
Bye-bye buybacks? Big Oil's record-breaking shareholder payouts are under threat
A protracted slump in crude prices has ramped up the pressure on Big Oil's commitment to allocate cash to shareholders.
Western energy supermajors have long sought to return cash to investors through buyback programs and dividends to keep their shareholders happy. Energy executives have also expressed confidence that they can continue to reward investors following a relatively robust set of first-quarter earnings.
Some analysts, however, are less convinced about Big Oil's pledge to return ever-higher shareholder returns, citing already stretched balance sheets and a sharp drop in crude prices.
Oil prices have fallen more than 12% year-to-date amid persistent demand concerns and U.S. President Donald Trump's back-and-forth trade policy.
Espen Erlingsen, head of upstream research at consultancy Rystad Energy, said recent market volatility has left the energy majors with "few economically attractive options" that allow for reinvestment while maintaining a competitive capital returns framework.
"As companies like Shell and ExxonMobil continue to push ahead with large-scale buyback programs despite shrinking cash inflows, the durability of these strategies is in question. For now, the majors are holding the line. But if oil prices remain depressed, adjustments may be inevitable," Erlingsen said in a research note published Thursday.
Share buybacks, which are typically more flexible than dividends, are "likely to be the first lever pulled," he added. In that vein, weaker crude prices mean energy majors will have less cash to return to shareholders.
Investor concern over the sustainability of Big Oil's shareholder returns comes after a year of record-breaking payouts.
Analysts at Rystad said total shareholder rewards from the likes of Shell, BP, TotalEnergies, Eni, Exxon Mobil and Chevron climbed to a whopping $119 billion in 2024, beating the previous record set in 2023.
The payout ratio, which refers to shareholder payouts as a share of corporate cash flow from operations (CFFO), meanwhile jumped up to 56% last year, Rystad said. That was well above the 30% to 40% range that was typical for the industry from 2012 through to 2022, the analysts added.
If shareholder payouts were to remain at 2024 levels throughout 2025, Rystad said this would imply companies distribute more than 80% of their cash flow to investors. The estimate was based on Big Oil's first-quarter CFFO as a proxy for full-year performance.
For European majors, analysts at Bank of America said at the start of the year in a note entitled "bye-bye buybacks?" that it anticipated cuts in such returns, from companies whose balance sheets were already stretched.
The Wall Street bank cited BP, Repsol and Eni at the time. It added that only Shell, TotalEnergies and Equinor were among the regional players likely to keep their respective 2025 buyback run-rates intact.
Spokespersons for Repsol and Eni were not immediately available to comment when contacted by CNBC.
So far, BP is the only European energy major to have trimmed its buyback run-rate. The beleaguered British oil company last month posted a sharp fall in first-quarter profit and reduced its share buyback to $750 million, down from $1.75 billion in the prior quarter.
BP, which has been the subject of intense takeover speculation, also reported significantly lower cash flow and rising net debt for the first quarter.
Lydia Rainforth, head of European energy, equity research at Barclays, said BP's future appears to be "really bright" — on the condition that the company can get through the next six months.
"If I think about when is that point of maximum weakness for BP, it is over the next six months, ultimately. Debt continues to go up a little bit, production continues to fall until mid-2026," Rainforth told CNBC's Steve Sedgwick on Thursday.
"As I get towards the end of the year, hopefully we'll see that sum of divestments taking down debt. Things like … selling their lubricants business, that could raise between $12 billion to $15 billion. It brings down debt, you start to see the benefit of cost savings coming through, and then production growth starts kicking in next year," she added.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
10 minutes ago
- Fox News
Merz says US in 'strong position' to stop Putin, Trump says 'let them fight for a little while'
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told President Donald Trump he is in a "strong position" to stop Russia's war in Ukraine, to which the president suggested maybe the world needs to "let them fight for a little while." "America is again in a very strong position to do something on this war and ending this war," Merz said, while also referencing the U.S.'s role in ending World War II on the eve of the anniversary of D-Day, which marked the turn of events that led to the defeat of Nazi Germany. "So let's talk about what we can do jointly, and we are ready to do what we can." Merz called for more pressure to be placed on Russia in coordination with European allies. Trump responded by providing an analogy of two kids fighting, and suggested perhaps it was "too early" to break up the fight between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. "Sometimes you see two young children fighting like crazy – they hate each other, and they're fighting in a park, and you try and pull them apart, they don't want to be pulled," Trump said. "Sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart." Trump said he gave that analogy to Putin in his call with him on Wednesday and said he told the Kremlin chief "maybe you're going to have to keep fighting and suffering a lot." Reporters asked Merz, who has been an ardent supporter of Ukraine and recently lifted Germany's existing strike bans, if he agrees with Trump that "fighting it out" was the way to proceed. "I think we both agree on this war and how terrible this war is. And we are both looking for ways to stop it very soon," Merz said. "I told the president before we came in that he is the key person in the world who can really do that now by putting pressure on Russia, and we will have this debate later on again, how we can proceed jointly between the Europeans and the Americans. "I think we are all… having the duty to do something on that now, to stop it after three and a half years, which is really terrible," he added, making it clear without directly contradicting the president that he did not agree with Trump. "We are on the side of Ukraine, and we are trying to get them stronger and stronger just to make Putin stop this war. This is our approach," Merz added.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Official US Economic Data Getting Less Reliable?
President Donald Trump's federal hiring freeze has forced the Bureau of Labor Statistics to cut back on collecting consumer price information. Economists have raised concerns that key data on inflation and other important measures of the economy will become less accurate because of Trump's policies. Earlier, the Trump administration disbanded expert panels that advised the BLS, raising further concerns about the quality of economic data.A key government agency has cut back on the amount of data it collects, raising concerns among experts about the accuracy of the information used to track inflation, unemployment, and other facets of the Bureau of Labor Statistics said this week it had cut back on the price surveys it uses to determine the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The agency said it cut back sample collection across the country and stopped data collection entirely in Buffalo, New York, Lincoln, Nebraska, and Provo, Utah. "These actions have minimal impact on the overall all-items CPI, but they may increase the volatility of subnational or item-specific indexes," the BLS said in a statement. "BLS makes reductions when current resources can no longer support the collection effort." Any problems with the inflation data could be widely felt across the economy. The inflation rate is closely watched by policymakers at the Federal Reserve who set the nation's monetary policy; by bond traders who determine the price of 10-year treasurys; and by major companies who use the information to make business decisions. Many federal benefits, including SNAP food aid and Social Security payments, are directly tied to the Consumer Price BLS is one of the federal agencies affected by President Donald Trump's freeze on hiring federal employees, which was instituted shortly after he took office. An internal BLS report said staffing shortages were the reason for cutting back data collection, the Wall Street Journal reported Thursday, citing an email the agency sent to economists. Trump has requested further cuts to the agency. His budget proposal would cut the BLS budget by 8% in 2026 from 2025 levels, if approved by Congress. 'The CPI temporarily reduced the number of outlets and quotes it attempted to collect due to a staffing shortage in certain CPI cities,' beginning in April, the email read, according to the Journal. 'These procedures will be kept in place until the hiring freeze is lifted, and additional staff can be hired and trained.'The cutbacks forced the BLS to use less hard data and more guesswork to produce the inflation data for April, the Journal reported. To measure the inflation rate, the BLS collects about 100,000 prices each month, with employees across the country visiting stores, making phone calls, or going online to check prices. About two-thirds of the data in the survey comes from in-person visits. Experts look to the BLS's massive surveys as the "gold standard" of economic addition to cutting back on its consumer price survey, the BLS said it will stop monitoring wholesale prices in 34 different industries including cookware, greeting cards, toys, and power tools. That data is used to create the Producer Price cutbacks raised alarms about the reliability of BLS data, according to a report by Bloomberg.'The reduced number of price quotes will likely reduce the reliability of the CPI as a measure of inflation and increase the volatility in the monthly CPI prints,' UBS economists led by Alan Detmeister said in a report obtained by Bloomberg. The cutback on data collection is just the latest red flag about the accuracy of the Trump administration's economic statistics. Jed Kolko, former Under Secretary for Economic Affairs at the Department of Commerce, wrote a blog post in April detailing several major threats to public trust in government statistics, including budget cuts. In March, Trump disbanded two outside advisory panels that helped the BLS produce its statistics. Kolko noted that expertise will be hard to replace.A survey of academic economists in March by the Chicago Booth School of Business showed that experts overwhelmingly believed the staff cutbacks at statistical agencies and the elimination of the advisory panels would lead to a "substantial reduction in the reliability of government economic data." Read the original article on Investopedia
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Stock Is Sinking. Trump-Musk Tensions Are Just One Reason Why.
Tesla shares slid Thursday, extending Wednesday's decline. The losses come as reports this week showed sales continued to decline in May across several European countries, and CEO Elon Musk criticized President Trump's signature budget legislation. Recent declines have rolled back some of Tesla's gains after CEO Elon Musk in April said he would spend more time at his (TSLA) shares dropped Thursday, falling for a second straight day, amid a public spat between CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump. The stock was down close to 9% in recent trading, extending Wednesday's decline. It has lost about one-quarter of its value since the start of the year. Musk left his role in the Trump administration last week. He has since attacked the Trump-backed budget reconciliation bill currently working its way through Congress, calling it a "disgusting abomination," and urging the Senate to "kill the bill." Trump at an event with the Chancellor of Germany on Thursday said he is "very disappointed" in Musk's recent attacks. Trump said that Musk "knew everything" about the bill, and claimed that the Tesla CEO only turned against the bill because of the cuts it would make to electric vehicle mandates and programs. "Elon and I had a great relationship," Trump said. "I don't know if we will anymore." "Whatever," Musk said in a post responding to a video of Trump's comments. "Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill." In a separate post, Musk called Trump's assertion that he knew details about the bill "false," and said that members of Congress did not read it before voting on it. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election," Musk posted minutes later. Tesla has also gotten more disappointing sales news in recent days: Auto industry groups in several European countries reported sales data for May showing declines in Tesla sales as overall EV sales rose. Despite the weak sales, some analysts have pointed to the planned launch of fully autonomous Tesla rides in Austin, Texas this month as a coming positive catalyst for the stock. The stock's recent declines have rolled back some of Tesla's gains after Musk in April said he would spend more time at his companies, and left the Trump administration in May. This article has been updated since it was first published to include additional information and reflect more recent share price values. Read the original article on Investopedia Sign in to access your portfolio