
Rep. Craig hosts town hall in Fischbach's 7th District
Apr. 25---- Democrat and 2nd District U.S. Rep. Angie Craig hosted a town hall meeting Thursday night in Willmar, part of U.S. Rep. Michelle Fischbach's district, with roughly 100 people in attendance.
Constituents of the 7th District have been calling for Fischbach to host a town hall for a little more than two months.
According to
from Fischbach's office, she hosted a telephone town hall with 14,000 people tuned in.
She has not conducted any in-person town halls in her sprawling western Minnesota district that stretches from Canada almost to the Iowa border.
"I'm going to listen to your questions to give you some answers to the best of my ability, because Michelle Fischbach won't show up and bring your concerns back to Washington," Craig said.
Craig had town halls this week in four cities located in Minnesota congressional districts represented by Republicans.
Craig's suburban and southeast Minnesota district includes Scott, Dakota and Le as well as portions of Washington and Rice counties.
She noted that her district is one of the most evenly divided congressional districts in the nation, comprising 49% Republican voters and 51% Democratic voters, and said that she has held 72 town halls in her district in the six years she has been in Congress.
"I got a whole bunch of Republicans who always show up at my town halls to give me hell, and I welcome them," Craig said. "Now they've shown up so many times I know some of their names, and I always make a point to talk to them after because, at the end of the day, I still believe that most of us have more in common than separates us in this nation."
Craig addressed questions on issues that are important to those in the 7th District, including the passage of a farm bill and proposed cuts to Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Social Security.
She also discussed Republicans in Congress being fearful of standing up to what is happening in the executive branch.
Craig noted that she was ranked in the top 3% of all bipartisan members of Congress in the last session, stating, "I fundamentally believe if an administration is doing something right, I'm going to cross the aisle and I'm going to work with them. But, if an administration is doing something wrong for my community, for my state, for my country, I also feel an intense responsibility to stand up and speak out and say something."
She explained that one of the reasons she is conducting the town halls is because she's "sick and tired" of her Republican colleagues privately complaining about what the Trump administration is doing and then standing idly by and saying nothing about it publicly.
"That is not leadership in our country. ... I know they're running scared from the president," she said.
Craig noted that Elon Musk has promised to spend his money during the primaries trying to defeat any Republicans who have spoken out against the Department of Government Efficiency and the current administration's actions.
Musk is a "special government employee" who has led the DOGE initiative created by executive order.
"(Those Republicans) want to keep their jobs. ... If you're not willing to risk your job for what you know is right, then you shouldn't be in the job in the damn first place," Craig said.
Minnesota's Congressional District 7 has 165,342 people on Medicaid, the health care program for people with limited income, and 67,000 utilize SNAP, according to Craig, who noted that able-bodied people have to work 20 hours per week to receive benefits from the SNAP, which was formerly known as food stamps.
Seventy percent of the people on SNAP are those who are disabled or are seniors, veterans or children, she added.
If the Trump administration does not extend the Affordable Care Act tax credits, Craig said that 20,000 people in Congressional District 7 will either lose their health insurance or see a 40% increase in their health insurance costs.
Craig is the ranking Democrat member of the House Agriculture Committee, which is responsible for the farm bill. SNAP benefits are tied to the farm bill and the committee has been asked to make $230 billion in cuts to those benefits.
"I'm hoping that they are not serious about cutting $230 billion from SNAP. I've been clear to Republicans and to my chairman that it is going to be very, very difficult to get a farm bill across the finish line if they come in and decimate SNAP," Craig said.
Craig said the proposed SNAP cuts would decimate the ag economy, hitting the entire supply chain and not just farm income.
"(Think about) the grocers and the clerks who put the food on the shelves, the truck drivers who drive it to the grocery stores," she said. "If you take $230 billion out of our food supply chain, not only are you taking food away from hungry veterans and seniors in our country and children in our country, you're also hurting family farms."
Congress has also instructed the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which oversees Medicaid spending, to find $880 billion in spending cuts. That figure cannot be reached without cutting Medicaid, according to Democrats and
"Gutting Medicaid would increase health care costs for every single American and it would put a lot of people at risk of losing their coverage altogether," Craig said.
She explained that these cuts are being made to give a tax break to the top 1% of the wealthiest people in the country and these cuts would actually add $14 trillion to the federal debt over the next 10 years.
"To listen to my colleagues talk about fiscal responsibility and waste, fraud and abuse — if you want to talk about those things, let's talk about it, let's have a conversation," Craig said.
Craig encouraged those in attendance Thursday to continue to call their representatives, noting that each member of Congress receives detailed reports of who is contacting them and the issues about which they are concerned.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Granholm: Democrats would ‘welcome' Musk ‘helping us out'
Former Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm said Tuesday that Democrats would 'welcome' tech billionaire Elon Musk 'helping us out' after an intense clash between Musk and President Trump last week. 'I think the Democrats would welcome him helping us out, politically, but — financially, etc.,' Granholm said at Politico's 2025 Energy Summit. 'But, maybe, maybe not, I don't know. I'm not running.' Last Thursday, a fight between Musk and Trump over the president's 'big, beautiful bill' earlier in the week escalated rapidly on Musk's X platform and Trump's Truth Social platform. The president said the tech billionaire 'just went CRAZY!' and threatened Musk's government contracts. Musk alleged that Trump had ties to convicted sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein on X. The public spat followed the end of Musk's recent service in the Trump administration and an alliance with the president that appeared to start off strong. Musk endorsed Trump in July 2024 in the wake of Trump surviving an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania. Musk's administration service was marked by intense backlash from those on the left and Democrats over actions taken by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) on the federal government. Trump's ex-personal attorney Michael Cohen on Saturday said that Trump isn't done with tech billionaire Elon Musk yet. 'They're going to really go after Elon Musk like nobody has seen, ever, in this country, because they can,' Cohen told MSNBC's Ali Velshi.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge strikes reference to ex-Illinois speaker Madigan's personal fortune from sentencing record
CHICAGO — A federal judge on Tuesday struck from the court record a reference to former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan's personal net worth of more than $40 million, agreeing with the Democrat's defense team that it should have been kept private, even as the attorneys acknowledged the move was 'hollow' given that it was already widely publicized. U.S. District Judge John Robert Blakey said he didn't find any 'bad faith' on the part of the federal prosecutors who included the figure in a filing last week ahead of Madigan's highly anticipated sentencing on Friday, but found that common practice would be to file such personal information under seal. Blakey's ruling came before the attorneys delivered arguments over sentencing guidelines at the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse, technically kicking off the sentencing process. Blakey took the matter under advisement until Friday's hearing. Federal prosecutors made Madigan's net worth public for the first time in a response to a sentencing memorandum filed by his attorneys, arguing that the defendant's 'greed is even more appalling given his law firm's success.' Daniel Collins, an attorney for Madigan, called the inclusion of the former speaker's personal fortune improper and a 'gratuitous effort' to publicly identify his net worth. 'It is not necessary to include the number in order for the government to make an argument about greed,' Collins said. But Assistant U.S. Attorney Sarah Streicker countered to the judge that the defense left the door open by arguing in filings that Madigan was solely motivated by a desire to help people. She also said the figure is relevant as the government seeks a fine in the case. 'It's fair for the government to rebut that narrative and show the defendant was motivated by greed not need,' Streicker said. 'This is a defendant that enjoyed every advantage and significant financial wealth and still turned to bribery and fraud.' In February, Madigan was convicted of 10 of 23 counts, including marquee allegations that he agreed to squeeze lucrative, do-nothing contracts from ComEd for pals such as former Ald. Frank Olivo and Ald. Michael Zalewski and precinct captains Ray Nice and Edward Moody, all while the utility won a series of major legislation victories. Madigan was also convicted on six of seven counts — including wire fraud and Travel Act violations — regarding a plan to get former Ald. Daniel Solis, a key FBI mole who testified at length in the trial, appointed to a state board. Jurors deadlocked on all six counts related to Madigan's co-defendant former ComEd lobbyist Michael McClain. _______
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Double Standard On LA's Protests Couldn't Be More Glaring
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump is warning those protesting against his unprecedented immigration crackdown in Los Angeles against targeting police officers and thousands of National Guard troops he's deployed there, promising to exact retribution on anyone who commits violence against them. 'Nobody's going to spit on our police officers. Nobody's going to spit on our military,' Trump told reporters on Monday, before posting on his social media website: 'IF THEY SPIT, WE WILL HIT, and I promise you they will be hit harder than they have ever been hit before. Such disrespect will not be tolerated!' But Trump felt differently about violence against law enforcement when he issued blanket pardons earlier this year for hundreds of people who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 in an effort to keep him in office after his loss to Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election. His pardons included those convicted of assaulting or interfering with police officers, roughly 1,000 nonviolent offenders and around 200 people accused of assaulting police. A number of those pardoned have reportedly since been rearrested for other alleged crimes. 'These are the hostages. Approximately 1,500 were pardoned. Full pardon,' Trump said after issuing the pardons on his first day in office. About 140 police officers were injured in the attack on the Capitol, something that Trump has called a 'beautiful day' despite being impeached by the U.S. House for inciting an insurrection by spreading lies about election fraud. 'Their hypocrisy just smacks you in the face,' Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who investigated the Capitol attack as a former member of the House, told HuffPost in response to Trump's response to LA's unrest. 'Violence is never appropriate. It wasn't appropriate on Jan. 6 and it's not appropriate in LA or anywhere else. We need to be consistent about that.' Trump quickly deployed thousands of troops to California over the weekend — including 700 U.S. Marines — despite no request from the state's governor, Gavin Newsom, who has warned the president's actions will further inflame the unrest. The protests initially began after Immigrations and Customs Enforcement agents executed raids at a Home Depot store in Los Angeles at the direction of the White House. As president on Jan. 6, 2021, however, Trump issued no order or formal request for National Guard troops to aid beleaguered U.S. Capitol police who were overrun by hundreds of his supporters. 'On Jan. 6, both the Democratic and Republican leadership in Congress were begging Donald Trump to make a statement, to call off the MAGA mob that invaded the Capitol,' Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) told HuffPost. 'People were begging him to call out the National Guard, and he sat there and did nothing, and now he's acting in a situation where the officials in charge are telling him that federalizing the National Guard and sending in the Marines will only exacerbate a situation which is under control.' Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), the House speaker at the time, also slammed Trump for federalizing the National Guard and sending troops to Los Angeles, something he refused to do when Congress was under attack. 'We begged the president of the United States to send in the National Guard. He would not do it,' Pelosi told reporters on Tuesday. 'And yet, in a contra-constitutional way, he has sent the National Guard into California. Something is very wrong with this picture.' While Democrats have slammed Trump's response to the protests, Republicans are broadly welcoming the federal intervention in California — even those who have long espoused the importance of state's rights and the ability of local governments to enforce their laws. In 2024, for example, a group of 24 conservative House Republicans warned then-President Joe Biden not to federalize the Texas National Guard as some Texas Democratic lawmakers had been urging him to do, saying it would be an 'encroachment on Texas' constitutionally protected sovereignty.' Asked Tuesday if Trump is being inconsistent by sending troops to Los Angeles after pardoning Jan. 6 rioters, meanwhile, Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) dodged the question entirely. 'The issue that's in front of us is the chaos in LA. The political leadership there wasn't up to the task,' he said at his weekly press conference. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), who has disagreed publicly with Trump's pardons of Jan. 6 rioters, said Democrats aren't being consistent on the issue by not sufficiently condemning violence in Los Angeles. 'I think Democrats who feel like the president is wrong to bring out force would be on firmer ground if they denounce the actions of violence in Los Angeles, Kenosha, and Portland,' he said, without specifying which Democrats have refused to speak out. Even Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), a Libertarian-leaning voice in the Senate, suggested Trump was within his rights to federalize the National Guard and send troops into California without approval from the state's governor. 'Democrats have failed to have law and order,' Paul said. 'I've always preferred local law enforcement to federal but this is a time in which it looks as though the state government is resisting enforcing federal law.' It's not clear what federal law the senator is referring to. Newsom has also condemned violent protesters and urged the demonstrations to remain peaceful. 'The federal government is taking over the California National Guard and deploying 2,000 soldiers in Los Angeles — not because there is a shortage of law enforcement, but because they want a spectacle,' Newsom said Sunday. 'Don't give them one. Never use violence. Speak out peacefully,' he added. Arthur Delaney contributed reporting.