
Mazda Voluntarily Recalls 171,000 Vehicles Due to Possible Airbag Fault
Mazda has initiated a safety recall for 171,412 of its late-model vehicles due to a software issue that could disable the airbags. The recall impacts 2024 and 2025 model-year Mazda 3 and CX-30 vehicles. Mazda has stated it is not aware of any accidents or injuries resulting from this issue.
Source: Kyle Edward
0:07
/
0:09
Thinking about buying a Toyota RAV4? These 5 rivals might change your mind
Watch More
The recall includes 119,555 CX-30 crossovers and 51,857 Mazda 3 sedans and hatchbacks. According to documents filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the defect lies within the Sophisticated Airbag Sensor (SAS) unit.
The issue occurs under a specific, unusual circumstance: if the vehicle's battery is completely drained while the ignition is left in the 'ON' position. This specific action can cause the SAS unit to store an internal fault. When the vehicle's battery is subsequently recharged and the car is started, this stored fault triggers the airbag warning light on the dashboard and, critically, deactivates the vehicle's airbags, preventing them from deploying in the event of a collision.
Mazda has confirmed that dealers have already been notified of the issue. The solution involves a software update to the existing SAS unit. Dealers will reprogram the module with improved software or, if necessary, replace the unit entirely.
Source: Mazda
The repair will be performed free of charge as all 171,412 affected vehicles are still covered by their original factory warranty.
Owners of the affected 2024 and 2025 Mazda 3 and CX-30 models will be formally notified by mail. The automaker expects to complete all owner notifications by the end of July 2025, instructing them to bring their vehicle to an authorized dealer for the repair.
About the Author
Kyle Edward View Profile

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Auto Express
38 minutes ago
- Auto Express
Car Deal of the Day: a cut-price Mazda MX-5 to soak up the summer sun in
Arguably the best sports car money can buy Engaging handling; old-fashioned thrills Just £296.57 a month The UK is currently basking in its fourth heatwave of the year, so what better way to enjoy this than with a drop-top? The Mazda MX-5 is more than just a drop-top, though, because it's the best-value sports car on sale in Britain, and a multiple Auto Express New Car Awards winner. You can bag the keys to one of the automotive world's greats for less than £300 right now – but you'd better hurry because deals like this won't hang around for long. Advertisement - Article continues below Carwow Leasey is offering the terrific MX-5 Roadster for just £296.57 a month right now. This four-year deal requires a £3,853.84 initial payment, while you can enjoy 6,000 miles of top-down motoring a year. This deal is for the entry-level 1.5-litre Prime-Lime – but, remember, Mazda doesn't make a bad MX-5, and to many enthusiasts the basic package is the best. It still comes with 16-inch black-painted alloys, cruise control and sat-nav, along with Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. Because this is the soft-top Roadster and not the hard-top RF (Retractable Fastback), the switch from top-up to top-down motoring requires just a flick of your wrist. Then you can hear the rorty exhaust note from that fizzy little 1.5-litre four-cylinder engine. With 130bhp and just a 1,106kg kerbweight to lug around, performance is brisk, with 0-62mph taking 8.3 seconds. But the MX-5 isn't really about speed – it's a wonderfully involving driving experience, with a rifle-bolt-sharp six-speed direct-action gearbox, and light, engaging steering. We can't think of many cheaper ways to get good old-fashioned summer thrills for such a low price. The Car Deal of the Day selections we make are taken from our own Auto Express Buy A Car deals service, which includes the best current offers from car dealers and leasing companies around the UK. Terms and conditions apply, while prices and offers are subject to change and limited availability. If this deal expires, you can find more top Mazda MX-5 leasing offers from leading providers on our Mazda MX-5 page. Check out the Mazda MX-5 deal or take a look at our previous Car Deal of the Day selection here…


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Thousands of motorists waste time of emergency service operators every year dialling 999 accidentally
Thousands of drivers are wasting emergency services operators valuable time every year by accidentally dialling 999 using a feature installed in their cars, according to a new report. Some 350,000 calls have been made to the emergency services line from vehicles since April 2018, though two-thirds were false alarms, a new investigation has revealed. Charity the RAC Foundation, which commissioned the study, said motorists are frequently triggering 'eCall' activations from their vehicles in error. The eCall feature automatically rings 999 and provides the emergency services with information such as the vehicle type and location under the assumption that the driver is in distress or has been involved in a collision so that help can arrive as quickly as possible. The system will spontaneously ring the emergency services when the airbags deploy in a crash or can be manually instigated by pressing a button often labelled 'SOS' on the dashboard. It has been a legal requirement for cars and vans sold in the UK to have the system installed since April 2018, though the charity says that motorists are making thousands of calls in error because they are 'unfamiliar' with the SOS button. Transport expert Dr Nick Reed, who conducted the study for the RAC Foundation, found that more than 85 per cent of eCall alerts made last year were triggered manually using the SOS button. 'About three-quarters of those were false alarms', according to the research. This is compared with approximately one in three automatic calls. Taken together, about two-thirds of all calls last year were by mistake, the study concluded. The report found common causes of manual false alarms include 'button misuse, poor interface design, system faults and demonstration presses at dealerships'. Dr Reed listed several high-profile incidents where a significant difference is likely to have been made if eCall was available. One was the Selby train crash of 2001 which left 10 people dead when a Land Rover careered off the M62 motorway in North Yorkshire and came to a standstill on train tracks. A train derailed when it struck the vehicle, and then a second train hit the first. The report stated that eCall could provide emergency services with 'better information more quickly' when a vehicle breaks down in a live lane on a smart motorway without a hard shoulder, compared with stopped vehicle detection systems, which rely on radar technology. The author recommended that more of the information provided by eCall should be passed on to road management organisations such as National Highways. He also warned that owners of up to four million cars and vans fitted with early versions of eCall could find themselves with systems with do not work because they rely on 2G and 3G mobile phone networks, which are progressively being deactivated. Drivers and passengers do not need to be carrying a mobile phone for the built-in safety feature to work. Vehicle makers install the eCall SOS button in different locations in the cabin. It is often found in the ceiling console by the internal rear-view mirror, behind a pop-out hatch or on the centre console. Drivers should refer to their car owner's manual if they are unaware of its position. National Highways points out that there is 'no need to check if your eCall is working, as the system will carry out a self-test each time the vehicle is started'. Motorists pressing the button to ensure it is working is one of the contributors to the high volume of false activations identified by RAC Foundation's investigation. Steve Gooding, director of the road safety charity, said eCall is 'a great idea' and can be 'particularly useful in remote areas where no other road users are on hand to dial 999'. He went on: 'However, this report reveals a number of shortcomings in the system that need sorting, not least in the processes through which data is handled and the system's historical reliance on old mobile phone networks that are being turned off. 'This requires urgent attention otherwise lives could be at risk from life-saving technology failing when it's needed most. 'The number of manually triggered false alarms also suggests the need for action to explain what is clearly still an unfamiliar system for many drivers.' Dr Reed said: 'The case for accelerating the emergency response to road crashes through the eCall alert system is clear. 'The report highlights that its effectiveness is being undermined by challenges in exploiting the data it provides and by a high rate of false alerts, often triggered by accidental misuse. 'As an ever-increasing proportion of vehicles are equipped with eCall and similar functionalities become available via smartphones, smartwatches and dashcams, it is essential that we assess the true value of these technologies and ensure we unlock their full, life-saving potential.'


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Daimler, Volvo, other truckmakers sue California to block emissions rules
Aug 12 (Reuters) - Four major truckmakers, including Daimler ( opens new tab and Volvo, sued California to block the state from enforcing strict emissions standards that U.S. President Donald Trump declared void in June. Daimler, Volvo, Paccar (PCAR.O), opens new tab, and International Motors ( opens new tab, formerly Navistar, said they have been "caught in the crossfire" after Trump reversed waivers issued during the Biden administration that let California set its own standards. In a complaint filed on Monday, the truckmakers said Trump's rescinding U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approval of California's plan to boost zero-emission heavy-duty truck sales and reduce nitrogen oxide emissions preempted the state's enforcement. They said this included enforcing the Clean Truck Partnership, a 2023 program giving the truckmaking industry flexibility to meet emissions requirements while advancing California's goal of lowering emissions. The truckmakers said the regulatory uncertainty has caused irreparable harm because they cannot plan production in advance without knowing which vehicles they will be permitted to sell. Monday's complaint names the California Air Resources Board and Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom as defendants, and was filed in the federal court in Sacramento, the state's capital. Newsom's office and the board did not immediately respond on Tuesday to requests for comment. Trump's action was part of the Republicans' effort to curb California's power under the federal Clean Air Act to set tighter pollution limits than federal law requires, and Newsom's desire to promote electric vehicles as he fights climate change. California has received more than 100 waivers under the Clean Air Act since 1970. During his June signing of joint congressional resolutions, Trump also blocked California's effort to end sales of gasoline-only vehicles by 2035. The state is also suing to undo Trump's actions. The case is Daimler Truck North America LLC et al v. California Air Resources Board et al, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California, No. 25-02255.