Clint Eastwood calls viral interview a fabrication: ‘Completely phony'
Clint Eastwood has released a statement to claim a recent interview with him is a fabrication.
Quotes from an alleged interview with the Oscar-winning actor and director had gone viral over the weekend and were picked up by a number of sites. Yet Eastwood has now said that he never spoke to anyone from German-language Austrian newspaper Kurier.
'A couple of items about me have recently shown up in the news,' Eastwood said in a statement released to Deadline. 'I thought I would set the record straight. I can confirm I've turned 95. I can also confirm that I never gave an interview to an Austrian publication called Kurier, or any other writer in recent weeks, and that the interview is entirely phony.'
Eastwood, who turned 95 over the weekend, had been originally quoted as saying he was in pre-production on his new movie and had rallied against 'an era of remakes and franchises'.
Kurier is based in Vienna and has a circulation of approximately 100,000 copies.
There is no official statement from Kurier or any details on how the interview was assembled.
Eastwood's most recent film Juror #2, which starred Nicholas Hoult, was released at the end of last year with no confirmed word on what his next film will be. In an interview to support the film with the Metrograph magazine, he addressed his legacy as a film-maker.
'That would be up to them, to the audiences, to answer,' he said. 'Up to the people on the outside. I just kind of go along. I consider this, again, emotional. It comes upon you. You have a story, you make a movie of it. You have to just go for it. If you think too much about how it happened you might ruin it. I go back and look at films I've made, and I could easily ask, 'Why the heck did I make this?' I don't remember! It might have been a long time ago.'
Eastwood had recently paid tribute to co-star Gene Hackman after Hackman's death in February. 'There was no finer actor than Gene,' he said. 'Intense and instinctive. Never a false note.' He added: 'He was also a dear friend whom I will miss very much.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Angelina turns 50: A look at her most stylish moments
Angelina Jolie is one of those rarities in Hollywood: an actress who doesn't work with a stylist. Speaking to Vogue in 2023, she said: 'There are more books than clothes in my closet. I'm not someone who likes clothes to consume her life. And I don't love the idea of being 'influenced'.' Yet there's no denying that her own look has been influential throughout her three-decades-long time in the spotlight. After all, who doesn't remember those Lara Croft hot pants and plaits? Or that much-memed right leg? A nepo-baby before the term was coined, Jolie's reputation for having a devil-may-care approach to fashion was evident from her first-ever red carpet appearance. Joining her father, the actor Jon Voight, at the 1986 Academy Awards, the 10 year old wore a white lace dress with oversized shoulders, which she accessorised with lots of pearl necklaces – a clear nod to the pop star of the moment, Madonna. But it would be her gothic approach to fashion in the late 1990s and early 2000s, when she first started making waves in her acting career, that would really cement her fame as well as her reputation as the 'bad girl' of Hollywood – something that would endure right up until she got together with her now ex-husband Brad Pitt on the set of 2004's Mr and Mrs Smith. In 2000, she won the Best Supporting Actress Oscar for her role in Girl, Interrupted, a coming of age story set in a women's mental institution in the 1960s which was inspired by real events. Her character, Lisa, is very much the scene-stealing antagonist of the film, which cast her opposite Winona Ryder (who herself sports a very iconic pixie crop). To collect her award, she chose a Morticia Addams-esque long-sleeve black dress by Marc Bouwer, with her long hair dyed matching black. Not very Oscars glam. Off-camera and off the red carpet, she continued to play up that gothic appeal, most famously perhaps during her 2000 wedding to fellow actor Billy Bob Thornton. Rather than an ivory dress, she wore a simple tank top, jeans and boots – casual, but not overly shocking. But that's before you factor in her choice of jewellery: a necklace with a vial of her husband's blood. Then came her undisputed bombshell era: kickstarted of course by her Amazonian appearance in 2001's Lara Croft, when she became the fantasy for teenage boys around the world thanks to her short-shorts, vest top and holsters – not to mention that epic plait. By the early 2010s, and perhaps as a way to mitigate the bad press she had surrounding being potentially the 'other woman' in Pitt and ex-wife Jennifer Aniston's relationship, Jolie's style undoubtedly became more refined – and PC. Case in point was the Atelier Versace dress she chose for their 2014 wedding, which featured hand-embroidered drawings done by their six children. On the red carpet, she began to reference Old Hollywood more and more, often turning to her wedding dress designer, Atelier Versace. Of particular note was the ivory satin gown from the fashion house that she wore to the 2012 Golden Globes, which featured a gathered waist and red accents. In many ways, it is symbolic of the signature glamazon Jolie look from the period. Of course, one of her most famous red carpet moments occurred the same year, when she posed at the 2012 Academy Awards wearing a black velvet Versace gown with a thigh-high split, showcasing the entirety of her right leg. Cue endless memes. In the mid 2010s, Jolie had refined her signature style further, entering her elder stateswoman mode. Case in point was the elegant Ralph and Russo skirt suit she wore to collect her Honorary Dame Grand Cross of the Most Distinguished Order of St Michael and St George from the late Queen in 2014. In many ways, it was a foreshadowing of the wardrobe she would wear to play opera singer Maria Callas, in Maria, released at the beginning of this year. Another influential fashion moment, the film's costume designer Massimo Cantini Parrini painstakingly created over 60 looks for the actress, with the influence being felt on the high street too, in what Vogue dubbed 'Callas-core'. As a 50-year-old mother of six, Jolie has now honed a signature pulled-together off-duty look, one that firmly puts her in the 'quiet luxury' camp. Staples of her wardrobe today include sophisticated coats, coordinated trouser suits and statement tote bags, usually by Yves Saint Laurent. She's also got a penchant for oversized sunglasses and elegant heeled pumps, with Christian Louboutin Dolly 75s a regular in her wardrobe. She's even launched her own fashion brand, Atelier Jolie, which makes quiet luxury separates. What does the future hold? Undoubtedly more glamour, more elegance, and hopefully a glimpse of that gothic past…
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
The good, the bad and the ugly: Clint Eastwood's interview debacle reveals bleak truths about film journalism
It is no surprise that Austrian newspaper Kurier's Clint Eastwood interview went viral over the weekend. An audience with a 95-year-old film legend containing stern words about the current state of cinema was always going to go like a rocket. Particularly during cinema's dregs season: the thin period post Cannes and pre the summer proper, with Mission: Impossible fever fading fast and Lilo & Stitch ruling the box office – a success from which only so many stories can be spun. Further evidence of this thinness comes from a quick scan of the news stories run over the past week in some of the trade magazines – Variety, Hollywood Reporter, Deadline, Screen International – who must keep producing them, regardless of actual material. These include a write-off of an interview in which Michael Cera says he didn't think Jackie Chan knew who he was when they first met, Renée Zellweger revealing that she shed a tear shooting the Bridget Jones film that was released last February and – an exclusive, this – a report that Bill Murray will appear at a film festival in Croatia. Against this backdrop, Eastwood telling younger directors to buck up is, basically, Watergate. Yet the waves the interview made do appear to have come as a surprise to the publication in which it ran. And, in a way, that itself is no surprise, for most of the apparatus of film journalism remains weirdly rooted in a pre-internet era, one in which Google translate doesn't exist and 18 sets of roundtable interviews, conducted over at least a decade, can feasibly be spun into a new article – which Kurier's defence of the piece does indeed suggest is kind of OK. What the paper does regret, according to its statement, is suggesting it was an 'interview' rather than a 'birthday profile', implying that the writer, Elisabeth Sereda, mis-sold them her access – which is why theywill no longer be working with her. Perhaps this is true? If so, it raises some further questions. Interviews of this nature generally involve considerably more back and forth (say 150 emails) between a commissioning editor, writer, picture editors, film publicist, personal publicist and more. Assuming none of these happened, it still feels concerning that the paper never confirmed when, where or how Sereda spoke to such a major, reticent – and elderly – star. More confusingly, Kurier's statement also describes its writer's approach to quote-gathering as basically kosher, and further touts her credentials. Sereda, it says, 'has been in the Hollywood business for decades, conducting interviews with the biggest stars … Her closeness to them is undoubtedly well known. 'This is also due, among other things, to the fact that Sereda is a member of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, the association that awards the Golden Globes and reports from Hollywood for international media.' The Hollywood Foreign Press is a defunct organisation, disbanded in 2023 after decades of accusations of unprofessionalism, bribery and misconduct by some of its members – international showbiz writers of hazy credentials and uncertain identity. The Golden Globes, which it did indeed dish out, were so discredited that they were boycotted by publicists, stars and broadcasters, and the association then had to issue multiple apologies for its lack of transparency and diversity (not a single black writer), before relaunching a couple of years ago. Writers such as Sereda and many of the original members of the HFPA – like many film journalists, many of them good reporters of integrity and genuine expertise – rely to a greater or lesser extent on access granted at film festivals. This access is brief, chaotic and non-exclusive. When I worked for another publication 20-odd years ago, I remember being at such roundtables involving one or two stars and perhaps a dozen sharp-elbowed correspondents from countries across the world. After a bruising 20 minutes, you would be left with a challenging tombola of quotes about, perhaps, an especially niche style of cinematography, whether the star might one day visit Latvia and a lot of bland waffle about how marvellous the director was. Getting a question of your own in was rare. Getting a good piece out of the results was rarer. It is possible to make a living on such access, if you trot around all the festivals – Sundance, Berlin, Cannes, Venice, Toronto – and remain in favour with a couple of publications, and, most crucially, the publicists. A certain level of sycophancy is essential – and, happily, appears to be far from a stretch for many of the writers. Sereda's Instagram page, for instance, is populated by wide-smiled selfies of her with assorted A-listers. These are posted in the event of a new interview, a new movie or their death. Such unabashed celeb-worship is absolutely common practice in film journalism, even among the most respected Hollywood pundits. I remember one brilliant writer who would post a selfie with a recently deceased star with such speed after news broke of their death that the gesture morphed from the morbid into the faintly suspicious. Could it be that they were the common factor behind all these tragedies? Thick skins, malleable standards and dribble: this is how a lot of this world works. Luckily, the Guardian is a publication with sufficient leverage that it does not need to rely on roundtable access – and would generally not accept it, unless for background, ahead of a 1:1. But much of the access that we are often offered and the circumstances of it is, still, sausage factory stuff: you probably don't want to know. Still: that roundtables persist is evidence of how much the film industry remains wedded to print publicity. Twenty years ago, the same ragbag quotes appearing in an Austrian broadsheet as well as, say, a Swedish film quarterly and an Australian celebrity magazine, would have gone unnoticed. Today, it makes much less sense, serving only to compress the schedules of stars, who are of course just as culpable as those they employ in agreeing to them. But despite the primacy of streamers and, more broadly, the whole tech-revolution of the past two decades, online versions of articles are of much less concern to publicists than the print version. Why? Because clients need presenting with something concrete, a hard glossy copy with a pre-approved photo of themselves on the cover – even if this is seen by perhaps 100th of the people who will read it online. That this is still the case is something I find very curious. Yet maybe the clients are changing. It was, after all, none other than Eastwood himself who first flagged the dodginess of the Kurier article. He had, in fact, said all those things. He just hadn't said them recently, or knowingly given an audience to that writer, for that newspaper. A new interview with him would be gold-dust because Eastwood did not do press for his most recent movie, Juror #2, which went straight to streaming in the US, after rumours of a rift between the director and the incoming head of studio Warner, David Zaslav (Eastwood didn't even show up to the premiere). Was Eastwood – now shooting his new movie – concerned these historic quotes would be interpreted as a broadside against him? Or is he, in his 10th decade, simply paying more attention than the rest of us?
Scottish Sun
3 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Clint Eastwood blasts Hollywood in bombshell interview… that he NEVER gave: Star slams Austrian paper over ‘phoney' Q&A
The paper has now cut all ties with the article's writer after the actor's stern response to the interview GOOD, BAD & BS Clint Eastwood blasts Hollywood in bombshell interview… that he NEVER gave: Star slams Austrian paper over 'phoney' Q&A Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) CLINT Eastwood has hit out at an Austrian newspaper for publishing a bombshell interview he claims he never even gave. The 95-year-old acting icon was directly quoted bashing Hollywood in the article - despite him now labelling the Q&A as "phoney". Sign up for the Entertainment newsletter Sign up 6 Clint Eastwood, 95, has hit out at the Austrian newspaper for the 'phoney' Q&A Credit: Getty 6 Eastwood in The Good, the Bad and the Ugly in 1966 Credit: Alamy 6 The supposed interview was published in Kurier, a Vienna-based paper with around 100,000 readers Credit: Worldshop Despite his age meaning his career on the big screen has all but finished, Eastwood's name was brought up again after his comments on the state of the film industry went viral. Kurier, a Vienna-based paper with around 100,000 readers, published a major Q&A spread with the Dirty Harry star on Friday. The main takeaway from the supposed interview was just how much Eastwood despised how reliant Hollywood has become on sequels and franchises. One of Eastwood's responses to a journalist's question said: 'I long for the good old days when screenwriters wrote movies like Casablanca in small bungalows on the studio lot. read more in Clint Eastwood SAD LOSS What we know about Clint Eastwood's late partner Christina Sandera "When everyone had a new idea. 'We live in an era of remakes and franchises. I've shot sequels three times, but I haven't been interested in that for a long while. "My philosophy is: do something new or stay at home.' The answer stirred up days of debates from film buffs who argued both sides of the fence. But Eastwood soon chimed in on the argument himself as he blasted the original interview as 'entirely phony". He claims he has never given those comments to Kurier and hasn't been interviewed by anyone in the past few weeks. Clint Eastwood attends the 20th Annual AFI awards The paper's editor has since conceded the quotes were in fact not from a formal interview with Eastwood who turned 95 last month. Instead, they were repackaged by a writer who had spoken to the actor at more than a dozen media events in the past. Elisabeth Sereda, a US-based Austrian journalist, had 'convincingly explained" to editor Martin Gebhart that her and Eastwood have met on 18 occasions at round table media events. This meant the quotes were a compilation of statements made by the actor over the years. But Gebhart did admit that the way the article was presented as a tell-it-all exclusive chat went against his quality standards. He then said he will no longer work with the Sereda as of a result. The story has also since been withdrawn from the paper's website entirely. Gebhart said: 'Even though no quotes were fabricated, the interviews are documented, and the accusation of fabrication can be refuted, we will no longer work with the author in the future." Michael Schumacher fake AI interview torment MICHAEL Schumacher's family were paid £170,000 in compensation after a magazine published a fake AI-generated interview with the F1 racing legend. German publication Die Aktuelle claimed last April to have secured a 'world exclusive' with the severely injured Ferrari great – who has not been seen in public since his 2013 skiing accident. In a two-page spread, promoted with a picture of Schumacher, it claimed the seven-time F1 champ had said 'My life has totally changed'. It promised it was not a story based on "half-sentences from friends" but it's "the incredible interview" with the F1 star with "redeeming answers to the most burning questions that the whole world has been asking for so long." The rest of the article was written in Q&A form, with an AI chatbot designed to mimic celebrities making up the answers Michael would supposedly give. The bot even spoke about the racing hero's physical condition, family and future recovery prospects. Die Aktuelle only admitted the quotes, which used graphic details to describe his injuries, were written by a chatbot in a note on the inside pages. The shameless interview just goes to show how "poisoned" bots can be weaponised, an expert warned. Sereda is known for publishing celebrity based articles for Kurier and other Austrian media. She is also a member of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association and listed as a voting member on the website of the Golden Globes. After Eastwood's admission, Jude Law's team also made similar comments on Sereda's work. She had published an interview claiming to be from the English actor earlier this year. Sources close to Law said no interview has ever taken place and that the only time those direct quotes would have been made would have been at a press conference at the Toronto international film festival last year. Eastwood is still working as a director with his most recent movie being Juror #2 which was released in November last year. He has long been an influential figure in Hollywood for bis longevity and ability. Since breaking through with the 1964 film of A Fistful of Dollars, Eastwood has continued as a leading man for decades. He has even received the ultimate honour as a director through two Academy Award's for best director with 1992's Unforgiven and Million Dollar Baby in 2005. 6 Eastwood in 2019 Credit: Getty 6 The acting legend in Dirty Harry Credit: Getty
