logo
Cruelty-free 55p hair growth tablets that work in 'weeks'

Cruelty-free 55p hair growth tablets that work in 'weeks'

Daily Mirror14 hours ago

Shoppers can get 25% off the capsules that aim to give men and women stronger and thicker hair
Whether it's due to ageing, stress, menopause, post-partum or simply genetics, hair loss and thinning is a concern that affects many. While numerous products, supplements and treatments aimed at tackling hair loss can be pricey, consumers have been singing the praises of an award-winning practitioner-grade supplement that costs a mere 55p per day, and users say they 'couldn't believe' the transformation it caused.
Dr Vegan's Hair Saviour is a plant-based, scientifically supported supplement that blends 14 key ingredients to foster stronger and healthier hair. Concocted by nutritionists, the capsules incorporate clinically tested components such as MSM, Biotin, Saw Palmetto, Zinc, Selenium, Silica and the star ingredient AnaGain.
AnaGain, derived from pea sprouts, is rich in phytonutrients, which have been demonstrated to aid hair growth and promote fuller, thicker locks. A clinical trial of this ingredient revealed a 78% surge in the ratio of healthy hair follicles over a three-month period.
Appropriate for both men and women, these twice-daily capsules also aim to enhance scalp health and root vitality, making them a fantastic all-rounder. The formula is 100% vegan, cruelty-free, and devoid of synthetic additives, hence they're perfect for individuals seeking to nourish their hair without ingesting anything unnecessary. However, it's worth mentioning that those with underlying health issues should seek professional advice before use, as reported by the Manchester Evening News.
There are similar products on the market, such as UK-based supplement brand Hairburst's collagen and biotin-infused formula. Alternatively, Aussie brand JSHealth Hair + Energy is priced at £24.99 for a month's supply and boasts kelp, iodine, and zinc as its key ingredients for luscious locks.
Dr Vegan claims that Hair Saviour users can expect to see significant improvements in hair thickness, less shedding, and new hair growth within eight to 12 weeks of consistent use. However, numerous customers have reported experiencing noticeable changes much sooner than anticipated.
Lisa explained: "I've only been taking it for five weeks and I can see a difference already. My hair is in much better condition, my nails have grown, my eyebrows have grown as have my eyelashes. I am so impressed."
Emma shared her journey from chemically damaged tresses to flowing locks: "I had a hair disaster in 2020/21 when I decided to go blonde and I never thought I would ever get my hair back to a good condition. I started Hair Saviour at the end of January and within a month my hair felt different. Soft, shiny hair was making a return, my hairdresser couldn't believe how much it had grown between appointments. I am so thrilled to have healthy, happy hair again and at 53 years old."
Women aren't the only ones celebrating their success, with James sharing: "I was a bit sceptical at the start, but after three months, I really noticed an improvement in thickness and general appearance. Have been taking it for well over a year now and would definitely recommend."
It's worth noting that results seem to vary, as one customer commented: "I've been using this product for well over six months now and to be honest I really can't see any improvement in the volume or thickness of my hair. Saying that, my hairdresser has noticed a difference? But my hair still looks the same to me. I still have it coloured and perhaps this doesn't help. I'll continue to use it until the end of the year and if I still feel the same."
Rebecca, who struggles with autoimmune-related hair thinning, was delighted by the improvements, added: "I have taken Hair Saviour for a month now and my hair is already feeling smoother, sleeker, less frizzy and I can go much longer between washes without it getting greasy. With autoimmune illnesses and related meds, my hair is usually fine, brittle and falling out - genuinely feel this isn't the case anymore. Can't praise it enough."
Dr Vegan's Hair Saviour costs £25.99 for a month's supply with a recommended intake of two capsules a day, either jointly or spread throughout the morning, afternoon or evening. Shoppers can use the discount code SAVIOUR25 to receive 25% off, knocking down the price to £19.50, which works out at 65p a day.
For optimal results, a three-month supply is recommended, which is currently on offer for £52.50, down from £69.99 with the use of the code, working out at an average of 58p per day. However, the most cost-effective method is through a rolling subscription, which offers an additional 15% saving, bringing the first month's cost down to £16.57, or 55p a day.
Supplements aren't the only answer to hair loss, as there are also topical treatments available on the high street that target hair thinning and loss. The Philip Kingsley Density Hair and Scalp Preserving Collection is worth £80 and has been reduced to £57.60 at LookFantastic. This set includes scalp drops and a scalp foam containing organic pea sprout extract, similar to Dr Vegan, that's designed to visibly thicken hair strands and add a glossy shine.
Alternatively, Hair + Me - an offshoot of the brand to Skin + Me - offers The Drops for hair growth, available on a subscription basis starting from £14.99, down from £34.99. These drops claim to 'reverse loss', 'stop thinning' and 'restore density'. For those in search of a plant-based addition to their hair care regimen, Dr Vegan's Hair Saviour could be the answer.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'I'm getting to know a new version of myself' - Stewart opens up on double diagnosis
'I'm getting to know a new version of myself' - Stewart opens up on double diagnosis

BBC News

time16 minutes ago

  • BBC News

'I'm getting to know a new version of myself' - Stewart opens up on double diagnosis

Scotland flanker Alex Stewart "didn't recognise the person in the mirror" before two life-changing diagnoses earlier this 21-year-old, who has 11 caps to her name, was diagnosed with both Type 1 Diabetes and Coeliac Disease during this year's Women's Six Nations after severe "exhaustion and low moods which didn't add up"."It was a tough beginning to the year," Stewart revealed in a candid statement. "I was exhausted all the time, struggling with low moods and some other symptoms that just didn't add up. "I didn't recognise the person I saw in the mirror anymore."After experiencing this for a couple of months and being monitored by the medical team at Scottish Rugby and I was sent for a blood test."Stewart's results provided a a Coeliac Disease diagnosis, which she says she felt "a relief" at receiving. She was named on the bench for the Italy match, then "woke up to a voicemail from my GP asking me to come in urgently"."That's when I found out I could also have Type 1 Diabetes," she added. "It felt like a real blow. Just as I was starting to feel like I was getting a handle on things."With a continuous glucose monitor fitted the next day, Stewart started to get used to her new life, with the support of the medical team.A hypoglycaemic episode during Ireland week confirmed what she didn't want to hear - the tournament was over for while she may not be quite the same person as before, Stewart is learning to see strength in the change."Things have changed a lot," she added. "My days now involve insulin, a gluten-free diet, and constantly checking in with how I'm feeling."She [the old me] didn't have to carb count before every meal and make sure her glucose levels were good before she trained or before a walk after dinner. She didn't have to make all these additional decisions and adjustments to everyday life."But I'm feeling more energetic and healthy than I have in a long time. I'm getting to know a new version of myself."This new version still has the same ambitions. For now, the main goal is making the World Cup squad."I'm just at the start of my journey with diabetes; I've got a lot more to learn and conquer," she added. "But I've got the rest of my life to worry about that, my main focus is being part of Scotland Women's 2025 World Cup squad."

Ethical questions surround the NHS sampling babies' DNA
Ethical questions surround the NHS sampling babies' DNA

The Guardian

time21 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Ethical questions surround the NHS sampling babies' DNA

Re your report (All babies in England to get DNA test to assess risk of diseases within 10 years, 20 June), the NHS plans to test the DNA of all babies to 'assess disease risk', in association with AI, having already sampled 100,000 newborns. The Department of Health and Social Care said that genomics and AI would be used to 'revolutionise prevention' and provide faster diagnoses and an 'early warning signal for disease'. In line with previous predictions, when individuals who submitted to a PCR test (which amplifies genetic material) during Covid-19 had their DNA sold for profit without their consent, infants now face their private, personal, biological data being captured, stored and used by who-knows-what corporations on behalf of the NHS. Not everyone wants to know what potential diseases they might suffer from in the future, especially if there is no known treatment. And for what purposes might it be used, other than 'prediction of disease risk'? Testing of new drugs? Testing of vaccines? Clearly an infant cannot give consent to its DNA being used for these purposes and research on children is unethical unless they stand to benefit. Will parents have the opportunity to give informed consent and can it even be informed if they are unaware of the many potential uses of the material? A global genomics market of $32.65bn in 2023 suggests that this is big business. Genomics England already makes available patients' genomic data to businesses. The association with AI additionally raises the spectre of surveillance in the form of digital IDs, incorporating not only biometric data, such as fingerprints, retinal scans and facial recognition, but potentially even the human genome itself. The NHS data of 57 million patients has already been used to train AI outside of the intended purpose. Will doctors recognise these risks and take steps to inform patients? Or will technology roll on regardless?Janet MenageRetired GP, Llanybydder, Ceredigion Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

A clear set of actions is needed to improve NHS maternity services
A clear set of actions is needed to improve NHS maternity services

The Guardian

time21 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

A clear set of actions is needed to improve NHS maternity services

This inquiry (Wes Streeting announces investigation into 'failing' NHS maternity services, 23 June) needs to get to the heart of why NHS maternity services in England are falling far short of where they need to be. It must leave no stone unturned; there are significant, systemic challenges that affect trusts' ability to consistently deliver high-quality care, deep-rooted issues with morale and culture within maternity services and, as you highlight (Editorial, 23 June), the 'shockingly higher risk of mortality faced by black and Asian mothers' and those from more deprived backgrounds. There have been innumerable recommendations and a regulatory landscape that has become complex, distracting and difficult for trusts to navigate. Trust leaders will welcome proposals to introduce one clear set of actions to improve care across every NHS maternity CorderyDeputy chief executive, NHS Providers After a number of years overseeing maternity and perinatal services at regional level, this proposal frustrates me. The inquiry is purely politically motivated and will not add any value to the women, babies and families affected previously or who may be in the future. Multiple strategic transformation programmes have been commissioned and funded. There is nothing new to discover; obstetricians focus on healthy babies, midwives focus on happy mothers. The medical v social models of care make this an impossible divide, not helped by either group frequently failing to listen and respond effectively to women's concerns. Perhaps when there are sufficient staff to work together as a team, and we place the woman at the centre of care and an effective digital infrastructure is in place to support effective communication, instead of focusing on the either/or approach of 'high risk' v 'low risk', we might get PearsonGatley, Cheshire We do not need another review of failing maternity services. The national service development funding (SDF) for maternity services will be cut from £95m in 2024-25 to just £2m in 2025-26. The patriarchy rules and as a consequence misogyny sets the tone for maternity care. Why else would there be gynaecology beds for women experiencing miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy or termination on a postnatal ward?Zoe GreenLondon Although failures in maternity care are of great concern, rather than simply chasing after the evidence of what failures look like and castigating those accused of 'passing the buck', perhaps Wes Streeting should also look at the 10 best performing units to find out what they do and how they achieve success. That might prove informative and more inspirational than (once again) punishing those that GibbsEmeritus professor of inclusive educational psychology and philosophy, Newcastle University Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store