REVEALED: Students getting into university with three Es at A-level in order to hit Government diversity targets
Figures from admissions body UCAS show many top universities, including the University of East Anglia, Oxford Brookes and Kent University, are accepting severely underperforming students in a bid to fulfil equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) targets.
The practice has become widespread across the sector after the Government-sponsored Office for Students (OfS) regulator urged universities to be more 'ambitious' in 'reducing inequality'.
It warned them that if they don't narrow the so-called 'access gap' between students by this year, they could face fines.
The data – revealed on the UCAS website, which lists all courses available in Clearing and their entry requirements – comes days before pupils receive their A-level exam results on Thursday.
It means anyone picking up disappointing results is still likely to be snapped up in Clearing, the process which matches unplaced students with unfilled courses.
Data showed students with DDE grades being accepted to study economics at Oxford Brookes, which usually asks for ABB.
Kent University has admitted CDD students onto its maths degree, while it officially asks for grades of ABB. And the University of East Anglia has admitted students with CCD on to its American studies course, officially requiring ABB.
Meanwhile, those with three D grades have done nursing at the University of South Wales, where standard requirements are BBB.
Typically, universities let in students with lower grades – making a 'contextual offer ' – if they reveal on their UCAS form that they suffered disadvantage. A handful also take into account race or gender.
In addition, some consider UCAS' listing of poor white males as a disadvantaged group, while the University of South Wales' nursing course takes into account whether students come from an ethnic minority group.
These contextual admissions are now being used by a quarter of all British universities, according to Sutton Trust research.
In another example, Bournemouth University admitted students with EEE grades onto its computer science course, which ordinarily demands BCC. The university said they came in via an additional 'foundation year', which has much lower entry requirements.
Latest Government figures show the number of universities offering foundation years rose from 52 in 2011/12 to 105 in 2021/22, with entrants soaring from just 8,470 to 69,325 over that period.
The Government claims foundation years are a 'valuable pathway to higher education, particularly for students from under-represented backgrounds'.
But critics questioned whether those achieving low grades would be able to cope with course content.
Chris McGovern, of the Campaign for Real Education, told The Mail on Sunday: 'Universities are betraying young people by encouraging them to sign up for courses for which they are not qualified.
'It will mean degree courses will have to be dumbed down. This will do long-term damage to the quality of our public services, the professions and to the economy.'
Mr McGovern added that 'the majority of school leavers and, indeed, the country are far better served by vocational training'.
The trend developed after universities were ordered to inform the OfS every year on what progress they are making towards EDI targets.
In addition, it can be financially beneficial for universities to be less selective as it means they do not need to run loss-making, half-full courses. The OfS said: 'Our aim is that anyone with the ability and desire to pursue higher education can access the life-changing benefits it can bring.'
A Department for Education spokesman said: 'While universities are independent from government and responsible for their own admissions decisions, it is essential that quality is maintained and that the students they admit are likely to succeed.'
When contacted, Bournemouth, South Wales and East Anglia universities confirmed they use contextual admissions for disadvantaged students but said they maintain high academic standards.
The other universities mentioned declined to comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Would you pay £12,460 for a John Lewis duvet? Department store chain sells Icelandic eiderdown cover from its 'Ultimate Collection'
It's what duvet dreams are made of – but you'll need deep pockets to sleep under it. John Lewis is selling an emperor size Icelandic eiderdown cover from its 'Ultimate Collection' for £12,460. The duvet, which promises 'pure luxury', has raised the eyebrows of shoppers. 'I could furnish my entire house for that and still have change,' said one. The single size version of the duvet is £4,935, medium is £7,205, king costs £9,710 and the superking is priced at £10,115. Other items in the Ultimate Collection range include a superking mattress worth £12,499, an Egyptian cotton duvet cover for £510 and a £75 Oxford pillowcase. A full set of bedding from the collection, including the duvet and mattress, can add up to £26,000. The 'Ultimate Collection' duvet is described as 'winter weight' – suggesting a switch to a lighter duvet during the summer months. 'Pure luxury whilst you sleep, this duvet provides unsurpassed insulation whilst also being exceptionally lightweight and fluffy,' the description says. 'Filled with unique down from the eider duck, which is collected in Iceland and sent to our textile factory in Lancashire where it is handcrafted.' The online listing shows just one review from a customer with the username 'Anniepie'. Giving five stars out of five, the review posted in March says: 'I've always been a bit of an insomniac, but since buying this duvet my sleep has improved no end.' But not everyone is convinced by the price tag. Helen Chandler-Wilde, an author and journalist, wrote online: 'What on EARTH is going on with this duvet John Lewis is selling for TWELVE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED POUNDS.' Icelandic Down, a manufacturer of products made with eiderdown, said: 'Like the world's most precious natural resources, eiderdown's price can partly be attributed to the difficulty of finding, collecting, and processing it.' John Lewis said the duvet is 'premium, made-to-order' and 'the ultimate luxury'. However, the firm has pointed out its other duvets start at £15, for shoppers on a more modest budget. John Lewis's slogan 'Never Knowingly Undersold' was introduced in 1925 to promise that it would refund the price difference if a purchased item could be found cheaper elsewhere. The slogan was ditched in 2022 then revived two years later, but applying only to a list of 25 major competitors including Boots, Marks & Spencer and Dunelm.
The Sun
4 minutes ago
- The Sun
B&M shoppers spot rare flavour of Snickers they've ‘never seen' before selling for £1
B&M shoppers have spotted a rare flavour of Snickers selling for £1. Customers were surprised to see coffee flavoured versions of the classic chocolate stocked on the shelves of the bargain store. Posting on the Facebook group Food Finds UK Official, a user wrote: "Not sure if these are new, but in B&M and I've never seen this flavour!" One user wrote: "I've been meaning to check out B&M for ages now and this might just be the push I need to go." Another added: "Imported from Australia, I had them over there and so so good I'll need to head to B&M." "I will be trying these," a third wrote. The bar sells for up to £2.99 at online retailers like Bombon and Candy Mail UK - nearly triple its price at B&M. The unusual chocolate bar appears to be a rare find, currently unavailable in other major UK supermarkets. The company Mars Incorporated launched Coffee Snickers back in February, with fans describing it as a bittersweet twist on their classic peanut, caramel and chocolate combo. The controversial new flavour comes after two years of development and 13 different product prototypes. Shoppers learned of the release through NewfoodsUK on Instagram. The bar divided opinions with one user calling it a "win-win" and another saying it was "disgusting". Mars Wrigley Research & Development director Chris Hutton said: 'We know how much Aussies love their coffee, and after two years of development and 13 different product prototypes, we're excited to bring this new twist on Snickers to life. 'Snickers Coffee Flavour is a proudly Australian-made product, formulated by our local team in Ballarat to deliver on both taste and sustainability, and we can't wait for fans to try it.' It comes after B&M shoppers spotted almond flavoured Snickers at the bargain store. The bar, containing almond pieces alongside peanuts, nougat, caramel and milk chocolate, was launched in the US six years ago. But it is not typically sold in the UK, making it an unusual find. Shoppers at B&M also previously spotted a brownie Snickers, which was another hit in the US. The Snickers bar was introduced by Mars, Inc. in 1930 and was named after the Mars family's favourite horse, Snickers. For decades, the bar was sold in the UK and Ireland under the name "Marathon" before being changed to Snickers in 1990. How to save money on chocolate We all love a bit of chocolate from now and then, but you don't have to break the bank buying your favourite bar. Consumer reporter Sam Walker reveals how to cut costs... Go own brand - if you're not too fussed about flavour and just want to supplant your chocolate cravings, you'll save by going for the supermarket's own brand bars. Shop around - if you've spotted your favourite variety at the supermarket, make sure you check if it's cheaper elsewhere. Websites like let you compare prices on products across all the major chains to see if you're getting the best deal. Look out for yellow stickers - supermarket staff put yellow, and sometimes orange and red, stickers on to products to show they've been reduced. They usually do this if the product is coming to the end of its best-before date or the packaging is slightly damaged. Buy bigger bars - most of the time, but not always, chocolate is cheaper per 100g the larger the bar. So if you've got the appetite, and you were going to buy a hefty amount of chocolate anyway, you might as well go bigger.
Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
New HS2 boss gets £940,000 pay package as the 'gravy train' rolls on
The new boss of HS2 is enjoying a pay package of nearly £1 million, it can be revealed. Mark Wild, who took over as chief executive of the beleaguered high-speed rail project in December, will pocket a salary of £600,000 for the 2025/26 year. But he is also in line for a bonus of up to £280,000 and pension contributions of £60,000, meaning his overall package is worth up to £940,000. It dwarfs the £676,763 that predecessor Mark Thurston received in his final year at the helm. Critics last night said it showed that the HS2 'gravy train knows no bounds', despite the project having been severely curtailed in recent years. John O'Connell, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'The new boss of HS2 must be as delighted as taxpayers are furious given his nearly seven-figure pay packet. 'There has been a high churn of senior managers at this failing project, as senior executives jump on the gravy train to make a quick buck while failing to deliver anything but wasted money and broken promises. 'Given Rachel Reeves' desperate need to fill the fiscal black hole created by her Budget, scrapping this white elephant would be a good place to start.' Lord [Tony] Berkeley, who served as deputy chairman of a government-ordered review into HS2, said: 'The HS2 gravy train knows no bounds. 'Taxpayers will be horrified at this sort of salary, which just looks like a blank cheque. And I think we've all had enough of blank cheques from this project.' Mr Wild's package was signed off by the previous Tory administration in March last year. His overall package for the last financial year came in at £212,402 because he only started in December. But sources revealed his annual salary from April this year will be £600,000, with a bonus of up to £280,000 if targets around keeping within budgets and hitting deadlines are met. Mr Wild was boss of Crossrail, now known as London's Elizabeth Line, from 2018 to 2022. While this was delivered three-and-a-half years late and £4 billion over budget, he is credited with turning the project around after construction work began more than 15 years ago. HS2 has been dogged by repeated delays and spiralling costs, with Birmingham to London trains originally due to begin in 2026. But this now won't happen until at least the mid-2030s. Mr Wild was boss of Crossrail, now known as London's Elizabeth Line, from 2018 to 2022. While this was delivered three-and-a-half years late and £4 billion over budget, he is credited with turning the project around after construction work began more than 15 years ago The project initially had a price tag of just over £30 billion, including for eastern and western legs to Leeds and Manchester from Birmingham. But only phase one, which connects London with Birmingham, will now go ahead after both northern legs were axed. Despite this, estimates suggest the final bill will still exceed £100 billion. A spokesman for HS2 Ltd defended Mr Wild's salary, saying: 'This is a highly technical project on a huge scale. 'As such, HS2 is competing with some of the biggest infrastructure schemes globally to employ people with the right level of skills and expertise to deliver it.'
