New Ukrainian general inflicts ‘unsustainable losses' on Russia
Ukraine's army is finding some rare success along the eastern front, reclaiming key positions and inflicting 'unsustainable losses' on Russian forces, according to battlefield reports.
While the frontline axis has not changed significantly, Ukrainian forces have advanced against Russian troops close to the two major eastern cities of Pokrovsk and Toretsk, according to new reports.
'The Ukrainian Armed Forces are actively advancing in Toretsk, reclaiming key positions,' said one war blogger closely observing the front lines. 'There are reports of complete encirclement of Russian occupiers in several areas.'
Toretsk provides a vital link for Ukraine to logistics bases in Kostiantynivka, north-west of the city. The attacks are reportedly being conducted with US-donated armoured vehicles.
Counter-attacks are also being conducted near the city of Pokrovsk – a key city for Ukrainian defences. Russia has been moving towards the city for the past year, and has advanced 40km (25 miles) west since February 2024.
Last week Ukraine announced a successful counter-attack to retake the settlement of Kotlyne, near Pokrovsk, and regained their position in Kotlynne, west of Pokrovsk. The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) said: 'The year-long Russian effort to seize Pokrovsk has so far failed.'
Meanwhile Russian military bloggers – accounts which are often cited as sources of information in lieu of official commentary from the Kremlin – reported that the Kremlin's troops had lost ground in Uspenivka in Donetsk Oblast.
The ISW also said on Saturday that Ukrainian forces are now inflicting 'unsustainable losses' on Russian forces and holding them to 'marginal gains'.
DeepState, a Ukrainian war-tracking blog, also said that Russian troops occupied 192 sq km of Ukrainian territory in February, marking a decline compared to previous months.
'Despite losing momentum, with the pace of advance now comparable to last July, the enemy continues to suffer heavy manpower losses,' DeepState said. 'The enemy's activity has decreased, although it has not ceased entirely.'
Praise for the counter-attacks is being lauded onto Gen Myhailo Drapaty, Ukraine's ground forces chief who also recently took command of fighting in the eastern Donbas region.
The 42-year-old commander is considered part of a 'new generation' of younger Ukrainian general officers that had fought against Russian forces since 2014.
Olena Mokrenchuk, the press officer of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, said previously that Gen Drapatyi's strategies are 'always unexpected and unconventional, but meticulously calculated'.
'He's very effective. I believe that under his command, we'll be able to push the Russians back,' she told Ukrainian broadcaster, Espreso TV.
In December 2024, Gen Drapatyi announced an ambitious transformation plan aimed at improving Ukraine's position on the battlefield, including reforming military training and providing Ukrainian soldiers with a technological edge over their enemy.
'Today, we're building an army of the future – an army that will defeat the enemy and overcome every obstacle on the way of transformation,' Gen Drapatyi said.
However, Moscow is still gaining ground. On Saturday it said it had seized two more villages in eastern Ukraine, Skudne and Burlatske, in the south of the eastern Donetsk region.
DeepState also reported that Russia had advanced near Burlatske, Andriivka, Pryvilne, Sverdlikove and Mykolaivo-Daryne in the past few days. On Sunday Russia conducted strikes on gas processing facilities used by the Ukrainian defence force.
The general staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces said in its operational update on Friday that the army was involved in '60 combat engagements'.
The intense fighting comes as senior US officials have warned that president Donald Trump may cut all aid to Ukraine, including any final aid shipments that Joe Biden, the former US president, approved.
Writing about Ukraine's recent gains and its army inflicting 'unsustainable losses' on Russia, the ISW said: 'This situation, combined with the severe challenges Russia will face in 2025, offers the United States great leverage in peace negotiations.'
Ukrainian forces have leveraged US-supplied military systems – including Patriot air defense systems, HIMARS and ATACMS long-range strike systems – to defend against nightly Russian drone and missile strikes and improve its strike capabilities.
The Ukrainian Armed Forces are also looking to complicate Russian logistics, command and control and disrupt Russia's defense industrial base.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Channel 4
3 hours ago
- Channel 4
Russia launches large scale attack across Ukraine
Three emergency responders have been killed in the Ukrainian capital Kyiv – as they rushed to help victims of a large scale Russian missile and drone attack across the country. President Zelenskyy said it showed Russia did not 'change its stripes' in its bid to 'destroy life'. And in the last hour – missiles and glide bombs have hit the eastern city of Kharkiv.
ITV News
4 hours ago
- ITV News
Reform UK chair quits but work to cut 'waste and inefficiency' at Kent County Council will go on
ITV News Meridian's Sarah Saunders has more on what's happened to Kent County Council after the departure of Zia Yusuf. The new leader of Kent County Council says work to rid KCC of "waste and inefficiency", will go on. That is despite the team she brought into carry out a US-style economy drive standing down just days after arriving in the Chairman of Reform UK, Zia Yusuf, and a tech entrepreneur had been tasked with heading up a DOGE style team last Monday. Kent County Council leader, Linden Kemkaran, said: "They have started work already and on Monday when Zia Yusuf came here to County Hall to give us that political impetus to really get going. "We were able to present to Zia our report on what we had found already and do you know what, he was very, very impressed. "He was amazed that we were able to do so much work in such a short space of time. So really for us, the work carries on, nothing has changed."Reform UK took over Kent County Council last month with an overwhelming majority. On Monday 2nd June the Chairman of Reform UK arrived in Kent to great fanfare to launch the party's first DOGE team looking for possibly millions of pounds worth of efficiencies. Four days later and he has resigned from the party and his tech volunteer Nathaniel Fried has opted to go with him. Nathaniel Fried said: "Yes, of course they will be able to make savings without me. There's a great team that I put in place there and there's very committed councillors which have invested a lot of time and effort into this stuff. "There's definitely inefficiency in these local councils, not much of it is because of the councils, a lot of it is because of central government funding but I still think there are major saving that they can definitely make."Zia Yusuf stood down after an internal spat in the Reform Party over whether the burhka should be banned. He was the driving force behind the Reform DOGE style missions but the new leader of KCC says their plans to reduce waste remain on KCC minimised the loss of these two figures, Labour MP for East Thanet, Polly Billington, said: "I think it's completely reasonable that anybody incoming would want to make sure that money was being spent properly, that's exactly what an incoming administration should do. "But bringing in private people who don't have the qualifications in order to be able to do this properly, is actually quite irresponsible. "Unsurprisingly, they've ended up with chaos, incompetence and resignations, that doesn't serve the people of Kent very well, and doesn't show that Reform is serious about being a proper party of government."
The Independent
7 hours ago
- The Independent
Global aid cuts are a massive wake-up call. It's time to give Africa a bigger voice
In less than a month, Seville will host the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in a climate of uncertainty following the abrupt decision by the US to dismantle its aid programmes. But Washington is not alone in this posture. The European Union agreed to reallocate €2 billion (£1.7bn) reallocation from development budgets in February 2024 —and many individual European countries have made cuts to their aid budget. It is a clear signal that the landscape of Overseas Development Assistance (ODA) is shifting. For Africa, this isn't just a reshuffle, it is a wake-up call for deep reflection and action: will we adapt, or will aid simply become a relic of the past? The timing is bad, the rationale questionable, and the ripple effects threaten to impact the lives and health of millions depending on aid programmes. Let's be honest: aid has had a mixed impact. The spectrum of aid's legacy in Africa, including my country, Guinea, runs from positive to disastrous. On the positive side, aid has contributed to infrastructure development – I'm thinking for instance about a project in northwest Guinea to replace an old ferry with a new road and bridge. During a visit, a cunning minister of public works convinced a skeptical partner to go on a very 'special' field trip via the old route, one that left a senior official so sore and tired that all doubters saw the project's true necessity. Once it was completed, traffic soared, proof that aid can work when it's aligned with real needs. But aid can fall flat. When I was serving as minister of finance, I led efforts to curb directly awarded contracts and boost transparency following an audit of public procurement procedures. The goal was to improve the quality and cost-effectiveness of public spending. But some donors were not willing to support this effort. I deplored one particular partner's failure to listen and, above all, a stubborn insistence on taking us backwards by ignoring our analysis. I said no to the help on offer. It was hard but necessary. Aid must serve the real priorities, not satisfy bureaucratic checkboxes. In a recent discussion with the director of an incubator to help small and medium-sized businesses grow – funded by a government donor – I was struck by the emergence of shortcomings I thought belonged to the past. These included a laziness to question one's own model for delivering results, despite warnings about the risks of inefficiency. We also see a narrow focus on so-called "easily accessible" geographic areas, such as capitals, and on disbursements. Aid, in many cases, has helped sustain corrupt elites or fostered unhealthy alliances with public administrations – perpetuating dependency rather than solving problems. When I look back on my own experience in development – a journey close to an out-of-body experience for an African – I realise we are at a critical juncture. It's the moment to question the very foundations of aid institutions inherited from the post-colonial era. Despite some positive reforms, such as untying aid, the core premise remains unequal. It is predominantly driven by the donors, with African countries still being passive recipients rather than active partners. How can this be changed? Change starts with listening. The 'receiving hand' is not dumb and has ideas. It knows its needs. Recipient countries, especially in Africa, must be at the centre of the discussions. Conversations largely driven by donors are a recipe for failure. Furthermore, African organisations and think-tanks must be active players. Decolonising aid must be more than just a buzzword. We are making progress, but it must be accelerated. We continue to see consultancies denied opportunities due to insufficient financial strength – despite their thorough knowledge of the field. It also means better coordination between donors. You would think this is obvious, and yet despite witnessing many innovative and pragmatic approaches, I still see some partners continue to burden governments' limited capacities by each imposing their own distinct systems and reporting requirements. This ends up being a distraction. Recipient governments are key and are the only ones who should replace any donor. I believe the cuts could be an opportunity to make fiscal compromises that (finally) prioritise the necessary and the productive over the superfluous and the personal gain of some actors. Aid must be used strategically and selectively. It should foster technical cooperation for Africa's economic transformation, its integration higher in global value chains. Aid should be a catalyst to reform the global financial architecture by leveraging innovation and the capital needed to finance our massive infrastructure programmes. It must be an instrument for the Africa Union's theme of the year: "Justice for Africans and People of African Descent Through Reparations'. It's time to make sure those people are at the table, and their voices are listened to.
