
The cowardly copycats avoiding sentencing must be stopped
There was a moment while I binge-watched the ITV drama, A Cruel Love, about Ruth Ellis, the last woman to be hanged in Britain, when I put down my coffee and sat bolt upright, silenced. I watched as a black cap was placed on the head of the judge and he passed sentence, telling Ellis of her death by hanging for the murder of her lover. It was the moment of reckoning.
I would not for one moment urge the return of capital punishment. The story of Ellis, hanged in 1955, is a reminder that the legal system was right to later introduce the defence of diminished responsibility while other cases showed how dreadful mistakes can be made about guilt. But the passing of a sentence, even without capital punishment, matters. It is the outcome of judgment and tells the victim's family, and indeed, all of us, that justice has been done. The convicted criminal faces avenging terrible deeds.
Except now we have a growing trend for those convicted to avoid such reckoning. On Tuesday, Kyle Clifford, found guilty of the murder of Carol Hunt, wife of the BBC's racing commentator, John Hunt, and of their daughters, Hannah and Louise, refused to come to court to listen to the judge pass sentence.
Clifford is the latest in a line of killers who have declined to attend court for their sentencing. Think of Thomas Cashman who shot dead nine year old Olivia Pratt-Korbel, or Jordan McSweeney, who sexually assaulted and murdered 35-year-old law graduate Zara Aleena.
Sometimes killers who profess their innocence do this, such as Lucy Letby, but others where there is indisputable proof, like Kyle Clifford, just refuse to listen. Surely the time has come to put a stop to the cowardly copycats who want to follow in the footsteps of their fellow murderers and evade this moment when they hear their fate.
One reason for this growing refusal of convicted murderers to attend sentencing may well be the introduction of Victims' Personal Statements being given in court, introduced by the Victims' Charter in 1996. Lawyers for the prosecution and the defence continue to outline the case in major criminal trials, and interrogate witnesses, but nothing brings home the consequence of someone's evil actions more powerfully than hearing from those most directly affected.
As John Hunt and his daughter Amy read their statements, those in court, including police officers, wept as they listened. Clifford, however, avoided hearing something so harrowing.
The previous government attempted to put an end to these refusals by pledging to introduce a criminal justice bill which would allow 'reasonable force' to be used to make criminals appear in the dock. But that bill, due to the calling of the general election, fell.
Families, including Cheryl, the mother of Olivia Pratt-Korbel, have campaigned for killers to be compelled to attend sentencing. But it can be difficult. In Kyle Clifford's case, the judge said he did not insist he came to court because he did not want him potentially disrupting proceedings. But the Starmer government must surely legislate some means of doing this, such as keeping a convicted killer refusing to attend court in their prison cell, while sentencing is broadcast to it.
On Tuesday, John Hunt said in his impact statement how much he regretted not being able to speak directly to Kyle Clifford: ' I so wanted to deliver these words, eye to eye, with Kyle '.
We no longer have eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth, Old Testament-style punishment in this country. There is no judge with a black cap on his head telling the killer in the dock 'May God have mercy on your soul', as they pronounce death by hanging. But we must surely have eye to eye sentencing – for the sake of families like the Hunts, and for all of us, wanting justice to be done.
Judges have raised concerns – and rightly – that bringing a screaming criminal with force to the dock would be highly disruptive. But there should surely be ways and means, such as broadcasting sentencing to their prison cell if they refuse to attend court. The Sunak government planned to introduce legislation about this but it fell because of the election. It must be revived.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
6 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
‘Crass' cops slammed for playing ‘snog, marry, kill' with mugshots of local call girls and felons
Read on to find out how playing the popular game could land you in trouble COP QUIZ FURY 'Crass' cops slammed for playing 'snog, marry, kill' with mugshots of local call girls and felons Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) LAYING 'snog, marry, avoid' with colleagues at work could be sexual harassment, a tribunal has ruled. The 'crass' and 'inappropriate' game may breach the Equality Act, an Employment judge said. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up The risqué quiz involves naming three people and then asking a person to pick which one you would like to kiss, which one you would get married to and which one you would steer clear of altogether. In the BBC hit comedy Gavin and Stacey, Pam, Mick, Gavin and Smithy played a version of it featuring celebrities during a car ride from Essex to Wales. However, the tribunal found it may break workplace laws. The ruling came in the case of a police officer who sued Derbyshire Police after a female colleague involved him in the game — using mugshots of sex workers. The officer candidly admitted to the tribunal that she had 'jokingly' played the game with co-workers and included PC Shafarat Mohammed in their discussion. PC Mohammed claimed that during the discussion in May or June 2022 he was only shown images of black women and was asked what he liked about one of them. He said he was 'embarrassed' and 'offended' by the questioning and felt it was inappropriate. The tribunal judge said: 'We agree that the questions were inappropriate.' However, the tribunal found there was no racial or religious element to it as the sex workers were of varying ethnicities. PC Mohammed lost his case for racial and religious discrimination and harassment. Two top cops accused of mocking a colleague's Irish accent in 'grossly offensive' leaving video


Scottish Sun
7 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Ex-BBC football pundit BANNED from driving for six months after being caught speeding in his Mercedes
The former pundit complained the speed camera that caught him was hidden STAR'S ROAD BAN Ex-BBC football pundit BANNED from driving for six months after being caught speeding in his Mercedes Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) RETIRED BBC football pundit Garth Crooks got a six-month driving ban yesterday after being caught speeding again. The former Tottenham Hotspur striker, 67, admitted driving his 1.4l Mercedes A Class diesel hatchback at 24mph in a 20mph zone. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Garth Crooks got a six-month driving ban after being caught speeding again Credit: BBC He complained that the speed camera that caught him in Holloway, North London, in January this year was hidden. But JPs at Lavender Hill magistrates' court said the limit applies at all times and not just when a camera is spotted. Crooks already had nine points for two speeding offences and a traffic signal rap. He got a further three — triggering an automatic ban. FA Cup and Uefa Cup-winner Crooks was fined £666 with £110 costs. He was also and ordered to pay a £266 victim surcharge. Crooks - who was awarded the OBE in 1999 - told the court he was now 'retired' and in receipt of a £118,000 a year pension. On seeing a press photographer outside, Crooks covered his face with his jacket as he descended the court steps.


The Sun
7 hours ago
- The Sun
Ex-BBC football pundit BANNED from driving for six months after being caught speeding in his Mercedes
RETIRED BBC football pundit Garth Crooks got a six-month driving ban yesterday after being caught speeding again. The former Tottenham Hotspur striker, 67, admitted driving his 1.4l Mercedes A Class diesel hatchback at 24mph in a 20mph zone. 1 He complained that the speed camera that caught him in Holloway, North London, in January this year was hidden. But JPs at Lavender Hill magistrates' court said the limit applies at all times and not just when a camera is spotted. Crooks already had nine points for two speeding offences and a traffic signal rap. He got a further three — triggering an automatic ban. FA Cup and Uefa Cup-winner Crooks was fined £666 with £110 costs. He was also and ordered to pay a £266 victim surcharge. Crooks - who was awarded the OBE in 1999 - told the court he was now 'retired' and in receipt of a £118,000 a year pension. On seeing a press photographer outside, Crooks covered his face with his jacket as he descended the court steps. Martin Keown battles epic rant from Garth Crooks on BBC's Final score