursday. The U.S. Open has arrived, and some of the sport's biggest names are preparing to tackle the daunting challenge of the historic golf course. Advertisement One name not in the field but still making headlines is Tiger Woods. The 49-year-old legend, a three-time U.S. Open champion, continues to battle injuries. Though he hasn't teed it up in an official event on Tour since The Open Championship last July, Woods remains a towering figure in golf. That was made even more evident this week. Just one day before the U.S. Open begins, Forbes shared its list of the highest-paid golfers of 2025, and Woods ranked fourth, despite his only competition being two events in the TMRW Golf League (TGL) that he formed with fellow golfer Rory McIlroy. According to Forbes, despite parting ways with Nike after 27 years in 2024, Woods has still earned $55 million, with $10 million on the course and $45 million in revenue off the course. Advertisement Even without frequent appearances on the course, Tiger's impact on the sport remains undeniable. Tiger Woods is fourth on the 2025 Forbes list of highest-earning golfers with $55 Gruber / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images Along with Tiger, several other stars also made the list: Jon Rahm ranks No. 1 on the list. The 30-year-old Spaniard earned $92 million on the course and $10 million off it. He's been a force in LIV Golf, currently sitting third in the individual standings with three top-five finishes in eight starts. Scottie Scheffler, the second highest-paid golfer, brought in $97 million total, $67 million on the course (including a $25 million FedEx Cup bonus) and $30 million off it. Despite those massive earnings, Scheffler still trails Rahm. McIlroy rounds out the top three. The 36-year-old finally captured his first green jacket at the Masters in April, completing the career grand slam. He made $84 million overall, evenly split between his on-course performance and endorsements. Collin Morikawa is fifth on the list at $50 million. The 28-year-old American, despite not winning on the PGA Tour since 2023, remains one of the sport's top draws. His best U.S. Open finish was fourth in 2021. As the 2025 U.S. Open begins, many eyes remain on the current stars battling at Oakmont. But the name Tiger Woods continues to carry serious weight in the world of golf. Related: Scottie Scheffler Reacts to Ryder Cup Announcement on Thursday Related: Phil Mickelson Addresses Incredible Birdie Shot at LIV Golf Virginia This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 11, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
While individual investors own 29% of Theon International Plc (AMS:THEON), private companies are its largest shareholders with 57% ownership
Theon International's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public Venetus Limited owns 57% of the company Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. Every investor in Theon International Plc (AMS:THEON) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 57% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. Meanwhile, individual investors make up 29% of the company's shareholders. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Theon International, beginning with the chart below. See our latest analysis for Theon International Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. Less than 5% of Theon International is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Theon International. Venetus Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 57% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.5% and 1.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Christianos Hadjiminas, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer. While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too. The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. We can report that insiders do own shares in Theon International Plc. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around €204m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling. The general public-- including retail investors -- own 29% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies. We can see that Private Companies own 57%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Theon International better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Theon International (of which 1 is potentially serious!) you should know about. Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Trump's trade brinkmanship imperils market stability
As the United States and China inch toward formalizing the outcomes of their recent economic talks in London, markets are sending a clear signal: they want stability, not another season of tariff theatrics. Yet the Trump administration's renewed protectionist tilt, including the looming July 9 deadline for punitive tariffs, risks derailing a fragile recovery and undermining American economic resilience. The London meetings followed a call between President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, culminating in a framework that would resume China's rare earth exports and ease U.S. trade restrictions. It's an imperfect deal, but it reflects an important truth: Economic coercion has failed to deliver strategic outcomes. Markets, manufacturers and consumers are all still paying the price of the last trade war. Rare earths remain a critical node in this standoff. China refines nearly 80 percent of the global supply — inputs essential to American electric vehicles, semiconductors and defense technologies. When Beijing halted export approvals earlier this year, U.S. manufacturers faced mounting delays and soaring input costs. The reversal eases a significant bottleneck and offers inflation relief. In exchange, China will regain access to U.S. manufacturing inputs and regulatory clarity — a win for both sides, but especially for U.S. firms squeezed by global supply chain frictions. Rare-earth dynamics further reinforce the stakes. China's June 26 pledge to resume rare-earth shipments to the U.S. triggered a sharp rally in domestic producers. Meanwhile, export volumes from China had fallen nearly 50 percent year-over-year in May, citing tightened controls. Those disruptions directly impacted U.S. electric makers and aerospace supply chains. In this context, the tentative deal on rare-earths licensing isn't a niche victory — it's a strategic pivot that underscores: markets reward policy clarity, even in geopolitically charged commodity markets. Yet the calm is temporary. Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff framework proposes up to 50 percent duties on countries that fail to sign new bilateral deals by July 9. A 90-day grace period has been offered, but this is brinkmanship disguised as strategy. And if the deadline passes without a broader deal, the tariffs snap back — with potentially damaging ripple effects. The last trade escalation offers a cautionary tale. Tariffs on Chinese goods hit 145 percent; Beijing responded with levies up to 125 percent. American manufacturers endured record costs, while exporters in both countries lost access to reliable markets. The U.S. goods trade deficit with China didn't shrink — it widened to $396 billion in 2024. Meanwhile, American farmers faced oversupply, and consumers bore the burden through higher prices. U.S. equities have responded to this nascent trade detente with enthusiasm. The S&P 500 ETF recently hit $615, brushing off earlier tariff jitters. Meanwhile, traders have rotated into commodities, with copper futures climbing nearly 3 percent in late June, reflecting expectations of stronger industrial demand under clearer supply logistics. Even gold has softened from conflict-driven highs. Markets are signaling that certainty matters — not tariff theatrics. The contrast is clear: a modest trade framework sparks calm; tariff threats inject volatility. That is the heartbeat investors care about. The global spillover from trade tensions was immediate. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, World Bank and International Monetary Fund all downgraded growth forecasts, citing the uncertainty created by revived trade barriers. Investor sentiment plunged. Only now, as trade talks signal détente, has the S&P 500 rallied and oil futures stabilized. Markets know the difference between real strategy and performative populism. So do the businesses that depend on open trade. Trump's tariffs didn't reshore factories or rebalance the trade deficit. What they did do was erode U.S. credibility with allies, invite World Trade Organization scrutiny and distort global supply chains. If the objective was to discipline China's behavior, the evidence shows failure. What has worked — albeit modestly — is targeted cooperation, regulatory certainty and consistent enforcement of existing rules. The current agreement is a pragmatic step forward. It restores supply chain continuity for U.S. firms, removes ambiguity for global investors, and signals that economic diplomacy still matters. It also nudges U.S. trade policy back toward rational engagement after years of unilateral theatrics. Legal uncertainty still clouds the picture. A recent federal court ruling in V.O.S. Selections v. United States raises questions about whether the White House even has the authority to implement broad-based tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. If the decision is upheld, it will undercut the legal rationale for Trump's tariff agenda — and perhaps prompt overdue congressional clarity on trade powers. The broader lesson is clear: economic interdependence isn't weakness — it's leverage. The U.S. and China will remain strategic competitors, but durable competition requires rules, not impulsive penalty regimes that backfire on domestic producers. If this new framework holds, it won't mark the end of rivalry — but it could mark the beginning of a more coherent doctrine of economic statecraft. One that recognizes that markets punish uncertainty, and that protectionism is not a patriotic virtue but an economic deadweight. For now, Washington would do well to recognize what the S&P already has: stability is strength. And the best way to keep markets calm is not through tariffs — but through smart, disciplined diplomacy. Imran Khalid is a physician and has a master's degree in international relations. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Sign in to access your portfolio
