Could the new pope come from a non-Catholic country?
Warning: This story spoils the ending of the film Conclave
Italian cardinals have always been major players in the conclave, a secretive, centuries-old meeting in the Sistine Chapel to elect a new pope.
In the Oscar-winning film Conclave, released last year, they face off against formidable candidates from the Americas and Africa.
But the cardinal elected as pope in the movie defies expectations — he was not a fancied contender and comes from a Muslim-majority country.
This fictional scenario raises the real-life question: Could the late Pope Francis's replacement be chosen from a country where Catholics are not the majority?
A distinctive conclave
Cardinals depart the Basilica of Saint Mary Major after visiting the tomb of the late Pope Francis.
(
Reuters: Guglielmo Mangiapane
)
The actual conclave will begin in Rome on Wednesday and the new pope will be chosen by eligible cardinals from the College of Cardinals.
There are 252 cardinals, but only 135 of those are cardinal electors, meaning they are under the age of 80 so can vote — and be elected pope.
Two cardinals have confirmed they will not attend conclave because of health reasons, so 133 cardinals will take part.
Europe has 52 cardinal electors this time, Asia 23, Africa 17, South America 17 and North America 16, while Oceania and Central America have four cardinal electors each.
Australian Catholic University associate professor Joel Hodge said this conclave was distinctive because there were more cardinal electors from countries outside of Europe than in previous conclaves.
"There's still a strong European presence, but we now have countries that have never had cardinals before, for example, Timor-Leste in our region of South-East Asia has a cardinal for the first time," he said.
"He'll be participating in the election of a pope for the first time. That's historic."
Underdogs of the underdogs?
Philippines Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle (left) with compatriot Ricardo Vidal in Rome.
(
Reuters: Max Rossi
)
The papacy has historically been held by cardinals from countries with a Catholic majority.
Cardinals from non-European regions, like Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle from the Philippines,
But what about cardinals from non-European and non-Catholic-majority countries? Are they the underdogs of the underdogs?
Dr Hodge said it was "certainly possible" the next pope could come from a country where Catholics were not the majority.
"It really just depends on the type of person, their theology, their spirituality, and their style of leadership."
Joel Hodge says it is possible a pope from a non-Catholic-majority country could be elected.
(
Supplied: Australian Catholic University
)
During the conclave, Dr Hodge said "geopolitics would certainly be on the minds of the cardinals".
"The person who becomes pope needs to be able to manage very complex relations across the world."
Pope Francis selected cardinals from nations that were not predominantly Catholic, like Mongolia with a very small Catholic population, explained Dr Hodge.
But the likelihood of the next pope coming from a non-Catholic-majority country was unclear, Dr Hodge added.
"You never know with a conclave, because, as the Italian saying goes, 'You enter the conclave as pope, and you come out as cardinal.'"
That quote advises against assuming an outcome of the conclave, stressing that the election is not a matter of popularity, but a process to select Christ's representative on Earth.
"Sometimes, the favourite does get elected, or one of the frontrunners succeeds. Other times, there are surprises. So, we'll have to wait and see," said Dr Hodge.
Becoming pope a 'foolish' dream
Pope Francis visited Indonesia in September 2024.
(
Reuters: Guglielmo Magiapane
)
After visiting Indonesia in 2024, Pope Francis noted that countries where Catholics were not dominant did not necessarily lack a vibrant church presence.
"In Indonesia, only about 10 per cent of the population is Christian, and just 3 per cent of them are Catholic, a minority," Pope Francis told a gathering in Vatican City in 2024.
"But what I found was a lively and dynamic church, capable of sustaining itself and spreading God's goodness in a country with an incredibly diverse culture, while at the same time being home to the world's largest Muslim population," he said.
Indonesia's cardinal, Ignatius Suharyo Hardjoatmodjo, is a cardinal elector who will attend the conclave.
Not only is he a non-European, like Cardinal Tagle of the Philippines, Cardinal Hardjoatmodjo also comes from a non-Catholic-majority country.
Ignatius Suharyo Hardjoatmodjo is a cardinal from Indonesia, the most populated Muslim country in the world.
(
Antara Foto: Rivan Awal
)
The name of this 74-year-old has barely been publicly mentioned ahead of the gathering — perhaps because he has never aspired to become pope, despite being known for his outspoken and progressive stance in Indonesia.
When the Indonesian government planned to hand out mining permits to religious organisations, Cardinal Hardjoatmodjo, who is the archbishop of Jakarta, firmly rejected the idea, citing church law that prohibits mixing religion with business.
"I'm not asking for mining permits or permission to build places of worship, I just want the state to do its job properly," he said at the time.
On another occasion, Cardinal Hardjoatmodjo said that "being chosen as pope is not about ambition, nor is it a career that keeps advancing — it is quite the opposite".
"If someone dreams of becoming pope, then, forgive me for saying this, but they are foolish," Cardinal Hardjoatmodjo told reporters in Jakarta.
Jakarta Archdiocese secretary Adi Prasojo (left) with Cardinal Hardjoatmodjo.
(
Supplied: Adi Prasojo
)
Archdiocese of Jakarta secretary Vincentius Adi Prasojo, who has served alongside Cardinal Hardjoatmodjo for the past 12 years, said the cardinal had no ambition for power.
"I can assure you that there is only one thing he thinks about, and that is serving the church … he has no mission for power or position, and he only cares about serving the people," Mr Prasojo, who is visiting the Vatican prior to the conclave, told ABC.
But since anything can happen in the meeting, Mr Prasojo said Cardinal Hardjoatmodjo would "accept it as an act of obedience" if chosen as pope.
Cardinal Charles Maung Bo, the archbishop of Yangon, Myanmar, a country where the majority of the population practices Buddhism.
(
AFP: Sai Aung Main
)
Also from a non-Catholic-majority country, Cardinal Charles Maung Bo of Myanmar, a Buddhist-majority country, has been touted as a possible candidate for the top job, and is considered to have a better chance in the papal election than Cardinal Hardjoatmodjo.
However, ACU's Dr Hodge explained that Cardinal Maung Bo's election was "probably unlikely".
"But he's had to show political, spiritual, and moral leadership in a very difficult situation in Myanmar, under civil conflict and military government and all that kind of thing," he said.
"So, he's an impressive person and someone who has had to manage and live in a very difficult situation, providing faith, spiritual guidance, and moral guidance."
'A lot of work to be done'
Some commentators expect this conclave to last more than two days, as finding a successor to Pope Francis is not an easy task.
(
AP: Andrew Medichini
)
The last two conclaves ended within two days, when one candidate received two-thirds of the vote.
The longest conclave lasted almost three years to elect a successor to Pope Clement IV, beginning in November 1268 and ending in September 1271.
Whatever the case, Mr Prasojo said the conclave could run for some time.
"I think this conclave seems likely to be longer than usual because it seems like there are no dominant candidates … what the media has reported are just speculations," he said.
And whoever walks out of that room as the new pope has a long list of issues to address.
"Around church reform, particularly financial reform, safeguarding children, addressing the sexual abuse crisis, and investigating those crimes — these are ongoing issues," said Mr Hodge.
"There's still a lot of work to be done in these areas around the world, and the Vatican has to take the lead."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
5 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Russia makes flurry of battlefield gains as Zelensky vows to keep land Putin covets
London: Russian forces have gained ground in eastern Ukraine in a rapid advance ahead of talks on Friday about a possible ceasefire, as Russian President Vladimir Putin demands territory in any deal with US President Donald Trump. Russian soldiers have seized areas around the Ukrainian city of Dobropillya and are seeking greater control over a major highway that leads to the west, presenting a serious threat after a long standstill between the two sides. The moves raise the stakes in Trump's meeting with Putin in Alaska on Friday after the Russian leader chose to intensify the war in recent weeks after the US president set a series of shifting deadlines for a peace deal. Russia has bombarded Ukrainian cities with missiles and drones while also trying to pierce the Ukrainian defences along the front line in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Putin wants to gain in the negotiations on Friday. Trump has alarmed European leaders with his suggestion of 'land-swapping' in his talks with Putin, triggering a warning from European Union leaders on Tuesday against giving up territory. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who has not been invited to the Alaska summit, insisted on Tuesday that he would not trade away the Donbas region, which covers Donetsk and Luhansk. 'We see that the Russian army is not preparing to end the war,' Zelensky said in a statement. 'On the contrary, they are making movements that indicate preparations for new offensive operations. In such circumstances, it is important that the unity of the world is not threatened.'

The Age
5 minutes ago
- The Age
Russia makes flurry of battlefield gains as Zelensky vows to keep land Putin covets
London: Russian forces have gained ground in eastern Ukraine in a rapid advance ahead of talks on Friday about a possible ceasefire, as Russian President Vladimir Putin demands territory in any deal with US President Donald Trump. Russian soldiers have seized areas around the Ukrainian city of Dobropillya and are seeking greater control over a major highway that leads to the west, presenting a serious threat after a long standstill between the two sides. The moves raise the stakes in Trump's meeting with Putin in Alaska on Friday after the Russian leader chose to intensify the war in recent weeks after the US president set a series of shifting deadlines for a peace deal. Russia has bombarded Ukrainian cities with missiles and drones while also trying to pierce the Ukrainian defences along the front line in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Putin wants to gain in the negotiations on Friday. Trump has alarmed European leaders with his suggestion of 'land-swapping' in his talks with Putin, triggering a warning from European Union leaders on Tuesday against giving up territory. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who has not been invited to the Alaska summit, insisted on Tuesday that he would not trade away the Donbas region, which covers Donetsk and Luhansk. 'We see that the Russian army is not preparing to end the war,' Zelensky said in a statement. 'On the contrary, they are making movements that indicate preparations for new offensive operations. In such circumstances, it is important that the unity of the world is not threatened.'


The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
Australia risks US ire with Palestine recognition move
A decision to announce Palestinian recognition after its allies might have allowed Australia to escape backlash from the US. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese revealed Australia will join the UK, Canada and France in recognising Palestinian statehood at a United Nations General Assembly meeting in September, after mounting pressure to alleviate civilian suffering in Gaza. The US has long been one of Australia's most important allies, but for decades it has remained staunchly opposed to the recognition of Palestine. While some have argued Australia's decision to break from the US could imperil the bilateral relationship, Flinders University international relations lecturer Jessica Genauer says the federal government's diplomatic calculus has helped dampen any impact. "Because Australia waited until other important countries all said they're planning to recognise Palestine ... I don't think it will be singled out by the US," Dr Genauer told AAP. "The Trump administration is opposed to countries recognising Palestine, but I think that they would put Australia in with a whole group of other countries and it wouldn't particularly be detrimental to Australia's relationship." Since US President Donald Trump began his second term, the Labor government has intentionally opted not to align too closely with his policy directions. Instead, Australia has worked closely with European nations and other partners to ensure it is part of a strong network of middle powers. This approach has been used to navigate a response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and now with Palestinian recognition, Dr Genauer said. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said Australia's announcement on statehood was "disrespectful" of its relationship with the US and could jeopardise peace as any ceasefire would be brokered by America. But the prime minister defended his decision. "President Trump has made it very clear he wants to see peace in the region. Australia wants to see peace in the region," he said. "We make our sovereign decisions as a nation state in Australia's national interest and we are aligning ourselves with like-minded countries." While recognising Palestine would not immediately change anything for the two million people in Gaza the UN projects are facing severe food insecurity, Dr Genauer said the move was important because it showed countries were looking for any possible way to shift the situation. More than 140 out of the 193 United Nations member states already recognise Palestine, but the addition of Australia - a strong middle power - alongside the UK and France, which have veto power in the UN Security Council, will add significant pressure. "The United States is now quite isolated in their position blocking that recognition," she said. A decision to announce Palestinian recognition after its allies might have allowed Australia to escape backlash from the US. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese revealed Australia will join the UK, Canada and France in recognising Palestinian statehood at a United Nations General Assembly meeting in September, after mounting pressure to alleviate civilian suffering in Gaza. The US has long been one of Australia's most important allies, but for decades it has remained staunchly opposed to the recognition of Palestine. While some have argued Australia's decision to break from the US could imperil the bilateral relationship, Flinders University international relations lecturer Jessica Genauer says the federal government's diplomatic calculus has helped dampen any impact. "Because Australia waited until other important countries all said they're planning to recognise Palestine ... I don't think it will be singled out by the US," Dr Genauer told AAP. "The Trump administration is opposed to countries recognising Palestine, but I think that they would put Australia in with a whole group of other countries and it wouldn't particularly be detrimental to Australia's relationship." Since US President Donald Trump began his second term, the Labor government has intentionally opted not to align too closely with his policy directions. Instead, Australia has worked closely with European nations and other partners to ensure it is part of a strong network of middle powers. This approach has been used to navigate a response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and now with Palestinian recognition, Dr Genauer said. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said Australia's announcement on statehood was "disrespectful" of its relationship with the US and could jeopardise peace as any ceasefire would be brokered by America. But the prime minister defended his decision. "President Trump has made it very clear he wants to see peace in the region. Australia wants to see peace in the region," he said. "We make our sovereign decisions as a nation state in Australia's national interest and we are aligning ourselves with like-minded countries." While recognising Palestine would not immediately change anything for the two million people in Gaza the UN projects are facing severe food insecurity, Dr Genauer said the move was important because it showed countries were looking for any possible way to shift the situation. More than 140 out of the 193 United Nations member states already recognise Palestine, but the addition of Australia - a strong middle power - alongside the UK and France, which have veto power in the UN Security Council, will add significant pressure. "The United States is now quite isolated in their position blocking that recognition," she said. A decision to announce Palestinian recognition after its allies might have allowed Australia to escape backlash from the US. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese revealed Australia will join the UK, Canada and France in recognising Palestinian statehood at a United Nations General Assembly meeting in September, after mounting pressure to alleviate civilian suffering in Gaza. The US has long been one of Australia's most important allies, but for decades it has remained staunchly opposed to the recognition of Palestine. While some have argued Australia's decision to break from the US could imperil the bilateral relationship, Flinders University international relations lecturer Jessica Genauer says the federal government's diplomatic calculus has helped dampen any impact. "Because Australia waited until other important countries all said they're planning to recognise Palestine ... I don't think it will be singled out by the US," Dr Genauer told AAP. "The Trump administration is opposed to countries recognising Palestine, but I think that they would put Australia in with a whole group of other countries and it wouldn't particularly be detrimental to Australia's relationship." Since US President Donald Trump began his second term, the Labor government has intentionally opted not to align too closely with his policy directions. Instead, Australia has worked closely with European nations and other partners to ensure it is part of a strong network of middle powers. This approach has been used to navigate a response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and now with Palestinian recognition, Dr Genauer said. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said Australia's announcement on statehood was "disrespectful" of its relationship with the US and could jeopardise peace as any ceasefire would be brokered by America. But the prime minister defended his decision. "President Trump has made it very clear he wants to see peace in the region. Australia wants to see peace in the region," he said. "We make our sovereign decisions as a nation state in Australia's national interest and we are aligning ourselves with like-minded countries." While recognising Palestine would not immediately change anything for the two million people in Gaza the UN projects are facing severe food insecurity, Dr Genauer said the move was important because it showed countries were looking for any possible way to shift the situation. More than 140 out of the 193 United Nations member states already recognise Palestine, but the addition of Australia - a strong middle power - alongside the UK and France, which have veto power in the UN Security Council, will add significant pressure. "The United States is now quite isolated in their position blocking that recognition," she said. A decision to announce Palestinian recognition after its allies might have allowed Australia to escape backlash from the US. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese revealed Australia will join the UK, Canada and France in recognising Palestinian statehood at a United Nations General Assembly meeting in September, after mounting pressure to alleviate civilian suffering in Gaza. The US has long been one of Australia's most important allies, but for decades it has remained staunchly opposed to the recognition of Palestine. While some have argued Australia's decision to break from the US could imperil the bilateral relationship, Flinders University international relations lecturer Jessica Genauer says the federal government's diplomatic calculus has helped dampen any impact. "Because Australia waited until other important countries all said they're planning to recognise Palestine ... I don't think it will be singled out by the US," Dr Genauer told AAP. "The Trump administration is opposed to countries recognising Palestine, but I think that they would put Australia in with a whole group of other countries and it wouldn't particularly be detrimental to Australia's relationship." Since US President Donald Trump began his second term, the Labor government has intentionally opted not to align too closely with his policy directions. Instead, Australia has worked closely with European nations and other partners to ensure it is part of a strong network of middle powers. This approach has been used to navigate a response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and now with Palestinian recognition, Dr Genauer said. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said Australia's announcement on statehood was "disrespectful" of its relationship with the US and could jeopardise peace as any ceasefire would be brokered by America. But the prime minister defended his decision. "President Trump has made it very clear he wants to see peace in the region. Australia wants to see peace in the region," he said. "We make our sovereign decisions as a nation state in Australia's national interest and we are aligning ourselves with like-minded countries." While recognising Palestine would not immediately change anything for the two million people in Gaza the UN projects are facing severe food insecurity, Dr Genauer said the move was important because it showed countries were looking for any possible way to shift the situation. More than 140 out of the 193 United Nations member states already recognise Palestine, but the addition of Australia - a strong middle power - alongside the UK and France, which have veto power in the UN Security Council, will add significant pressure. "The United States is now quite isolated in their position blocking that recognition," she said.