Smartphone bans have little to no impact on education or bullying, study finds
Last week, new national guidance was issued to schools on restricting mobile phone use.
Primary schools now require a policy to ban the use of and access to mobile phones during the school day, while secondary schools require a policy to restrict mobile phone use during the school day.
€9 million in funding has been allocated for schools to look at a range of storage storage solutions including lockable boxes, cubby holes or drop-off and collection at the school office.
It followed opposition criticism of a plan to fund "phone pouches" across secondary schools.
Researchers from DCU's Anti-Bullying Centre found that the stricter the phone ban, the more students look for ways to subvert it.
A report published on Wednesday looked at existing international research as well as a new Irish study on the experiences of students.
In the DCU report, researchers examined existing international research on smartphone bans and related research on smartphones among children and adolescents.
It finds that that international research is "clearly mixed and somewhat conflicting", with most studies showing that smartphone ban policies can have "little or no impact on education and wellbeing among students" in different countries.
The study finds that no current research can be said to definitively demonstrate that smartphone bans completely protect children and adolescents from online bullying or harmful content.
The Anti-Bullying Centre is also recommending that online safety and digital citizenship education should be a compulsory topic in schools.
Researchers also conducted focus groups in six schools in the east of the country.
Students reported that they were not taught enough in school about online safety and digital citizenship, leading them instead to rely on their peers for guidance and skills.
Some pupils also reported that teachers cause distractions to the learning environment with their phone use.
Others were concerned that smartphone bans may inhibit students from learning resilience and skills for life beyond school.
The report also found that students' voices have not been included in decision-making on smartphone restrictions within schools.
Lead author of the report, Dr Megan Reynolds, said: "Our research shows that we need to listen to students on issues that directly impact them and ensure that they are included in the decision-making process regarding policies on smartphone bans and related issues.
"My hope is that this research will allow adolescents to finally have their voices heard and it will provide an opportunity for more nuanced conversations on smartphones."
Director of DCU Anti-Bullying Centre and Unesco chair on Bullying and Cyberbullying, Professor James O'Higgins Norman, added: "Students have also indicated that there are more pressing issues for students than smartphones in schools that they believe require action, including vaping."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Academic row over 'temperature neutrality' vs 'climate neutrality'
Ireland's national climate objective is set out in the 2015 Climate Act. It is to "pursue and achieve" and make the transition to "a climate resilient, biodiversity rich, environmentally sustainable and climate neutral economy" by the year 2050. There are massive commitments packed into that single sentence, yet it is not really clear what precisely it means. Ireland's climate scientists are now fighting over that issue. The first bit is OK - climate resilience. We are going to have intense rain, more frequent and violent storms, bigger droughts and greater heat stress. Resilience means preparing to live with that. The biodiversity bit is OK too. Protecting nature is not hard to understand and most people would sign up for that. The third term – "environmentally sustainable". Some people think "sustainability" on its own is a bit of a wishy-washy term. But environmental sustainability is now commonly understood. Committees have been set up to focus on it in workplaces and communities all over the country. But that last phrase in the national climate objective, the commitment to a "climate neutral economy". That is a different ball game altogether. There is no agreement about what this entails, and a big academic row has now broken out among climate scientists about it. They are at loggerheads over what exactly climate neutrality is and how it should be measured. On one side is the Climate Change Advisory Council. This is the independent statutory body of climate experts that advises the Government about climate matters. It is their job to set Ireland's so-called "carbon budgets". This involves calculating how much cumulative greenhouse gas emissions need to be restricted to, every five years, if the country is to stay within its legally binding climate commitments. A huge amount of data and information, and some very important judgement calls, are needed for their calculations. The data and information parts are complicated but straightforward enough. Judgement calls however, are never straight forward and can be very controversial, as they are in this case. This week, a group of climate scientists took a major swipe at a most important judgement call recently made by the Climate Change Advisory Council when setting Ireland's carbon budget for the years 2031 to 2035. They accused the council of choosing to define climate neutrality in a way that confers a competitive advantage on Irish agriculture. Their complaint, which is a serious one, is that the Government's key climate advisers are choosing now, for the first time, to substitute "temperature neutrality" for "climate neutrality" when calculating Ireland's carbon budget. It means the Climate Change Advisory Council has told the Government it is OK to only ensure that by 2050 Ireland causes no additional warming to the earth's atmosphere. This is not the same as delivering "net zero" emissions from Ireland by 2050 which is much harder to achieve. The "net zero" approach puts the key emphasis on the quantity of greenhouse gas emissions. It requires, among other things, enormous changes in farming practices, forestry and land use to ensure that absolutely all greenhouse gases still coming out of Ireland by 2050 are re-absorb by natural processes here. Of course, the alternative "temperature neutrality" approach, now favoured by the Climate Change Advisory Council, aims to do everything possible to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. But the difference with this approach is that the ultimate emphasis is to ensure the contribution Ireland is making to rising global temperatures is zero by 2050. The council explained that it considered multiple definitions of what climate neutrality means before deciding that, for Ireland in particular, it had to mean ensuring temperature neutrality. It also explained that in making this judgement call, it reflected on the national climate objective and was guided by the objectives of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. It said the Paris Agreement's long-term temperature goal - which is to limit global warming to well below 2C and pursue efforts to limit warming to 1.5˚C - was also key in its deliberations. Ireland produces nine times more beef and dairy output than it consumes. Because of this it has an unusual greenhouse gas emissions profile, with a far higher share of methane emissions than most other countries. New Zealand is similar. But there are not many other places in the developed world where agriculture is so dominant. Methane from agriculture is an enormously potent greenhouse gas. It is capable of trapping about 85 times more heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide over a short time frame. After about 10 years however, methane dissipates. It breaks down and disappears from the atmosphere. So, its impact on global temperature ceases in a few short years while the warming effect of carbon dioxide carries on for several hundred years. All this means that a country with a huge agriculture sector can have an outsized impact in terms of limiting global warming by doing a relatively small amount of methane reduction. It gives it more wriggle room if the main aim is to eliminate a nation's contribution to rising global temperature. In some circumstances it could even enable a country to ease up on carbon emission efforts in sectors outside of agriculture and still ensure a lower contribution to the global warming potential of its national greenhouse gas mix. It turns out that this is precisely the impact the Climate Change Advisory Council's adaptation of the temperature neutrality target has for Ireland. The council itself has gone to some length to explain and document this impact. It calculated that aiming for temperature neutrality instead of net zero emissions will enable Ireland to emit an additional nine million tonnes of greenhouse gases during the first five years of the next decade. It also said it is entirely up to the Government to decide which sectors of the economy can share in that additional climate mitigation wriggle room, and by how much. Its carbon budget proposal document says all this will be fine "provided the rest of the world follows an emissions pathway that can be considered compliant with the Paris Agreement long term temperature goals". In essence what they are saying is that since most countries in the world do not have as large an agriculture sector as Ireland, or New Zealand, they are unlikely to choose the same temperature neutrality approach. That is because there is no advantage for them in doing so. And if that remains the case then all will be well. It is an approach that has startled the critics who have specifically highlighted the polar opposite argument – that it would be a disaster if every country followed Ireland and adopted temperature neutrality as their climate target. The dissenters insist it would seriously jeopardise the Paris Agreement goal of limiting global warming to 1.5˚C. These criticisms are outlined in a paper published in the journal Environmental Research Letters, by Dr Colm Duffy and David Styles of University of Galway, Dr Róisín Moriarty and Professor Hannah Daly of University College Cork, and Carl Doedens and Malte Meinshausen of the University of Melbourne. They claim that Ireland's approach rewards modest cuts in methane emissions and serves to protect what they describe as "methane emissions privileges" at the expense of poorer nations. In doing so, they say it locks in current inequalities in the global food system. Their paper highlights that, by enabling Ireland to maintain a high share of global agriculture emissions, adopting the temperature neutrality target undermines the global transition to a sustainable and equitable food system. They note too that it dramatically reduces the level of ambition needed for overall greenhouse gas emissions reduction. Many might argue that the additional wriggle room it provides of nine million tonnes of emissions for Ireland spread out over a nine-year period does not sound particularly dramatic. However, if lots of countries were to benefit from the same approach the impact could become dramatic very quickly.
RTÉ News
2 days ago
- RTÉ News
Ireland becoming 'world leader' in early detection cancer research
Ireland is becoming a world leader in early detection cancer research, according to Breakthrough Cancer Research. The charity has praised the work of Irish scientists and researchers in the fight against cancer at the opening of a "powerful and immersive" free exhibition in Dublin. 'Cancer Revolution: Science, Innovation and Hope' was developed by the Science Museum Group in the UK and specially adapted for an Irish audience. It highlights key Irish contributions to cancer science and delves inside the research that's changing lives and the breakthrough technologies shaping the future of treatment. "Ireland is making a huge contribution, from how we can try to detect cancer earlier," said Orla Dolan, CEO of Breakthrough Cancer Research, especially in pioneering new treatments. "The idea that you can replicate the whole of the human body in digital form and test treatments out so you can personalise the treatment," Ms Dolan told RTÉ News. Breakthrough cancer research said that the exhibition "pulls back the curtain" and presents cancer in all its stages in an "understandable way so that people are hopeful about the work going into the future". The exhibition also included stories of personal experiences of cancer, including the case of Caitríona Greene, a mother of two from Donegal, who was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2021. Two weeks after she had a double mastectomoy, Caitriona found out that she was eight weeks pregnant with her second child. "It was a terrifying journey," she said. "I just prayed everyday that the baby would arrive safely and thank God she arrived healthy and strong, perfect and we so blessed and I was able to continue my treatment." Ms Greene documented her cancer journey by taking a picture every day from the first diagnosis to the end of her treatment a year later. The photos are included in the exhibition and show the highs and lows along the way including the birth of her second child. "I'm just reminded of all the love and I'm so grateful to be here today," Ms Greene said. Businessman and former dancer star Michael Flatley has said that his cancer diagnosis made him realise that the disease does not "discriminate". "It doesn't matter if you're a child, it doesn't matter if you're an older person, it doesn't matter if you're middle aged, it doesn't matter what your nationality, country, country, or religion," he said. He was treated for a malignant melanoma in 2003 and two years ago he underwent surgery after diagnosis of an aggressive form of cancer. "It was completely unexpected," Mr Flatley said. "And I remember getting the news, I faced that doctor and I asked my wife to leave the room. It's something that I will never ever forget in my life. It's life-changing," he said. Mr Flatley's cancer story is also featured in the exhibition alongside a flute that brought him joy as he faced cancer for the second time. Other cancer survivors donated a range of items from a knitted doll that a child received during her treatment, to a turban made for a person facing cancer treatment during the Covid-19 pandemic. Walking poles used by a person to complete the 800km of the Camino de Santiago following a cancer diagnosis were also donated. Visitors can also experience close-up the complexity of tumours through a three-metre large scale tumour 3D installation created especially for the exhibition. Immunologist Dr Luke O'Neill said he was hugely impressed by the exhibition. "They've recreated a massive tumor full of the immune cells that are getting in there, trying to kill the tumor using their weapons," he said. "And the immune system has very powerful weapons that it uses to kill viruses, for instance. Now those same weapons are now being mobilised against the tumor," he said. One in two people in Ireland will be diagnosed with cancer in their lifetime. Breakthrough Cancer Research said hard-to-treat cancers like lung, pancreatic, brain, stomach, liver, and oesophageal continue to have poor outcomes. Breakthrough Cancer Research focuses its efforts - through cutting-edge, patient-focused research - making sure that no cancer, no person, and no family, is left behind. "There are more than 220,000 cancer survivors living in Ireland today, that's the equivalent of a whole new county of people," Ms Dolan said. "That progress didn't happen by chance. It happened because of research. But we cannot stop here. The exhibition is an invitation to see how far we've come - and how far we can still go."
Agriland
3 days ago
- Agriland
19 osprey chicks arrive in Ireland to be released as part of reintroduction programme
A programme aiming to establish a viable population of ospreys breeding in Ireland is now in its third year. Ospreys were once part of the Irish landscape and ecosystems, but unfortunately, this bird of prey became extinct. It is thought that they became extinct as breeding birds in this country over 150 years ago, but continued to visit the island as part of their migratory pattern. The National Parks and Wildlife Service's (NPWS) five-year reintroduction programme began in 2023. Now in its third year, the NPWS is preparing to release 19 osprey chicks into the wild, with nine chicks released in both 2024 and 2023 in Co. Waterford. Ospreys are fish-eating birds of prey which need habitats close to rivers, lakes or coastal areas ensuring a sufficient supply of fish, the NPWS said. As a result, Ireland is thought to provide the perfect conditions for the chicks. Ospreys are known to be monogamous and faithful to both their mate and their nest. Dr. Philip Buckley of the NPWS, who heads up the osprey reintroduction programme, said there have been ongoing efforts to reintroduce species such as the osprey and white-tailed eagle to Ireland for a number of reasons, especially to improve biodiversity. He explained that ospreys became extinct at a time when people's view of birds of prey was that they were bad and should be eliminated, and that the osprey may have been viewed as a threat to the supply of fish. The osprey is a specialist feeder, relying on medium-sized fish, both marine and fresh water. The bird will fly above the water's surface to locate fish, sometimes gliding and soaring up to 70 metres high. Dr. Buckley said that to restore any species in a country, a detailed analysis must be done to see if the factors that caused extinction are still present. "We looked at that and we concluded that people's attitudes have changed," he told Agriland. "We looked at if the habitat is still suitable, if the food supply is still suitable. "We basically concluded the cause of extinction doesn't pertain anymore and it would be likely the species would survive if they were reintroduced." The osprey is a "medium-sized bird", and occurs on most continents. Dr. Buckley said the birds that breed in north-western countries in Europe, be that Ireland, Britain or Norway, generally migrate to Africa for the winter months. They would typically return to countries like Ireland around April, set up territories and rear their young, before setting off to the warmer climate in September. When the NPWS was determining how many chicks should be released each year to get a population that could become self-sustaining, factors such as the life length, number of offspring produced, and mortality rates were considered. It was decided that around 50 to 60 osprey chicks should be brought in over the five years with the aim of establishing a population of ospreys eventually breeding in Ireland. This is now year three of the programme, and 19 chicks have been brought to Ireland from two locations in Norway in July this year to be released soon. The birds were caught in Norway before they can fly, but at an advanced enough stage that they will survive and are easier to look after, according to Dr. Buckley. They are in holding pens since being brought to Ireland, with a platform simulating a nest, and are fed around three times a day currently, but without seeing humans - "the whole idea is they don't see humans and don't associate us with food". Dr. Buckley said that it will become apparent when the birds are ready to fly by their behaviour. "When they come in first, you can see they might spend more time sleeping. As they get a bit older they'll move out onto the branches or perches, and then maybe after another week they'll start flapping the wings and exercising them, and then you know well these birds are getting ready to fly. "We'll open the pens and let them out, and most of them will fly within three hours, and we do put out food around the area where we've held them. "The idea is to provide them with a food supply because they have no adults to teach them how to fish, so to provide them with something to transition them from being looked after by us to then looking after themselves. "Usually they'll find that food source and stay there until they're ready to migrate sometime in September." Ospreys breed from around three years of age. In the first year they migrate to Africa, they most likely won't return to Ireland or other European countries. They will spend that first summer in Africa, and return in the second or third year. Dr. Buckley said it will be next year when it will really be known if any of the birds released in the first year of the programme have survived and made their way back. "They have to cross large areas of ocean, the Sahara Desert, so the mortality rate is quite high." The percentage that come back could be between 10% and 30%, it is estimated. Dr. Buckley expressed his gratitude to farmers for their cooperation with and support for the reintroduction programme, with the pens holding the birds constructed at two sites on farmland.
